Greg seriously? Not understand why you are defending him, is he a friend or something? LOL
Do you not see that this guy historically inserts himself into situations that he shouldn't be in, over and over and over and over again? Doesn't raise a red flag to you? At all?
Inserts himself in situations.....where is that in the Florida criminal code? If you can find it for me, I'll give you a round of applause.
Check out Bernie Goetz. Similar situation IF GZ was trying to instigate a 'justified' shooting. Goetz was found innocent but he was tried for murder. If he had a past like GZ and it was introduced in court what would have happened?
Wasn't Bernie Goetz being mugged? That's not similar at all, unless you are one of those people that just sees a white man shooting a black teen and lumps it all together. Which makes you part of the problem. btw.
Bernie Goetz repeatedly rode the subway looking for an opportunity to 'defend himself'. Meaning that in a way he caused/looked for the confrontation that led to the shooting. In that way I thought it was on point. Also I think you completely missed the tone. The previous poster asked how it would be illegal to shoot someone in self defense. Goetz was on point in that regard. He was charged and tried.
If I was not clear, my fault. But by no means was I using Goetz to justify Zimmermin and I'm a bit resentful that you casually lumped me into that group and stopped just short of calling me a racist, btw
I'm sorry that I don't want to post a picture of my diploma or my commissioning warrant from my alma matre. So yes, for a PLC pogue.
Frankly, I cannot imagine anyone, even GWG, making such an outlandish request and expecting you to publish personal info here. It's so very similar to all the hoo-ha by the Birthers that I cannot view it as coincidental.
I have my persona-non-grata preferences here, just like everyone else does. I generally, although not nearly enough, manage to just avoid any interaction with those posters. Maybe if GWG starts presenting less inflammatory subjects and somehow manages to play well with others it would make it worthwhile to engage with him.
Unfortunately, that's fairly obviously not why he posts here. When the discussion devolves into demanding tangible "proof" of someone's assertions, especially in your case where there already exists substantial corroborating evidence, I think it's the better part to just say Sayonara, sucker and let him howl at the moon all by his lonesome.
Frankly, I cannot imagine anyone, even GWG, making such an outlandish request and expecting you to publish personal info here. It's so very similar to all the hoo-ha by the Birthers that I cannot view it as coincidental.
I have my persona-non-grata preferences here, just like everyone else does. I generally, although not nearly enough, manage to just avoid any interaction with those posters. Maybe if GWG starts presenting less inflammatory subjects and somehow manages to play well with others it would make it worthwhile to engage with him.
Unfortunately, that's fairly obviously not why he posts here. When the discussion devolves into demanding tangible "proof" of someone's assertions, especially in your case where there already exists substantial corroborating evidence, I think it's the better part to just say Sayonara, sucker and let him howl at the moon all by his lonesome.
Nicely stated. And that's why I'm taking the advice found in Bill2's post.
Here is my issue - GWG posted that awful, homophobic tirade that I reposted above. He was banned, and Eric, as is his right, let him back.
That means that it is now incumbent upon the rest of us to forget that he is a hate-filled piece of shit. Does GWG do ANYTHING to prove that he is any different than what he displayed in that post? Nope, same behavior, only slightly more circumspect, and he revels in it.
Sometimes a piece of shit needs to be reminded what decent people think of him.
on Matthew Apperson haven't gone unnoticed. This thread is all about GWG's stupid ass now but this Apperson character definitely seems like a shit-stirrer.
Police have charged Apperson with aggravated assault among other things over the incident, and he's out on $35,000 bail. And if the police report is to be believed he has some mental issues. Link - ( New Window )
Quote:
In comment 12281577 Greg from LI said:
Quote:
In comment 12281568 Johnny5 said:
Quote:
In comment 12281460 Greg from LI said:
Quote:
shooting.
Greg seriously? Not understand why you are defending him, is he a friend or something? LOL
Do you not see that this guy historically inserts himself into situations that he shouldn't be in, over and over and over and over again? Doesn't raise a red flag to you? At all?
Inserts himself in situations.....where is that in the Florida criminal code? If you can find it for me, I'll give you a round of applause.
Check out Bernie Goetz. Similar situation IF GZ was trying to instigate a 'justified' shooting. Goetz was found innocent but he was tried for murder. If he had a past like GZ and it was introduced in court what would have happened?
Wasn't Bernie Goetz being mugged? That's not similar at all, unless you are one of those people that just sees a white man shooting a black teen and lumps it all together. Which makes you part of the problem. btw.
Bernie Goetz repeatedly rode the subway looking for an opportunity to 'defend himself'. Meaning that in a way he caused/looked for the confrontation that led to the shooting. In that way I thought it was on point. Also I think you completely missed the tone. The previous poster asked how it would be illegal to shoot someone in self defense. Goetz was on point in that regard. He was charged and tried.
If I was not clear, my fault. But by no means was I using Goetz to justify Zimmermin and I'm a bit resentful that you casually lumped me into that group and stopped just short of calling me a racist, btw
Quote:
Even for PLC Pogues?
:(
I'm sorry that I don't want to post a picture of my diploma or my commissioning warrant from my alma matre. So yes, for a PLC pogue.
Frankly, I cannot imagine anyone, even GWG, making such an outlandish request and expecting you to publish personal info here. It's so very similar to all the hoo-ha by the Birthers that I cannot view it as coincidental.
I have my persona-non-grata preferences here, just like everyone else does. I generally, although not nearly enough, manage to just avoid any interaction with those posters. Maybe if GWG starts presenting less inflammatory subjects and somehow manages to play well with others it would make it worthwhile to engage with him.
Unfortunately, that's fairly obviously not why he posts here. When the discussion devolves into demanding tangible "proof" of someone's assertions, especially in your case where there already exists substantial corroborating evidence, I think it's the better part to just say Sayonara, sucker and let him howl at the moon all by his lonesome.
I have my persona-non-grata preferences here, just like everyone else does. I generally, although not nearly enough, manage to just avoid any interaction with those posters. Maybe if GWG starts presenting less inflammatory subjects and somehow manages to play well with others it would make it worthwhile to engage with him.
Unfortunately, that's fairly obviously not why he posts here. When the discussion devolves into demanding tangible "proof" of someone's assertions, especially in your case where there already exists substantial corroborating evidence, I think it's the better part to just say Sayonara, sucker and let him howl at the moon all by his lonesome.
Nicely stated. And that's why I'm taking the advice found in Bill2's post.
We all have posters on here that get under our skin, and we all post things we shouldn't or wish we could take back.
Except for me. lol
I can't believe this thread is still going.
Here is my issue - GWG posted that awful, homophobic tirade that I reposted above. He was banned, and Eric, as is his right, let him back.
That means that it is now incumbent upon the rest of us to forget that he is a hate-filled piece of shit. Does GWG do ANYTHING to prove that he is any different than what he displayed in that post? Nope, same behavior, only slightly more circumspect, and he revels in it.
Sometimes a piece of shit needs to be reminded what decent people think of him.
He has no place on this board.
Ban.
He's all too visible, and for those who haven't seen it, shame on you.
Link - ( New Window )