NFT: Mets Minors 5/15/2015

and called up Campbell

and the last run he let up were on a bunt single and infield chopper to short. That bunt single broke up the streak of 15 straight set down by him.

Anyway what is our injured/steroids list so far this season?

Wheeler
Gee
Edgin
Parnell
Black
Meija
Wright
Herrera
D'arnaud

And our players who have actually stayed healthy but which have sucked

Cuddyer
Murphy
Mayberry
Kirk



And our players who have actually stayed healthy but have been only ooookay

Granderson
Lagarez
Duda
Flores
Tejada
Recker

And our players who have actually stayed healthy and have been good

All the Starting Pitchers
Familia



There's a problem here. Are we technically the worst first place of all time? As far as individual performances of players on the team

In comment 12288819 Headhunter said:

Quote:

7 2/3 2 runs 3 hits 2BB 9 k 100 pitches Wasting time in AAA

LOL, ready for what? To lose 1-0 games on the MLB roster? No thanks. Keep him in the minors until the mets have a MLB offense.

In comment 12288861 Tanker20 said:

Quote:

And our players who have actually stayed healthy but have been only ooookay Granderson Lagarez Duda Flores Tejada Recker

Granderson has NOT been okay. He has sucked. The only thing he's done well is taking walks. Except, he's our lead off hitter and can't even steal a base, so the walks are essentially a waste. He's one of our premier power hitters and he has 3 HRs (two of which came in Yankee Stadium and CBP...two extremely HR friendly parks).

Tejada has been okay??? Seriously? Come on dude. I don't even know how to respond to that garbage.

Recker? Really? The guy has had 21 ABs so far this season and had one awesome game that we lost anyway.

So that leave's you with Duda, Lagares and Flores...who are all vastly underperforming. Duda has downright sucked for a while now since his hot start.

They are not this bad, but they have a shitty approach and they need to be more aggressive. I'm so tired of watching these batters take a first pitch meatball down the plate and then swing at a garbage slider two feet off the plate. They do it ALL THE DAMN TIME. Fortune favors the bold, fellas. When the Nats were coming out of their funk when they played the Mets, they were attacking the shit out of our pitchers often and early. Something needs to change.

DW and TdA aren't going to "save" the offense. There's no guarantee that they will pick up where they left off. Hell, there's no guarantee that they wouldn't suck right now also.

so he can lose 1-0 games

The Mets are 2nd to last in the NL in swinging at the first pitch, bottom 5 in stolen bases, and has a manager that is openly against the hit and run.

The Met's need to take risks and create offense. Unfortunately, their manager doesn't take risks or create anything. Waiting for them to "just come out of it" is an awful strategy.

In comment 12288883 Headhunter said:

Quote:

so he can lose 1-0 games

Brilliant.

In comment 12288883 Headhunter said:

Quote:

so he can lose 1-0 games

The Mets have one of the best pitching staffs in the league and the worst offense. We just brought up Thor. And you are still obsessed with Matz. Bringing him up right now does nothing for anybody. Bring up a bat.

I agree with you and think Grandy has sucked. My 'ooookay' section should have been called 'sucked but not as sucky as the people in the prior sucked group'

The whole "But Granderson is walking" idea reminds of the Rick Nash "But hes backchecking" argument. It's fine and all but its not what were paying him for. He needs to hit homeruns.

What's sad is I truely believe that if the Yankees, or Cardinals any other team almost today acquired Granderson or Duda, they would all of a sudden start smashing homeruns. its a Mets thing.

until I realized you live for when the Mets lose. You probably live miserable lives and your default mode is bitch and moan about everything in life. You fool yourselves by saying you are realists and call it the way it is, but the reality is whining is your comfort zones. Just remember that I'm not crying with you I am laughing at you. Knock yourselves out telling me how fucked up I am and how you get it and I don't

What a hypocrite. You described yourself

if the bottom of our worst loosing streaks is still a few games over .500 at some point the pendulum will swing the other way back towards the 10 game over mark. Dreams of playing with the Nats are probably dead unless Wright comes back like an MVP candidate, but most expected that. Though, if the slide goes under .500 I think Terry will not be very comfortable.

IMO what will improve this offense long term are a couple of things. They need to 1) get more athletic and 2) get better hitters. The athleticism should come from the transition of young players replacing some of the current crop of unathletic placeholders taking up half the lineup - Murphy, Cuddyer, Granderson, Flores. That should also obviously improve the defense. The 2nd part is the hard part. This team has been far to happy to settle for guys who check the lowest criteria of "passable" for what they need, like Cuddyer/Granderson as mid-order guys. Wil Myers has been traded twice the past few seasons, J. Upton too. Ellsbury, Cano, Cruz, and HRam were all impact bats who changed teams for nothing but cash. Need to start making some bigger moves if this lineup is ever going to get up to contender level while the pitchers are still cheap. The clock is ticking on that and waiting for Wright is the answer.

In comment 12288891 Headhunter said:

Quote:

until I realized you live for when the Mets lose. You probably live miserable lives and your default mode is bitch and moan about everything in life. You fool yourselves by saying you are realists and call it the way it is, but the reality is whining is your comfort zones. Just remember that I'm not crying with you I am laughing at you. Knock yourselves out telling me how fucked up I am and how you get it and I don't

Once you realize that nobody really cares what the hell you think, life will be easier for you old man. Fans live and die with their teams...that means they cheer when they are good and bitch when they suck. Sorry you don't have the mental capacity to understand that.

You like to think you are level headed with this stuff when you are just a fucking liar. You are one of the most fucked up, irrational, psychotic losers in this place. I've seen enough posts from you wishing people dead, or shot in the face, or whatever messed up crap goes through your head at times...to know that there is just not something right with you. You are a joke and people just tolerate you. So, enjoy the view from your high horse.

it was supposed to say "the bats will eventually wake, it's just a losing streak"

If that 11 game win streak never happened and the Mets had just played slightly above .500 baseball and the standings looked exactly as they do right now, the perception would probably be totally different.

I think the super hot start created somewhat unrealistic expectations. Baseball teams and players always find ways to "correct" themselves or revert to the mean. That's basically what's going on here even though it's extremely frustrating.

Most teams swing back and forth between a relatively small range all year. Last year it was like 10 games under and 5 games under for almost the entire season. I will be extremely pleased if we can stay on the 5-10 over .500 side this year. What's more frustrating than the record is that the team can pitch with anyone in the league, including the Nats, and they're wasting it with a bottom barrel payroll.

It's very frustrating. It seems like we just can't put a lineup out there that generates runs at an above average clip no matter what we do. We sign guys who were good hitters before they got here and they just completely stop hitting, then they go somewhere else and start again.. and then guys who have been here either get hurt or don't perform up to par.

I wish I knew why it happened. I don't believe there's something about the Mets specifically that just saps hitters of their ability or any of that hocus pocus BS but it does seem to happen to us way more than I see it happen elsewhere.

Oy..

exactly overpowering teams during their 11 game win streak like the Nats have been doing for a while now. We had just enough hitters to do well, a bunch of clutch hits, and took advantage of errors at the beginning of the season when teams aren't in full stride yet.

This team is much closer to the one we've been seeing than it is to the team that won 11 straight. That's the problem. The massive amount of injuries don't help but that doesn't excuse the entire offense going into the shitter.

An 85ish win team. They weren't as good as they were in April and they're not as bad as they are right now. That's really all it is.

Like I said, if this shitty losing streak never happened and the big win streak at the beginning didn't happen, the perceptions would probably be a lot different. If we had just been winning 3 and losing 2 every 5 games or whatever, we'd just say "well, this is what we expected this year"

In comment 12288913 arcarsenal said:

Quote:

It's very frustrating. It seems like we just can't put a lineup out there that generates runs at an above average clip no matter what we do. We sign guys who were good hitters before they got here and they just completely stop hitting, then they go somewhere else and start again.. and then guys who have been here either get hurt or don't perform up to par. I wish I knew why it happened. I don't believe there's something about the Mets specifically that just saps hitters of their ability or any of that hocus pocus BS but it does seem to happen to us way more than I see it happen elsewhere. Oy..

I don't know, I think sometimes we talk ourselves into the best case scenarios. Last season we all said "they can't just add Cuddyer" but then we all bought in during ST. I think even ZG agreed with that last year. Cuddyer's a perfectly professional hitter, but he's just never been a 100 rbi guy (1x in 10+ years) and he's definitely not in COL anymore. I still wouldn't be shocked to see him put up 15/80, but it's clear he's not a top RH hitter. This team needs to add a true top talent, in their prime, just as they did when they added Piazza or Beltran. Throwing good money at role players alone just isn't working.

I knew that was going to be our offseason and wasn't thrilled about it. I definitely did not expect him to hit .300 here and be a 25 HR guy.. but I did expect better than what he's given us so far.

I'm not really sure why I bother at this point though. Beltran was probably our last truly A+ FA signing. Feels like almost every guy we've signed since has been a fucking bomb or a disappointment.

I think some fans expected them to be strong contenders already this season.

I do expect for them to improve this season but I more view this season to where they will get some of the young arms up and pitching at the major league level and where they will also find out some answers to what they have in some of their young players (Flores, etc.) in order to better plan how to move from here.

For those fans old enough I would put this season possibly comparable to 1984. In 83 just as last season while the records weren't good you could begin to see the light at the end of the tunnel and things to begin to get excited about after a long period of losing. In 84 they started to win but didn't have all the pieces or experience to take it to the next level and win it all, it would take two more seasons for that to happen.

As frustrating as some of these losses are I still enjoy it because we are getting to witness what I feel is the early beginnings of a new chapter for the Mets. Getting to watch that unfold is what should be a lot of fun for diehard fans. Those types of transitions don't happen very often so appreciate getting to watch it all.

with his knee injury

activities. not expected back until June.

It was a great three weeks while it lasted.

Looking forward to 2016.



just kidding, sort of.

In comment 12288954 steve in ky said:

Quote:

For those fans old enough I would put this season possibly comparable to 1984. In 83 just as last season while the records weren't good you could begin to see the light at the end of the tunnel and things to begin to get excited about after a long period of losing. In 84 they started to win but didn't have all the pieces or experience to take it to the next level and win it all, it would take two more seasons for that to happen. As frustrating as some of these losses are I still enjoy it because we are getting to witness what I feel is the early beginnings of a new chapter for the Mets. Getting to watch that unfold is what should be a lot of fun for diehard fans. Those types of transitions don't happen very often so appreciate getting to watch it all.

Besides the pitching staff and prospects, nothing indicates they are building the '86 Mets though.

The 80's Mets signed Hernandez followed by Carter with bats already in place. This team will still be introducing Conforto/Nimmo in two years with Wright older than dirt and Duda will be in the 32/33 range.

Waiting and waiting for kids to develop, tying up old veterans as starters and holding onto Wright is maintaining a team which always has many holes.

And fortunately there are now five postseason spots

in style or types of players but just the time it takes to transition from a long period of losing into a winning team. I think some fans expect it to happen quicker than it often does.

I don't know if Sandy will end up being successful or not but I am willing to enjoy watching it unfold these next couple of seasons.

86 was a tremendous team I doubt they easily duplicate that style and talent anytime soon.

the progression from 84 on was visible while this team appears to have glaring holes now and going forward.

The 80's Mets would go out and sign a Hernandez and Carter. They would part ways with a George Foster if he was disruptive. They would move trade for a Frank Viola. Move Backman out, etc.

This era signs terrible vets (Grandy, Cuddyer, Mayberry, Young, etc and won't part ways with anything. Why the F is Murphy, Gee or Niese still here?

Not to mention, ownership never talked about playoffs in 84 whereas this circus of insults has mentioned a "90 win frame of mind" how fans should be "true New Yorkers" and the cockadoodle SNY commercials this spring which featured Mets players all talking playoffs.

IMO, outside of pitchers, this is nothing like the 80's and I'm not sure what the Mets are building. Around the Diamond it looks like Flushing with a new Citi Field the pitchers mound while the surrounding area is the rest of Flushing waiting to be developed.

I see improvements from a couple of seasons ago and can see potential for them to be contenders in another two or three season, where it sounds like you don't.

In comment 12288891 Headhunter said:

Quote:

until I realized you live for when the Mets lose. You probably live miserable lives and your default mode is bitch and moan about everything in life. You fool yourselves by saying you are realists and call it the way it is, but the reality is whining is your comfort zones. Just remember that I'm not crying with you I am laughing at you. Knock yourselves out telling me how fucked up I am and how you get it and I don't

You are a fucking douchenozzle of epic proportions. The mets SUCK dude, get it through your thick fucking skull. Maybe you should try hunting a head that has a fucking brain in it. Fucking dumb motherfucker.

would NOT win 90 games and some of you guys flamed me to hell for that but i'm sticking to it and i don't give a shit how much i get flamed. I know we're only in may but before you know it it'll be july, then the beginning of september and this team will be about 10 games out of first playing meaningless baseball again. All you stat freaks can give all the bullshit stats you want, the most damning stat i heard this morning is the mets are hitting fucking .230 as a team. I dont give a shit how many gems harvey and colon pitch, if the team can't hit the ball then you can't score runs and if you can't score runs you lose. It's that simple.

In comment 12289000 steve in ky said:

Quote:

I see improvements from a couple of seasons ago and can see potential for them to be contenders in another two or three season, where it sounds like you don't.

In two or three seasons anybody could make a case. Is this a eight year plan for SA? Good lord, it NY not some backwards town from the Middle East.

but now the team is drawing somewhat respectably (up 10% from last year and right on the border of the top 10 vs. 21st last year). Now is the time to make an additional investment if it's for the right player (not Tulo). Gomez would really be a very good fit for example. Hell, I might even be interested in Braun for the right deal (Granderson would have to be going the other way). And if they punt on making an addition in season, next offseason better not be another offseason where they don't even call the top guys.

In comment 12289134 Giants2012 said:

Quote:

In comment 12289000 steve in ky said: Quote: I see improvements from a couple of seasons ago and can see potential for them to be contenders in another two or three season, where it sounds like you don't. In two or three seasons anybody could make a case. Is this a eight year plan for SA? Good lord, it NY not some backwards town from the Middle East.

Well that was my entire point. I was comparing how long it still actually took to win in 86 from the 83 and 84 seasons once the process turned for the better back then and how I see similarities of that possibility now.

Not sure how old you were or how involved as a fan you were in the early 80's but I was going to a lot of games and watching them all during that time. And in 83 similar to last season while the records weren't good there were many good signs of possibilities to come. In 84 the team didn't have much if any of a better record than these 2015 Mets 36 games into the season but improved to 90 wins, their first winning season in years. It still took two more before they would win a championship.

My only point is that yes even when we first see the signs of a team turning a corner it can take three or four more seasons for it to come together and watching that process take place is a lot of fun for a fan to be part of even taking into account the ups and downs that go along with it.

Who knows if they end up pulling it off and put together the remaining pieces to get there but I am going to enjoy watching them try.

Maybe you don't enjoy the process as much as I do and only more enjoy a more finished result and that's fine as well. I am just pointing out to anyone who may enjoy it that it may be currently happening. I remember in 83 very few fans thought it was taking place either.

Followed them very closely in the 80's.

Apparently, you love the monotony and enjoy whatever process you believe this is. A tree can grow from a seed too and i'm sure there are some sitting in rocking chairs watching and waiting year after year with no sense of urgency. Someday it will grow and so will Grandchildren. Too bad this is an entertainment business and as other teams can win, tear down, rebuild and win again, this organization just crawls along. You certainly found a team for your speed process with two speeds; slow and stop.

and adding an insulting slant.

Nowhere did I say I love monotony or wish for turn arounds to be slow. I enjoy baseball and watching the Mets. Of course I would prefer they always win but obviously that doesn't happen. I can still enjoy watching them try to rebuild a winning team but it sounds like you are saying that you can't.

I don't even know why you are arguing. How it there a right or wrong way to enjoy watching and being a fan of a team? You want to hate them right now and complain about most players on the team have it I just can't relate to it. I enjoy rooting for the Mets and these are this seasons current Mets.

Just for fun I looked up what their record was in 84 after 36 games into the season as we currently are. Oddly enough they were 20-16 exactly where they are now. maybe that is a good omen (grin)

Sounds like a two way street.

This process is a disgrace when compared to other process'

The process has taken so long that Wright is old
The process will continue though Grandy and Cuddyer until Duda is older
The process will continue as Conforto and Nimmo get promoted
The prcess will continue as the pitchers are lost due to compensation
and the process continues.

Love the process.

Meanwhile, progress is minimal and sustainability is not even on the map.

this crap from SA who goes to three straight winter meetings looking for a SS and comes back with bs (we have options, blah blah blah) followed by a "90 win frame of mind" etc. after wasting precious dollars on old corner outfielders.

The whole episode has felt just a smidge anti-climactic, hasn’t it?
Sure, there’s buzz surrounding Noah Syndergaard’s Citi Field debut Sunday against the Brewers, but there would have been more excitement a year ago at this juncture. And the excitement level arguably would be higher right now if the Mets had called upon Steven Matz, rather than Syndergaard, to replace the injured Dillon Gee in the team’s starting rotation.
So consider this column a public service to Mets fans: The baseball industry, based on a survey conducted by The Post, still believes in Syndergaard’s ceiling. A slowed-down fast track, the fact Syndergaard spent all of last season with Triple-A Las Vegas without earning a promotion to the big leagues, did little to curb talent evaluators’ enthusiasm about the towering right-hander — even as Matz surged onto the radar.
In the days following Syndergaard’s major league debut Tuesday, a loss to the Cubs at Wrigley Field, The Post asked 10 talent evaluators from 10 different teams (none of them the Mets) this question: If you could choose between Syndergaard and Matz, bet on one pitcher’s long-term future over the other’s, whom would you take?
Eight selected Syndergaard. Two went with Matz.
“I think he has better stuff, is more physical, and has had less injury history,” one talent evaluator from a National League team said about Syndergaard, on the condition of anonymity. “I like Matz a lot. I just think Syndergaard is the better bet.”
This assessment included a couple of themes that recurred: 1) Nearly everyone surveyed viewed this as a no-lose proposition; and 2) Most who sided with Syndergaard cited his robustness and lack of interaction with noted orthopedist Dr. James Andrews and his brethren. As much as the Mets like to spin the notion that assets such as Matt Harvey and Zack Wheeler will be better off after submitting to Tommy John surgery — the Stony Brook native Matz, too, is a member of the TJ Club — there’s still a great deal to be said for the guy with a clean medial record.
“I will take the guy with no injury history long-term,” an official from an American League team said.
“Noah has never been injured,” another AL club’s executive opined.
Modal Trigger
Noah Syndergaard
Photo: Getty Images
A scout from an AL club cited Syndergaard’s secondary stuff as a tiebreaker, although he stressed he wanted to make sure Syndergaard maintained the confidence to throw his curveball and changeup sufficiently. According to Fangraphs, Syndergaard threw his fastball 65.7 percent of the time against the Cubs. As points of comparison, Matt Harvey has gone with his fastball 60.4 percent of the time and Jacob deGrom 63.2 percent.
An NL scout noted the duo’s age difference: Syndergaard won’t turn 23 until August, while Matz turns 24 later this month. The same scout said he nevertheless might have gone with Matz if not for Syndergaard’s brilliant closing run (for now) with Las Vegas — during which he permitted just two runs in 22 innings, walking two and striking out 27, over his last three starts.
Syndergaard, the scout said, can be “another Harvey.”
No one spoke poorly of Matz, however.
“Both are potential stars,” said one AL official.
“Both guys are studs,” said another AL executive.
“It’s a good choice to have,” one decision-maker from an NL club said.
Two from the surveyed group chose Matz, who is pitching for Vegas. One, a scout from an NL team, cited Matz’s meteoric rise back into the baseball consciousness last year with Class-A St. Lucie and Double-A Binghamton, during which he compiled a 2.24 ERA in 140 ²/₃ combined innings pitched.
“He could’ve been a September call-up last year, and he would’ve fit in just fine,” said the scout, who also said Matz’s left-handedness gave him an edge.
The other Matz advocate graded the Mets’ 2009 second-round pick “slightly ahead” of Syndergaard.
Being a lefty “doesn’t hurt,” said the evaluator, who works for an AL team, “but we see more of a starter profile with his feel and delivery. He does it easier [than Syndergaard].”
Syndergaard, the official added, could wind up best suited as a back-of-the-bullpen option.
It’s a fun subject, and the question represents the Mets’ embarrassment of riches in the pitching department.
The answers represent the enthusiasm that still envelops Syndergaard, even if he’s no longer the Flavor of the Month in Flushing. On Sunday, the locals will get their first shot to see, in person, what the industry believes is a very special pitcher.
Link - ( New Window )

nice defense

nice to see

- Wilmahhhhhh

with the grand slam, just what that kid needed

.

It wasn't Cliff Lee, but hopefully acceptable to TC...

.

let's hope this gets everyone out of the funk.

And it all started with a clutch RBI from degrom

.

Shake the cobwebs out.
Now come on Noah 2 in a row tomorrow

Vic Black and Bobby Parnell all pitched for STL tonight.

Gee pitched really well, the other two just pitched.