Mainly because the Duggars are "good Christian folk".
This is one of the hypocrisies that exists today. Because Huckabee is friends with the family, I guess having allegations about molesting young girls come to light is insulting.
I guess if it revolves round trailer trash like Honey Boo Boo's family, then it is disgusting.
I really don't give a fig one way or another about what happened, but it is curious that some candidates trot out shit like "family values" and then don't mind events like this. I personally like this defense:
"Presidential candidate Mike Huckabee is coming out swinging for Josh Duggar ... saying he should be forgiven for his sins, because the alleged molestation happened when he was a minor with poor judgment"
Well shit, doesn't that pretty much account for 90% of most fuckups in a lifetime?
Great Campaign Stance - (
New Window )
Anti-Abortion and
Anti-Evolution
All will be forgiven. Does not matter what you do, just ask for forgiveness, and there you go.
It's amazing how many Republicans think they have a real shot at being President. Huckabee is just another one of these clowns. Can't wait until they dwindle the field and eliminate some of these bums from contention.
I don't really think it is my place to offer any public statements on forgiveness or a lack thereof. What value does it add?
It only leads to hypocrisy. Huckabee has publicly said negative things about gays, but apparently forgives a child molester. I just can't comprehend that for a logic standpoint.
The gay bashing is a separate issue. Those people's morality should be called into question.
Yeah he only molested 5 girls including his sisters, and his parents helped cover it up. But it's all in the past.
The point is that this was a criminal act that was shielded and hidden by adults who have now profited off AND preached about morals without acknowledging this act until they had to
Josh Duggar, a reality TV star on TLC’s 19 Kids and Counting and the oldest child of the Duggar clan, admitted that he sexually molested several young girls as a teenager. Duggar only owned up to his conduct after records of a police investigation were obtained by In Touch Magazine. He was never prosecuted because, by the time he was reported to the authorities, the statute of limitations had expired.
Prior to his admission on Thursday night, Duggar spent years crisscrossing the country as a spokesman for “traditional values.” Duggar took a job as executive director of the Family Research Council’s political arm in 2013. In that role, which he resigned on Thursday, Duggar argued that marriage equality and abortion rights — among other things — were destroying the values that he and his family embodied.
Here are nine of Duggar’s most sanctimonious moments:
From a site a Democrat can appreciate ... - ( New Window )
intouchweekly.com - ( New Window )
Actually I'm normally happy(not on drugs). I'm happy to be alive. We're all just visiting. Whatever issues you have with someone you care about squash it and mend the relationship. If you are unable to forgive than God won't forgive you.Than you go to hell. Mark 7:7
That's correct.
Well, in this particular case, both these guys are active and notable political figures.
100% agree with this
Even conceding a minor point to the other side is "an admission of weakness" in one's position / assumptions.
Rather than having a discussion along the lines of "Among a list of key issues, we agree on some, disagree on others and therefore on average you choose candidate from party X and I choose a candidate from party Y." there is often such an entrenched position on each side, that the areas of agreement are lost.
There is a huge rant I can make here, but so many people take advantage of the idea of forgiveness, that it truly cheapens what it is.
Unfortunately, a large group that has done this is comprised of people who have made a living either preaching immaculate values or has made a living brainwashing others. The 1980's wing in the HOF of people needing forgiveness would be almost completely comprised of fallen evangelists, most of whom used the concept of forgiveness to not only regain power, but resort back to their previous behavior.
But some people just say, "Everyone needs forgiveness" which keeps the cycle going in continuity. I bet most people don't realize that Jim Bakker still rakes in several million dollars a year in a combination of preaching in Branson, MO and selling "survivalist" products for the upcoming apocolypse.
Even conceding a minor point to the other side is "an admission of weakness" in one's position / assumptions.
Rather than having a discussion along the lines of "Among a list of key issues, we agree on some, disagree on others and therefore on average you choose candidate from party X and I choose a candidate from party Y." there is often such an entrenched position on each side, that the areas of agreement are lost.
This is more true on the right than the left. There are absolutely zealots and whackos on each side. There's no lefty version of the tea party that can knock out democrats in primaries like there is for the republicans.
So, the candidates have to meet the tea party litmus test criteria with positions that often also alienate independents and centrists. That's why, for example, they'll pretty much all say that marriage is man+woman even though that's now a minority opinion that won't help them in the general election.
I know far too many homosexuals to realize that not only didn't they choose to be gay anymore than I chose to be straight, but so many of them would rather have not been that way to better conform to society. It is sad that society effectively has taken a group of people and have shamed them for no other reason than sexual orientation.
Personally, I don't have a problem with gays or gay marriage. I also understand those who oppose the lifestyle, to an extent, but I don't understand or agree with those trying to impose their values on people by preventing them from marrying. To me, it is a simple civil rights/legal issue. But, that is a whole, other discussion that probably should not be expanded upon here.
Even conceding a minor point to the other side is "an admission of weakness" in one's position / assumptions.
Rather than having a discussion along the lines of "Among a list of key issues, we agree on some, disagree on others and therefore on average you choose candidate from party X and I choose a candidate from party Y." there is often such an entrenched position on each side, that the areas of agreement are lost.
Ron Fournier wrote an article about how candidates judge reporters that cover them in today's National Journal that touches on some of the same points.
Outside of politics, relationships are far less binary.
Although Huckabee might like you more.....
Shows like that piss me off because they got rich simply for being stupid morons.
I don't understand why a statute of limitations even exists for crimes of that magtnitude. You shoplift a new pair of Jordan's? OK, statute of limitations. Murder or rape or child molestation? Nope.
Shows like that piss me off because they got rich simply for being stupid morons.
Well then at least you still have a chance, buddy!
Headhunter - it's so interesting you say this.
I can tell you that I don't feel this way at all. Yes, I know that the right and the left exist and have an opinion. My situation is that I do not agree with either the right or the left on enough of the issues to feel as though I'm connected to one or the other. Depending on the issue I may be more conservative or more progressive, and I'm self-aware enough to realize that my viewpoint is evolving on issues over time as well.
To me there's just the facts, and then a bunch of noise that I basically tune out all the time.
Some of the comments to the statement ...
Just pull Josh. Show the rest of the family. The show shouldn't be condemned for his actions.
So you will still show the programs about weird sex, a guy that has multiple wives, and other bad things but you won't keep a show about a family that has a real past and learned to forgive and move on without becoming bitter and entitled? Classy tlc.
NOOOOOO! Everybody makes mistakes. I sure wouldn't want the world to know everything I did at 15. Have a forgiving heart!
Wow. I won't be watching TLC until this show is returned. What a low blow.
I'm so upset with this. I have worked with youth sex offenders and Josh has taken all the right steps. He got treatment and is living a good life. I'm proud of him. TLC is making a mistake.
Effective immediately, our family has pulled TLC from our station list. We are deeply saddened and troubled by TLC's knee jerk reaction, our thoughts and prayers are with Josh Duggar and the entire Duggar family as their good name is being smeared and dragged through the mud and muck.
Excuse me but this happened TWELVE years ago. The family sought God - Josh sought forgiveness and they gave that to him. You just lost a long time viewer of TLC here. I refuse to watch ANYTHING on your show now.
I am so very sad! It's the only show I watch! The Duggar family is wonderful. The situation happened 12 years ago and was dealt with. No Reason to punish Josh or the Duggar family now. I am disappointed in this decision.
Wow. Judgement of a fourteen year old and his actions which were wrong and corrected and dealt with are going to affect the show after all these years. Shame on you TLC. The media is always looking for a way to spoil something that so many have enjoyed.
It happened like 12 yrs ago and no I don't condone it nor am I defending him. But the Appropriate actions AND Such Were done and he got help. He has asked for forgiveness and asked God for forgiveness.... don't know why this is being brought up now. It's ridiculous.
I'll be boycotting all TLC shows! It's ridiculous to think it's ok to cancel a show about a nice Christian family because of something that one family member did as a minor! Look at all the other trash on tv... And 19 kids and counting gets pulled?!
ACSN was privatized in 1980, and its name was changed to "The Learning Channel" in November of that year; the name was subsequently shortened to "TLC."[5] (NASA immediately launched NASA TV as the ACSN's internal replacement). The channel mostly featured documentary content pertaining to nature, science, history, current events, medicine, technology, cooking, home improvement, and other information-based topic"
Not like it was Gumbel 2 Gumbel...
As for statute of limitations, most states have them for sexual abuse of minors. The biggest proponent of the statutes if the Catholic Church.
That's a pretty dated boogeyman. "Trial lawyers" are a pretty impotent group as a source of contributions these days. And they were never very effective. Even when they were giving a lot they got hurt with PSLRA, SLUSA, and the the Class Action Fairness Act.
The major money in politics is (1) corporations, (2) unions, (3) individual rich people, and (4) aggregated grass roots contributions. Everything else pales (I may be forgetting a source or two).
Link - ( New Window )
I wash born here, an I wash raished here, and dad gum it, I am gonna die here, an no sidewindin' bushwackin', hornswagglin' cracker croaker is gonna rouin me bishen cutter.
"The judge ordered us yesterday to expunge that record," Lewis said, adding that similar records are typically kept indefinitely. "As far as the Springdale Police Department is concerned this report doesn't exist."
Link - ( New Window )