Greek banks will stay shuttered and capital controls will be imposed as talks broke down over the debt crisis and a default and Eurozone exit seem likely, perhaps imminent. While this is not the first such crisis, the Europeans seem unlikely to yield at this juncture and Greece may bow to the inevitable. The couple years interlude has probably given the creditor states and the rest of the Eurozone room to prepare for such a contingency, but there are of course risks of contagion for the rest of the Eurozone, specifically the peripheral countries with long-running financial issues.
Link - (
New Window )
The market has basically doubled since 2008. You're sweating 2%?
Quote:
400 pts down. Oh well, I'm not retiring anytime soon anyway.
The market has basically doubled since 2008. You're sweating 2%?
I could do the same thing and point out the market is up a mere 11% over the last 15 years couldn't I? If you don't believe it I can show you an S&P 500 mutual fund I bought and held on to since 1999.
Weak, corrupt craphole economies need to be able to devalue and reform at the same time, in order to become competitive.
Locked into the Euro, Greece couldn't devalue, and locked into ridiculous promises and corruption, it couldn't become competitive even if it did devalue.
I could never figure out how this was going to actually work. Greece has practically nothing to sell that anyone anywhere else in the world wants, other than tourism. And meanwhile, cutting spending without devaluing just leads to one recession after another. Germany continuing to throw money down a bottomless pit makes no sense.
The bottom line is that leaving the Euro, defaulting and devaluing seems like the only possible combination that could stop the economic erosion.
No winners here. The best hope is that the EU can shut the door after Greece leaves without anyone else needing to follow them.
If it hasn't already been squatted in.
Obviously is cheaper to kick them out than let them stay on their terms.
PR broke - ( New Window )
I was just about to post that. $73B in debt they can't pay. How much fear is there that Greece will spread to at least some of the other PIIGS?
What Greece has going for it is tourism. With a cheap drachma, foreign tourists will hopefully take advantage of cheap Greek currency to vacation there. The challenge for Greece is to provide adequate security.
Quote:
In comment 12347119 buford said:
Quote:
400 pts down. Oh well, I'm not retiring anytime soon anyway.
The market has basically doubled since 2008. You're sweating 2%?
I could do the same thing and point out the market is up a mere 11% over the last 15 years couldn't I? If you don't believe it I can show you an S&P 500 mutual fund I bought and held on to since 1999.
They have charts for these sort of things, trust is not really necessary.
It is some interesting timing, as the Dow had tripled from '93 to '99. Bad luck I guess.
Obviously is cheaper to kick them out than let them stay on their terms.
Exactly. These are intelligent people, both in government and in business. The last few years have been about planning for and managing the inevitable. That's why there isn't much of any push to find an accommodation. Now that isn't to say they can anticipate the second and third order effects of this or the impact on the confidence of investors in other struggling economies (PIIS I guess at this point, though I understood - perhaps dated though - that Ireland was relatively stable), only that the direct consequences of this for their banks, their firms and those of their respective countries have likely been anticipated and mitigated.
Imagine if this was Italy instead of a piddling Greek economy.
Tax evasion is an art form in Greece going back to the days when they were under Ottoman occupation. Back then it was considered a form of civil resistance. The problem is, the idea of tax evasion never left (helped vs. the Ottomans but screwed themselves royally here)
They reported numbers that suggested a normal modern economy, which made it possible for them to borrow money in the capital markets. In reality, they were an economic basket case. Tax evasion was systemic, they didn't report several major costs and liabilities (i.e. they kept them off the books), there really wasn't a viable private sector, etc. Several years - and billions of Euros borrowed - later, the facade came off. Now they can't borrow money like they used to repay the old loans and their creditors (EU, ECB, IMF) made them adopt draconian austerity measures that torpedoed their economy and contributed to social hardship and unrest.
The Greeks then elected the relatively new Syriza party to power. Syriza is a fringe leftist/populist party that promised to end austerity in negotiations with creditors. The creditors are saying NFW and here we are.
If that's the case, seems like they should be guilty of defrauding their lenders, but I guess what can you do with an entire country.
no real surprise, nor is it a surprise that markets will use the opportunity to freak. This am I told the wife that stock will drop, oil will rise (despite Greece not producing oil). Stock is a no brainer. the market freaks when a mouse farts. oil is more or less the same.
If that's the case, seems like they should be guilty of defrauding their lenders, but I guess what can you do with an entire country.
The other detail being that the folks running the Eurozone had every reason to suspect that the Greek economic outlook wasn't as rosy as was portrayed in their application, but didn't look very hard. They wanted to let them in to gain market for their exports (that wouldn't be affected by adjustments in currency markets) more than they wanted to screen out high risks.
2. Are there civil movements there urging for an end of the tax evasion?
The strong European economies want access to cheap markets and raw materials (including labor), but don't want to let the immigration of these elements into their sphere of influence.
It's always been the Eastern and Southern Europe question; how much do you expand membership along these margins, knowing that they are likely very high risks.
And no large scale civil movements against this; this type of "corruption" is largely seen as a cost of doing business in Greece.
Quote:
and then cried poor (or were actually too poor) to even begin paying back?
If that's the case, seems like they should be guilty of defrauding their lenders, but I guess what can you do with an entire country.
The other detail being that the folks running the Eurozone had every reason to suspect that the Greek economic outlook wasn't as rosy as was portrayed in their application, but didn't look very hard. They wanted to let them in to gain market for their exports (that wouldn't be affected by adjustments in currency markets) more than they wanted to screen out high risks.
Frankly they were complicit in cooking the books. The blame has fallen to Goldman and of course GS usually gets what it deserves but plenty of people in Northern Europe made a buttload of money exporting to Southern Europe. They're not stupid, they knew the bill would eventually come due, presumably they thought that either they'd get out before the shit hit the fan or that the government (European or national) would backstop them.
And no large scale civil movements against this; this type of "corruption" is largely seen as a cost of doing business in Greece.
Are you sure it's not a higher percentage? A while back (last year) I read a 40% number with respect to tax receipts. Perhaps they stepped up enforcement at least to a degree since then.
Totally agree. Been saying this for a while. Syriza are one problem. It is Podemos who tower over this situation because if they get in in Spain then shit will get real fast. That is not a 5% correction to an already high market.
There is a school of thought that the EU has to show the Spanish and others the consequences of the Greek's actions. The risk with that is an Iceland style rapid revival makes the Greece option look appealing.
Quote:
in 26% lower tax receipts.
And no large scale civil movements against this; this type of "corruption" is largely seen as a cost of doing business in Greece.
Are you sure it's not a higher percentage? A while back (last year) I read a 40% number with respect to tax receipts. Perhaps they stepped up enforcement at least to a degree since then.
That was solely income tax, and not other taxes as well.
rather than the Global financial meltdown of 2008 which causes all economy in the world to contract and then the imposed austerity by the Trioka which has cause Greece GDP to contract 25% in 5 years
the problem isn't Greece not paying their debt
the problem is freaking 28% unemployment
the probem is 60% youth unemployment
rather than the Global financial meltdown of 2008 which causes all economy in the world to contract and then the imposed austerity by the Trioka which has cause Greece GDP to contract 25% in 5 years
the problem isn't Greece not paying their debt
the problem is freaking 28% unemployment
the probem is 60% youth unemployment
at 1:20 am Manh George said: "...Greece has practically nothing to sell that anyone anywhere else in the world wants, other than tourism."
The lack of industry equates to unemployment - so your point, while valid, has already been covered here at least in part.
You are correct to highlight it however as it has been glossed over quite a bit on this thread.
Part of the solution is to improve tax collection, and another, more important part of the solution is to increase employment levels, particularly among the youth.
Job creation requires a lot more than protesting for more jobs however, a fact that many people in the U.S. and abroad seem blind to. We often assign the blame for high levels of youth unemployment on policy, when the reality is that most youth today (in the U.S. and abroad) are not skilled enough to be employable. I don't know enough about Greece to label their youth as unskilled, but I can say that there is global demand for laborers with specific skill sets.
This will all shake out painfully for Greece - economically, politically, socially and psychologically. The whole country is being exposed as a fraud and laughing stock in a very public and humiliating way.
Anyone that blames Greece's problems on austerity is a simpleton with an eye toward politics, not economics.
Yes you are the expert Rob!
you still got that gold under your bed ??
Quote:
Anyone that blames Greece's problems on austerity is a simpleton with an eye toward politics, not economics.
Yes you are the expert Rob!
you still got that gold under your bed ??
Homerjonesredux was the gold bug, ace. I can honestly say I have never commented on precious metals, or any other directly investable asset, as I feel this isn't the forum for it. Try again?
Bear in mind, no matter how you deflect, you are still dead fucking wrong on this topic.
One of these days I'm going to cash that in.
But the entire Macro system is built on trust and credit, not actual money in the bank. What austerity does is essentially confuse these two realms, forcing a national treasury (a public institution responsible for the welfare of citizens, not profit making), operating on the Macro level, to adhere to micro rules. Under austerity, a treasury that is responsible for welfare and public services is restricted from providing these services. Innocent people suffer as a result.
This does not excuse Greece's ineffectual (invisible?) tax collecting machinery and irresponsible fiscal policy. However, one might argue that these policies need to be reformed along side debt relief.
A Keynesian would say that when the economy stumbles, public spending and services need to increase in order to account for the drop in activity/ demand left by struggling private sector. The time for austerity and belt tightening is during boom times, when economies can cut back on their own terms.
A classical econ student, who sees the macro and micro realms operating in closer relation would advocate riding the boom wave all the way to the top, and then tightening belts when the going gets tough, similar to how a private household would behave.
i mean thinking like a 10 year old, they are a tourist hot spot and should bring in outside money. Is this not the case?
dont kill me but i just want to understand this good.
i mean thinking like a 10 year old, they are a tourist hot spot and should bring in outside money. Is this not the case?
dont kill me but i just want to understand this good.
Tourism is quite substantial, but the Euro made (makes) tourism more expensive and undermines the advantage Greece had as a relatively inexpensive destination depending on the ebbs and flows of exchange rates. And Greece makes very little other than olive oil. They have an outsized role in merchant shipping, but that's about it. And they have a huge public sector, huge legacy costs from past public sector workers, and their tax collection is a joke.