Which of these is most likely?
The FBI conducts a thorough review of Ms.Clinton's computer and thumb drive and clears her of destroying or hiding public documents.
The FBI finds evidence of destruction or hiding public documents
This is a sham investigation to allow the justice department to take the email question out of the campaign
Link - ( New Window )
You have tunnel vision. Fauxcohontas appeals to bits and pieces of the Democratic constituency (educated white liberals in particular) but she will not raise money well and what in her perpetually angry demeanor is going to make her empathetic to everyone is in the Democrats' big tent? She might be a viable Veep candidate, especially for a guy like Biden who has less pull within the faculty lounges, but she is not the one to keep the Obama Coalition together.
Quote:
she'd be tied with, if not leading, HRC. I really hope Liz gets in, but it looks unlikely.
You have tunnel vision. Fauxcohontas appeals to bits and pieces of the Democratic constituency (educated white liberals in particular) but she will not raise money well and what in her perpetually angry demeanor is going to make her empathetic to everyone is in the Democrats' big tent? She might be a viable Veep candidate, especially for a guy like Biden who has less pull within the faculty lounges, but she is not the one to keep the Obama Coalition together.
Perhaps.
This is like the magazine Highlights from the dentist office. Who can spot the problem?
Link - ( New Window )
One of the few women who can be alone with him and not have to worry about being molested, lol.
The thing that sunk Jimmy Carter was that he had a Congress, particularly the House, that was so far to the left and so anti-military (both in terms of respect and funding) that being 1 helicopter short would have been normal operating status. Remember, they had enough helicopters on the carrier, it was just that enough of them were in a state of disrepair such that the mission had to be undertaken with no reserve copter.
I'm aware of that. He was right in what he said, but was gracious enough not to specify why he was 1 copter short.
I find handwashing to be a pain in the ass. Therefore I won't do it before surgery or between patients. There's no law.....
Quote:
and I found it to be a pain in the ass. I remember when my old job switched the policy and let people check work email on personal phones. Like half the lawyers had new smart phones within a month.
I find handwashing to be a pain in the ass. Therefore I won't do it before surgery or between patients. There's no law.....
Quote:
In comment 12430864 Deej said:
Quote:
and I found it to be a pain in the ass. I remember when my old job switched the policy and let people check work email on personal phones. Like half the lawyers had new smart phones within a month.
I find handwashing to be a pain in the ass. Therefore I won't do it before surgery or between patients. There's no law.....
My Obamacare benefits suck. Do you give a nonsterilization discount?
Eh. I still have to wash my hands after....
Link - ( New Window )
And although he will be dismissed by the likes of Dean and Carville as a partisan hack, their interview with Michael Mukasey was even more damning.
Quote:
People voting for a name or a party without looking at character at all. It's not like HRC doesn't have a track record that you can judge her from. The minions that they have propped up on these shows defending her are pathetic.
Great point--doesn't happen to other side. Thanks for all your insight!
Except that Democrats area always telling the world that they are so much smarter than Republicans. Republicans have accepted that they are not as smart.....
Quote:
In comment 12432591 buford said:
Quote:
People voting for a name or a party without looking at character at all. It's not like HRC doesn't have a track record that you can judge her from. The minions that they have propped up on these shows defending her are pathetic.
Great point--doesn't happen to other side. Thanks for all your insight!
Except that Democrats area always telling the world that they are so much smarter than Republicans. Republicans have accepted that they are not as smart.....
Quote:
In comment 12432591 buford said:
Quote:
People voting for a name or a party without looking at character at all. It's not like HRC doesn't have a track record that you can judge her from. The minions that they have propped up on these shows defending her are pathetic.
Great point--doesn't happen to other side. Thanks for all your insight!
Except that Democrats area always telling the world that they are so much smarter than Republicans. Republicans have accepted that they are not as smart.....
Ugh.
Ugh.
Just trying to avoid a Hitler reference- those never go over well
Ugh.
So now we have the Clintdashians going against the KarTrumpains and the ghost of Howard Beale is the most important historic figure in this election.
And it's a big point of advantage for her.
Because abortion providers are threatened, clinics are bombed, doctors have been murdered.
That's terrorism, folks.
It wasn't a matter of 'if', it was a matter of 'when' Hillary was going to pull the trigger and begin using this point of attack.
The usage of the term 'Terrorist' isn't some off-handed, Trump-esqe gaffe. That's VERY intentional and the first salvo fired in the REAL Presidential campaign for 2016.
Quote:
.
Yup.
And it's a big point of advantage for her.
Because abortion providers are threatened, clinics are bombed, doctors have been murdered.
That's terrorism, folks.
Quote:
In comment 12439509 njm said:
Quote:
.
Yup.
And it's a big point of advantage for her.
Because abortion providers are threatened, clinics are bombed, doctors have been murdered.
That's terrorism, folks.
And you're accusing a specific GOP candidate of this or the RNC in general?
But it's a fact. You're a hard-line, no exceptions Pro-Lifer who supports minimalizing access to what IS a Constitutional right - you are supporting and enabling people who actually DO partake in what equates to terrorist activities.
The quote: "Now, extreme views about women, we expect that from some of the terrorist groups, we expect that from people who don't want to live in the modern world, but it's a little hard to take from Republicans who want to be the president of the United States"
So - she's focusing on "Extreme views on women" - but the terrorist terminology has a literal place in the discussion that I've raised here. Hillary didn't go as far as I did, but that is EXACTLY what that language is referencing.
Quote:
.
Yup.
And it's a big point of advantage for her.
Because abortion providers are threatened, clinics are bombed, doctors have been murdered.
That's terrorism, folks.
But none of the Republican candidates have condoned or supported in any way the bombings and murder, none of which have taken place since the campaign season has begun.
So I guess Hillary has joined the gang that couldn't shoot straight. OMG, did I just accuse Hillary of being a gang member?
It wasn't a matter of 'if', it was a matter of 'when' Hillary was going to pull the trigger and begin using this point of attack.
The usage of the term 'Terrorist' isn't some off-handed, Trump-esqe gaffe. That's VERY intentional and the first salvo fired in the REAL Presidential campaign for 2016.
Of course if she too shrill and indiscriminate as far as who she accuses then it could backfire. And remember, what plays in the Northeast and the Left Coast does not always play in Florida, Ohio, Wisconsin and Colorado.
Not directly. But the implication is there, couched in the language.
She knows exactly what she is doing and the comment was an intentional draw away from the e-mail crap.
Again, do you think that 47% of people are like terrorists because they are pro-life?
Stupid bullshit, no more 'rooted in truth' than comparing Sanger to Himmler because they treated certain people as subhuman.
Again, do you think that 47% of people are like terrorists because they are pro-life?
That isn't the point.
The point is Hillary's usage of the word terrorist and what it suggests. What it implies.
Again, her quote: "Now, extreme views about women, we expect that from some of the terrorist groups, we expect that from people who don't want to live in the modern world, but it's a little hard to take from Republicans who want to be the president of the United States"
OK, so she's talking about 'extreme views' here.
The rest of it is pretty vanilla excepting one word.
"Terrorist".
So - no - she isn't implying that Pro Lifers are terrorists and neither am I.
But she IS smartly invoking the word to make people remember.
Oh yeah, they bomb abortion clinics here. They murder doctors.
She's linking the Pro-Life movement in general without a direct accusation or even talking directly about the issue.
Expect MUCH more of this in the next year. By November, you'll wish Roe and Wade were both aborted. :)
IMO, they are the extremists.
So again, being against abortion is equal to being a terrorist?
What R candidate has advocated enslaving women?
Which R candidate has advocated women not drive or vote?
Which R candidate has said that women must be covered from head to toe?
Which R candidate has advocated punishing women who they perceive as an adulterer by beheading?
Those are terrorist positions on women. Not being pro-life.
And yes, but saying that anyone who is pro-life, candidate or not, is equal to a terrorist, she is calling all pro-lifers terrorists.
IMO, they are the extremists.