I haven't been a believer, I thought he was more about arrogance than innovation. I thought this sport was too evolved to have room for something so radically different.
" Preseason doesn't count", is only a generalization and a sembelance of truth. 70 points in two games might not be defining but it's got to get your attention. It's also the ease that they're doing it with, and, in spite of who is quarterbacking, there are open men all over the field.
I'm not sold yet, but I'm certainly preparing my denials of words and thoughts falsely attributed to me while preparing the "I knew it all along" speech.
And , to do something so radical in a league that's come so far and is so sophisticated would be exciting and really would cement Chip as something very special. There's been a lot of great coaches like Shula and Nolls but only a few true innovators like Brown, Landry, Lombardi and Whalsch. The thought that we MIGHT be seeing something that special is scary and makes our prospects tougher, even if it's interesting and somewhat historic.
Stay tuned, more after the break (or the pre-season)
They're running NFL plays and concepts you've seen before, that anyone could run if they chose to, only with highly precise execution, and at a rapid pace.
The innovation comes in the attention paid to physical fitness and training.
Bleurgh.
Agreed if Murray performs like last year it will greatly improve the odds of Bradford staying healthy. Everyone is seriously underrating the impact Murray had on the entire Dallas team last year. They controlled the clock which kept their defense off the field and opened up the play action passing game. Romo is really going to miss Murray and we have seen what a reliable running game can do for an offense.
They're running NFL plays and concepts you've seen before, that anyone could run if they chose to, only with highly precise execution, and at a rapid pace.
The innovation comes in the attention paid to physical fitness and training.
This. When I hear about how Chip Kelly runs so many plays and keeps the pressure on the defense, this is nothing new. Go back to the K-Gun offense in Buffalo in the 1990s. When it's working well, like the AFC Championship game in 1990, they can smoke someone 51-3. When it's not working and you are off the field quick and your defense gets worn down...like, oh Super Bowl XXV, you lose.
And going with a read-option offense featuring a brittle QB is plain stupid. I know all the attention Suggs got this weekend, but the bottom line is the rules of the game say that he can hit a QB who is pretending to keep the ball and they don't have the same rules of protection. It would be a miracle if Bradford is able to play the entire season. But if something goes wrong, he's got Sanchez and Barkley and Tebow...umm, hurray?
One thing to also keep in mind, when guys leave that team, they seem to be slamming this new way that he has them in for conditioning. Players don't like coaches, it happens. But coaches, whether they like it or not, have to adjust. Chip seems set in his ways and is out to prove he's right. Those types of coaches tend to go down in flames, ie- Mike Martz.
Maybe I'll be proven wrong, but Chip looks to me to be best suited to go back to college. The good thing for Giants fans is that if that is the case, the Eagles already have given him the keys. So if he goes back, he's crashed the car and the Eagles will take years to undo the damage. This thought makes me happy.
Kelly has the same type athletes as everyone else. He is arrogant to think only he has the magic formula to maximize performance.
It looks like they hit a wall figuratively and literally last year. And even for his 10 wins - it resulted in a non-playoff season.
He most likely ran out of subject line space. I have and I try to get the essentials in that subject line by cutting out the letters that wouldn't be missed..Except by you...:)
I am sorry to upset you so...I can see where Ch. Kelly for Chip Kelly could confuse and disorient you. But maybe if you'd give me an idea for future references....Is T.C. all right, can I go with J.R? if we slip into politics do I have to type out Franklin Delanor Roosevelt, or does F.D.R work, maybe you'd be comfortable with Franklin D. Roosevelt, eh.?
And if we slip into the auto world can you handle G.M.?
Thanks again
Grizz
Post Script (that's long for the unacceptable P.S)....., dumb dumb and dumber..
JR needs to build our defense back to respectability. We need a few more studs on D. I think we have a fairly solid foundation, but I think our ceiling this year is average.
I wondered how he'd do with a bad team and if a few three and outs in two minutes each might not ruin any defense much less any team.
And as to the poster who wrote that he's running the same plays...I'm not sure that's true. He has plays that work off each other in a way that Most NFL teams are not using.
And of course, it's only pre-season can't be said often enough. But at least I don't think anyone can say it's an open and shut case.
I'm of the mind you can run them into the ground. There is nothing magical about his approach.
That being said, I wouldn't get too concerned about an NFL team scoring points in the pre-season when that team is running an offense that can be taught to HS kids.
Scoring in the pre-season is all about which teams are further along in their prep work. Running a complex offense or defense is going to put you behind a team who runs a simpler scheme.
He's basically trying to run as many plays a game as possible and with his fast break style of offense not allow the defense to do situational substitution and keep them on the field and make them even more vulnerable as they move down the field.
As for comparing them to the Bills Kelly and the K-gun it wasn't the fast break type of offense you see Chip Kelly using. Jim Kelly called the plays himself at the line of scrimmage after he looked over the defense. Grant it they didn't huddle and was more a two minute offense but not nearly the pace the Eagles try to employ.
If you like fast break basketball in the NFL then you love Chip ball. Me I hate it. The offense has the clear advantage to do whatever they want . I just feel the defenses are at such a disadvantage anymore because of the rules they should at least allow them to get set in their positions before the ball is snapped.
Blue: At what point did they look good last preseason? I don't care what the record says. Who was in the game when leads were taken?
They're running NFL plays and concepts you've seen before, that anyone could run if they chose to, only with highly precise execution, and at a rapid pace.
The innovation comes in the attention paid to physical fitness and training.
Funny, I just read an article (can't find it again) that states one key of Kelly's offense is simplicity. I had been under the impression that it was complex and innovative, but the article says that the simplicity means fewer mistakes and faster play with less thinking. And we all know that simplicity is ridiculed on BBI.
Quote:
They're not lighting up the league on new formations or quirky playcalls. Kelly is not re-inventing the wheel.
They're running NFL plays and concepts you've seen before, that anyone could run if they chose to, only with highly precise execution, and at a rapid pace.
The innovation comes in the attention paid to physical fitness and training.
Funny, I just read an article (can't find it again) that states one key of Kelly's offense is simplicity. I had been under the impression that it was complex and innovative, but the article says that the simplicity means fewer mistakes and faster play with less thinking. And we all know that simplicity is ridiculed on BBI.
The myth that Chip runs this shadowy strategic offense has gone back to Oregon. People think the only way to score a lot of points is deception or doing something nobody has ever seen before.
In fact, perhaps the most important thing in that offense is stressing the fundamentals. Block on screens. Make the defense play the whole field. Act as if you expect to get the ball on every play. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x4k5L-04LSU
Really the only thing different that he does (in game) is that he doesn't care about conventional NFL wisdom. He's okay with going against he grain and being criticised. He'll go for it on 4th downs, he's not going to take the air out of the ball and run out the clock if he's up on the scoreboard. He's ultra-aggressive.
Pretty much all you need to know about Chip Kelly's personality is in this youtube clip.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QTiFRa70m48
He also places a high importance on great special teams play. I don't have the exact numbers from last season, but the Eagles special teams was a very productive unit. You could say he's turned that into an offensive opportunity too.
JOrthman : 8/24/2015 8:36 pm : link : reply
I don't think we've ever had a good preseason with TC, but we've had some good years during the regular season.
JOrthman
blueblood'11 : 6:58 am : link : reply
Intersting. I guess last year's 5 and 0 preseason doesn't count.
I judge a preseason by how our starters do against the opposing starters. Last year, we were 1-4. This year we are 0-2. That tend to be a better predictor than the overall record. When scrubs who will no longer be on a team are beating another group of scrubs, it really doesn't matter.
And as unfair as it may be injuries will play a part.
Colossal pricks who end up wearing out their welcome before they are able to achieve sustained success.
That's a huge difference between him and Walsh. Walsh was egotistical as a football mind, but as a person, he was polite and sometimes indifferent. I really can only thin k of one guy recently who might be considered a jerk who has had sustained success - Belicheck.
But Bill is also a bit of an introvert. Guys like ryan, Harbaugh and Kelly aren't, which gives them amples opportunities to put their foot in their mouths and piss people off.
That's not to say it will work, just to counter the notion that he's running the same plays we've seen from other teams..