Here it comes, maybe: New monthly poll from Investor's Business Daily/TechnoMetrica Market Intelligence shows this:
That actually looks pretty favorable for Rubio. Bush can't get any momentum, Fiorina will fade, and Carson would be a disaster for the Republicans
Link - (
New Window )
I think Jeb sucks, but cribbing that quote to suggest that his response to a mass shooting was simply to say "stuff happens" was unfair.
I understand his appeal but under finer scrutiny I don't think he can take it all.
Quote:
"Stuff happens" response to Oregon did not serve him well. Its Rubio's time to step up. We will see if he has it in him...
I think Jeb sucks, but cribbing that quote to suggest that his response to a mass shooting was simply to say "stuff happens" was unfair.
“But I resist the notion—and I had this challenge as governor—because we had—look, stuff happens, there’s always a crisis. And the impulse is always to do something and it’s not necessarily the right thing to do.”
Link - ( New Window )
I think comparing people on one side of the aisle who may have policy preferences that you disagree with, to complete maniacs, dimwits and billionaire clowns without a single clue about anything outside of real estate, golf courses, bad TV shows and young foreign models, is a bit unfair. You may not like Hilary Clinton but she's not a fanatic or a dummy and she has valid experience and knowledge about the world. There is something terrifying about trump and/or Carson leading any poll at any time. I almost feel badly for reasonable conservatives who have to choose between such an embarrassing list. How is it possible that there is literally no one more appealing and capable than that selection of characters?
Separately, the GOP has a real problem. Wealthy moderate Republicans I know here in NYC are terrified as they saw Bush or perhaps Kasich as their shot. Its like their party has deserted them. They tell me they wish Bloomberg would get in. Dems I know here are disillusioned with HRC personally but will hold their noses and vote for her unless Joe gets in.
Zero chance he's in this spot in three months so what's the point?
I'd hate to see another Clinton/Bush ticket - along with many others probably.
I usually vote for the Libertarian candidate out of principle, but haven't looked into their candidate yet.
I was torn between McClain and Obama, but at least felt that neither would be a disaster. Once Palin was chosen (probably not by McClain) thst choice was easy for me.
Overall I'm just depressed.
Zero chance he's in this spot in three months so what's the point?
I think Carson's popularity is a combination of his appeal to social conservatives (still a force even if not as strong as in the past), and also the same displeasure with establishment politicians that's helping fuel Trump's and Fiorina's poll numbers.
- Trump has backing from unions as they know he can work the jobs angle likely better any of the candidates, and also is not for illegal immigrants solely being awarded those jobs like the current administration.
- unions don't like Hillary, they like Biden
- Biden considering entering race in a few weeks.
Seems like the only way out our economic mess is growth, jobs, and smaller government. Saunders or establishment republicans and democrats will complete the destruction of our country. Hopefully our nation figures that out before it's too late. At some point it needs to be about Americans and not about corporate non-soverign interests, outsiders (illegals), etc.
Imo, the Republican candidate response to the shootings was sad. Look, you don't have to believe in major changes in gun laws, but is it too much to ask that registration laws be tightened, large ammo clips be outlawed, and other minor changes be considered? Even if that wouldn't have changed anything given the fact pattern in Oregon?
Btw, what kind of fuck-ups must the shooter's family have been to think he was sane enough to have 13 assorted firearms? They had to know at least how much he owned, and ought to at least have asked why. If they knew and did nothing, they should be arrested--and sued, of course.
If people think that the Trump, Carson, and Fiorina voters are going to say nevermind, we want an establishment candidate, you're nuts. First, I dont see these guys racing to drop out from a top 4 slot with no clear front runner other than Trump (who cant win -- see unfavorables). But if you count someones as sitting pretty once to neophytes drop out, it's Cruz. IMO he is the heir apparent to the Trump voter. And my guess is that a lot of the non-Trump/Carson vote is just looking for a winner after 8 years of Obama.
I don't know if Trump is a Christian or not, don't really care but his behavior and actions historically are not what I would call traditional Christian to be kind. Do believe want to believe that bad?
I do wonder if many of the Carson voters go to Trump and vice versa should one drop out. I think that would be the case.
The love of Rubio is because of those near the top, he is the biggest threat as seen by democrats, the most realistic or at least the one people can fathom happening at this point.
And you will never get the guns out of this country. I know too many people that live and breath this shit. I think its a little bizarre. I do enjoy shooting, served in the military, its fun. But there are plenty of people that just live and breath and talk about this stuff 24/7 like its fishing, boating, baseball, football etc..
I know the stats and the gun rights, 2nd amendment folks lose on all those arguments but it won't change anything.
Is there really anything that is going to prevent these things that can possibly be done? I am not sure. Canadians have plenty of guns, they just don't kill eachother as often.
The President is 100% right when he compares terrorism #s of deaths to gun violence deaths but if statistics drove change, like facts they don't seem to matter much.
I don't know if Trump is a Christian or not, don't really care but his behavior and actions historically are not what I would call traditional Christian to be kind. Do believe want to believe that bad?
I do wonder if many of the Carson voters go to Trump and vice versa should one drop out. I think that would be the case.
The love of Rubio is because of those near the top, he is the biggest threat as seen by democrats, the most realistic or at least the one people can fathom happening at this point.
no offense to some people but is it just possible that the base of that party aren't exactly highly evolved individuals? Like for instance, if there was a license to vote, they wouldn't pass the test ever in their lives.
Until we shrink the amount of candidates , We can not get an accurate read.
Please , those with less than 5% please drop out
Until we shrink the amount of candidates , We can not get an accurate read.
Please , those with less than 5% please drop out
There are serious candidates with <5% of the vote. And they'd post respectable poll numbers if the polls weren't skewed by flavors of the month.
Even provided a link.
Quote:
"Stuff happens" response to Oregon did not serve him well. Its Rubio's time to step up. We will see if he has it in him...
I think Jeb sucks, but cribbing that quote to suggest that his response to a mass shooting was simply to say "stuff happens" was unfair.
Unfair in that, that is exactly what he said? In context.... come on man he said it he meant it. Wagons were no meant to be driven only in circles.....
As far as the worst tin eared comment from Jeb, this is barely top 5. I still have not stopped being pissed about the free stuff BS! The ONLY people in America who get free stuff are already rich enough to pay for the lobbyists who procured their free stuff for them. Oh and since the USSC apparently thinks corporations are people, they comprise the vast majority of "people" who get free stuff....
Again, I don't like Jeb, I don't want another Bush (or Clinton) in the White House, but the reporting on this clearly mischaracterized what he was saying.
Come on, He was directly asked a question regarding if prayer would help stop these shootings prior to them happening, and this was his response:
You can't honestly sit here and claim that is taken out of context. I understand he is not really that callous and he was most likely buying time to get his thoughts together but yes he was talking specifically about the shootings. Where he really screws up is when he tried to salvage that quote but doubling down and saying:
“Things happen all the time,” Mr. Bush said. “Things. Is that better?”
THEN he attempts to use an analogy that is asinine, especially considering he did exactly what he was attempting to point out as being the wrong way to handle this:
Unfortunately for Jeb he did exactly that. He passed a law in 2000 called the "Preston de Ibern/McKenzie Merriam Residential Swimming Pool Safety Act.” which is named after a child who drowned in a pool without a fence.
He took a simple misspoken statement, and somehow turned that into one of the most bumbling silly ass attempts at spinning seen so far this cycle.
[quote] In comment 12522010 Kevin(formerly Tiki4Six) said:
Quote:
You make a post like this , this is by far the only Poll I have seen that doesn't have Trump still in the lead .., are the other dozen Polls wrong ? I don't think so..,
Until we shrink the amount of candidates , We can not get an accurate read.
Please , those with less than 5% please drop ou
There are serious candidates with <5% of the vo. And they'd post respectable poll numbers if the polls weren't skewed by flavors of the month. [/quot
Like who lol ?
Can someone explain Hillary Clinton? The one time that she tried to make her own name in politics she failed miserably and was chased out of Washington. Then she found Bill and blackmailed him into marriage (not my words his) and found new success as First Lady of Arkansas. Her marriage license is her resume.
I refuse to give either of those two credit for their family members success.
For the first 200 years of the republic, marriage was the main path by which women achieved prominence in politics. Hillary is part of a transitional generation in that regard. A lot of women I respect see Hillary ultimately eclipsing Bill as an important symbol of how far they have come. Whether that's a good reason to support her candidacy, I don't know. It seems to me that we could do a lot worse, and if there's a problem with HRC, it's not her resume.
As for the Bushes, the last one with a presidential resume was GHWB. I personally find their links to the Saudis more troubling than any of the skeletons in Hillary's closet; but my cynical side says that both sets of issues have been exaggerated by their opponents.
Bush has the same problem as Romney in 2012. He's thinking ahead to the general election and it's causing him to suffer now. He wants to come off as the "serious" candidate in a field filled with a bunch of non-serious people - but at the same time he's had to show he has personality and a sense of humor, which is essential in the era of social media.
Bush is clearly most comfortable when he can just focus on policy, which may have served him well in the 20th century, but today's candidates are asked to comment on trending stories in the news, be viciously combative towards their opponents, and do improv on late shows and sketch comedies.
Bush likely won't last too much longer - he's trying to be something he's not and it's leading to all of these missteps. What's scary is that if Donald Trump even remotely sounded competent on policy issues he would be a certain nominee for the republicans.