for display only
Big Blue Interactive The Corner Forum  
Back to the Corner

Archived Thread

20 Games deep into the ben mcadoo system...

Route 9 in LEH : 10/9/2015 9:40 pm
Just a bunch of questions....

Are you impressed by the system? Are you not impressed by this system? Did it live up to your expectations? Better? Eli? Do you think he's better here or in Gilbride's system?


Are you still excited to see more? is it a personal issue that you think needs fixed? What?

I'm looking at Donnell in particular and think he had a good year last year but most of his damage was done against the Redskins in that one Thursday night game. I don't think he's necessarily the worst thing in the world, but I'd like to see a better Tight end in this system (obviously) OBJ is going to get the attention so other guys need to make other teams pay for that and I'm anxiously awaiting the day that Cruz is on the field during game time. I also think that Randle is a very essential part to this 2015 team.

I also really like the Ereck Flowers draft choice. I just want to see this team go 11-5 and beat up on this division without Romo and ...Sam bradford. and fuck the Redskins. 2015 is about the Giants in the NFC East.
Pages: 1 2 <<Prev | Show All |
Anything that drastically decreases turnovers  
Jint 77 : 10/9/2015 11:15 pm : link
& improve efficiency, I'm for it. It's baby steps for me.

Like someone said earlier, For whatever reason, Gilbride's offense was torture to watch in the last couple of years.

This offense will start to pick up more yards and big plays as the season progresses.

It's only been 20 games but seems like a lifetime ago.
RE: I love it!  
TyFromQueens : 10/9/2015 11:41 pm : link
In comment 12537607 Big Rick in FL said:
Quote:
Far better then Gilbride. Just look at Elis numbers in those 20 games. Missing Odell for 4 of them, Rashad for 5, Cruz for 14. Yet Eli is completing 63% of his passes, has 5386 yards at 11.2 yards per completion with 37 TDs & 15 INTs. The crazy thing is 5 of those INTs were in 1 game. If you take the 49ers game out his stats are very close to Tom Brady/Aaron Rodgers level.

The Oline should keep getting better the more they play together. Which should mean the run game keeps improving & that also should help Eli out.

If the Offense continues to improve I just don't see how McAdoo doesn't take over the HC position when Coughlin decides to retire.



Better than our previous offense?

No offense.....but if you look at Gilbrides tenure with The Giants,we put up points,yards...and when it all worked together...wins and SB titles.

Gilbrides revamped run and shoot didn't fail this team. The terrible Oline play (lack of talent with a combination of injuries and players getting old) contributed to all of that.

I like our new offense. But until we put up the points,yards and success that our previous offense was able to achieve...(you get my point)

Remember in 2008 we had two 1000 yard RB's in this offense.

I love the McAdoo offense  
SHO'NUFF : 10/9/2015 11:50 pm : link
but I still think there is too much TC influence in it. Meaning, they stubbornly stick with the inside run when it obviously doesn't work. I can understand keeping teams honest with the running game, but still...
I really like the system because of the decrease in turnovers  
Sonic Youth : 10/10/2015 12:04 am : link
I'm curious to see what this offnese will look like as the O-line gels. Will we see more intermediate passes? Will the route tree depth stay the same? It's a legit mystery.

I do wish we had better RBs. Jennings is a c+ back, Vereen can only catch the ball, and Williams is pretty much a developmental project. I salivate at the thought of what Wilson could have done for this offense, but what's done is done.

One thing I miss are the big plays. We were truly blessed - we got to see our team win TWO superbowls with the core tenents of "knock the shit out of the team's QB and get him out of the game" and "either power run up their throat or throw the ball down the fucking field".... which is a really awesome way to see your team win a SB.

I've digressed, but I do like McAdoos offense and truly wonder what Eli's numbers would look like if he played in this offense his whole career as opposed to Gilbride's GO BIG OR GO HOME offense. Can't really complain though - we've got 2 rings (FUCK YES).

But I do think the perception of Eli is negatively skewed due to the risky offense. Whatever.... I root for the laundry, not the guy wearing it, but Eli is an exception and he's already 1A NYC athletes that I've seen growing up in my heart (hank is #1B)
p.s.  
Sonic Youth : 10/10/2015 12:05 am : link
in terms of the route tree and aggressiveness, I shouldn't have said it's a legit mystery since I'm sure there are many people on this board who can give me a greater understanding of the offense and how it will evolve as the quick-pass necessity dies down.


had a couple beers and typing too stream of consciousness.
Honestly  
Mr. Nickels : 10/10/2015 12:18 am : link
I am not impressed so far..

We should be lighting up the league
,...  
Route 9 in LEH : 10/10/2015 12:22 am : link
I think the one bad game vs the 49ers (5 interceptions) skewed towards the mediocre minds of how well Eli played in 2014, take that game away and he goes 30-9...

The first year with MacAdoo Eli threw the ball 601 times... Second closest was 2011 with 589.
RE: ,...  
Sonic Youth : 10/10/2015 12:28 am : link
In comment 12537910 Route 9 in LEH said:
Quote:
I think the one bad game vs the 49ers (5 interceptions) skewed towards the mediocre minds of how well Eli played in 2014, take that game away and he goes 30-9...

The first year with MacAdoo Eli threw the ball 601 times... Second closest was 2011 with 589.

It's very annoying to hear fans of other NFL teams repeat the same tired mantra of Eli turning the ball over too much, when he protected the ball well in 2014 and had a high % of his turnovers come in one game.

I guess it just shows that preconceived notions about players stick.

I think it was AnishPatel on this board that always said that he wished Eli got more time in a QB friendly system so that he could see where Eli's stats would end up, and so that Eli'd be looked down on more favorably in the history books. While rings matter most, I do wish I could see what Eli's stats would look like if he had played in a west coast, safer pass offense his whole career.

But holy shit, the East Coast Offense was fun from 2005-2012.... Play action, throw the ball down the field. I did LOVE it.
Not as impressive...  
Pink Ranger : 10/10/2015 1:25 am : link
As the 2008 offense when we ran over everyone at will.
Love it...  
ChaChing : 10/10/2015 1:25 am : link
I was a fan of KG's overall tho agreed it was time for a change. Ironically, I think OBJ & Cruz could have been the best tandem of WRs in that O, also think it played to Eli's strengths out the gate...but still it was time

Eli's short - mid area passing is improving slowly and if he really nails it down he will have all the elite stats fwiw, likely means we're playing well overall. Also think the biggest issue outside of the clock mgmt gaffes are simply execution (drops mainly). But we've helped the OL at all 5 spots getting the ball out quickly

One Q is i've always heard this was TCs run game. In some ways, esp short yardage & goaline it seems similar to the old O, tho iirc this yr we've run more out of somewhat obv power situations. If so I'd prefer more mix like from 3-4 WR sets (even the KG draw), esp with the threat from the improved short passing game. IMO might help the RZ% as well
One thing I noticed almost immediately  
BlackLight : 10/10/2015 1:35 am : link
last season was how confident Eli was in the new offense. Also, the major recurring criticism of Gilbride's system was its supposedly complexity. I honestly don't know what to think about that, other than to note the obvious - Eli's throwing fewer picks than he ever did before.
When the Gilbride offense had all cylinders clicking  
David in LA : 10/10/2015 1:38 am : link
it was a bitch to stop. 2011 NFC Championship game, Carlos Rogers was complaining how those option routes were impossible to stop. The most complete offense was the 2008 team. Prior to Plaxico's gunshot, we had a WR corps with aging stars and budding players. Plaxico wasn't having a great year, he was playing ok. Toomer was aging and I believe he suffered an injury late in that season. Steve Smith was starting to get some burn, and Manningham was a rookie who hasn't seen the field much that season. Domenik Hixon was returning on special teams, and filled in alright in Plax's place, but he did have a killer drop against the Eagles! Our offense had a dominant run game with that OL playing at such a high, cohesive level, with Jacobs and Ward serving as our two headed beast, with a dash of Bradshaw in there.

I don't think we've seen how great our passing attack (or offense overall) can be in this MacAdoo offense. I'd like to see a dominant running attack again, and what our passing game would look like with a legit #2 next to Beckham. If we can somehow get a two-way TE, a healthy Cruz (or a legit #2 through the draft or FA), this offense would be tough to stop.
McAdoo's biggest job when he came here was to help fix a broken QB.  
Devon : 10/10/2015 6:41 am : link
There are still some issues with play calling in some situations that he needs to work out and he's perhaps overcompensated for the OL with too much conservativeness, but I can't complain too much about any of that because he certainly has done that biggest job pretty well.

He's done it largely with a subpar set of surrounding talent, really only having one WR of real value (though he's of tremendous value, so far), an OL in transition, awful TEs, and a less than stellar run game (because of the RBs and the OL), too.
I think Eli is getting hit less  
JohnB : 10/10/2015 6:54 am : link
True?

I'm not saying we should go back to Gilbride...  
Jerz44 : 10/10/2015 7:31 am : link
but I was watching the 2011 Super Bowl this morning for fun while I cleaned the house. Our offense really hummed then more than it has since McAdoo took over I think. I like the McAdoo system but Id still like to see us run on wheels like we did in the past. I used to feel like every 3rd and 8 was gettable. I just dont have that sense before the ball is hiked now.
It's working but  
Spider 67 : 10/10/2015 8:04 am : link
With a very good line, Gilbride's offense was fantastic. Long passes to Burress or Nicks opened the running game and shorter passes to Hixon & Cruz. They had an exciting offense. Might have to go back to Tittle to find the last time they used the whole field. Without the weapons and more importantly, the protection, they were constantly in 3rd & long, therefore riskier passes and more interceptions.

McAdoo's offense is designed for the QB to get rid of the ball quickly. The combination of the short quick passes, better offensive line play and 4th quarter leads in every game are the reason Eli's interceptions are down this year.

I miss the consistent down field bombs to Burress and Nicks. Hopefully, if Cruz comes back and offensive line continues to play well, Eli will open it up again with OBJ!
20 Games Into McAdoo & Chill and He Gives You This Look...  
Vin R : 10/10/2015 8:13 am : link
Agree....  
Doomster : 10/10/2015 8:38 am : link
I like it
jtfuoco : 10/9/2015 10:25 pm : link : reply
But the give up play on 3rd and long drive me crazy. I mean 3rd and 12 is not that hard to get as I watch even the bad teams pull it off quite often


I'd also get rid of that short pass completion on third down, that doesn't get a first down....


The TC influence is still there....the offense puts up 16 points early in the game, and then goes into balance mode, trying to run the ball.....next thing you know we don't score until the fourth quarter, with a great individual play by Jennings....

You can't count on this defense yet.....two td's were called back on penalties, and their kicker missed a 30 yarder....turnovers and penalties have helped this defense quite a bit.....each week, they look better, but they aren't there yet....It's imperative that this offense continues to score, making the opposing offenses one dimensional, and easier to defend....
McAdoo  
Shadow : 10/10/2015 8:45 am : link
Will be responsible for getting Eli in the Hall of Fame.
Also years latter he will be described as clutch performer not
turnover machine.
4 or 5 stay building years  
Shadow : 10/10/2015 8:50 am : link
And Eli will be mentioned as good as Peyton and better than Brady
Brady will always be remembered by the cheating scandals.
And that Eli beat him twice.
Stat  
Shadow : 10/10/2015 8:52 am : link
Stat not stay
IF we're better in the Red Zone now  
SwirlingEddie : 10/10/2015 8:55 am : link
and I think we are, then I'm all in favor of it.
Yes..  
Big Blue '56 : 10/10/2015 9:10 am : link
If you're expecting Green Bay results then you might be somewhat disappointed..I'm not..

We've never seen Cruz and OBJ on the field together, either
it's generally good  
Chaka : 10/10/2015 9:14 am : link
but his playcalling at end of games has clearly sucked

and this team has the 2nd most no huddles in the league behind philly. all the snark about chip kelly exhausting his own defense might come back to bite us here

RE: I don't know how anybody cannot be impressed.  
AnishPatel : 10/10/2015 9:17 am : link
In comment 12537535 robbieballs2003 said:
Quote:
He has made chicken shit soup out of shit. He has had Eli playing his best statistical football. Our OL is in a rebuild. We are having success with a rookie LT, a second year player at center, a retread RT, etc. Yes, we are hoping for more but we have to be realistic too. I think if everything stays intact then we can see a top offensive unit next year.


I agree, I love what I see thus far. If we had better talent, I am sure we would be getting even better production out of our offense. I love the fact that eli is putting up good numbers.

Makes me wonder if we ran a system like this, what would the option of Eli be. High Qb rating, good amount of TDs, and barely any Ints. Hopefully we can continue this system until Eli retires and get better personnel to make our offense even more productive.
Good so far  
Patrick77 : 10/10/2015 11:00 am : link
I am impressed with what he is doing. The Giants are finally playing a style of offense to hide their weaknesses and play to some of their strengths. The offense can still improve but we are getting good results with a banged up offensive line that is far from great when healthy, no Cruz, and a second and third WR group that routinely disappear for games at a time. The TE position is filled with borderline NFL roster players and the running backs as a group are great, as individuals each has pretty big shortcomings.

With that said, when Gilbride had the pieces he needed and the offense was clicking there was no other offense I would want to the Giants running. At one point the Giants imposed their will on teams on the ground and lit them up with big plays whenever the opportunity presented itself. Gilbride's offense unfortunately required a good offensive line, a ballsy QB, and receivers smarter and harder working than the average WR out there. Near the end the Giants had none of the pieces to run that offense.

This offense is easier to find pieces for and hides the fact the Giants don't have the blocking needed to be a deep ball hard running offense.
Still a work in progress  
The Tempest : 10/10/2015 11:31 am : link
When everyone heard we picked up an offensive coordinator from Green Bay, people saw a 30 point average per game explosive high scoring offense.

We still don't have that
RE: I think Eli is getting hit less  
BlueLou : 10/10/2015 11:32 am : link
In comment 12538067 JohnB said:
Quote:
True?


True, and it may be the best point about McAdoo's system. One beat or national guy (forget who) had his assistant put a stopwatch on all of Eli's attempts vs Buffalo and the average time of release was 1.8 sec!.

So that really takes the pressure off the OL to maintain pass blocks, and where we have a rook at OLT and a mediocre journeyman at ORT, but we haven't been hurt by that much.

Eli obviously can handle the fast reads, the no huddle, etc, and he obviously gets the principle - as Joe Montana once called it, about his role in Walsh's modified WCO - of getting the ball into other people's hands.

This is great for Eli, and will prolly extend his career. I was worried after 2011, and especially after that 9ers game, how much more of a pounding Eli could (or would) take. Gilbride's O was murder that way, there were a lot of passing routes that took time to develop.

The flip side, of course, is that Eli gets fewer chances to throw deep - which is one of his strengths, he throws a lovely deep ball from one sideline to the other...
The Gilbride system  
Shadow : 10/10/2015 11:48 am : link
Destroyed some of the best Defenses in this Era.
When protected and the WR was on the same read
Eli would cut through teams like a surgeon.
May have been the hardest offense in the history of the
League to stop.
This offense can be stopped.
RE: The Gilbride system  
Ace718 : 10/10/2015 11:56 am : link
In comment 12538315 Shadow said:
Quote:
Destroyed some of the best Defenses in this Era.
When protected and the WR was on the same read
Eli would cut through teams like a surgeon.
May have been the hardest offense in the history of the
League to stop.
This offense can be stopped.


Lots of ifs and whens were required to make that system work.
An important stat to me  
mrvax : 10/10/2015 12:03 pm : link
is 3rd down conversions and conversions in general.
....  
Route 9 in LEH : 10/10/2015 12:05 pm : link
BlueLou : 11:32 am said:
Quote:

Quote:
on all of Eli's attempts vs Buffalo and the average time of release was 1.8 sec!


Didn't know this! Very cool.

I just wish the running game was a little bit better, get back Cruz and get some God damn pressure on the oppsing QB and we'll be unstoppable.



(and get rid of Donnell, hehe)
RE: An important stat to me  
Spider 67 : 10/10/2015 12:28 pm : link
In comment 12538330 mrvax said:
Quote:
is 3rd down conversions and conversions in general.

3rd down conversion rates reflect 1st and 2nd down efficiency. Teams averaging 7-9 yards on first and 2nd down have much better 3rd down conversion rates than teams than teams that gain little or loose yards on 1st and 2nd down. It's a lot easier to get a first down with 3rd & 2 than it is 3rd & 12.
....  
Route 9 in LEH : 10/10/2015 12:34 pm : link
Imagine if David Wilson was still playing for the Giants in this system ...
RE: The Gilbride system  
Vanzetti : 10/10/2015 12:37 pm : link
In comment 12538315 Shadow said:
Quote:
Destroyed some of the best Defenses in this Era.
When protected and the WR was on the same read
Eli would cut through teams like a surgeon.
May have been the hardest offense in the history of the
League to stop.
This offense can be stopped.


The key phrase in your post "when protected." Most systems can work if the QB has all day to throw. When the other team applied pressure, Coughlin/Gilbride's system led to INTs and miscues.

It also required the Giants to establish a running game to really work well. When the Giants couldn't run, the offense could not sustain drives.

The old system was 1990s football. Giants are much better off with McAdoo--and are going to get better as McAdoo gets more experience. The guy is still incredibly young for an OC.
ha fuck  
Route 9 in LEH : 10/10/2015 12:38 pm : link
in my OP

personnel issue***
How can you not be impressed?  
UConn4523 : 10/10/2015 12:50 pm : link
those comparing to 2008, please compare the rosters as well.

New offense with far less pieces that's somehow making far less mistakes and finding its groove. I love Mcadoo.
Yes  
TMS : 10/10/2015 12:58 pm : link
it is moving the chains and keeping ELI upright for now. Should only improve as they play more together.
People are talking about lighting up the league  
Big Rick in FL : 10/10/2015 1:53 pm : link
Yet they forget we are without our Pro Bowl caliber slot WR who is a match up nightmare & our starting LT. Also missed numerous starters last year. If Cruz comes back & is anywhere near the player he was I think they are going to be a top 3 offense in the league.

Also we have new players in Flowers, Newhouse, Vereen & Harris still learning the offense. Hopefully Harris can build off of what he did last week. If he continues to play like that & Randle does the same it will really open things up for Odell.
RE: Who cares if he throws for 200 yards on 35 passes?  
HomerJones45 : 10/10/2015 2:26 pm : link
In comment 12537728 Big Rick in FL said:
Quote:
Although it's completely wrong. He is averaging 11.2 yards a completion with McAdoo coaching the offense. Which is right around his career average.

Tom Brady & Joe Montana are hall of famers with almost exactly the same yards per completion. Brady averages 11.7 yards per completion for his career & Montana averaged 11.3.

Would you rather have him throw 30 TDs & 14 INTs with a 11.2 yard average or 18 TDs & 27 INTs with a 12 yard average?
He was averaging over 12 yards a completion the last 3 years with the old offense. You are also jiggling the numbers since this season he is averaging under 11 yards a completion (his yards per attempt is back to his early career numbers even completing 6 or 7% more passes passes. After midseason last year, he started throwing down the field to Beckham.

Montana played in a different era before every rule changed to benefit the passing game. Brady is completing 75% of his passes (btw Gronk is averaging 19 yards a catch- we need three completions to go 19 yards) and is over 8 yards an attempt.

As I said, I think McAdoo is still learning, falls in love with those ultra-short routes and wastes a weapon like Beckham on 3 yard passes. McAdoo's system will take 7 yard completions on 3rd and 10. So, great, it's a completion and it's 7 yards but who gives a shit. Certainly not the defense.

Now it may be that he is not confident in the pass blocking and so limits his options. We will see as the year goes along if he opens it up. Coughlin has said publicly that the ball needs to go down the field more.
Stats, Stats, Stats  
Spider 67 : 10/10/2015 3:10 pm : link
The only one that's important is points for and points against after each game. Low # of sacks indicates great O line right? Or does it mean the QB is getting rid of the ball quicker? Or does it mean the QB scrambles well and avoids sacks? Or does it mean the offense has a lot of 3 and outs and isn't on the field much.This style offense is designed to work with a weak O line.

Manning's int's were up because the O line was crap, therefore the running game wasn't there and he had to throw long passes every 3rd down with little or no protection. McAdoo's style offense works with the shorter passes. If the line can continue to improve,and the can find a good all round TE (which is needed for McAdoo's style too) I hope the long passes come back. Sure, they'll be a few interceptions, but that's part of it. A balanced offense is what they need. Whether it's 4-6 yd passes or 4-6 yd runs and medium and deep passed, defenses all have areas that can be exploited. But it all starts with the front 5 or 6.
Homer  
Big Rick in FL : 10/10/2015 4:38 pm : link
Sorry, but you are terrible at math. If you think he needs 3 completions to go 19 yards. This year he is averaging 10.8 yards per completion. Brady is averaging 0.8 more yards per completion this year.

The 11.2 yard average was between last year & this year. He averaged 11.6 yards per completion last year & 10.8 this year. If you add those numbers together & divide them by 2 you get 11.2.

We are also 9th in the league in points per game so they must be doing something right. I don't know how anybody can complain about that especially without our starting WR & LT. We've also went up against a pretty good Cowboys & Skins defense & the #1 or 2 defense in the league.
Like I said earlier  
Big Rick in FL : 10/10/2015 4:53 pm : link
Nobody would have a problem with Rodgers yards a completion on the year at 11.2. Yet 10.8 this year & 11.2 under McAdoo is a problem.

Which is better?

2012 & 2013 he played 36 games. He had 44 TDs & 42 INTs while averaging 12.15 yards per completion.

2014 & 2015 he's played 20 games under McAdoo. He has 37 TDs & 15 INTs while averaging 11.2 yards per completion.

Is this really even a debate? Less then a yard difference per completion & only 7 less TDs in 16 less games.

People on here are so weird. They will literally find anything to bitch about. Throws INTs & they bitch about Eli. Stops throwing INTs & they bitch about it. Goes from throwing 1.16 INTs per game to 0.75 & fans are still complaining.
I'm not sure how anyone could complain.  
drkenneth : 10/10/2015 5:02 pm : link
Gilbride/TC was finicky, outdated, and completely unnecessary given today's NFL rules. Don't get me wrong, when it worked, it worked, but led to inconsistent play (I think Fewell's system in that way was similar- horrible pairing)

If things didn't go their way, they basically were fucked.

We haven't seen the best of this offense yet. Arrow is up on O & D.
Homer  
crick n NC : 10/10/2015 5:54 pm : link
is pro coach to the extreme. When Gilbride left his opinion is the faults on offense were 100% on the players, he has the same opinion with Fewell. He has been downplaying spagnualo's early season success as long as any success McAdoo has had. As with most things in life the reason(s) for problems come from multiple sources. I honestly don't think Gilbride was a problem, there was a talent problem. As with Fewell, i think his time was up here and Spagnualo has been a breath of fresh air to the players.
'as well'  
crick n NC : 10/10/2015 5:55 pm : link
.
McAdoo vs Gilbride  
Oliver : 10/10/2015 9:18 pm : link
Not yet impressed with McAdoo. It is a work in progress. The only stat that really matters is the W stat. I have not seen every game, but I have seen 2 top WRs sent to the sidelines. Defenses study game films also. Notice the corners coming closer and charging faster. Notice the shorter drives. Yes Eli gets the ball out fast- you would too if you were seeing Dlines and LBs clawing at your throat. Sending our star wide outs on flat passes is going to result in harder hits by stronger hitters. Eli is an impressive QB when on his game and with a good game plan, but he cannot run fast and is not elusive. This system requires a mobile QB. Can it develop? Sure, almost any system can develop. Even Rod Rust had his moments. I agree with the commenters who posted about the Gilbride-Eli tandem when they were in sync with each other and the Giants drafted or signed some good horses up front. The kids show promise and if they develop and if the offense can sustain drives and score TDs, it may be something.If not, well it may wind up to be a bunch of out of the playoffs seasons. I am willing to have an open mind, but what I am seeing is going to lead to injured stars and passing plays that gain less than running plays.
RE: I love the McAdoo offense  
Coach Mason : 10/10/2015 10:23 pm : link
In comment 12537833 SHO'NUFF said:
Quote:
but I still think there is too much TC influence in it. Meaning, they stubbornly stick with the inside run when it obviously doesn't work. I can understand keeping teams honest with the running game, but still...


Too much of read option stuff with the WRs could be stunting OBJs growth.
Amish Patel  
AP in Halfmoon : 10/10/2015 10:48 pm : link
Get back to me when this system is responsible for 2 Super Bowl wins.
RE: Amish Patel  
Coach Mason : 10/10/2015 11:43 pm : link
In comment 12539207 AP in Halfmoon said:
Quote:
Get back to me when this system is responsible for 2 Super Bowl wins.


We won more on the strength of the defense than the offense.

And yes when the old O system had everytng line up perfectly it was great but this system doesnt require so many things to line up just right to function well.
Pages: 1 2 <<Prev | Show All |
Back to the Corner