Seems pretty cut and dried to me. He was negligent in giving her a hug and therefore the father (or his homeowner's insurance most likely, right?) must pay her $127,000.
The injuries, losses and harms to the plaintiff were caused by the negligence and carelessness of the minor defendant in that a reasonable eight years old under those circumstances would know or should have known that a forceful greeting such as the one delivered by the defendant to the plaintiff could cause the harms and losses suffered by the plaintiff,” the lawsuit claims
Right or wrong, this shit right here is why people think lawyers are the scum of the fucking earth. The fact that someone actually took the time to write this garbage, knowing full well that it's all because an 8-year-old boy was happy to see his aunt on his birthday, is fucking despicable. What kind of shitstain subhuman would take this case?
I hope this wretched bitch slips on dog shit leaving her next dinner party and breaks her fucking hip. Maybe she can slap a lawsuit on the dog if she ever finds it.
that the mom's life insurance policy kicked in and aunite wasn't given a piece of the pie. Might just be the ironic twist to the horse-a-doovers plate she couldn't/wasn't allowed to hold.
where posters who were trial lawyers said that while in the federal court system there really is the possibility of sanctions for filing a frivolous law suit (spurious litigation?) it is much more difficult in state courts. This would seem to be a case in point.
jailed for assault on a defenseless lady? If this little shit doesn't get charged and wins this trial, you know he's going to continue on his heinous ways of getting overly excited about his relatives and showing them such affection. Think about all of the potential future victims!
jailed for assault on a defenseless lady? If this little shit doesn't get charged and wins this trial, you know he's going to continue on his heinous ways of getting overly excited about his relatives and showing them such affection. Think about all of the potential future victims!
Forget that, I'm trying to see if I can get my nephew to give me a running hug, to see if I fall on my water polo shoulder and ring up the big bucks.
However, after seeing the Mother's funeral announcement, I'm betting she's trying to get the insurance money away from the (possibly) abusive widower.
Highly unlikely. If that were the case wouldn't she be bring action for custody or some sort of conservatorship with respect to the insurance proceeds for the child's benefit?
RE: RE: Am I the only one, who wants to see this little punk... Â
jailed for assault on a defenseless lady? If this little shit doesn't get charged and wins this trial, you know he's going to continue on his heinous ways of getting overly excited about his relatives and showing them such affection. Think about all of the potential future victims!
Forget that, I'm trying to see if I can get my nephew to give me a running hug, to see if I fall on my water polo shoulder and ring up the big bucks.
Make sure it's one of your portly nephews. I bet that will make it almost a slam dunk that you'll get your big payout. And really, who does it hurt other than the home insurance company?
RE: apparently it never occurred to her to hold that hors d'eurve plate Â
However, after seeing the Mother's funeral announcement, I'm betting she's trying to get the insurance money away from the (possibly) abusive widower.
Highly unlikely. If that were the case wouldn't she be bring action for custody or some sort of conservatorship with respect to the insurance proceeds for the child's benefit?
What if he was only abusive to the Mother and there's no evidence he did anything to the kid?
However, after seeing the Mother's funeral announcement, I'm betting she's trying to get the insurance money away from the (possibly) abusive widower.
Highly unlikely. If that were the case wouldn't she be bring action for custody or some sort of conservatorship with respect to the insurance proceeds for the child's benefit?
What if he was only abusive to the Mother and there's no evidence he did anything to the kid?
Irrelevant. If she wins she gets to do anything with the proceeds she wishes, including spending it on herself. If she was out to protect the child she could actually strengthen her case by litigating to put the money in a trust or conservatorship to benefit the child.
One said the jury took all of 25 minutes to reach a verdict. My comment- That's probably as long as it took them to go through a plate of hors d'oeuvres.
Second was that all the women named Jennifer Connell are busy changing their names so they won't be asked when they meet people "Are YOU the Jennifer Connell that...."
it's all over for the defendant once a jury hears emotional testimony like this:
Well then.
“I live in Manhattan in a third-floor walk-up so it has been very difficult,” she said. “And we all know how crowded it is in Manhattan.”
And then there is the damage the injury has done to Connell’s social life.
“I was at a party recently, and it was difficult to hold my hors d’oeuvre plate,” she said.
Apparently she walks on her hands up to her third-floor walkup?
Imagine rich in houston's law suit payout, based only on the pain and suffering!
I can't imagine the horror of struggling to hold my hors d’oeuvre plate.
it was jumbo shrimp. she can't lift those with a bum wrist.
Right or wrong, this shit right here is why people think lawyers are the scum of the fucking earth. The fact that someone actually took the time to write this garbage, knowing full well that it's all because an 8-year-old boy was happy to see his aunt on his birthday, is fucking despicable. What kind of shitstain subhuman would take this case?
I hope this wretched bitch slips on dog shit leaving her next dinner party and breaks her fucking hip. Maybe she can slap a lawsuit on the dog if she ever finds it.
Anyone who's been to a nice party knows the hors d'oeuvres are typically the best part of the meal. I really don't see the issue with her complaint.
oh, and balance her champagne glass on her head? C'mon man.
it seems like there are a lot of issues in this family.
Its a shame this kid is seemingly being used as a pawn.
Link - ( New Window )
Crazy but not bad looking at all. I'll allow them to go through this craziness on their own.
Crazy but not bad looking at all. I'll allow them to go through this craziness on their own.
I'd do her.
Forget that, I'm trying to see if I can get my nephew to give me a running hug, to see if I fall on my water polo shoulder and ring up the big bucks.
So she couldn't continue to give handjobs at the office parties?
Highly unlikely. If that were the case wouldn't she be bring action for custody or some sort of conservatorship with respect to the insurance proceeds for the child's benefit?
Quote:
jailed for assault on a defenseless lady? If this little shit doesn't get charged and wins this trial, you know he's going to continue on his heinous ways of getting overly excited about his relatives and showing them such affection. Think about all of the potential future victims!
Forget that, I'm trying to see if I can get my nephew to give me a running hug, to see if I fall on my water polo shoulder and ring up the big bucks.
Make sure it's one of your portly nephews. I bet that will make it almost a slam dunk that you'll get your big payout. And really, who does it hurt other than the home insurance company?
Probably because she's not a farmer. Cretin.
Quote:
However, after seeing the Mother's funeral announcement, I'm betting she's trying to get the insurance money away from the (possibly) abusive widower.
Highly unlikely. If that were the case wouldn't she be bring action for custody or some sort of conservatorship with respect to the insurance proceeds for the child's benefit?
What if he was only abusive to the Mother and there's no evidence he did anything to the kid?
Ahh, c'mon. The kid was just a little too excited.
Quote:
In comment 12547164 Peter in Atl said:
Quote:
However, after seeing the Mother's funeral announcement, I'm betting she's trying to get the insurance money away from the (possibly) abusive widower.
Highly unlikely. If that were the case wouldn't she be bring action for custody or some sort of conservatorship with respect to the insurance proceeds for the child's benefit?
What if he was only abusive to the Mother and there's no evidence he did anything to the kid?
Irrelevant. If she wins she gets to do anything with the proceeds she wishes, including spending it on herself. If she was out to protect the child she could actually strengthen her case by litigating to put the money in a trust or conservatorship to benefit the child.
Link - ( New Window )
Second was that all the women named Jennifer Connell are busy changing their names so they won't be asked when they meet people "Are YOU the Jennifer Connell that...."
Why should it be any different for the family kid?
Regardless, woman or not, she needs a nice solid slap upside the head...
“it was difficult to hold my hors d’oeuvre plate"
Gimme a GD break...