Are there any BBI members still here from the 2000 season?

what he says, not what he does. In layman terms that kind of behavior is called hypocrisy. Put up or shut up, your choice.

For the record, Nature is not a theory. That is why no one, including myself, can dispute the findings.

We should just leave him alone with his numbers.

Though I bet they wish they had selected an invite only model...

the Time Cube guy seem well-adjusted.

In comment 12614647 TDexperiment said:

Quote:

Whatever happened to BBWC?

Do you want to Spam them too?

And would Bennett have had a great career if not for the hamstring injury?

you'd just ignore the 9:23am post. I put up.

Now it is your turn to shut up.

Let me guess, the next post has a 100% chance of saying "FatMan needs to put up" and will ignore that I have.

Am I right?

sparing with you guys. I will take note of the names in this post so that if anyone of you submit your keyword search results by December 23, 2015, and mention this thread for verification then you will be qualified for one of the NYG print sets that I have set aside for football fans. Additional details will be posted next week at the TD web site.

Those of you that voted for the NY Giants back in the day (including the FatMan) should take pride of your past efforts to support your team in this historic research. Best wishes...

research?

Yes. This guy is doing things we've never seen reputable scientists do before.

Discuss.

1) He isn't fat.

2) There is no 9:23 post. One presumes he means 9:32, but saying it was 9:23 proves that it exists.

histrionic.

I am an 03/05 guy who came here when I couldnt get enough discussion about the whole Plaxico Burress free agency saga.

After the infamous hacking earlier this year I had to get a new handle.

In comment 12614638 GMenLTS said:

Quote:

.

I share this feeling of confusion -- WTF happened?

In comment 12614718 FatMan in Charlotte said:

Quote:

Yes. This guy is doing things we've never seen reputable scientists do before. Discuss.

Only history can distinguish between the innovators and the lunatics. -Timothy Croon

is still disingenuous 15 years later.

my 11:40am correctly references the 9:32, not the 9:23 to give the 411.

Found this place via Mistress of the Meadowlands (MOTM) from another site. I remember Pete's Corner and that old format.

sometime in mid to late 90s

Can you still put your money where your mouth is?

However, you then have to prove that it's a mouth, and that it's your mouth. And that it's your money. And that proofs work.

It's all very scientific.

That was it. I posted there as well.

An unscientific scientific explanation, why posters can't help themselves for clicking on topics they don't like -

"As the thought experiment illustrates, we have the ability to choose because we do not have the option to not choose in order to exist."

or so

... for me also. Don't you get an informal "sequence" number when you join - or want to start a thread in Corner Forum? If it still works that way (or ever did) that info is private though, anyway.

but lurked since '98

In comment 12614671 Moondawg said:

Quote:

In comment 12614441 Cam in MO said: Quote: In comment 12614436 Moondawg said: Quote: In comment 12614402 Deej said: Quote: I think it was 1999, but that was a rough time for me. I was caught in a landslide with no escape from reality. Lol. Just look up to the skies and see!

He's just a poor boy, He needs no sympathy

Billboard Metrics is the coming thing regarding superdeterministic reality science....DUH!

June 6, 1999. I know the date because the night before I met Tiki in a bar after the 4 point play. Tiki was very candid about the Kent Graham/Kerry Collis controversy. When I told DaveinBMNY told me about this site and suggested I post about my encoubter. I've been posting ever since.

In comment 12614311 AP in Halfmoon said:

Quote:

.

Still no where close the views that thread labeled "High school kids having sex" got a few months back haha

I remember Eric's letters to the editor which I read often but only sent in a few myself and I wasn't really active until Pete's Corner.

In comment 12615584 steve in ky said:

Quote:

I remember Eric's letters to the editor which I read often but only sent in a few myself and I wasn't really active until Pete's Corner.

i just read Letters and did not jump in until Pete's Corner was created.

I have no idea who the hell this guy is despite being plenty active on Pete's Corner in 1999.

The pseudoscience certainly does bring to mind MiS, though.

In comment 12615606 Big Al said:

Quote:

In comment 12615584 steve in ky said: Quote: I remember Eric's letters to the editor which I read often but only sent in a few myself and I wasn't really active until Pete's Corner. i just read Letters and did not jump in until Pete's Corner was created.

LOL, yeah the internet was still kind of new to and me other than looking up information the whole sending in a letter was kind of strange to me for some reason. I think I sent in maybe three or four and quit. For whatever reason Pete's corner was right up my alley and I felt more comfortable getting more involved posting.

In comment 12615620 Greg from LI said:

Quote:

I have no idea who the hell this guy is despite being plenty active on Pete's Corner in 1999. The pseudoscience certainly does bring to mind MiS, though.

I vaguely remember the billboard stuff but not at all anything about this guy. I think I remember MIS.

Anyone who posted back then should remember him. Just about anyone who posted back then had multiple unnecessary run-ins with him.

You have been here long enough to know Big Al's sense of humor.

I thought it might be sarcasm, but wasn't 100%. Then I was trying to remember of he was one of the posters who sort of took MiS under their wing, so to speak.

I created the program for fans to vote, not for me to help you guys to vote. That was the fans responsibility, not mine. The log files from this activity showed me where these votes came from which allowed me to "lurk".

As I recall, FatMan was one off the early supporters of voting for the Giants until the Bills fans started to give you guys a run for it. That's when FatMan turn against it and like a canker sore poisoned the taste of fan support for the Giants SB XXXV bid. The rest as they say is history.

If you want to know why you guys failed that year, you have the FatMan and his following to thank.

NY Giants Fans Concede Legacy For Super Bowl XXXV - ( New Window )

That kind of full-blown psychosis is hard to forget.

They solicit and they do it hard. There is no peer review; there's no peer anything wrt criticism. It's a good way to bank your papers I guess and they try to make you feel good by telling you the number of people who happened to have clicked on your name. But there's not much more significance to their stats than that. Judging from my inbox, it's borderline spam.

a debt of gratitude. By actively sabotaging NY Giants fan support that year, he helped quieted fan skepticism that since I was a Giants fan I would rig the votes in the Giants favor. For you guys this was a competition for me this was an experiment to see:

"Can destiny be tempted by having history repeat itself for a third time, and if so, for which NFL team?"

So I never thank the FatMan for doing me this favor. I do now.
Rams Fans showed they're #1 - ( New Window )

You do not have a clue as to what you are talking about. Nobel Laurettes and many of the world's PhDs in science have profiles and their peer-reviewed papers there for review.

You are out of your league Bill, don't criticize what you do not understand.

I never was a supporter of TemptDestiny in any form.

All I remember is the board being spammed constantly with calls to vote and the stupid "GO FOR IT" tagline, which you apparently still do today.

And to find out the whole time it was to promote shitty artwork by Manuel Morales.

I remember that nonsense. I honestly can't believe that it's back.

Quote:

Rams Fans showed they're #1 Congratulations to the #1 Rams fans and winner of the 3rd Tempt Destiny!™ billboard rights. However, due to the Rams playoff loss, the 3rd Tempt Destiny™ billboard was not created for SB XXXV

Another year the billboard shit didn't work. So your experiment worked what 2 out of 15 times?

mudbear's recollections had a better hit percentage.

You should take credit for your work of which I am grateful for. Way to go big guy!

In comment 12616043 TDexperiment said:

Quote:

You do not have a clue as to what you are talking about. Nobel Laurettes and many of the world's PhDs in science have profiles and their peer-reviewed papers there for review. You are out of your league Bill, don't criticize what you do not understand.

People have their papers listed there and it's a good way to request reprints. There is no peer review and there is no peer criticism. There is a pseudo ranking based on hits and citations (going forward). In and of itself, Resarch Gate is meaningless. LinkedIn with less cv and more bibliography and no relationship to job openings.

I've done is to point out repeatedly the lack of science and the lack of following experimental protocol in this whole farce.

All in the name of shitty art.

Vote for the Giants and I'll give you one of these free!

as what Brian Williams was to combat veterans.