If you actually read what this was all about the perhaps you would have not said, "Another year the billboard shit didn't work. So your experiment worked what 2 out of 15 times?"
I realized this is out of your league for even a five year old can understand that you cannot choose what cannot be chosen. In other words, a fan cannot support his team's Super Bowl quest (act) if they do not go to the big game (potential). The act of selection is a dichotomy in that BOTH elements (act+potential) need to simultaneously exist for either to exist. This is what the Tempt Destiny experiment showed time and time again (see link).
"Resarch Gate is meaningless" to those who do not know its value and how to use it to share research among the world's scientific community. Become a researcher, publish your findings, and then join the community to see how this all works. Once again, you are out of your league Bill and should refrain from commenting about what you do not know.
do you ever get laughed at when you've wasted a large portion of time on an "experiment" where the act and potential have no relation to one another?
You've proven one thing - that random chance exists - but that's already been proven.
Your arrogance comes off as Matt in Syracuse, but you are a shitty painter named Manuel Morales, not a disgraced, fired Ithaca College professor named Matt Frank.
Used to log onto a website called "big blue wrecking crew" ended up here eventually (remember Pete's corner) but rarely if ever posted and it would have been under a long-forgotten handle.
Picked up aquidneck when I moved to the island in 2006.
do you ever get laughed at when you've wasted a large portion of time on an "experiment" where the act and potential have no relation to one another?
You've proven one thing - that random chance exists - but that's already been proven.
Your arrogance comes off as Matt in Syracuse, but you are a shitty painter named Manuel Morales, not a disgraced, fired Ithaca College professor named Matt Frank.
I guess that is why you bailed on your team when the going got too much for to continue to vote for the Giants. What a guy! Again, I thank you.
"Let me boil it down to you simply - your "experiment" has proved nothing. To put it more broadly, it has proved, zilch, nada, zero, squadoosh."
Since you do not know what omitted-variable bias means to an experiment, allow me to clue you in. It means your experiment is BOGUS because you failed to include the variables that caused the effects observed in the experiment, e.g., the scientific method of using false-positive data.
In 2012, CERN claimed they found the elusive Higgs boson they had been looking for the past 50 years. When I applied my findings to particle physics I found that by using the scientific method they had made an EPIC omission error. They have no idea which selection event caused the particle collision which caused the product decay they used as evidence for their discovery. The multibillion dollar Large Hadron Collider was solely built to detect effects, not the cause of the effects detected - BIG MISTAKE! (see peer-reviewed "Assumed Higgs" article)
In January of this year a CERN physicist confirmed my findings.
And to think, this all came about by supporting the NY Giants!
I guess that is why you bailed on your team when the going got too much for to continue to vote for the Giants. What a guy! Again, I thank you.
"Let me boil it down to you simply - your "experiment" has proved nothing. To put it more broadly, it has proved, zilch, nada, zero, squadoosh."
Since you do not know what omitted-variable bias means to an experiment, allow me to clue you in. It means your experiment is BOGUS because you failed to include the variables that caused the effects observed in the experiment, e.g., the scientific method of using false-positive data.
In 2012, CERN claimed they found the elusive Higgs boson they had been looking for the past 50 years. When I applied my findings to particle physics I found that by using the scientific method they had made an EPIC omission error. They have no idea which selection event caused the particle collision which caused the product decay they used as evidence for their discovery. The multibillion dollar Large Hadron Collider was solely built to detect effects, not the cause of the effects detected - BIG MISTAKE! (see peer-reviewed "Assumed Higgs" article)
In January of this year a CERN physicist confirmed my findings.
And to think, this all came about by supporting the NY Giants! Assumed Higgs Boson Discovery Proved Einstein Right - ( New Window )
this guy is like a pit bull dog. You see how many times in that link he's referenced the TemptDestiny research and the supposed uncovering of the Higgs Boson hoax?
We really are dealing with a mentally ill person.
I do think Terrance Howard and this guy should match wits.
JohnC, you crack me up. My eyes are still watering. Indeed seeing the uneducated comments being made are indeed funny. To realize that I am trying to give these guys an opportunity to win officially license NFL LE prints of the NYG Super Bowl commemorative series, and then see their response to this gift is bewildering to say the least.
Who are these people? Don't answer, there actions speaks loud enough.
is that people are still answering the OP with when they first joined. As if the OP actually gives a damn other than to peddle his shit site and experiment.
Seriously, are people not reading the thread before they post? Talk about not having situational awareness.
is that people are still answering the OP with when they first joined. As if the OP actually gives a damn other than to peddle his shit site and experiment.
Seriously, are people not reading the thread before they post? Talk about not having situational awareness.
When given the oppurtunity to brag about how long they've been here, some posters can't help themselves. They think it means something I guess...
beats the people who have the overwhelming need to flaunt their
just don't read the thread and respond to the OP. Look at the Duek Johnson slob job's thread about the robbery. Clearly it's one of our most dedicated dupe-trolls, but people are hilariously offering heartfelt advice in the midst of him getting pilloried...
RE: beats the people who have the overwhelming need to flaunt their
Yeah...but the OP is the whack job sign man, so by answering him, they're not really doing anything "in spite" of him but actually providing him what he asked for. It's not like he's just some random poster on the thread trying to derail a legitimate thread.
RE: beats the people who have the overwhelming need to flaunt their
When it comes to Nature opinions are worthless and that is what the Final Selection Thought Experiment was designed to address. Either Nature is indeed absolutely deterministic or it is not. I invite all to test for themselves if their opinions to the contrary of the unambiguous empirical evidence obtained is false or not.
I once asked a five year old child if she knew what an experiment was. She replied, "To test something".
I then asked her if she could do an experiment without first choosing to do so? She looked at me puzzled, and then replied with a sharp tone of sarcasm, "Of course not. What kind of stupid question is that?"
If find it surprising that even a five year old child realizes how illogical (or stupid as she stated) it would be to think otherwise. If one's logic is based on effects causing effects then one is blind to cause and effect. As the findings show science is about learning from nature and then from others, not the other way around. Yet, here we are...
Allow me to make this as concise as possible:
Conduct an experiment without first making a selection.
Make a calculation without first making a selection.
Continue your existence on this planet without making a selection.
If anyone here cannot, then perhaps the clarity of a five year is needed in order for science to be about nature instead of our opinions of nature. As the unambiguous empirical has shown, energy and the two acts of selection are one and the same.
So if the FatMan is "dead-on target" then why is he afraid to put his money where his mouth is? Even a five year old knows better than this.
Make a calculation without first making a selection.
By the way - my money and my mouth firmly believe you are insane AND full of shit. And not by cause and effect.
Like any madman, you keep arguing you've proved something that you haven't. Writing a paper or creating a website doesn't make what you've done legitimate, nor does using absolute terms to declare you've proven something.
I bet even a 5-year old child could tell you that.
RE: RE: beats the people who have the overwhelming need to flaunt their
Yeah...but the OP is the whack job sign man, so by answering him, they're not really doing anything "in spite" of him but actually providing him what he asked for. It's not like he's just some random poster on the thread trying to derail a legitimate thread.
I think sign guy troll was trying to use the question as a means to segue into more snake oil nonsense. This was a "dip my toe into the water" thread that thanks to FMiC got blown the hell up
RE: RE: RE: I think most answering the OT question
Yeah...but the OP is the whack job sign man, so by answering him, they're not really doing anything "in spite" of him but actually providing him what he asked for. It's not like he's just some random poster on the thread trying to derail a legitimate thread.
I think sign guy troll was trying to use the question as a means to segue into more snake oil nonsense. This was a "dip my toe into the water" thread that thanks to FMiC got blown the hell up
During my typical morning comprised of checking emails, avoiding coworkers and surfing the internets on the ol' laptop I felt an ever-so-slight rumbling going on in my stomach. Right away I had two choices...ignore it and hope it goes away or attempt to alleviate the tightness in my belly by letting loose a gaseous turn back in time to experience last night's delicious dinner of sausage and peppers.
Now - if I were on phone call or someone was in my office, I'd use the old Mind Over Matter Technique (MOMT) and ignore. But being as I was in my safe place, I decided to TEMPT DESTINY. It's like playing Russian Roulette with your underpants. I let loose and low and behold I won! Noxious clouds emanated throughout my office while my underwear remained clean as a whistle. Phew.
I think I'll Tempt Destiny a little later on by checking out early, grabbing some beers and watching some porn. Higgs Bosun indeed!
RE: RE: RE: I think most answering the OT question
Yeah...but the OP is the whack job sign man, so by answering him, they're not really doing anything "in spite" of him but actually providing him what he asked for. It's not like he's just some random poster on the thread trying to derail a legitimate thread.
I think sign guy troll was trying to use the question as a means to segue into more snake oil nonsense. This was a "dip my toe into the water" thread that thanks to FMiC got blown the hell up
I agree...and that's why it's funny that people are actually seriously answering his question in the OP. People replying to threads without even glancing at the direction that they are going is just comical.
the unambiguous empirical caught my eye too, as did this:
Quote:
When it comes to Nature opinions are worthless and that is what the Final Selection Thought Experiment was designed to address
He keeps talking about "Nature". Meanwhile he created a poll for voting for a shitty banner to try and correlate to a team's success. There isn't even an aspect of nature or natural in there.
Oh, wait a minute: And to think, this all came about by supporting the NY Giants!
Repetitive jargon is a lot of what defined MiS too. If he says, "Bow to the Master", B will shit his pants!
I realized this is out of your league for even a five year old can understand that you cannot choose what cannot be chosen. In other words, a fan cannot support his team's Super Bowl quest (act) if they do not go to the big game (potential). The act of selection is a dichotomy in that BOTH elements (act+potential) need to simultaneously exist for either to exist. This is what the Tempt Destiny experiment showed time and time again (see link).
Flawed Scientific Method - ( New Window )
Let me boil it down to you simply - your "experiment" has proved nothing. To put it more broadly, it has proved, zilch, nada, zero, squadoosh.
You've proven one thing - that random chance exists - but that's already been proven.
Your arrogance comes off as Matt in Syracuse, but you are a shitty painter named Manuel Morales, not a disgraced, fired Ithaca College professor named Matt Frank.
Picked up aquidneck when I moved to the island in 2006.
You've proven one thing - that random chance exists - but that's already been proven.
Your arrogance comes off as Matt in Syracuse, but you are a shitty painter named Manuel Morales, not a disgraced, fired Ithaca College professor named Matt Frank.
Link - ( New Window )
"Let me boil it down to you simply - your "experiment" has proved nothing. To put it more broadly, it has proved, zilch, nada, zero, squadoosh."
Since you do not know what omitted-variable bias means to an experiment, allow me to clue you in. It means your experiment is BOGUS because you failed to include the variables that caused the effects observed in the experiment, e.g., the scientific method of using false-positive data.
In 2012, CERN claimed they found the elusive Higgs boson they had been looking for the past 50 years. When I applied my findings to particle physics I found that by using the scientific method they had made an EPIC omission error. They have no idea which selection event caused the particle collision which caused the product decay they used as evidence for their discovery. The multibillion dollar Large Hadron Collider was solely built to detect effects, not the cause of the effects detected - BIG MISTAKE! (see peer-reviewed "Assumed Higgs" article)
In January of this year a CERN physicist confirmed my findings.
And to think, this all came about by supporting the NY Giants!
Assumed Higgs Boson Discovery Proved Einstein Right - ( New Window )
"Let me boil it down to you simply - your "experiment" has proved nothing. To put it more broadly, it has proved, zilch, nada, zero, squadoosh."
Since you do not know what omitted-variable bias means to an experiment, allow me to clue you in. It means your experiment is BOGUS because you failed to include the variables that caused the effects observed in the experiment, e.g., the scientific method of using false-positive data.
In 2012, CERN claimed they found the elusive Higgs boson they had been looking for the past 50 years. When I applied my findings to particle physics I found that by using the scientific method they had made an EPIC omission error. They have no idea which selection event caused the particle collision which caused the product decay they used as evidence for their discovery. The multibillion dollar Large Hadron Collider was solely built to detect effects, not the cause of the effects detected - BIG MISTAKE! (see peer-reviewed "Assumed Higgs" article)
In January of this year a CERN physicist confirmed my findings.
And to think, this all came about by supporting the NY Giants! Assumed Higgs Boson Discovery Proved Einstein Right - ( New Window )
You cracked the Higgs Boson hoax!
That should sell a lot of shitty artwork.
We really are dealing with a mentally ill person.
I do think Terrance Howard and this guy should match wits.
JohnC, you crack me up. My eyes are still watering. Indeed seeing the uneducated comments being made are indeed funny. To realize that I am trying to give these guys an opportunity to win officially license NFL LE prints of the NYG Super Bowl commemorative series, and then see their response to this gift is bewildering to say the least.
Who are these people? Don't answer, there actions speaks loud enough.
It's a big world out there and it is filled with all kinds of crazy.
Seriously, are people not reading the thread before they post? Talk about not having situational awareness.
Seriously, are people not reading the thread before they post? Talk about not having situational awareness.
When given the oppurtunity to brag about how long they've been here, some posters can't help themselves. They think it means something I guess...
Hahaha. Those are always a hoot.
Yeah...but the OP is the whack job sign man, so by answering him, they're not really doing anything "in spite" of him but actually providing him what he asked for. It's not like he's just some random poster on the thread trying to derail a legitimate thread.
Nice catch...didn't even think about it that way.
Or asking for "car buying help" when in fact they are looking to flaunt their spending capacity. "I have 50k to spend on a car, need advice!!!"
I don't begrudge people their wealth (well, not too much anyway), but those threads crack me up.
When it comes to Nature opinions are worthless and that is what the Final Selection Thought Experiment was designed to address. Either Nature is indeed absolutely deterministic or it is not. I invite all to test for themselves if their opinions to the contrary of the unambiguous empirical evidence obtained is false or not.
I once asked a five year old child if she knew what an experiment was. She replied, "To test something".
I then asked her if she could do an experiment without first choosing to do so? She looked at me puzzled, and then replied with a sharp tone of sarcasm, "Of course not. What kind of stupid question is that?"
If find it surprising that even a five year old child realizes how illogical (or stupid as she stated) it would be to think otherwise. If one's logic is based on effects causing effects then one is blind to cause and effect. As the findings show science is about learning from nature and then from others, not the other way around. Yet, here we are...
Allow me to make this as concise as possible:
Conduct an experiment without first making a selection.
Make a calculation without first making a selection.
Continue your existence on this planet without making a selection.
If anyone here cannot, then perhaps the clarity of a five year is needed in order for science to be about nature instead of our opinions of nature. As the unambiguous empirical has shown, energy and the two acts of selection are one and the same.
So if the FatMan is "dead-on target" then why is he afraid to put his money where his mouth is? Even a five year old knows better than this.
By the way - my money and my mouth firmly believe you are insane AND full of shit. And not by cause and effect.
Like any madman, you keep arguing you've proved something that you haven't. Writing a paper or creating a website doesn't make what you've done legitimate, nor does using absolute terms to declare you've proven something.
I bet even a 5-year old child could tell you that.
Quote:
exotic vacations under the guise of finding a place to watch the Giants. "Hey guys, I'm going to be skiing in Gstaad - where can I watch the game???"
Or asking for "car buying help" when in fact they are looking to flaunt their spending capacity. "I have 50k to spend on a car, need advice!!!"
Absolutely, I have no idea why would brag about 50K as if it is anything but a down-payment to someone like me..pfft!
Quote:
Are doing so in spite of the whack job sign man
Yeah...but the OP is the whack job sign man, so by answering him, they're not really doing anything "in spite" of him but actually providing him what he asked for. It's not like he's just some random poster on the thread trying to derail a legitimate thread.
I think sign guy troll was trying to use the question as a means to segue into more snake oil nonsense. This was a "dip my toe into the water" thread that thanks to FMiC got blown the hell up
Quote:
In comment 12616341 montanagiant said:
Quote:
Are doing so in spite of the whack job sign man
Yeah...but the OP is the whack job sign man, so by answering him, they're not really doing anything "in spite" of him but actually providing him what he asked for. It's not like he's just some random poster on the thread trying to derail a legitimate thread.
I think sign guy troll was trying to use the question as a means to segue into more snake oil nonsense. This was a "dip my toe into the water" thread that thanks to FMiC got blown the hell up
Fuck that fat shit! I uncovered him, bitches!
Now - if I were on phone call or someone was in my office, I'd use the old Mind Over Matter Technique (MOMT) and ignore. But being as I was in my safe place, I decided to TEMPT DESTINY. It's like playing Russian Roulette with your underpants. I let loose and low and behold I won! Noxious clouds emanated throughout my office while my underwear remained clean as a whistle. Phew.
I think I'll Tempt Destiny a little later on by checking out early, grabbing some beers and watching some porn. Higgs Bosun indeed!
Quote:
In comment 12616341 montanagiant said:
Quote:
Are doing so in spite of the whack job sign man
Yeah...but the OP is the whack job sign man, so by answering him, they're not really doing anything "in spite" of him but actually providing him what he asked for. It's not like he's just some random poster on the thread trying to derail a legitimate thread.
I think sign guy troll was trying to use the question as a means to segue into more snake oil nonsense. This was a "dip my toe into the water" thread that thanks to FMiC got blown the hell up
I agree...and that's why it's funny that people are actually seriously answering his question in the OP. People replying to threads without even glancing at the direction that they are going is just comical.
FMiC with the assist
I'd rather have B in ALB shit on a canvas. It would look better than Manuel Morales' works.
Thank you, Mr. Holmes...
Quote:
He is not a real scientist.
Thank you, Mr. Holmes...
You're welcome.
For the rest of the month, this dazzling analysis comes at a bargain basement price of $750 an hour.
I'd rather have B in ALB shit on a canvas. It would look better than Manuel Morales' works.
My Shit Prints are limited edition and very hard to come by.
Sure; one Jets print coming up...
You want a billboard with that too, you freeloading motherfucker.
My great BBI regret is missing out on Matt in Syracuse, and I'm hoping this guy gives a glimpse into that world.
He keeps talking about "Nature". Meanwhile he created a poll for voting for a shitty banner to try and correlate to a team's success. There isn't even an aspect of nature or natural in there.
Oh, wait a minute:
And to think, this all came about by supporting the NY Giants!
Repetitive jargon is a lot of what defined MiS too. If he says, "Bow to the Master", B will shit his pants!