The former designated Title IX representative claims that around 20 women accused FSU players and then claims that even more women were raped but did not come forward.
Such a claim by an interested party is very different than 20 women coming forward and saying their rape charges were ignored.
Also, she was on the job for 9 years. Why didn't she go public with this earlier? Wouldn't she owe that to the victims?
I have no doubt that sexual misconduct was covered up by the FSU administration but I don't think you can just accept claims such as this at face value without further evidence.
Such a claim by an interested party is very different than 20 women coming forward and saying their rape charges were ignored.
Also, she was on the job for 9 years. Why didn't she go public with this earlier? Wouldn't she owe that to the victims?
I have no doubt that sexual misconduct was covered up by the FSU administration but I don't think you can just accept claims such as this at face value without further evidence.