Â
|
|
Quote: |
In a recent segment for “The Ian & Puck Show” on 950 AM KJR in Seattle, Ian Rapoport of the NFL Network was discussing recent rumblings that Lynch might retire and dropped an interesting tidbit about Lynch’s thriftiness. “Marshawn Lynch has a lot of money,” Rapoport said. “He hasn’t spent a dime of his actual playing money … ever.” Presumably, Lynch has been living the last nine years off of endorsements and other business ventures. Lynch is estimated to earn about $5 million per year through endorsement deals with Nike, Pepsi, Skittles, Progressive, and Activision, according to Forbes. |
I think you're making a leap and a judgment on his character without any information, and that's pretty lazy (at best). Rappaport is a respected reporter and it would be an incredibly odd thing for him to make up.
He makes $5 million annually on endorsements. That's more than most NFL players make annually, all in. Lynch has always been an odd guy, and there has been a bigger stress on financial responsibility for NFL players in recent years. It's very believable, IMO.
Its not hard to live on millions of endorsement money ;)
Quote:
.
I think you're making a leap and a judgment on his character without any information, and that's pretty lazy (at best). Rappaport is a respected reporter and it would be an incredibly odd thing for him to make up.
He makes $5 million annually on endorsements. That's more than most NFL players make annually, all in. Lynch has always been an odd guy, and there has been a bigger stress on financial responsibility for NFL players in recent years. It's very believable, IMO.
He didn't make $5 million in endorsements in '07 when he was a rookie. I find it highly unlikely that he didn't spend ANY of the money from his rookie contract. Perhaps it should have been worded "he didn't spend any money from his more recent contracts".
He starred in a Pepsi commercial based on his persona
he continues to make money off this character he created
Football was his platform
This
Some people are hardwired to live below their means. Im one of them.
Quote:
does he have every cent of his nfl money...maybe, maybe not...the point is, he has lived frugally or off his endorsement money...stop being a dick and move on.
This
What would be good is if the investment return of that $50M is yielding $2M+ per year for the next 50 years. And he's able to adjust his spending down from $5M per year to $2M.
What would be good is if the investment return of that $50M is yielding $2M+ per year for the next 50 years. And he's able to adjust his spending down from $5M per year to $2M.
How do you know how much he is spending in a year???
I am sure he must have spent some that first year..... or better yet, just ask his agent if he got paid for his services. Chances are very high that ML spent some of his money if on nothing else than paying his agent.
but the rest of the story is believable
Eh. There are 100 worse ways. So many players get ripped off by what is effectively affinity fraud -- they get in with someone who invests the money for other rich people they know. Except no one in that circle knew how to pick an adviser in the first place. Or affinity fraud's cousin, affinity incompetence -- they pick an adviser who is good at marketing to athletes and people like them, even if that person is a bad adviser.
At least if you give money to Goldman, the bank is on the hook if the adviser steals your money (and maybe even if they invest it negligently). You just have to make sure they dont let John Paulson design your portfolio.
I'd think a lot of people's families' didnt have enough money to have connections to a financial adviser. No idea what Lynch's background is.
In any event, the happenstance of your father knowing people who do this for a living doesnt mean that it's a better connection that just walking into a GS office.
I could be wrong, but I'm under the impression that MLs family didn't need a financial advisor.
And while it may be a bizarre method, it probably puts him in the top 25% of professional athletes.
Even when agent's recommend a financial advisor, in many cases they will choose the advisor based on what type of kick back they receive - relatively unethical but not illegal.
I could be way off and if so, more power to him. I just don't believe it at all.
Even when agent's recommend a financial advisor, in many cases they will choose the advisor based on what type of kick back they receive - relatively unethical but not illegal.
Ike Hilliard will testify to that.
He skipped his senior year and no evidence he ever graduated, but one can learn a lot at UC Berkeley in 3 years if one actually attends classes...
It not like he attended Miami or Florida State or LSU...
He skipped his senior year and no evidence he ever graduated, but one can learn a lot at UC Berkeley in 3 years if one actually attends classes...
It not like he attended Miami or Florida State or LSU...
Why is he a tightwad for not spending the money he makes from one source of income?
Quote:
while attending UC Berkeley was "money". Kinda reminds one of another famous pro athlete tighwad who had a reputation as a sound investor, former Knicik "Dollar Bill" Bradley.
He skipped his senior year and no evidence he ever graduated, but one can learn a lot at UC Berkeley in 3 years if one actually attends classes...
It not like he attended Miami or Florida State or LSU...
Why is he a tightwad for not spending the money he makes from one source of income?
The term would better have been frugal, and that is by way of comparison to other young players who don't save and invest nearly enough. Did not mean "cheap", poor diction on my art.
This.
And think about who would be giving him this "tightwad" reputation. Guys that are notoriously bad at managing money that can't see passed (past? What's the correct word there? Always fucks me up) their next season and next paycheck. In other words, their idea of "frugal" I'm sure doesn't match yours or mine.
The term would better have been frugal, and that is by way of comparison to other young players who don't save and invest nearly enough. Did not mean "cheap", poor diction on my art.
Ok, that's less charged. Though I'd still say that anyone with such a limited prime earnings window (for RBs it's closed in their early 30s unless they have a second career like broadcasting lined up) is not frugal for having a high savings rate. Rather it is the smart thing to do. Though my bias is that a high savings rate is actually smart for a lot of people, not just athletes (if you can swing it).
no wonder things are the way they are