This guy doesn't give a shit about if Peyton did or didn't do something. He only cares about how the reactions to an allegation made 13 fucking years ago compare to public perception of Cam Newton.
My question is this: Who gives a flying fuck about Cam Newton?
But the source document was written by her lawyer and the article by a reporter looking for a story. And if the info was so damning, why did she settle. Like to hear the other side.
That being said take a look at the other articles this guy has wrote.he is a one trick pony, if it does not deal with racism he does not write about it. So he started researching this article after poor Cam got lit up for acting like a 3 yr old after the Super Bowl. It was of course because he was black it happened not because he acted like a petulant child.
This isn't news, story has been out for a while. I've always been surprised that it never gained any traction because if a player did this in 2016, it would be all over the place. Hell, if a different player did this, the story would have probably gotten a second life, so the article has merit. But it's hardly the shocking expose the writer is making it out to be.
Peyton's first instinct when winning the super bowl is to start ripping off plugs to Budweiser and papa john. Between that and his demeanor, it's not hard to get a read that the guy can be a dick to some people.
I don't know if this article is racially motivated or not. It could be an attempt by someone described in Wikipedia as a civil rights activist and who is the 'senior justice writer' for the Daily News, to discredit Manning after the opposing black qb in Super Bowl 50 looked like a jerk. The timing makes this suspicious. It could also be completely coincidental.
Lets wait and see what the other side to the story is.
Peyton Manning assaulted a trainer. The woman lost her position and it ultimately cost his school a ton of money.
He then shamelessly lied about it in the book with Archie, which cost his victim standing again and she came back after him this time, so he settled with her.
That this stayed so under the radar for so long is evidence of how ridiculous the media dick sucking and idolization of this guy has been. Boo hoo if it's coming more to the forefront now because someone wants to point out something about Cam's treatment or ride off Denver's SB win. It should have been part of the story of Peyton Manning all along.
the story has been told a million times. It crops up every couple of years from people that want to paint an unfavorable portrait of Peyton.
The 64 page report that the writer refers to appears to be a complaint against the University for a long stream of slights and transgressions. The part about Peyton is a minor part.
Naughright also sued Peyton for defamation later after her career turned south at a second school.
She has since sued Donna Karen, the designer, and a company she owned, when she was an employee there for an injury she received from an "eastern massage therapist". Supposedly he "fractured and dislocated Naughright's jaw, causing damage to her hearing and balance, and the treatments caused a spinal fusion which has required a bone graft in Naughright's neck," That suit was dismissed by the judge. She subsequently sued the trainer. Not sure how that turned out.
So three employers, three lawsuits. Seems like an interesting woman.
I don't know if this article is racially motivated or not. It could be an attempt by someone described in Wikipedia as a civil rights activist and who is the 'senior justice writer' for the Daily News, to discredit Manning after the opposing black qb in Super Bowl 50 looked like a jerk. The timing makes this suspicious. It could also be completely coincidental.
Lets wait and see what the other side to the story is.
Isn't that largely covered in the piece? The Mannings wrote a book about the incident, presumably putting their side of the story there, then got eviscerated by the judge when trying to get the resulting defamation case turfed out, then they ended up settling.
Lied about being black when his parents are both white. Also a discredited BLM spokesperson and Daily KOs columnist. Shows how far left the Daily News has gone hiring this scumbag. Racist motives of course.
But this reporter recently wrote something in that if you criticized Cam Newton, you were racist. So there's an agenda - his last two columns before this were: White privilege manifests in more than sports, music and Super Bowl 50 highlights racial double standard in NFL
Not to demean this story, but it's been written about and is still linked to in every recent Big Lead post about Peyton Manning. In fact, this guy was tweeting as if he was breaking news, and the Big Lead tweeted back that they covered this in 2014.
That's not to say the mainstream sports media hasn't protected Manning, Nantz basically admitted to it.
Lied about being black when his parents are both white. Also a discredited BLM spokesperson and Daily KOs columnist. Shows how far left the Daily News has gone hiring this scumbag. Racist motives of course.
because I never saw or heard of this story before. I am curious to know how much is true. The third lawsuit, with Donna Karan, really is irrelevant. But, the other two, if this story is true, are valid wrongful termination suits. Likewise, what compelled Manning to violate a non-disclosure agreement and why hasn't that brought more to the public light?
Regardless of whether any of this is true or to what degree, the author of the article is a moron and race baiter trying to make a name for himself. This has 0 to do with Cam Newton and the criticism of Newton's behavior has 0 to do with race.
Lied about being black when his parents are both white. Also a discredited BLM spokesperson and Daily KOs columnist. Shows how far left the Daily News has gone hiring this scumbag. Racist motives of course.
Its like David Duke writing an article about Cam Newton. You don't even read it because the author is a racist.
to give Peyton the beneit of the doubt, but this story and the coverup have always been a skeleton in his closet.
That said, I wish we were more nuanced with our language. To me "sexual assault" implies that Peyton touched the trainer in appropriate places and I think many people connect it with rape. While what Peyton allegedly did was inappropriate and punishable, it doesn't seem like there was any sexual motivation behind it.
Not to miller, but I find it similar to my disdain for using the term "rape" to describe two drunk people who had sex and couldn't consent because of the connotation rape has with the use of force and intimidation and/or violence.
I also liken it to how any time an athlete tests positive for any banned substance, they are quickly labeled as using the broad "PEDs" or steroids.
The author's expression of shock is strange. The issue is what you do with it. I've never thought all that highly of Peyton as a person, in part because of this. What he did was disturbing, what he did to her thereafter is too.
I don't know if this article is racially motivated or not. It could be an attempt by someone described in Wikipedia as a civil rights activist and who is the 'senior justice writer' for the Daily News, to discredit Manning after the opposing black qb in Super Bowl 50 looked like a jerk. The timing makes this suspicious. It could also be completely coincidental.
Lets wait and see what the other side to the story is.
Isn't that largely covered in the piece? The Mannings wrote a book about the incident, presumably putting their side of the story there, then got eviscerated by the judge when trying to get the resulting defamation case turfed out, then they ended up settling.
They filed for dismissal of the suit and were denied. That's standard legal practice. The question should be if this was such egregious behavior by Peyton, why did she settle and not get a verdict that would have publicly exposed this incident and Peyton.
to give Peyton the beneit of the doubt, but this story and the coverup have always been a skeleton in his closet.
That said, I wish we were more nuanced with our language. To me "sexual assault" implies that Peyton touched the trainer in appropriate places and I think many people connect it with rape. While what Peyton allegedly did was inappropriate and punishable, it doesn't seem like there was any sexual motivation behind it.
Not to miller, but I find it similar to my disdain for using the term "rape" to describe two drunk people who had sex and couldn't consent because of the connotation rape has with the use of force and intimidation and/or violence.
I also liken it to how any time an athlete tests positive for any banned substance, they are quickly labeled as using the broad "PEDs" or steroids.
Paul - if this story is true she was a constant victin of sexual harrassment at the school and, yes, what Peyton did was sexual assault.
Also, rape does not have to be violent or intimidating. Having sex with someone who says no is rape. Having sex with someone who is not in a state to consent (piss drunk, passed out, sleeping, etc.) is rape. Likewise, there certainly are more violent rape incidents.
The one term/category I have a problem with is statutory rape when both parties are underage. This is by default applied only to the male involved, which is sexist. If both consented, then technically both committed the crime. Of course, when one is an adult, then that is a different story.
Lied about being black when his parents are both white. Also a discredited BLM spokesperson and Daily KOs columnist. Shows how far left the Daily News has gone hiring this scumbag. Racist motives of course.
Kill the messenger!
This isn't killing the messenger. It's pointing out it's a very agenda driven piece written by a very agenda driven writer. The whole "revelations about Peyton" perspective betrays this as it's an old story as has been pointed out here.
Fact that he releases one sides argument without the other clearly tells me he has an agenda. This is a document submitted to the court by one side, not a document written by the court. He never mentions the ruling, the settlement amounts or why criminal charges were never filed.
This may have happened and may be damning, but it needs to be written by someone who hasn't been doing everything he can to bring down the perception of the "classy QB" for the last week with his decense of Newton and articles about racial double standards. I have no problem with those articles alone, or this one alone, but combined it shows me a writer with an agenda.
I will wait to hear all of the facts of the case, from an unbiased writer before I choose a side. Unfortunately, all the Bromley's, Duka Lacrosse, Rolling Stone frat situations leave me skeptical. And I hate thinking like this because its not fair to the actual victims.
Add in fame and millions of dollars coming your way soon it's not hard to see how something like this could happen. And like any other person on earth he's going to fucking lie about it.
That doesnt mean that Peyton Manning is defined by that act. Peyton might be an asshole. He also might be a really good guy who did something stupid when he was young. There is no way for us to know.
King is a piece of shit. He'd be out of a job if race wasnt an issue in the world.
Headhunter said, and I quote " your 10 year old son should be fucked in the ass by a 10 inch dick" to me a month ago today with Kulish29 agreeing with him and several witnesses present including Rob in Ct and Bill2. Rob actually lectured him on his "style" of posting for 20 minutes after the statement.
You're in no position to be calling out anyone for being a sexual deviant you asshole.
This is old news, it's common knowledge Peyton was a major asshole in college, ate with a silver spoon didn't have to answer to anyone except his father. The privileged life, unfair if you're not the fortunate son.
Add in fame and millions of dollars coming your way soon it's not hard to see how something like this could happen. And like any other person on earth he's going to fucking lie about it.
That doesnt mean that Peyton Manning is defined by that act. Peyton might be an asshole. He also might be a really good guy who did something stupid when he was young. There is no way for us to know.
King is a piece of shit. He'd be out of a job if race wasnt an issue in the world.
Add in fame and millions of dollars coming your way soon it's not hard to see how something like this could happen. And like any other person on earth he's going to fucking lie about it.
That doesnt mean that Peyton Manning is defined by that act. Peyton might be an asshole. He also might be a really good guy who did something stupid when he was young. There is no way for us to know.
King is a piece of shit. He'd be out of a job if race wasnt an issue in the world.
So King is the one who's a piece of shit?
Absolutely. Pointing out racism and double standards makes you a worse racist than the ones doing the racism or benefiting unfairly.
Remember Al Sharpton is a worse human being than Abu Bakr Al-Baghdadi and the only racists are black people who need to shut up and be happy they're stealing money from hard working, smarter white people.
He's a white guy pretending to be black who only writes about what he perceives to be racist. His Twitter world is half truths and outright lies, for example he reported Klan activity on college campuses over the summer. Shame on the Daily News for giving him a venue to spew his hate. Worse it's hypocritical of them given their staunch gun control position. King was canned from his job at Moorehouse for brandishing a gun and has tweeted about keeping his gun clipboard with hollow points. Wonderful behavior for an self described activist for black lives given the scourge of gun violence in the black community.
Add in fame and millions of dollars coming your way soon it's not hard to see how something like this could happen. And like any other person on earth he's going to fucking lie about it.
That doesnt mean that Peyton Manning is defined by that act. Peyton might be an asshole. He also might be a really good guy who did something stupid when he was young. There is no way for us to know.
King is a piece of shit. He'd be out of a job if race wasnt an issue in the world.
I read this as Peyton being an idiot in college but I don't think it was done to force a sexual act I think it was more about him thinking that would be funny (he was wrong). He didn't pin down the woman and force himself or attempt a rape.
That being said, it is still sexual assault, which isn't ok.
Luckily for the woman, in the face of this heinous act, she was compensated to the tune of $300,000.00 by UT. In accordance with the settlement they both signed a silence agreement. Peyton breached it in his book, so she got ANOTHER settlement, which is the correct thing to do.
I don't know what she or the author of the article wants. Does she want Peyton blackballed from the NFL because he put his balls on her head for a second in 1996?
She was clearly wronged, and was compensated for it. That's how the world works- make a mistake and pay up. Does she want a public shaming in Times Square or something?
As an aside, I'd let Peyton put his balls on my head for 300,000 in a Louisiana minute.
Separate and apart from the incident (which was never a secret) Â
The Facebook Pastor. When this guy opens up the books to reveal where all of the money went dating back to his Hatiian home relief fund and countless other charities, I'll take what he says about other's integrity seriously. Until then, this guy is about the last person who should be lecturing about transparency and truth.
Old story. Still disgusting.
Article on it from a couple of weeks ago:
Quote:
But Manning needed to have the final word. In the book he co-wrote with his father, Archie, and a ghostwriter, Manning: A Father, His Sons, and a Football Legacy, though he described his actions as “inappropriate,” he felt Naughright should have laughed off the up-close display of his rump and should have viewed it as “Crude, maybe, but harmless.” Manning also felt the need to call her a “vulgar woman,” swore that he was actually mooning a fellow teammate, not Naughright, and said that all of this unpleasantness could have been avoided were it not for the destruction of male-only spaces.
........
As to the question of to whom Manning wanted to show his ass, Malcolm Saxon, a track and field athlete who was in the room during the incident, wrote a letter to Manning to say that no, he was not the intended moon-ee (as Manning had written in his book), imploring him to “maintain some dignity and admit to what happened… Your celebrity doesn’t mean you can treat folks that way… Do the right thing here.”
Naughright and Manning ended up agreeing to an out-of-court settlement in 2003 that included a confidentiality ban on both parties. “He felt it was his mistake, he tried to apologize and he was remorseful,” Archie Manning told the Associated Press of his son’s incident in 2003. “He got punished and he took his punishment.”
Manning, however, just couldn’t keep his mouth shut.
Two years later, Naughright again took Manning to court after he violated the terms of the agreement by babbling about the incident “on network television nationally in a documentary entitled ESPN Classic Sports Century: Peyton Manning.”
I appreciate the response but we are not talking about the same thing. I am aware that by the laws, his action is considered sexual assault as well as the comment I made about non-consensual sex of drunk people being rape by the book. My problem is that these terms have such a wide berth.
is from the perspective of the woman's attorney, whether true or not
Not really:
Quote:
In other words, Judge Kornstein said that there is evidence to support the conclusion that Peyton Manning lied in his book about the incidents and knew that he was lying about the incidents.
I'm amazed he thought it was a good idea to write that in the book. Awful decision. Why in the world would he take shots at her after the settlement?
Hope to clear lingering whispers, really believe the thing was fabricated, was told by the editor or publisher to say something about it- could be a lot of reasons. Whatever, apparently not the wisest idea.
And if AP is Barilko, good- one of the few football posters that ever made any fucking sense around here.
I'm amazed he thought it was a good idea to write that in the book. Awful decision. Why in the world would he take shots at her after the settlement?
Hope to clear lingering whispers, really believe the thing was fabricated, was told by the editor or publisher to say something about it- could be a lot of reasons. Whatever, apparently not the wisest idea.
And if AP is Barilko, good- one of the few football posters that ever made any fucking sense around here.
Yeah you both worship Coughlin, he who can do no wrong.
is from the perspective of the woman's attorney, whether true or not
Including the judge's statements?
But know I see why I haven't heard this before. Aside from the media and Madison Avenue burying it, instead of dealing with the story, a lot of people want to focus on the person who wrote the story. Meanwhile, Manning will probably scoop up some more endorsements.
The article itself about PM is damning to say the least Â
Its a story that paints PM in a bad light and it should be illuminated more. It appears to be based on the truth and its despicable how PM and Archie addressed it if true. What I don't get is why King attempts to correlate this with how Cam Newton caught shit for his actions after the SB. They are two different things that have no bearing on each other and attempting to use this as a means to claim Cam is being treated unfairly is absurd.
First and foremost is his ignoring the aspect that this is an age of instantaneous info vs a fledgling Internet back then. If PM had done this within the last few years this would most definitely have been covered, dissected and brought to light much more then how it was covered back then.
Secondly, the continuous clamoring that the reason why Cam has caught shit is due to his race is disingenuous to say the least. Cam brought this upon himself via the way he chose to handle his successes and failures. Cam has had quite a few endorsement deals, to the point that it is claimed by his own Agent that he is second behind PM for endorsement money, this despite the fact prior to this year the Panthers have not done all that much with Cam at QB. So if Cam's skin color is the reason behind the dislike of Cam, how does he rank #2 in endorsements? Not just #2 but right behind PM and ahead of Tom Brady, Eli, and just this year Drew Brees, all QBs that have accomplished much more then what Cam has.
These are two different issues. Nail Peyton for what he did, but don't sit here and attempt to apply some absurd correlation to two different issues because the writer has a desire to make it about race.
Just a shame you had to attack my little boy, the banning is far better than you deserve. So long scumbag, let us know how the view from 20,000 ft is someday.
Just a shame you had to attack my little boy, the banning is far better than you deserve. So long scumbag, let us know how the view from 20,000 ft is someday.
Here we go with the banning nonsensical threats again. So far you have been firing nothing but blanks with regards to those threats. Why not give it a rest at this point because everyone is tired of this shit.
Supporting hh's attack on my son? Not like you at all montana.
I am not supporting anything, but you're the one that started the shit up in this thread and the banning threats by you are becoming silly to keep pulling. No need to ruin a thread with excellent discussion in it because you got a grudge going on
Well lets see, you have made the threat at least 4 times, and as per your M.O. you're 0-4. But you go on making them, it gets added to the long laugh list of your BBI resume.
You're jumping into something that has absolutely nothing to do with you. Unless you are defending HH you need to go harass someone else. Talk about distracting from the original post, that's on you.
How could you have a problem with this guy bringing it up? He should have been tossed off BBI the first time.
I didn't see what happened but what could it possibly be to reply like that and then follow up with It again? Isn't that fool like 60 years old? And he says shit like that? And wants to meet up to fight about it?
How could you have a problem with this guy bringing it up? He should have been tossed off BBI the first time.
I didn't see what happened but what could it possibly be to reply like that and then follow up with It again? Isn't that fool like 60 years old? And he says shit like that? And wants to meet up to fight about it?
That's hilarious and sad.
Because this thread is dealing with something else completely. Rocky can make his own thread to fight with someone, this is a different subject and the grudge crap gets old in threads where a good discussion is going on.
HH said something wrong and when it happened i even stated that, but Rocky trolled him on here and he was silly enough to bite on it. Rocky really wants to address, man the fuck up and make a special thread for it, but he won't do that will he?
is from the perspective of the woman's attorney, whether true or not
Including the judge's statements?
But know I see why I haven't heard this before. Aside from the media and Madison Avenue burying it, instead of dealing with the story, a lot of people want to focus on the person who wrote the story. Meanwhile, Manning will probably scoop up some more endorsements.
From Florio who himself is a Lawyer..His comments, in part:
Quote:
The ensuing #longread from Shaun King of the Daily News is at times hard to follow, as it attempts to summarize most of the 74 pages in chronological order. Also, King’s article displays a clear anti-Peyton bias, and more than a little melodrama. This #notaslongread item comes from the 74-page document itself, which has been published in full by the Daily News.
Before going any farther, it’s important to understand what the 74-page document is, and what it isn’t. The 74-page document is a piece of advocacy. The 74-page document is something that was written by the lawyers representing Jamie Ann Naughright in her defamation case against the Mannings. The 74-page document is, necessarily, one-sided.
The 74-page document is not objective. The 74-page document is not supposed to be objective. The 74-page document is not a court order or any other decision made by a neutral party. And, ultimately, the 74-page document is incomplete without comparing it to the corresponding “Facts of the Case” document submitted by the defendants in the case.
How could you have a problem with this guy bringing it up? He should have been tossed off BBI the first time.
I didn't see what happened but what could it possibly be to reply like that and then follow up with It again? Isn't that fool like 60 years old? And he says shit like that? And wants to meet up to fight about it?
That's hilarious and sad.
Because this thread is dealing with something else completely. Rocky can make his own thread to fight with someone, this is a different subject and the grudge crap gets old in threads where a good discussion is going on.
HH said something wrong and when it happened i even stated that, but Rocky trolled him on here and he was silly enough to bite on it. Rocky really wants to address, man the fuck up and make a special thread for it, but he won't do that will he?
How deep is that hole you're digging for yourself? 6 feet under? Got an echo yet?
How could you have a problem with this guy bringing it up? He should have been tossed off BBI the first time.
I didn't see what happened but what could it possibly be to reply like that and then follow up with It again? Isn't that fool like 60 years old? And he says shit like that? And wants to meet up to fight about it?
That's hilarious and sad.
Because this thread is dealing with something else completely. Rocky can make his own thread to fight with someone, this is a different subject and the grudge crap gets old in threads where a good discussion is going on.
HH said something wrong and when it happened i even stated that, but Rocky trolled him on here and he was silly enough to bite on it. Rocky really wants to address, man the fuck up and make a special thread for it, but he won't do that will he?
How deep is that hole you're digging for yourself? 6 feet under? Got an echo yet?
Why you going to threaten me with it now? That one would be hilarious
Shaun King. I will not read another. Guy is a racist, period.
You want to defend Cam. Defend him. Don't pull the 4th grade argument that somebody else did worse. Yes, what Peyton did (twice) was wrong. WTF does that have to do with the current league MVP acting like a two year old and sulking.
I love Cam's enthusiasm. I disliked the excuses for not going after the fumble and then not answering questions after the game.
If you wish child rape...or any rape on someone... you are going to get banned from this or any other site on the internet.
How stupid do you have to be? And anyone defending Headhunter's position on this ought to be ashamed of themselves.
I like Headhunter a lot, but his post is indefensible. And he did it TWICE.
NOT ONE person defended his statements. But ignoring the fact that Rocky trolled him and was the one who initiated the bullshit in this threads is pretty remarkable
RE: Imagine how nasty this thread would be if it were about politics. Â
I have always maintained how I couldn't understand how any adult would complain to Eric about insults on a message board instead of just simply ignoring it.
However this is one example of where I really can't blame a father for doing so having had that said about his son and it's arguably the worst incident for people to hang their hats on when complaining about someone being a crybaby regardless of who it is or how you may feel about him.
what happened between hedgehunter and rocky? are these people on headgehunter's side, are they friends in the real world or just on here and did this incident happen in real life or on the internet? where do broken hearts go? do aliens exist? who put the bop in the bop shoo bop?
If you wish child rape...or any rape on someone... you are going to get banned from this or any other site on the internet.
How stupid do you have to be? And anyone defending Headhunter's position on this ought to be ashamed of themselves.
I like Headhunter a lot, but his post is indefensible. And he did it TWICE.
Perhaps the smartest action would have been to ban them both. Rocky/Cruzin has a looooong history of crappy behavior on here, and is at least guilty of dredging up an old "insult" for the purposes of getting someone banned.
This smacks of, if not a double standard, then a real inability to attach consequences to actions for all parties involved.
Let me explain why I'm so happy you posted here this evening, no, there is too much, let me sum up:
You chastised me for detracting from the original topic. My participation here was 4 posts before you chimed in, 1 of which was on topic. My conversation with HH was over, you were the one that reignited and took the thread in a different direction. This proves you are a hypocrite.
You accused me of false threats. My final post, before you intervened, was after HH's account was already suspended. If you had bothered to check his status before you typed your drivel you would have known this and avoided embarrassing yourself but even after a neutral 3rd party told you you were wrong and then another neutral poster confirmed you were mistaken you weren't man enough to admit you were wrong.
This left you with only one option, attack the poster. This proves you are a coward.
Then, somewhere after your balls shriveled up and you started babbling because you were too far into it to back out now you mentioned that you were present on the original thread a month ago when HH threatened my son, then he justified it by saying that anyone who disagreed with the statement was anti-gay and a homophobe, then he gave testimonial on his feelings towards gays in America yet you didn't say anything. Not one " that's not nice HH", "that's just wrong HH", "lighten up HH" but you expect people to listen to you chastise Archie Manning for how he handled his son 20 years ago in college? Teach us how to hold the moral high ground oh anointed one. This proves you are a pussy.
I would like to thank you for this, it's here for everyone to see how much of a hypocrite, coward and pussy you are. I would like to claim a hand in the exposure but you did it all by your self.
Yes, HH is banned. But, given the wonderfully tough banning Â
to give Peyton the beneit of the doubt, but this story and the coverup have always been a skeleton in his closet.
That said, I wish we were more nuanced with our language. To me "sexual assault" implies that Peyton touched the trainer in appropriate places and I think many people connect it with rape. While what Peyton allegedly did was inappropriate and punishable, it doesn't seem like there was any sexual motivation behind it.
If someone put their dick and balls on your wife/moms/sisters face you wouldn't consider that to be a sexual assault?!
LOL..Is there anything weaker then someone running their mouth Â
Rockyy (or whatever name your using after your 5th banning) Please stop with your absolute insane rational.
The cowardice is on exhibit by the fact you can't handle your problems by yourself, you always have to run to Eric for resolution because you lack the means to address on your own, you don't handle it because your personal issues deny you the ability to do so, thus the need for "big brother Eric" to bail you out
You have sat here for 3 months running around acting like you have some special "Ban Hammer". You know the reality here Rocky? Your nothing but a punk ass on this board who plays a shitload of games pushing the boundaries of their latest rules that allowed them back on this board for the 5th fucking time. You think because you gave Eric a ride one time that this grants you some special privilege, that alone illustrates what a weak fuck you are and how meaningless your life is.
In reality your a despicable twat who the vast majority despises. HeadHunter was completely wrong for what he said but you know what his greatest crime is? Was making your sorry lame ass a sympathetic figure. You run when its convenient, you cry like a woman when it hurts you, you hide when its beneficial, you use your past mental issues as a crutch, and your whole persona on here is about as distasteful as it comes.
You have been banned more then any other, and yet your pussified ways makes you beg to come back because you lack any pride, and any relevancy in real life. You lack the basic foundation of what constitutes a man and you illustrate that continuously with your actions on here. Basically you're just a friendless little piece of shit, and the funny thing is that virtually everyone on this board knows this. You will undoubtedly be banned again and the board will be better for it, Its what you do and what you are all about.
Let me explain why I'm so happy you posted here this evening, no, there is too much, let me sum up:
You chastised me for detracting from the original topic. My participation here was 4 posts before you chimed in, 1 of which was on topic. My conversation with HH was over, you were the one that reignited and took the thread in a different direction. This proves you are a hypocrite.
You accused me of false threats. My final post, before you intervened, was after HH's account was already suspended. If you had bothered to check his status before you typed your drivel you would have known this and avoided embarrassing yourself but even after a neutral 3rd party told you you were wrong and then another neutral poster confirmed you were mistaken you weren't man enough to admit you were wrong.
This left you with only one option, attack the poster. This proves you are a coward.
Then, somewhere after your balls shriveled up and you started babbling because you were too far into it to back out now you mentioned that you were present on the original thread a month ago when HH threatened my son, then he justified it by saying that anyone who disagreed with the statement was anti-gay and a homophobe, then he gave testimonial on his feelings towards gays in America yet you didn't say anything. Not one " that's not nice HH", "that's just wrong HH", "lighten up HH" but you expect people to listen to you chastise Archie Manning for how he handled his son 20 years ago in college? Teach us how to hold the moral high ground oh anointed one. This proves you are a pussy.
I would like to thank you for this, it's here for everyone to see how much of a hypocrite, coward and pussy you are. I would like to claim a hand in the exposure but you did it all by your self.
Please stop with your absolute insane rational. The cowardice is on exhibit by the fact you can't handle your problems by yourself, you always have to run to Eric for resolution because you lack the means to address on your own, you don't handle it because your personal issues deny you the ability to do so, thus the need for "big brother Eric" to bail you out
You have sat here for 3 months running around acting like you have some special "Ban Hammer". You know the reality here Rocky? Your nothing but a punk ass on this board who plays a shitload of games pushing the boundaries of their latest rules that allowed them back on this board for the 5th fucking time. You think because you gave Eric a ride one time that this grants you some special privilege, that alone illustrates what a weak fuck you are and how meaningless your life is.
In reality your a despicable twat who the vast majority despises. HeadHunter was completely wrong for what he said but you know what his greatest crime is? Was making your bitch ass a sympathetic figure. You run when its convenient, you cry like a woman when it hurts you, you hide when its beneficial, you use your past mental issues as a crutch, and your whole persona on here is about as distasteful as it comes.
You have been banned more then any other, and yet your pussy ways makes you beg to come back because you lack any pride and any relevancy in real life. You lack the basic foundation of what constitutes a man and you illustrate that continuously with your actions on here. Basically you're just a little piece of shit and the funny thing is that virtually everyone on this board knows this. You will undoubtedly be banned again and the board will be better for it, Its what you do and what you are all about.
LOL, is there anything weaker then someone running their mouth Â
Rockyy (or whatever name your using after your 5th banning) Please stop with your absolute insane rational.
The cowardice is on exhibit by the fact you can't handle your problems by yourself, you always have to run to Eric for resolution because you lack the means to address on your own, you don't handle it because your personal issues deny you the ability to do so, thus the need for "big brother Eric" to bail you out
You have sat here for 3 months running around acting like you have some special "Ban Hammer". You know the reality here Rocky? Your nothing but a punk ass on this board who plays a shitload of games pushing the boundaries of their latest rules that allowed them back on this board for the 5th fucking time. You think because you gave Eric a ride one time that this grants you some special privilege, that alone illustrates what a weak fuck you are and how meaningless your life is.
In reality your a despicable twat who the vast majority despises. HeadHunter was completely wrong for what he said but you know what his greatest crime is? Was making your sorry lame ass a sympathetic figure. You run when its convenient, you cry like a woman when it hurts you, you hide when its beneficial, you use your past mental issues as a crutch, and your whole persona on here is about as distasteful as it comes.
You have been banned more then any other, and yet your pussified ways makes you beg to come back because you lack any pride and any relevancy in real life. You lack the basic foundation of what constitutes a man, and you illustrate that continuously with your actions on here. Basically you're just a friendless little piece of shit, and the funny thing is that virtually everyone on this board knows this. You will undoubtedly be banned again and the board will be better for it, Its what you do and what you are all about.
LOL, is there anything funnier then someone who needs a mod Â
Rockyy (or whatever name your using after your 5th banning) Please stop with your absolute insane rational.
The cowardice is on exhibit by the fact you can't handle your problems by yourself, you always have to run to Eric for resolution because you lack the means to address on your own, you don't handle it because your personal issues deny you the ability to do so, thus the need for "big brother Eric" to bail you out
You have sat here for 3 months running around acting like you have some special "Ban Hammer". You know the reality here Rocky? Your nothing but a punk ass on this board who plays a shitload of games pushing the boundaries of their latest rules that allowed them back on this board for the 5th fucking time. You think because you gave Eric a ride one time that this grants you some special privilege, that alone illustrates what a weak fuck you are and how meaningless your life is.
In reality your a despicable twat who the vast majority despises. HeadHunter was completely wrong for what he said but you know what his greatest crime is? Was making your sorry lame ass a sympathetic figure. You run when its convenient, you cry like a woman when it hurts you, you hide when its beneficial, you use your past mental issues as a crutch, and your whole persona on here is about as distasteful as it comes.
You have been banned more then any other, and yet your pussified ways makes you beg to come back because you lack any pride, and any relevancy in real life. You lack the basic foundation of what constitutes a man and you illustrate that continuously with your actions on here. Basically you're just a friendless little piece of shit, and the funny thing is that virtually everyone on this board knows this. You will undoubtedly be banned again and the board will be better for it, Its what you do and what you are all about.
Let me explain why I'm so happy you posted here this evening, no, there is too much, let me sum up:
You chastised me for detracting from the original topic. My participation here was 4 posts before you chimed in, 1 of which was on topic. My conversation with HH was over, you were the one that reignited and took the thread in a different direction. This proves you are a hypocrite.
You accused me of false threats. My final post, before you intervened, was after HH's account was already suspended. If you had bothered to check his status before you typed your drivel you would have known this and avoided embarrassing yourself but even after a neutral 3rd party told you you were wrong and then another neutral poster confirmed you were mistaken you weren't man enough to admit you were wrong.
This left you with only one option, attack the poster. This proves you are a coward.
Then, somewhere after your balls shriveled up and you started babbling because you were too far into it to back out now you mentioned that you were present on the original thread a month ago when HH threatened my son, then he justified it by saying that anyone who disagreed with the statement was anti-gay and a homophobe, then he gave testimonial on his feelings towards gays in America yet you didn't say anything. Not one " that's not nice HH", "that's just wrong HH", "lighten up HH" but you expect people to listen to you chastise Archie Manning for how he handled his son 20 years ago in college? Teach us how to hold the moral high ground oh anointed one. This proves you are a pussy.
I would like to thank you for this, it's here for everyone to see how much of a hypocrite, coward and pussy you are. I would like to claim a hand in the exposure but you did it all by your self.
Please stop with your absolute insane rational. You have sat here for 3 months running around acting like you have some special "Ban Hammer". You know the reality here Rocky? Your nothing but a punk ass on this board who plays a shitload of games pushing the boundaries of their latest rules that allowed them back on this board for the 5th fucking time. You think because you gave Eric a ride one time that this grants you some special privilege, that alone illustrates what a weak fuck you are.
In reality your a despicable twat who the vast majority despises. HeadHunter was completely wrong for what he said but you know what his greatest crime is? Was making your bitch ass a sympathetic figure. You run when its convenient, you cry like a woman when it hurts you, you hide when its beneficial, you use your past mental issues as a crutch, and your whole persona on here is about as distasteful as it comes.
You have been banned more then any other, and yet your pussy ways makes you beg to come back because you lack any pride and any relevancy in real life. You lack the basic foundation of what constitutes a man and you illustrate that continuously with your actions on here. Basically you're just a little piece of shit and the funny thing is that virtually everyone on this board knows this. You will undoubtedly be banned again and the board will be better for it, Its what you do and what you are all about and the best thing is that you know what i say is true, it eats you up at night and controls your whole life.
The proof is in the posts, all you had to do was admit you were wrong and you could have saved yourself all this embarrassment. Probably not have gone to bed angry either.
Oh well, you win some, you lose some, you may possibly win one in the future.
What he did was still shitty and I totally get why Rocky would be upset. I don't think a banning/suspension for HH is out of line for bringing that stuff up again, I'd want to punch him if I was Rocky. But I do feel the need to get his back a tiny bit by saying he didn't wish child rape on anyone. He wished future gay adult consensual sex not current child rape.
....
This writer might be a race baiter and bringing Cam up in this Peyton discussion might be stupid. But imagine if Cam did this in college. Cam gets shit for being like most superstud college athletes and getting paid to play. Peyton gets 0 shit for sexually assaulting a woman trainer. Imagine if the roles were reversed. You don't think Cam would get more shit for it than Peyton? Peyton is one of the most overprotected athletes by his league/media I've ever seen, it's a bit of a joke.
Let's not forget what a crybaby Peyton can be when he loses too. Remember when he threw his entire OL under the bus after a playoff loss? Cam didn't do something like that.
Didn't Cruisin provide some elaborate story tyring to convince Â
everyone he wasn't rockythompson? His MO is always the same and the internet tough guys fights always seem to follow him around. I have no idea why Eric allows him back every time, it just creates so much bullshit he has to deal with.
does not like Peyton Manning. Link - ( New Window )
Kluwe is an attention whore, still tugging on progressive Twitterati for back-pats and a further 15 minutes of fame. Tell me again, oh millionaire punter, how all white people need to check their privilege.
Btw, that was the LONGEST article I have ever read..:)
My question is this: Who gives a flying fuck about Cam Newton?
People just didn't care and/or ignored it for whatever reasons.
What does this have to do with Cam?
Why were there court documents in Polk County, Florida? I missed something.
Timing makes it suspect.
Shitty if true.
Peyton's first instinct when winning the super bowl is to start ripping off plugs to Budweiser and papa john. Between that and his demeanor, it's not hard to get a read that the guy can be a dick to some people.
I can't let this pass - I am on to you Barilko - you are a fine one for casting stones - pervert
My God your posts are horrendous.
Lets wait and see what the other side to the story is.
He then shamelessly lied about it in the book with Archie, which cost his victim standing again and she came back after him this time, so he settled with her.
That this stayed so under the radar for so long is evidence of how ridiculous the media dick sucking and idolization of this guy has been. Boo hoo if it's coming more to the forefront now because someone wants to point out something about Cam's treatment or ride off Denver's SB win. It should have been part of the story of Peyton Manning all along.
Quote:
His treatment of the trainer was disgusting. He couldn't let it go. I have no respect for Peyton. He's no Eli, that's for sure.
My God your posts are horrendous.
What was wrong with his post? Seems like a fair opinion to have?
The 64 page report that the writer refers to appears to be a complaint against the University for a long stream of slights and transgressions. The part about Peyton is a minor part.
Naughright also sued Peyton for defamation later after her career turned south at a second school.
She has since sued Donna Karen, the designer, and a company she owned, when she was an employee there for an injury she received from an "eastern massage therapist". Supposedly he "fractured and dislocated Naughright's jaw, causing damage to her hearing and balance, and the treatments caused a spinal fusion which has required a bone graft in Naughright's neck," That suit was dismissed by the judge. She subsequently sued the trainer. Not sure how that turned out.
So three employers, three lawsuits. Seems like an interesting woman.
Lets wait and see what the other side to the story is.
Isn't that largely covered in the piece? The Mannings wrote a book about the incident, presumably putting their side of the story there, then got eviscerated by the judge when trying to get the resulting defamation case turfed out, then they ended up settling.
Gotcha. I'm out of the loop. :) thanks.
Not to demean this story, but it's been written about and is still linked to in every recent Big Lead post about Peyton Manning. In fact, this guy was tweeting as if he was breaking news, and the Big Lead tweeted back that they covered this in 2014.
That's not to say the mainstream sports media hasn't protected Manning, Nantz basically admitted to it.
Kill the messenger!
Regardless of whether any of this is true or to what degree, the author of the article is a moron and race baiter trying to make a name for himself. This has 0 to do with Cam Newton and the criticism of Newton's behavior has 0 to do with race.
Quote:
Lied about being black when his parents are both white. Also a discredited BLM spokesperson and Daily KOs columnist. Shows how far left the Daily News has gone hiring this scumbag. Racist motives of course.
Its like David Duke writing an article about Cam Newton. You don't even read it because the author is a racist.
Kill the messenger!
That said, I wish we were more nuanced with our language. To me "sexual assault" implies that Peyton touched the trainer in appropriate places and I think many people connect it with rape. While what Peyton allegedly did was inappropriate and punishable, it doesn't seem like there was any sexual motivation behind it.
Not to miller, but I find it similar to my disdain for using the term "rape" to describe two drunk people who had sex and couldn't consent because of the connotation rape has with the use of force and intimidation and/or violence.
I also liken it to how any time an athlete tests positive for any banned substance, they are quickly labeled as using the broad "PEDs" or steroids.
Quote:
I don't know if this article is racially motivated or not. It could be an attempt by someone described in Wikipedia as a civil rights activist and who is the 'senior justice writer' for the Daily News, to discredit Manning after the opposing black qb in Super Bowl 50 looked like a jerk. The timing makes this suspicious. It could also be completely coincidental.
Lets wait and see what the other side to the story is.
Isn't that largely covered in the piece? The Mannings wrote a book about the incident, presumably putting their side of the story there, then got eviscerated by the judge when trying to get the resulting defamation case turfed out, then they ended up settling.
They filed for dismissal of the suit and were denied. That's standard legal practice. The question should be if this was such egregious behavior by Peyton, why did she settle and not get a verdict that would have publicly exposed this incident and Peyton.
That said, I wish we were more nuanced with our language. To me "sexual assault" implies that Peyton touched the trainer in appropriate places and I think many people connect it with rape. While what Peyton allegedly did was inappropriate and punishable, it doesn't seem like there was any sexual motivation behind it.
Not to miller, but I find it similar to my disdain for using the term "rape" to describe two drunk people who had sex and couldn't consent because of the connotation rape has with the use of force and intimidation and/or violence.
I also liken it to how any time an athlete tests positive for any banned substance, they are quickly labeled as using the broad "PEDs" or steroids.
Also, rape does not have to be violent or intimidating. Having sex with someone who says no is rape. Having sex with someone who is not in a state to consent (piss drunk, passed out, sleeping, etc.) is rape. Likewise, there certainly are more violent rape incidents.
The one term/category I have a problem with is statutory rape when both parties are underage. This is by default applied only to the male involved, which is sexist. If both consented, then technically both committed the crime. Of course, when one is an adult, then that is a different story.
Quote:
Lied about being black when his parents are both white. Also a discredited BLM spokesperson and Daily KOs columnist. Shows how far left the Daily News has gone hiring this scumbag. Racist motives of course.
Kill the messenger!
This isn't killing the messenger. It's pointing out it's a very agenda driven piece written by a very agenda driven writer. The whole "revelations about Peyton" perspective betrays this as it's an old story as has been pointed out here.
This may have happened and may be damning, but it needs to be written by someone who hasn't been doing everything he can to bring down the perception of the "classy QB" for the last week with his decense of Newton and articles about racial double standards. I have no problem with those articles alone, or this one alone, but combined it shows me a writer with an agenda.
I will wait to hear all of the facts of the case, from an unbiased writer before I choose a side. Unfortunately, all the Bromley's, Duka Lacrosse, Rolling Stone frat situations leave me skeptical. And I hate thinking like this because its not fair to the actual victims.
That doesnt mean that Peyton Manning is defined by that act. Peyton might be an asshole. He also might be a really good guy who did something stupid when he was young. There is no way for us to know.
King is a piece of shit. He'd be out of a job if race wasnt an issue in the world.
Let's see
Headhunter said, and I quote " your 10 year old son should be fucked in the ass by a 10 inch dick" to me a month ago today with Kulish29 agreeing with him and several witnesses present including Rob in Ct and Bill2. Rob actually lectured him on his "style" of posting for 20 minutes after the statement.
You're in no position to be calling out anyone for being a sexual deviant you asshole.
Does anyone have a quote that bad from Barrilko?
This is old news, it's common knowledge Peyton was a major asshole in college, ate with a silver spoon didn't have to answer to anyone except his father. The privileged life, unfair if you're not the fortunate son.
That doesnt mean that Peyton Manning is defined by that act. Peyton might be an asshole. He also might be a really good guy who did something stupid when he was young. There is no way for us to know.
King is a piece of shit. He'd be out of a job if race wasnt an issue in the world.
So King is the one who's a piece of shit?
Quote:
Add in fame and millions of dollars coming your way soon it's not hard to see how something like this could happen. And like any other person on earth he's going to fucking lie about it.
That doesnt mean that Peyton Manning is defined by that act. Peyton might be an asshole. He also might be a really good guy who did something stupid when he was young. There is no way for us to know.
King is a piece of shit. He'd be out of a job if race wasnt an issue in the world.
So King is the one who's a piece of shit?
Absolutely. Pointing out racism and double standards makes you a worse racist than the ones doing the racism or benefiting unfairly.
Remember Al Sharpton is a worse human being than Abu Bakr Al-Baghdadi and the only racists are black people who need to shut up and be happy they're stealing money from hard working, smarter white people.
Quote:
Add in fame and millions of dollars coming your way soon it's not hard to see how something like this could happen. And like any other person on earth he's going to fucking lie about it.
That doesnt mean that Peyton Manning is defined by that act. Peyton might be an asshole. He also might be a really good guy who did something stupid when he was young. There is no way for us to know.
King is a piece of shit. He'd be out of a job if race wasnt an issue in the world.
So King is the one who's a piece of shit?
It's time to delete this mess.
That being said, it is still sexual assault, which isn't ok.
Luckily for the woman, in the face of this heinous act, she was compensated to the tune of $300,000.00 by UT. In accordance with the settlement they both signed a silence agreement. Peyton breached it in his book, so she got ANOTHER settlement, which is the correct thing to do.
I don't know what she or the author of the article wants. Does she want Peyton blackballed from the NFL because he put his balls on her head for a second in 1996?
She was clearly wronged, and was compensated for it. That's how the world works- make a mistake and pay up. Does she want a public shaming in Times Square or something?
As an aside, I'd let Peyton put his balls on my head for 300,000 in a Louisiana minute.
Can I at least get a Papa John's pie?
Article on it from a couple of weeks ago:
........
As to the question of to whom Manning wanted to show his ass, Malcolm Saxon, a track and field athlete who was in the room during the incident, wrote a letter to Manning to say that no, he was not the intended moon-ee (as Manning had written in his book), imploring him to “maintain some dignity and admit to what happened… Your celebrity doesn’t mean you can treat folks that way… Do the right thing here.”
Naughright and Manning ended up agreeing to an out-of-court settlement in 2003 that included a confidentiality ban on both parties. “He felt it was his mistake, he tried to apologize and he was remorseful,” Archie Manning told the Associated Press of his son’s incident in 2003. “He got punished and he took his punishment.”
Manning, however, just couldn’t keep his mouth shut.
Two years later, Naughright again took Manning to court after he violated the terms of the agreement by babbling about the incident “on network television nationally in a documentary entitled ESPN Classic Sports Century: Peyton Manning.”
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/02/01/peyton-s-manning-s-forgotten-sex-scandal.html - ( New Window )
Not really:
And if AP is Barilko, good- one of the few football posters that ever made any fucking sense around here.
He comes off like a big time douchebag. Then he did it again in a tv interview and she sued him again. Jackass.
Quote:
I'm amazed he thought it was a good idea to write that in the book. Awful decision. Why in the world would he take shots at her after the settlement?
Hope to clear lingering whispers, really believe the thing was fabricated, was told by the editor or publisher to say something about it- could be a lot of reasons. Whatever, apparently not the wisest idea.
And if AP is Barilko, good- one of the few football posters that ever made any fucking sense around here.
yes, I'm aware of that. Someday we shall meet in person and I will show you how it's really going to turn out.
Barilko - it's interesting that you feel the same way about this as a lot of us here feel about you - "disgusting by any standard"
BTW Barilko - aren't you banned from BBI -- have you sought permission to return under your assumed nom de plume?
Including the judge's statements?
But know I see why I haven't heard this before. Aside from the media and Madison Avenue burying it, instead of dealing with the story, a lot of people want to focus on the person who wrote the story. Meanwhile, Manning will probably scoop up some more endorsements.
First and foremost is his ignoring the aspect that this is an age of instantaneous info vs a fledgling Internet back then. If PM had done this within the last few years this would most definitely have been covered, dissected and brought to light much more then how it was covered back then.
Secondly, the continuous clamoring that the reason why Cam has caught shit is due to his race is disingenuous to say the least. Cam brought this upon himself via the way he chose to handle his successes and failures. Cam has had quite a few endorsement deals, to the point that it is claimed by his own Agent that he is second behind PM for endorsement money, this despite the fact prior to this year the Panthers have not done all that much with Cam at QB. So if Cam's skin color is the reason behind the dislike of Cam, how does he rank #2 in endorsements? Not just #2 but right behind PM and ahead of Tom Brady, Eli, and just this year Drew Brees, all QBs that have accomplished much more then what Cam has.
These are two different issues. Nail Peyton for what he did, but don't sit here and attempt to apply some absurd correlation to two different issues because the writer has a desire to make it about race.
Just a shame you had to attack my little boy, the banning is far better than you deserve. So long scumbag, let us know how the view from 20,000 ft is someday.
Quote:
I still hopes it turns out that way
Just a shame you had to attack my little boy, the banning is far better than you deserve. So long scumbag, let us know how the view from 20,000 ft is someday.
Here we go with the banning nonsensical threats again. So far you have been firing nothing but blanks with regards to those threats. Why not give it a rest at this point because everyone is tired of this shit.
Supporting hh's attack on my son? Not like you at all montana.
Supporting hh's attack on my son? Not like you at all montana.
I am not supporting anything, but you're the one that started the shit up in this thread and the banning threats by you are becoming silly to keep pulling. No need to ruin a thread with excellent discussion in it because you got a grudge going on
Thought they were blanks also.
Go away dickhead
Thought they were blanks also.
Go away dickhead
Well lets see, you have made the threat at least 4 times, and as per your M.O. you're 0-4. But you go on making them, it gets added to the long laugh list of your BBI resume.
You're jumping into something that has absolutely nothing to do with you. Unless you are defending HH you need to go harass someone else. Talk about distracting from the original post, that's on you.
Facts don't matter, he's rollin'
How could you have a problem with this guy bringing it up? He should have been tossed off BBI the first time.
I didn't see what happened but what could it possibly be to reply like that and then follow up with It again? Isn't that fool like 60 years old? And he says shit like that? And wants to meet up to fight about it?
That's hilarious and sad.
Quote:
Doesn't seem like a threat...
Facts don't matter, he's rollin'
LOL...And i give you under 2 months to follow in those footsteps
AP in Halfmoon is quite clearly barilko for those keeping score.
How could you have a problem with this guy bringing it up? He should have been tossed off BBI the first time.
I didn't see what happened but what could it possibly be to reply like that and then follow up with It again? Isn't that fool like 60 years old? And he says shit like that? And wants to meet up to fight about it?
That's hilarious and sad.
Because this thread is dealing with something else completely. Rocky can make his own thread to fight with someone, this is a different subject and the grudge crap gets old in threads where a good discussion is going on.
HH said something wrong and when it happened i even stated that, but Rocky trolled him on here and he was silly enough to bite on it. Rocky really wants to address, man the fuck up and make a special thread for it, but he won't do that will he?
Quote:
is from the perspective of the woman's attorney, whether true or not
Including the judge's statements?
But know I see why I haven't heard this before. Aside from the media and Madison Avenue burying it, instead of dealing with the story, a lot of people want to focus on the person who wrote the story. Meanwhile, Manning will probably scoop up some more endorsements.
From Florio who himself is a Lawyer..His comments, in part:
The ensuing #longread from Shaun King of the Daily News is at times hard to follow, as it attempts to summarize most of the 74 pages in chronological order. Also, King’s article displays a clear anti-Peyton bias, and more than a little melodrama. This #notaslongread item comes from the 74-page document itself, which has been published in full by the Daily News.
Before going any farther, it’s important to understand what the 74-page document is, and what it isn’t. The 74-page document is a piece of advocacy. The 74-page document is something that was written by the lawyers representing Jamie Ann Naughright in her defamation case against the Mannings. The 74-page document is, necessarily, one-sided.
The 74-page document is not objective. The 74-page document is not supposed to be objective. The 74-page document is not a court order or any other decision made by a neutral party. And, ultimately, the 74-page document is incomplete without comparing it to the corresponding “Facts of the Case” document submitted by the defendants in the case.
Quote:
In comment 12813978 glowrider said:
Quote:
Doesn't seem like a threat...
Facts don't matter, he's rollin'
LOL...And i give you under 2 months to follow in those footsteps
There ya go, misdirection. You were wrong, just shut up and slink away. Have a nice night.
Quote:
In comment 12813986 Cruzin said:
Quote:
In comment 12813978 glowrider said:
Quote:
Doesn't seem like a threat...
Facts don't matter, he's rollin'
LOL...And i give you under 2 months to follow in those footsteps
There ya go, misdirection. You were wrong, just shut up and slink away. Have a nice night.
The really funny thing here? He still has 4 more lives to go until he catches up to you..lol
Quote:
Headhunter deserves a punch in the face. Or two.
How could you have a problem with this guy bringing it up? He should have been tossed off BBI the first time.
I didn't see what happened but what could it possibly be to reply like that and then follow up with It again? Isn't that fool like 60 years old? And he says shit like that? And wants to meet up to fight about it?
That's hilarious and sad.
Because this thread is dealing with something else completely. Rocky can make his own thread to fight with someone, this is a different subject and the grudge crap gets old in threads where a good discussion is going on.
HH said something wrong and when it happened i even stated that, but Rocky trolled him on here and he was silly enough to bite on it. Rocky really wants to address, man the fuck up and make a special thread for it, but he won't do that will he?
How deep is that hole you're digging for yourself? 6 feet under? Got an echo yet?
BB, he attacked my son. It's in this thread.
Quote:
In comment 12814009 KWALL2 said:
Quote:
Headhunter deserves a punch in the face. Or two.
How could you have a problem with this guy bringing it up? He should have been tossed off BBI the first time.
I didn't see what happened but what could it possibly be to reply like that and then follow up with It again? Isn't that fool like 60 years old? And he says shit like that? And wants to meet up to fight about it?
That's hilarious and sad.
Because this thread is dealing with something else completely. Rocky can make his own thread to fight with someone, this is a different subject and the grudge crap gets old in threads where a good discussion is going on.
HH said something wrong and when it happened i even stated that, but Rocky trolled him on here and he was silly enough to bite on it. Rocky really wants to address, man the fuck up and make a special thread for it, but he won't do that will he?
How deep is that hole you're digging for yourself? 6 feet under? Got an echo yet?
Why you going to threaten me with it now? That one would be hilarious
He said something really stupid awhile back and Rocky trolled him in here on it again and he bit on it.
OHHH....watch out B, "you're digging a hole for yourself"...OHHH
You want to defend Cam. Defend him. Don't pull the 4th grade argument that somebody else did worse. Yes, what Peyton did (twice) was wrong. WTF does that have to do with the current league MVP acting like a two year old and sulking.
I love Cam's enthusiasm. I disliked the excuses for not going after the fumble and then not answering questions after the game.
Headhunter banned
Montana making a fool of himself
b in Alb siding with the fool in the hole
("Damn right I ordered the Code Red!") some people just aren't that bright.
Tell Kendrick I said "Hi"
Weird and very sad all at the same time
How stupid do you have to be? And anyone defending Headhunter's position on this ought to be ashamed of themselves.
I like Headhunter a lot, but his post is indefensible. And he did it TWICE.
How stupid do you have to be? And anyone defending Headhunter's position on this ought to be ashamed of themselves.
I like Headhunter a lot, but his post is indefensible. And he did it TWICE.
NOT ONE person defended his statements. But ignoring the fact that Rocky trolled him and was the one who initiated the bullshit in this threads is pretty remarkable
bahahaha
Quote:
.
bahahaha
Brett has been killing it all night
However this is one example of where I really can't blame a father for doing so having had that said about his son and it's arguably the worst incident for people to hang their hats on when complaining about someone being a crybaby regardless of who it is or how you may feel about him.
If someone posts something about child rape, I would pray that person would e-mail us immediately.
I get many more immediate complaints when someone is ticked off about far more innocuous comments.
I get many more immediate complaints when someone is ticked off about far more innocuous comments.
Don't bother with the truth or facts Eric, it just gets in the way for these guys.
How stupid do you have to be? And anyone defending Headhunter's position on this ought to be ashamed of themselves.
I like Headhunter a lot, but his post is indefensible. And he did it TWICE.
Perhaps the smartest action would have been to ban them both. Rocky/Cruzin has a looooong history of crappy behavior on here, and is at least guilty of dredging up an old "insult" for the purposes of getting someone banned.
This smacks of, if not a double standard, then a real inability to attach consequences to actions for all parties involved.
You chastised me for detracting from the original topic. My participation here was 4 posts before you chimed in, 1 of which was on topic. My conversation with HH was over, you were the one that reignited and took the thread in a different direction. This proves you are a hypocrite.
You accused me of false threats. My final post, before you intervened, was after HH's account was already suspended. If you had bothered to check his status before you typed your drivel you would have known this and avoided embarrassing yourself but even after a neutral 3rd party told you you were wrong and then another neutral poster confirmed you were mistaken you weren't man enough to admit you were wrong.
This left you with only one option, attack the poster. This proves you are a coward.
Then, somewhere after your balls shriveled up and you started babbling because you were too far into it to back out now you mentioned that you were present on the original thread a month ago when HH threatened my son, then he justified it by saying that anyone who disagreed with the statement was anti-gay and a homophobe, then he gave testimonial on his feelings towards gays in America yet you didn't say anything. Not one " that's not nice HH", "that's just wrong HH", "lighten up HH" but you expect people to listen to you chastise Archie Manning for how he handled his son 20 years ago in college? Teach us how to hold the moral high ground oh anointed one. This proves you are a pussy.
I would like to thank you for this, it's here for everyone to see how much of a hypocrite, coward and pussy you are. I would like to claim a hand in the exposure but you did it all by your self.
I think that's the over on Rocky's latent tendencies coming to the fore, no?
That said, I wish we were more nuanced with our language. To me "sexual assault" implies that Peyton touched the trainer in appropriate places and I think many people connect it with rape. While what Peyton allegedly did was inappropriate and punishable, it doesn't seem like there was any sexual motivation behind it.
If someone put their dick and balls on your wife/moms/sisters face you wouldn't consider that to be a sexual assault?!
Rockyy (or whatever name your using after your 5th banning) Please stop with your absolute insane rational.
The cowardice is on exhibit by the fact you can't handle your problems by yourself, you always have to run to Eric for resolution because you lack the means to address on your own, you don't handle it because your personal issues deny you the ability to do so, thus the need for "big brother Eric" to bail you out
You have sat here for 3 months running around acting like you have some special "Ban Hammer". You know the reality here Rocky? Your nothing but a punk ass on this board who plays a shitload of games pushing the boundaries of their latest rules that allowed them back on this board for the 5th fucking time. You think because you gave Eric a ride one time that this grants you some special privilege, that alone illustrates what a weak fuck you are and how meaningless your life is.
In reality your a despicable twat who the vast majority despises. HeadHunter was completely wrong for what he said but you know what his greatest crime is? Was making your sorry lame ass a sympathetic figure. You run when its convenient, you cry like a woman when it hurts you, you hide when its beneficial, you use your past mental issues as a crutch, and your whole persona on here is about as distasteful as it comes.
You have been banned more then any other, and yet your pussified ways makes you beg to come back because you lack any pride, and any relevancy in real life. You lack the basic foundation of what constitutes a man and you illustrate that continuously with your actions on here. Basically you're just a friendless little piece of shit, and the funny thing is that virtually everyone on this board knows this. You will undoubtedly be banned again and the board will be better for it, Its what you do and what you are all about.
You chastised me for detracting from the original topic. My participation here was 4 posts before you chimed in, 1 of which was on topic. My conversation with HH was over, you were the one that reignited and took the thread in a different direction. This proves you are a hypocrite.
You accused me of false threats. My final post, before you intervened, was after HH's account was already suspended. If you had bothered to check his status before you typed your drivel you would have known this and avoided embarrassing yourself but even after a neutral 3rd party told you you were wrong and then another neutral poster confirmed you were mistaken you weren't man enough to admit you were wrong.
This left you with only one option, attack the poster. This proves you are a coward.
Then, somewhere after your balls shriveled up and you started babbling because you were too far into it to back out now you mentioned that you were present on the original thread a month ago when HH threatened my son, then he justified it by saying that anyone who disagreed with the statement was anti-gay and a homophobe, then he gave testimonial on his feelings towards gays in America yet you didn't say anything. Not one " that's not nice HH", "that's just wrong HH", "lighten up HH" but you expect people to listen to you chastise Archie Manning for how he handled his son 20 years ago in college? Teach us how to hold the moral high ground oh anointed one. This proves you are a pussy.
I would like to thank you for this, it's here for everyone to see how much of a hypocrite, coward and pussy you are. I would like to claim a hand in the exposure but you did it all by your self.
Please stop with your absolute insane rational. The cowardice is on exhibit by the fact you can't handle your problems by yourself, you always have to run to Eric for resolution because you lack the means to address on your own, you don't handle it because your personal issues deny you the ability to do so, thus the need for "big brother Eric" to bail you out
You have sat here for 3 months running around acting like you have some special "Ban Hammer". You know the reality here Rocky? Your nothing but a punk ass on this board who plays a shitload of games pushing the boundaries of their latest rules that allowed them back on this board for the 5th fucking time. You think because you gave Eric a ride one time that this grants you some special privilege, that alone illustrates what a weak fuck you are and how meaningless your life is.
In reality your a despicable twat who the vast majority despises. HeadHunter was completely wrong for what he said but you know what his greatest crime is? Was making your bitch ass a sympathetic figure. You run when its convenient, you cry like a woman when it hurts you, you hide when its beneficial, you use your past mental issues as a crutch, and your whole persona on here is about as distasteful as it comes.
You have been banned more then any other, and yet your pussy ways makes you beg to come back because you lack any pride and any relevancy in real life. You lack the basic foundation of what constitutes a man and you illustrate that continuously with your actions on here. Basically you're just a little piece of shit and the funny thing is that virtually everyone on this board knows this. You will undoubtedly be banned again and the board will be better for it, Its what you do and what you are all about.
Rockyy (or whatever name your using after your 5th banning) Please stop with your absolute insane rational.
The cowardice is on exhibit by the fact you can't handle your problems by yourself, you always have to run to Eric for resolution because you lack the means to address on your own, you don't handle it because your personal issues deny you the ability to do so, thus the need for "big brother Eric" to bail you out
You have sat here for 3 months running around acting like you have some special "Ban Hammer". You know the reality here Rocky? Your nothing but a punk ass on this board who plays a shitload of games pushing the boundaries of their latest rules that allowed them back on this board for the 5th fucking time. You think because you gave Eric a ride one time that this grants you some special privilege, that alone illustrates what a weak fuck you are and how meaningless your life is.
In reality your a despicable twat who the vast majority despises. HeadHunter was completely wrong for what he said but you know what his greatest crime is? Was making your sorry lame ass a sympathetic figure. You run when its convenient, you cry like a woman when it hurts you, you hide when its beneficial, you use your past mental issues as a crutch, and your whole persona on here is about as distasteful as it comes.
You have been banned more then any other, and yet your pussified ways makes you beg to come back because you lack any pride and any relevancy in real life. You lack the basic foundation of what constitutes a man, and you illustrate that continuously with your actions on here. Basically you're just a friendless little piece of shit, and the funny thing is that virtually everyone on this board knows this. You will undoubtedly be banned again and the board will be better for it, Its what you do and what you are all about.
Rockyy (or whatever name your using after your 5th banning) Please stop with your absolute insane rational.
The cowardice is on exhibit by the fact you can't handle your problems by yourself, you always have to run to Eric for resolution because you lack the means to address on your own, you don't handle it because your personal issues deny you the ability to do so, thus the need for "big brother Eric" to bail you out
You have sat here for 3 months running around acting like you have some special "Ban Hammer". You know the reality here Rocky? Your nothing but a punk ass on this board who plays a shitload of games pushing the boundaries of their latest rules that allowed them back on this board for the 5th fucking time. You think because you gave Eric a ride one time that this grants you some special privilege, that alone illustrates what a weak fuck you are and how meaningless your life is.
In reality your a despicable twat who the vast majority despises. HeadHunter was completely wrong for what he said but you know what his greatest crime is? Was making your sorry lame ass a sympathetic figure. You run when its convenient, you cry like a woman when it hurts you, you hide when its beneficial, you use your past mental issues as a crutch, and your whole persona on here is about as distasteful as it comes.
You have been banned more then any other, and yet your pussified ways makes you beg to come back because you lack any pride, and any relevancy in real life. You lack the basic foundation of what constitutes a man and you illustrate that continuously with your actions on here. Basically you're just a friendless little piece of shit, and the funny thing is that virtually everyone on this board knows this. You will undoubtedly be banned again and the board will be better for it, Its what you do and what you are all about.
You chastised me for detracting from the original topic. My participation here was 4 posts before you chimed in, 1 of which was on topic. My conversation with HH was over, you were the one that reignited and took the thread in a different direction. This proves you are a hypocrite.
You accused me of false threats. My final post, before you intervened, was after HH's account was already suspended. If you had bothered to check his status before you typed your drivel you would have known this and avoided embarrassing yourself but even after a neutral 3rd party told you you were wrong and then another neutral poster confirmed you were mistaken you weren't man enough to admit you were wrong.
This left you with only one option, attack the poster. This proves you are a coward.
Then, somewhere after your balls shriveled up and you started babbling because you were too far into it to back out now you mentioned that you were present on the original thread a month ago when HH threatened my son, then he justified it by saying that anyone who disagreed with the statement was anti-gay and a homophobe, then he gave testimonial on his feelings towards gays in America yet you didn't say anything. Not one " that's not nice HH", "that's just wrong HH", "lighten up HH" but you expect people to listen to you chastise Archie Manning for how he handled his son 20 years ago in college? Teach us how to hold the moral high ground oh anointed one. This proves you are a pussy.
I would like to thank you for this, it's here for everyone to see how much of a hypocrite, coward and pussy you are. I would like to claim a hand in the exposure but you did it all by your self.
Please stop with your absolute insane rational. You have sat here for 3 months running around acting like you have some special "Ban Hammer". You know the reality here Rocky? Your nothing but a punk ass on this board who plays a shitload of games pushing the boundaries of their latest rules that allowed them back on this board for the 5th fucking time. You think because you gave Eric a ride one time that this grants you some special privilege, that alone illustrates what a weak fuck you are.
In reality your a despicable twat who the vast majority despises. HeadHunter was completely wrong for what he said but you know what his greatest crime is? Was making your bitch ass a sympathetic figure. You run when its convenient, you cry like a woman when it hurts you, you hide when its beneficial, you use your past mental issues as a crutch, and your whole persona on here is about as distasteful as it comes.
You have been banned more then any other, and yet your pussy ways makes you beg to come back because you lack any pride and any relevancy in real life. You lack the basic foundation of what constitutes a man and you illustrate that continuously with your actions on here. Basically you're just a little piece of shit and the funny thing is that virtually everyone on this board knows this. You will undoubtedly be banned again and the board will be better for it, Its what you do and what you are all about and the best thing is that you know what i say is true, it eats you up at night and controls your whole life.
The proof is in the posts, all you had to do was admit you were wrong and you could have saved yourself all this embarrassment. Probably not have gone to bed angry either.
Oh well, you win some, you lose some, you may possibly win one in the future.
Which version of the 4 last posts should I be reading?
Stutter much?
You going to cry to Eric now bitchboy?
I'm glad I'm not alone. For the life of me I don't know how people can tell what someones past handle was let alone keep track of it all.
Quote:
I thought I was on here too much...Then I find threads where people discuss past identities or arguments spreading over several threads.
I'm glad I'm not alone. For the life of me I don't know how people can tell what someones past handle was orkeep track of it all.
I always suspected that you were Matt in
Syrause
How have you been my friend? How has married life been treating you?
Don't forget you're always welcome if the two of you are ever going to be traveling this way.
How have you been my friend? How has married life been treating you?
Don't forget you're always welcome if the two of you are ever going to be traveling this way.
Link - ( New Window )
....
This writer might be a race baiter and bringing Cam up in this Peyton discussion might be stupid. But imagine if Cam did this in college. Cam gets shit for being like most superstud college athletes and getting paid to play. Peyton gets 0 shit for sexually assaulting a woman trainer. Imagine if the roles were reversed. You don't think Cam would get more shit for it than Peyton? Peyton is one of the most overprotected athletes by his league/media I've ever seen, it's a bit of a joke.
Let's not forget what a crybaby Peyton can be when he loses too. Remember when he threw his entire OL under the bus after a playoff loss? Cam didn't do something like that.
Kluwe is an attention whore, still tugging on progressive Twitterati for back-pats and a further 15 minutes of fame. Tell me again, oh millionaire punter, how all white people need to check their privilege.