for display only
Big Blue Interactive The Corner Forum  
Back to the Corner

Archived Thread

Myles Jack and Jaylon Smith injury information

Listening to a Mike Ryan who is/was (?) a personal trainer for the Giants and Jaguars on Sirius he was discussing Myles Jack. He said that he had a lateral meniscus injury which bears the most weight in the leg. It connects the thigh bone to the shin bone. It is much different than the medial (?) meniscus. He also said that most of the meniscus cannot repair itself since it doesn't have great blood flow. However the outter edge does get blood flow. Most surgeries on the meniscus just remove a part of the meniscus and flatten it out. With Jack they did not remove any of his meniscus, they repaired it. That sounds good, right? Well, this is such a rare situation that doctors and teams don't know what to make of it which would give credence to the mixed medicals with Jack especially the ones that say he hasn't showed much healing from the last medical at the combine.

He went into Jaylon Smith and said that the nerve damage is very concerning because the part of his leg that picks the foot up toward the body is what seems most effected. I missed the majority of the Smith discussion since I was trying to type about Jack.

He is talking about his discussion with teams and it always centers around risk factor. He isn't grading him as a scout. That isn't his job. The teams want examples of other athletes have gone through similar injuries. The teams take that info and uses it accordingly.
Just  
mdthedream : 7:10 am : link
seems like a big risk for a team picking high.
A Healthy Jack Would Be A Great Pick...  
Jim in Tampa : 7:12 am : link
But I get a kick out the posters who hope Jack is available at 10 due to injury concerns.

If he drops to 10 due to injury concerns, why would the Giants pick him? Wouldn't they have the same concerns as all the other teams that passed on Jack?
Too risky for Jerry. No way Giants select Jack  
ZogZerg : 7:33 am : link
if he is there.
Jim  
It's because of value. At 5 to a team like Jacksonville there will be players with similar value like Tunsil, Bosa, Buckner. At 10 he's far & away the best player on the board.

That sounds scary  
mfsd : 8:03 am : link
And picking #10 is a tough spot to whiff bc of an injury shortened career
Floyd is the safer and IMO  
NikkiMac : 8:04 am : link
Better pick at 10 .

I wouldn't touch Jack or Smith and I don't think Reese will make those picks with his ass on the line.
You  
mdthedream : 8:05 am : link
could have said the same about Todd Gurley. He was the best player before the injury happened.
For me  
allstarjim : 8:07 am : link
When you see that Jack did a 10'4" broad jump and 40 inch vertical at his pro day, that gives me a bit more confidence in taking him. I know he didn't run, but I think if he's leaping like that right now he'll be running around pretty good at some point, but of course, I'm not a doctor, and that's who the Giants need to listen to. But he's certainly a rare human being, even amongst NFL athletes. A healthy Jack would be like winning the lotto.
Jack should be a no brainier at 10  
Personally I think he could be the next LT and Reese would pass him as he's a LB. Reese and imassume the rest of the FO seem to think the only thing that matters is the pass rush.

Jack's injury concerns give him the perfect out. If he drops. Kid is going to be a star.
Thanks!  
DonQuixote : 8:17 am : link
Thoughtful post. You can imagine the risk/reward playing out during the draft and how difficult it is to be making these decisions.
And for the huge Reese fans I'm  
Being somewaht sarcastic about passing on LT so please don't get it undies in a bunch. Nothing could be clearer though that the FO looks at LB as much less important than other positions
Very familiar with meniscus injuries  
BlueHurricane : 8:19 am : link
Shocked they would attempt to repair it. There is so little to work with and as stated it usually does not get the needed blood flow to allow it to fully heal up.

Will be interesting to see what kind of career he has.
RE: For me  
Rjanyg : 8:19 am : link
In comment 12907142 allstarjim said:
Quote:
When you see that Jack did a 10'4" broad jump and 40 inch vertical at his pro day, that gives me a bit more confidence in taking him. I know he didn't run, but I think if he's leaping like that right now he'll be running around pretty good at some point, but of course, I'm not a doctor, and that's who the Giants need to listen to. But he's certainly a rare human being, even amongst NFL athletes. A healthy Jack would be like winning the lotto.


If I were NYG I would want to see Jack do a 40 and run some drills. Same with Floyd, I would want to see him bench 225 lbs. since he didn't do it at his pro day or the combine. Can't miss on this pick. That said, I still thing Jack goes before 10 and that Floyd will be available.
Don't be an asshole  
Carl in CT : 8:28 am : link
Cause you are. Don't compare anyone who hasn't played a down, has I injury concerns to LT.
If any team has recent experience with this course of rehab...  
... it's the Giants. From the description, Jack's situation seems similar to Osi Umenyiora's in 2008. Osi tore his lateral meniscus a bit earlier in the football year than Jack, opted for the same general course of treatment (repair rather than removal), and like Jack was out for the rest of that year. The cautionary aspect of Osi's story is that he was horrible in 2009, and never fully regained his circa-2005 form.

Of course, every injury is unique, and Osi had already been diminished by a hip injury in 2006.
These cartlidge issue does not prevent players from playing  
it just might cause issue later in life.....

Drafting a great player vs an iffy player is the REAL risk.
RE: Don't be an asshole  
In comment 12907166 Carl in CT said:
[quote] Cause you are. Don't compare anyone who hasn't played a down, has I injury concerns to LT. [/quot

Let's see who is the asshole. You or I. I need that Reese would pas on LT due to his playing LB. Where did i compare the two? I said Jack will be a srar. I even made a second post pointing out I was being sarcastic about the LT comment assuming that some idiot would jump into idiocy. Congrats. You win.

Carl. Just take this for what it's worth. You either are a moron with no reading comprehension or a moron. Calling me am asshole is also pretty funny. Learn to read. Not my fault you only have one set of grandparents
Why take a chance on Jack  
Cruzin : 8:38 am : link

when we could have the best player in the draft with Smith?

Waiting a year is the price you pay for getting the best player with the #10 pick.

Yes, it would be better to trade down and pick Smith later in the draft but the Giants just don't do that.

And yes Eli is no spring chicken and we have to win now but that just realistically isn't going to happen unless we outscore everyone this year while the defense gets built.

Maybe, if the people who think Smith will be there in the second rd ( which I consider highly unlikely) are right, we could get both Jack and Smith at 10 and 40. Then we would actually have LBs and a defense we could look forward to see playing.

A pass rush covers up a lot of flaws in the secondary but you have to be able to stop the run and cover the TEs and RBs in pass coverage. This defense was close to the worst in the NFL, you can't fix that in a year, it's a 2 year rebuild, let's draft accordingly.
RE:  
LauderdaleMatty said:
Quote:
And for the huge Reese fans I'm... Being somewhat sarcastic about passing on LT so please don't get it undies in a bunch. Nothing could be clearer though that the FO looks at LB as much less important than other positions

If Jerry were GM of a team with a 3-4 base defense, I think he would be all over Lawrence Taylor, Von Miller, DeMarcus Ware, etc. He might have Markus Kuhn and Cullen Jenkins at 5-technique DE, but he wouldn't neglect the edge-rushing OLB.
Whoa Matty!!  
I think if healthy? Jack will be very good but Lt good? I don't think so. I personally think Lt is a once in a lifetime player. In our lifetime, I don't think we will see another like him. A player of LT's size, strength, speed, agility and pure ferocity and could use his ability to will things to happen. I just don't see that in Jack. He's going to be good but not that good.
I see Myles Jack having the same type of impact as Jessie Armstead.  
Curtis in VA : 8:53 am : link
Might not be LT good, but thats till pretty darn good.
RE: Jack should be a no brainier at 10  
Cruzin : 9:01 am : link
In comment 12907145 LauderdaleMatty said:
Quote:
Personally I think he could be the next LT and Reese would pass him as he's a LB. Reese and imassume the rest of the FO seem to think the only thing that matters is the pass rush.

Jack's injury concerns give him the perfect out. If he drops. Kid is going to be a star.


This post does not say Jack will be the next LT, it emphasizes the neglect toward LBs in the draft.

No one could possibly be LT, who could go on a 3 day coke binge, show up on Sunday with no sleep or nutrients in 72 hours and dominate a football game like LT? They broke the mold after LT.
Too much risk, I say lets grab an OT and move on to Rd 2  
PatersonPlank : 9:06 am : link
.
With his injury, is it safe to say....  
BamaBlue : 9:35 am : link
we don't know Jack?
LT didn't arrive with a major knee injury.  
The most injured team in the league, 3 years straight.

Some of you never, ever learn.

Jack is a remote-thrower pick for me.
Fuck  
Torrag : 9:40 am : link
This is the wrong draft for two of the top three defensive prospects to have serious injury risk attached to them. We need defensive impact players.

Same goes for having two top ten picks in doubt which could thin the talent pool at #10.

Fuck.
RE: Too much risk, I say lets grab an OT and move on to Rd 2  
In comment 12907208 PatersonPlank said:
Quote:
.
Thank you.
RE: Why take a chance on Jack  
allstarjim : 9:53 am : link
In comment 12907180 Cruzin said:
Quote:

when we could have the best player in the draft with Smith?

Waiting a year is the price you pay for getting the best player with the #10 pick.

Yes, it would be better to trade down and pick Smith later in the draft but the Giants just don't do that.

And yes Eli is no spring chicken and we have to win now but that just realistically isn't going to happen unless we outscore everyone this year while the defense gets built.

Maybe, if the people who think Smith will be there in the second rd ( which I consider highly unlikely) are right, we could get both Jack and Smith at 10 and 40. Then we would actually have LBs and a defense we could look forward to see playing.

A pass rush covers up a lot of flaws in the secondary but you have to be able to stop the run and cover the TEs and RBs in pass coverage. This defense was close to the worst in the NFL, you can't fix that in a year, it's a 2 year rebuild, let's draft accordingly.


Why? Because there is no guarantee Smith will ever play again, and if he does, there's no guarantee he will physically be as good as he used to be. And he very likely will be one more injury to the same knee ending his career. Finally, even if both were healthy, Jack might be the better player anyway.
RE: Fuck  
Johnny5 : 10:21 am : link
In comment 12907257 Torrag said:
Quote:
This is the wrong draft for two of the top three defensive prospects to have serious injury risk attached to them. We need defensive impact players.

Same goes for having two top ten picks in doubt which could thin the talent pool at #10.

Fuck.

Yep. And it's why I see Floyd as our pick at #10. If he's there... lol.
RE: Very familiar with meniscus injuries  
mdc1 : 11:07 am : link
In comment 12907153 BlueHurricane said:
Quote:
Shocked they would attempt to repair it. There is so little to work with and as stated it usually does not get the needed blood flow to allow it to fully heal up.

Will be interesting to see what kind of career he has.


ice, NSAID
Then so be Brinkley, Kennard, and crew  
micky : 11:17 am : link
Too bad
Smith would concern me more than Jack  
sjnyfan : 11:48 am : link
Smith tore his ACL, LCL and reportedly has nerve damage.

Jack tore the meniscus. I'm no doctor and I know that everyone is different but the success of coming back from a meniscus seems much higher than what Smith will have to go through. Plus Jack has 3 extra months of recovery time. For all we know, Jack didn't want to risk his NFL career by coming back to soon for UCLA and the 'concern' by teams could be smokescreen. It is that time of year and also why the chatter seems to be so mixed.

Didn't Michael Boley have a meniscus tear his first year here? I believe Arian Foster hid one from the Texans and managed to play through it. On the basketball side Russell Westbrook tore his and is just as explosive as ever. Metta World Peace came back from one after only 12 days. I know, that's extreme and again overall I know that everyone is different but unless there's someone who's career was devastated or ended over a meniscus tear recently please let me know. Besides, I'm very encouraged by his broad jump and vertical.
We've gambled before  
Rambo : 11:49 am : link
and have had too many injuries which I feel was our major cause for losing and missing the playoffs over the years. We need healthy players first and foremost especially in some key areas like DL, linebacker, safety and o-line.
Great  
AcidTest : 11:54 am : link
post. Thanks. Too risky for both.
You need a starter with the 1st pick  
#10* : 12:20 pm : link
If the best doctors in the world aren't sure if he will be able to continue to play...
A meniscus doesn't connect bone to bone -  
12aob : 12:26 pm : link
it is additional cushioning for the knee joint. The lateral collateral ligament connects the femur (thigh bone) to the tibia (shin bone).

The rest of what was said sounds accurate - that generally menisci don't heal well due to limited blood flow but some sections of it can heal well.

Several years ago Osi tore his medial meniscus in training camp or early season and they opted to repair it rather than remove it. The thinking was he was better off being lost for the season but retaining the meniscus to help tolerate the future stress on his knee given his occupation.
Info on both  
old man : 12:37 pm : link
seems to be filled with mixed and varied determinations.
I would be extremely cautious on looking favorably on either player.
Too bad too because they seem to be possible stars in the NFL sans injury. Jacks in the better scenario medically.
Stop it with the oline  
Mike B from JC : 12:56 pm : link
Not impact players. Already took 3 high in the last 4 drafts. Look at Dallas, all those oline high picks and romo got his butt kicked. Rather use it on a top defender, then find a good lunchpail oline later.
Give me Jack or Smith....  
Emlen'sGremlins : 12:57 pm : link
....over the light in his pants, square peg round hole, OLB/DE 3-4/4-3 hybrid from Georgia.
I posted on these injuries in the last Jack and last Jaylon Smith  
732NYG : 1:08 pm : link
threads if anyone wants to take a look. I'm on my phone so I can't link it right now, but it shouldn't be hard to find. If Jack's meniscus is intact, I like his prognosis a lot more than if they had removed some of it.
if stanley is indeed  
msh : 5:33 pm : link
the player the titans covet hopefully he is still on the board at 10 and the titans want to trade back up to get him

i would like jack alot i think he is a high impact player they could use badly but the chance to fix the RT,WR,DE say with that one pick they have at 10 if they trade back that would allow them to fix more

they could then use their own picks to draft help at DB,LB,DT,TE and OG too as right now they need to pick which positions they can target.

whereas a trade back could net them more depth at more positions they could win with the LB corp they have now especially if they fix the OL (both RT and RG),upgrade the secondary (with possibly a CB and a FS),DE rotation,WR corp maybe even add a later round TE bryce williams being someone i would like in round 5
'Several years ago Osi tore his medial meniscus'...  
Torrag : 5:36 pm : link
...interesting fact...thx. The Giants will have perhaps slightly better info on how to assess/handle this having gone through it before with one of their premier players.
RE: A meniscus doesn't connect bone to bone -  
shyster : 5:52 pm : link
In comment 12907652 12aob said:
Quote:
it is additional cushioning for the knee joint. The lateral collateral ligament connects the femur (thigh bone) to the tibia (shin bone).

The rest of what was said sounds accurate - that generally menisci don't heal well due to limited blood flow but some sections of it can heal well.

Several years ago Osi tore his medial meniscus in training camp or early season and they opted to repair it rather than remove it. The thinking was he was better off being lost for the season but retaining the meniscus to help tolerate the future stress on his knee given his occupation.


Osi tore his lateral meniscus not his medial.

But it's not clear that Osi tore his lateral in the same way that Jack tore his or that Osi's required the same type of surgical repair.

The lateral meniscus may not attach "bone to bone" but the anterior horn of the lateral meniscus does attach to the tibia. According to reports, Jack's lateral meniscus was torn off the bone and he had surgery to sew it back on.
Link - ( New Window )
If Reese can get  
mrvax : 6:00 pm : link
the Giants doctors to give Jack a green light, by all means take him. As another poster noted, Jack has less bust potential than Floyd.
Rather take the guy who flies out of windows from upper floors  
xman : 8:19 pm : link
and manages to stay injury free. Nkemdiche
Back to the Corner