Nerves regrow at a rate of about 1 inch per month after a one-month lag time, Cooper said, and the injured area is roughly 6 inches above the muscle, so Smith – 3½ months out from surgery – has at least several more months of wait-and-see ahead.
he running and cutting.
Link - (
New Window )
That says about everything you need to know.....
Marcus Lattimore was never the same for example
is gonna take him before then .
You have no idea if that's true..Totally a guess without any real foundation
Good thing you cleared this up for everyone.
Actually, re-read what you wrote. It wasn't cut and dry and obvious at all. You definitively said THERE ARE GOING TO BE..Not might, not possibly, but an absolute..Please don't insult us by saying it was "obviously an opinion." You stated it as FACT...Not an "I believe," or "imo," rather THERE ARE GOING TO BE..
Big difference and hence my response of you can't possibly know..None of us can
Gotta take him at 10, he's not gonna be there at 40.
Waiting on Smith is the price you pay for getting the best player in the draft at #10. Realistically the chances are very slim that we have a playoff defense this year. High risk, high reward.
Ask Philly and the Rams how much it cost them to move up, a lot more than waiting on Smith and they won't even be getting the best player. Christ, he's working with the Cowboys physician, don't give Dallas a shot at him. They wouldn't take him at #4 would they?
This kid will be the face of the Giants after Eli's gone and the leader of our championship defense for the next 8-10 years. With so many question marks in a substandard draft, it makes sense to grab the best player. Everyone's a risk, go for the highest reward.
Quote:
There are going to be 31 teams regretting they didn't take this kid.
Actually, re-read what you wrote. It wasn't cut and dry and obvious at all. You definitively said THERE ARE GOING TO BE..Not might, not possibly, but an absolute..Please don't insult us by saying it was "obviously an opinion." You stated it as FACT...Not an "I believe," or "imo," rather THERE ARE GOING TO BE..
Big difference and hence my response of you can't possibly know..None of us can
Wow bb56 lay off a guy with an opinion. Jeez.
Gotta take him at 10, he's not gonna be there at 40.
Waiting on Smith is the price you pay for getting the best player in the draft at #10. Realistically the chances are very slim that we have a playoff defense this year. High risk, high reward.
Ask Philly and the Rams how much it cost them to move up, a lot more than waiting on Smith and they won't even be getting the best player. Christ, he's working with the Cowboys physician, don't give Dallas a shot at him. They wouldn't take him at #4 would they?
This kid will be the face of the Giants after Eli's gone and the leader of our championship defense for the next 8-10 years. With so many question marks in a substandard draft, it makes sense to grab the best player. Everyone's a risk, go for the highest reward.
Smith would be a very high reward down the line, but there's no way in hell you can take him at 10 overall. Nobody would do that.
Gotta take him at 10, he's not gonna be there at 40.
Waiting on Smith is the price you pay for getting the best player in the draft at #10. Realistically the chances are very slim that we have a playoff defense this year. High risk, high reward.
Ask Philly and the Rams how much it cost them to move up, a lot more than waiting on Smith and they won't even be getting the best player. Christ, he's working with the Cowboys physician, don't give Dallas a shot at him. They wouldn't take him at #4 would they?
This kid will be the face of the Giants after Eli's gone and the leader of our championship defense for the next 8-10 years. With so many question marks in a substandard draft, it makes sense to grab the best player. Everyone's a risk, go for the highest reward.
You feel it prudent to spend a top ten pick on a player with a devastated knee with nerve damage because he played for your favorite college team. Gotcha
Who's better?
You take Floyd there's a risk he sucks.
You take Jack, he's got knee problems of his own
You take Elliot you have 6 RBs
Stanley or Conklin directly help Eli, I'd accept that and pray that Smith falls to rd 2.
Stanley, another Notre Damer, nothing wrong with having quality, talented players on your team.
What elite talents are there?
Did you just say BB56 is over 400 years old?
I knew it!
Quote:
In comment 12921481 joeinpa said:
Quote:
There are going to be 31 teams regretting they didn't take this kid.
Actually, re-read what you wrote. It wasn't cut and dry and obvious at all. You definitively said THERE ARE GOING TO BE..Not might, not possibly, but an absolute..Please don't insult us by saying it was "obviously an opinion." You stated it as FACT...Not an "I believe," or "imo," rather THERE ARE GOING TO BE..
Big difference and hence my response of you can't possibly know..None of us can
Wow bb56 lay off a guy with an opinion. Jeez.
Fine, just lay off stating opinions as facts..Big Al told me 15 years ago, that what is most annoying to many posters are statements that are emphatic without stating it's an opinion. That's what I WAS DOING and didn't realize it. So I try to always state that "I believe" or "imo." Do I always put in disclaimers? No..But I try to be careful with that..
Who's better?
You take Floyd there's a risk he sucks.
You take Jack, he's got knee problems of his own
You take Elliot you have 6 RBs
Stanley or Conklin directly help Eli, I'd accept that and pray that Smith falls to rd 2.
Stanley, another Notre Damer, nothing wrong with having quality, talented players on your team.
That high let someone else take the risk. Not confident he ever plays again (see Lattimore, Bennie Joppru, etc.) and even if he does, will he be the same?
You my friend are quite often an annoying twit.
Quote:
In comment 12921525 Big Blue '56 said:
Quote:
In comment 12921481 joeinpa said:
Quote:
There are going to be 31 teams regretting they didn't take this kid.
Actually, re-read what you wrote. It wasn't cut and dry and obvious at all. You definitively said THERE ARE GOING TO BE..Not might, not possibly, but an absolute..Please don't insult us by saying it was "obviously an opinion." You stated it as FACT...Not an "I believe," or "imo," rather THERE ARE GOING TO BE..
Big difference and hence my response of you can't possibly know..None of us can
Wow bb56 lay off a guy with an opinion. Jeez.
Fine, just lay off stating opinions as facts..Big Al told me 15 years ago, that what is most annoying to many posters are statements that are emphatic without stating it's an opinion. That's what I WAS DOING and didn't realize it. So I try to always state that "I believe" or "imo." Do I always put in disclaimers? No..But I try to be careful with that..
Why do you smash your fingers?