for display only
Big Blue Interactive The Corner Forum  
Back to the Corner

Archived Thread

Do the Giants realize that they don't have a #2 or #3 WR...

Josh in the City : 4/29/2016 11:00 am
...that they can rely on? We all know that the current iteration of the NFL is a passing league and we amazingly only have one weapon at WR. As you look at the roster and the holes that remain, to me, WR sticks out like a sore thumb.

Are we waiting to potentially sign a veteran? Does this team think they can get away with the 'talent' already on the roster?

Admittedly, I don't know as much about college players as others here so I'm curious if there are other WR's still available in the draft who are capable of contributing on day 1?

So what's the current plan and what do you want/expect to see happen?
Do you realize  
Jay on the Island : 4/29/2016 11:04 am : link
that CB is just as big of a need as WR. They also have needs at S, DE, RT, LB, G. They can't fill all those holes with one 1st round pick. The truth is I wasn't happy with the Apple pick but let's be patient and see what he develops into. Many people weren't happy with Beckham because they wanted Zach Martin.
We have five more picks.  
Klaatu : 4/29/2016 11:04 am : link
Relax.
do you realize  
deeee : 4/29/2016 11:05 am : link
the Giants only had ONE pick last night?
Jesus Christ  
Giantology : 4/29/2016 11:05 am : link
Yeah Josh, I'm pretty sure the front office is aware of the players on the roster.
Potential help in Rounds 2 and 3 depending on what the Giants think  
Torrag : 4/29/2016 11:06 am : link
Boyd and Shepard headline Round 2 for me as well as TE Hunter Henry who is my highest graded TE coming out since Gronk.

Carroo in Round 3

Peake in Round 4
I expect Cruz  
spike : 4/29/2016 11:06 am : link
To be no 3
To OP,  
Big Blue '56 : 4/29/2016 11:07 am : link
no they don't..
potential WR depth in rounds 2 & 3 depending on what the Giants think  
Bill L : 4/29/2016 11:08 am : link
but strap on your seatbelts for the season because no starters here.
I agree that it's a huge need, Josh, but I expect them to go WR in  
yatqb : 4/29/2016 11:09 am : link
one of the next two rounds, and perhaps sign someone like Boldin as well.

Problem is the team is so thin at so many positions that we don't have enough thumbs to fill all the holes in the dyke.
I understand  
Josh in the City : 4/29/2016 11:10 am : link
that this is the day after the draft but I'm not referring to the fact that we didn't draft a WR in rd 1 last night. In fact, I don't think there was a single WR in this draft that warranted a top 10 pick.

My question was more geared towards the offseason as a whole and what seems to be a lack of effort to even try and find true #2. We made no effort to re-sign Randle (which I agreed with) but we also made no known effort to address this glaring need.

So I'm asking the question in all seriousness, what is our current plan at this point in the offseason? I see everyone clamoring for Myles Jack in round 2 but we haven't spent a dime on our offense (while we've spent a kings ransom + a 1st rd pick on our defense) when it's in need of some major improvement.
The Giants probably have no idea  
UConn4523 : 4/29/2016 11:10 am : link
that they need other players on this team...
I'm really disappointed we  
Randy in CT : 4/29/2016 11:11 am : link
didn't address all our needs with one pick. dammitt.
RE: I'm really disappointed we  
Josh in the City : 4/29/2016 11:12 am : link
In comment 12932402 Randy in CT said:
Quote:
didn't address all our needs with one pick. dammitt.


Read my post above before making snide, useless, remarks.
that's just it  
djm : 4/29/2016 11:13 am : link
to say the Giants don't have a #2 or #3 WR is flat out false. They have guys on the roster and these aren't rookies. Some of them are even accomplished.

You don't need household names at every position. You won't be able to field a roster with household names at every position. It's simply not possible.

The Giants won super bowls with journeyman at some positions, including WR. Maybe a guy like Myles White can emerge as a decent player, even if not nearly elite. Maybe that's good enough to sort of hold things together. Maybe Cruz is in fact OK.

The Giants also likely draft a WR today or early tomorrow.

Josh - why do you think anybody on this site  
Jimmy Googs : 4/29/2016 11:13 am : link
knows what the Giant's plan is at WR?

Common sense says they will probably draft one, maybe as early as tonight. And then maybe bring whatever remaining free agent is out there to camp or find a late cut in Sept.

that's about it...
RE: that's just it  
Josh in the City : 4/29/2016 11:14 am : link
In comment 12932413 djm said:
Quote:
to say the Giants don't have a #2 or #3 WR is flat out false. They have guys on the roster and these aren't rookies. Some of them are even accomplished.

You don't need household names at every position. You won't be able to field a roster with household names at every position. It's simply not possible.

The Giants won super bowls with journeyman at some positions, including WR. Maybe a guy like Myles White can emerge as a decent player, even if not nearly elite. Maybe that's good enough to sort of hold things together. Maybe Cruz is in fact OK.

The Giants also likely draft a WR today or early tomorrow.

Seems like wishful thinking.
I think they have some hope for Geremy Davis as well.  
yatqb : 4/29/2016 11:14 am : link
Kid ran 4.47 at his pro day, and had great 3-cone numbers. Didn't have a drop as a senior. But we sure could use a burner who can take a bit of pressure off OBJ.
RE: Josh - why do you think anybody on this site  
Josh in the City : 4/29/2016 11:14 am : link
In comment 12932415 Jimmy Googs said:
Quote:
knows what the Giant's plan is at WR?

Common sense says they will probably draft one, maybe as early as tonight. And then maybe bring whatever remaining free agent is out there to camp or find a late cut in Sept.

that's about it...


I don't, I'm asking what you think the plan is and what options are still available.
RE: potential WR depth in rounds 2 & 3 depending on what the Giants think  
njm : 4/29/2016 11:15 am : link
In comment 12932388 Bill L said:
Quote:
but strap on your seatbelts for the season because no starters here.


Actually I think Shepard, Boyd and Carroo could all be starters, just not a #1. But we have a #1.
RE: RE: I'm really disappointed we  
x meadowlander : 4/29/2016 11:15 am : link
In comment 12932409 Josh in the City said:
Quote:
In comment 12932402 Randy in CT said:


Quote:


didn't address all our needs with one pick. dammitt.



Read my post above before making snide, useless, remarks.
Your initial post invited ridicule.

Sorry, but on this board, if you bend over and drop trou, don't be surprised when you get whacked.

"Do the Giants realize?" Is condescending, and given that the passing game is the core of the offense, yes, it's a safe bet that they 'realize'.

Maybe a title like "How are the Giants going to improve their WR corps?" would be more conducive to a serious conversation.
RE: RE: RE: I'm really disappointed we  
Josh in the City : 4/29/2016 11:16 am : link
In comment 12932432 x meadowlander said:
Quote:
In comment 12932409 Josh in the City said:


Quote:


In comment 12932402 Randy in CT said:


Quote:


didn't address all our needs with one pick. dammitt.



Read my post above before making snide, useless, remarks.

Your initial post invited ridicule.

Sorry, but on this board, if you bend over and drop trou, don't be surprised when you get whacked.

"Do the Giants realize?" Is condescending, and given that the passing game is the core of the offense, yes, it's a safe bet that they 'realize'.

Maybe a title like "How are the Giants going to improve their WR corps?" would be more conducive to a serious conversation.


I clarified my position, and yes the current Giants front office deserves plenty of criticism.
RE: that's just it  
LeonofKiev : 4/29/2016 11:17 am : link
In comment 12932413 djm said:
Quote:
to say the Giants don't have a #2 or #3 WR is flat out false. They have guys on the roster and these aren't rookies. Some of them are even accomplished.

You don't need household names at every position. You won't be able to field a roster with household names at every position. It's simply not possible.

The Giants won super bowls with journeyman at some positions, including WR. Maybe a guy like Myles White can emerge as a decent player, even if not nearly elite. Maybe that's good enough to sort of hold things together. Maybe Cruz is in fact OK.

The Giants also likely draft a WR today or early tomorrow.



LMAO so we have a #2 and #3 but you just don't name who they are? Who are these people?
If Tunsil was off the board  
Andy in Halifax : 4/29/2016 11:17 am : link
I would have taken Doctson, but if we get Shepard then that would be just fine. Shepard can play. If we strike out, we can give Bolden a call after the draft.

Also, you say we don't have a #2 or #3 but we do have a fully rehabilitated Cruz.
...  
Eric from BBI : Admin : 4/29/2016 11:18 am : link
The moment when it dawns on people that this roster is still a mess.
I wouldn't be surprised  
David B. : 4/29/2016 11:18 am : link
If they brought in Anquan Boldin after the draft. I actually think it would be a good move, but I wouldn't wait too much longer if they're interested.
RE: RE: Josh - why do you think anybody on this site  
Joe in CT : 4/29/2016 11:19 am : link
In comment 12932422 Josh in the City said:
Quote:
In comment 12932415 Jimmy Googs said:


Quote:


knows what the Giant's plan is at WR?

Common sense says they will probably draft one, maybe as early as tonight. And then maybe bring whatever remaining free agent is out there to camp or find a late cut in Sept.

that's about it...



I don't, I'm asking what you think the plan is and what options are still available.


There is still a good 4 to 5 WRs that will be drafted betweens round 2 and 5, it's just a matter of which one the Giants like and which round they decide to grab the player in. It's not like they are totally unaware of what their roster needs are.
RE: If Tunsil was off the board  
Josh in the City : 4/29/2016 11:19 am : link
In comment 12932445 Andy in Halifax said:
Quote:
I would have taken Doctson, but if we get Shepard then that would be just fine. Shepard can play. If we strike out, we can give Bolden a call after the draft.

Also, you say we don't have a #2 or #3 but we do have a fully rehabilitated Cruz.


Counting on Cruz this year would be like counting on David Wilson in 2014. Hope for the best but be prepares for the worst.
RE: that's just it  
Bill L : 4/29/2016 11:20 am : link
In comment 12932413 djm said:
Quote:
to say the Giants don't have a #2 or #3 WR is flat out false. They have guys on the roster and these aren't rookies. Some of them are even accomplished.

You don't need household names at every position. You won't be able to field a roster with household names at every position. It's simply not possible.

The Giants won super bowls with journeyman at some positions, including WR. Maybe a guy like Myles White can emerge as a decent player, even if not nearly elite. Maybe that's good enough to sort of hold things together. Maybe Cruz is in fact OK.

The Giants also likely draft a WR today or early tomorrow.
It's inconceivable to me that anyone could talk about the emergence of Myles White (or Davis, etc) and rail about Newhouse/Jerry. And I don't really mean you, but anyone. It's the same argument about Newhouse/Jerry but times 10. Cruz at this point is a pipe dream.

I agree with Josh that it's not about this draft. By last night, I wouldn't have drafted and still wouldn't draft a single one. I'd trade for one already proven but that's a different story. I didn't like Randle but IMO "addition by subtraction" is a fantasy and something you just say to fill dead air. At the point when Randle signed, and he the absolute last quality guy on the market, their whole pan was, "we don't want him". There wasn't anything else. I didn't like Randle, but they should have signed him. Then and only then does this draft make the team better than they were. As a whole, and for sure offensively.
so tired of the imbeciles on this site  
Shirk130 : 4/29/2016 11:20 am : link
who can't have a grown up conversation. Josh never said all of the holes needed to be filled in round 1. Bunch of Reese apologists who pounce on any kind of criticism as if he hasn't screwed up the roster with a bunch of risky picks.
RE: RE: potential WR depth in rounds 2 & 3 depending on what the Giants think  
Bill L : 4/29/2016 11:22 am : link
In comment 12932429 njm said:
Quote:
In comment 12932388 Bill L said:


Quote:


but strap on your seatbelts for the season because no starters here.



Actually I think Shepard, Boyd and Carroo could all be starters, just not a #1. But we have a #1.
I should clarify. They can be starters because the rules require you start *someone*.

And, I vehemently disagree with the notion of #1 and #2. Its right and left (or whatever). It's not #1 and #2 OT or DE. #1 and #2 denote depth position; this is not that.
I think WR  
old man : 4/29/2016 11:22 am : link
happens tonight; my guess at 71. I think they go DE or DT at 40.
If only there were a way for the Giants  
Mr. Bungle : 4/29/2016 11:23 am : link
to take three players with their first pick!
You do realize that the past few years, teams like New England,  
barens : 4/29/2016 11:25 am : link
Seattle and Carolina haven't had #2 receivers, let alone a number 1 guy.
'Actually I think Shepard, Boyd and Carroo could all be starters'...  
Torrag : 4/29/2016 11:28 am : link
...'just not a #1. But we have a #1.'

Yep. All have the game to start and contribute significantly as the #2 WR. WR and RB are the easiest positions to transfer productivity from college to the NFL.
RE: If only there were a way for the Giants  
Josh in the City : 4/29/2016 11:31 am : link
In comment 12932501 Mr. Bungle said:
Quote:
to take three players with their first pick!


Another foolish post before reading the thread!
I tried..  
FatMan in Charlotte : 4/29/2016 11:33 am : link
scanning Twitter, Google and news reports to get the answer and failed.

And I suspect you did the same thing.
RE: RE: RE: potential WR depth in rounds 2 & 3 depending on what the Giants think  
njm : 4/29/2016 11:34 am : link
In comment 12932489 Bill L said:
Quote:
In comment 12932429 njm said:


Quote:


In comment 12932388 Bill L said:


Quote:


but strap on your seatbelts for the season because no starters here.



Actually I think Shepard, Boyd and Carroo could all be starters, just not a #1. But we have a #1.

I should clarify. They can be starters because the rules require you start *someone*.

And, I vehemently disagree with the notion of #1 and #2. Its right and left (or whatever). It's not #1 and #2 OT or DE. #1 and #2 denote depth position; this is not that.


I too should clarify. They all are legitimate starter quality, just not as good as Beckham. But how many teams have 2 starters as good as Beckham?
And are you really..  
FatMan in Charlotte : 4/29/2016 11:36 am : link
expecting serious responses here?

You are directly insinuating that the team doesn't know the makeup of their roster, their needs and a plan to rectify it.

Why don't you go to a space geeks website and ask why NASA doesn't know the design of their next space vehicle.
Hunter Henry  
RAIN : 4/29/2016 11:39 am : link
Could fix a lot of problems in round 2. A receiving threat. Just not split wide.
No  
Jon in NYC : 4/29/2016 11:40 am : link
Josh, the team doesn't know who is on its roster.

JFC
RE: And are you really..  
Josh in the City : 4/29/2016 11:44 am : link
In comment 12932585 FatMan in Charlotte said:
Quote:
expecting serious responses here?

You are directly insinuating that the team doesn't know the makeup of their roster, their needs and a plan to rectify it.

Why don't you go to a space geeks website and ask why NASA doesn't know the design of their next space vehicle.


Have you seen the teams the Giants have fielded over the last 4 seasons? I think they've earned the criticism of whether they know the makeup of their roster. And yes, I'm expecting serious responses when I ask a serious question about potential strategy and player availability.
Harris can be a #3  
KWALL2 : 4/29/2016 11:46 am : link
There will be options coming up today.

If it's later (maybe round 4) Kolby Listenbee would work with Beckham and Cruz/Harris.
Hunter Henry  
Giantfootball025 : 4/29/2016 11:58 am : link
Kind of solves the problem of not having a big receiver. While also helping on the line in the run game. Could be the pick tonight.
RE: RE: And are you really..  
Giantology : 4/29/2016 11:59 am : link
In comment 12932640 Josh in the City said:
Quote:
In comment 12932585 FatMan in Charlotte said:


Quote:


expecting serious responses here?

You are directly insinuating that the team doesn't know the makeup of their roster, their needs and a plan to rectify it.

Why don't you go to a space geeks website and ask why NASA doesn't know the design of their next space vehicle.



Have you seen the teams the Giants have fielded over the last 4 seasons? I think they've earned the criticism of whether they know the makeup of their roster. And yes, I'm expecting serious responses when I ask a serious question about potential strategy and player availability.


Sure, they've earned the criticism, but I think it's pretty clear they know the make up of the roster. They know it better than you ever will.
RE: Hunter Henry  
Josh in the City : 4/29/2016 12:00 pm : link
In comment 12932729 Giantfootball025 said:
Quote:
Kind of solves the problem of not having a big receiver. While also helping on the line in the run game. Could be the pick tonight.


Don't know much about him but it would be great to have a legit every down #1 TE who would be a reliable threat in the passing game and also block well.
If Cruz can't stay on the field  
Dave in Hoboken : 4/29/2016 12:00 pm : link
or is nowhere near the same player he once was, we have Beckham and absolutely nothing else. Comforting.
RE: RE: RE: And are you really..  
Josh in the City : 4/29/2016 12:00 pm : link
In comment 12932733 Giantology said:
Quote:
In comment 12932640 Josh in the City said:


Quote:


In comment 12932585 FatMan in Charlotte said:


Quote:


expecting serious responses here?

You are directly insinuating that the team doesn't know the makeup of their roster, their needs and a plan to rectify it.

Why don't you go to a space geeks website and ask why NASA doesn't know the design of their next space vehicle.



Have you seen the teams the Giants have fielded over the last 4 seasons? I think they've earned the criticism of whether they know the makeup of their roster. And yes, I'm expecting serious responses when I ask a serious question about potential strategy and player availability.



Sure, they've earned the criticism, but I think it's pretty clear they know the make up of the roster. They know it better than you ever will.

Perfect, then at least try and make the necessary moves to fill the holes and fix it.
RE: If Cruz can't stay on the field  
Giantology : 4/29/2016 12:00 pm : link
In comment 12932740 Dave in Hoboken said:
Quote:
or is nowhere near the same player he once was, we have Beckham and absolutely nothing else. Comforting.


Anthony Dable baby! ALL YEAR LONG
RE: RE: RE: RE: And are you really..  
Giantology : 4/29/2016 12:02 pm : link
In comment 12932744 Josh in the City said:
Quote:
In comment 12932733 Giantology said:


Quote:


In comment 12932640 Josh in the City said:


Quote:


In comment 12932585 FatMan in Charlotte said:


Quote:


expecting serious responses here?

You are directly insinuating that the team doesn't know the makeup of their roster, their needs and a plan to rectify it.

Why don't you go to a space geeks website and ask why NASA doesn't know the design of their next space vehicle.



Have you seen the teams the Giants have fielded over the last 4 seasons? I think they've earned the criticism of whether they know the makeup of their roster. And yes, I'm expecting serious responses when I ask a serious question about potential strategy and player availability.



Sure, they've earned the criticism, but I think it's pretty clear they know the make up of the roster. They know it better than you ever will.


Perfect, then at least try and make the necessary moves to fill the holes and fix it.


Which move should they have made last night? Was drafting a 3rd CB (a need position with how much we play nickel and with DRC known to come off the field from time to time) not a necessary move as well?

The point I'm making Josh, is you just don't agree with the moves or stances they made. Still doesn't mean they don't know the make up of their own roster.
There  
Giantfootball025 : 4/29/2016 12:03 pm : link
are so many holes on this team though that any picks tonight are going to help regardless of position. Even if they took Henry at 40. I don't think a WR would be out of the question in the third either.
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: And are you really..  
Josh in the City : 4/29/2016 12:08 pm : link
In comment 12932753 Giantology said:
Quote:
In comment 12932744 Josh in the City said:


Quote:


In comment 12932733 Giantology said:


Quote:


In comment 12932640 Josh in the City said:


Quote:


In comment 12932585 FatMan in Charlotte said:


Quote:


expecting serious responses here?

You are directly insinuating that the team doesn't know the makeup of their roster, their needs and a plan to rectify it.

Why don't you go to a space geeks website and ask why NASA doesn't know the design of their next space vehicle.



Have you seen the teams the Giants have fielded over the last 4 seasons? I think they've earned the criticism of whether they know the makeup of their roster. And yes, I'm expecting serious responses when I ask a serious question about potential strategy and player availability.



Sure, they've earned the criticism, but I think it's pretty clear they know the make up of the roster. They know it better than you ever will.


Perfect, then at least try and make the necessary moves to fill the holes and fix it.



Which move should they have made last night? Was drafting a 3rd CB (a need position with how much we play nickel and with DRC known to come off the field from time to time) not a necessary move as well?

The point I'm making Josh, is you just don't agree with the moves or stances they made. Still doesn't mean they don't know the make up of their own roster.

I'm not saying last night. As I've stated multiple times above I'm talking about the entire offseason. There wasn't even a single report of them talking to a FA WR. When you're exploring improving a specific position, there's almost always some smoke signals that media and fans are able to see. It just seems like we've completely ignored the position up to this pt in the offseason and that's what I was referring to.
I want them to add a weapon in R2 today, but their track record  
Devon : 4/29/2016 12:22 pm : link
strongly suggests that they're going to rely on Cruz.

It's stupid and will likely blow up miserably on them (though obviously I hope otherwise), but it's realistically been the most likely route they were going to take from the start of this offseason.
Wow  
gidiefor : Mod : 4/29/2016 12:24 pm : link
it's amazing - Josh in the City is the only one who realizes that the Giants need a #2 and a #3 WR
Rather have more linemen  
Giants2012 : 4/29/2016 12:25 pm : link
Cam Newtown and the Panthers almost won a Super Bowl with a strong OL/DL with few receiving weapons including the talented Benjamin on IR.
RE: I want them to add a weapon in R2 today, but their track record  
BrettNYG10 : 4/29/2016 12:33 pm : link
In comment 12932840 Devon said:
Quote:
strongly suggests that they're going to rely on Cruz.

It's stupid and will likely blow up miserably on them (though obviously I hope otherwise), but it's realistically been the most likely route they were going to take from the start of this offseason.


Agreed - Cruz should be treated as a call option at this point. Counting on him is absurdly risky.
I thought Reese has gone on the record saying  
leatherneck570 : 4/29/2016 12:35 pm : link
That they are not counting on Cruz...I could be wrong though.
.  
arcarsenal : 4/29/2016 12:35 pm : link
Henry and Shepard are probably both going to be strong considerations based on what's been said today.

I'm pretty sure the Giants are aware there's a need there. I'm also pretty sure it's impossible to plug all of our holes in one round.
It's April 29th  
pjcas18 : 4/29/2016 12:38 pm : link
I wouldn't worry about it yet.
RE: RE: that's just it  
djm : 4/29/2016 12:41 pm : link
In comment 12932442 LeonofKiev said:
Quote:
In comment 12932413 djm said:


Quote:


to say the Giants don't have a #2 or #3 WR is flat out false. They have guys on the roster and these aren't rookies. Some of them are even accomplished.

You don't need household names at every position. You won't be able to field a roster with household names at every position. It's simply not possible.

The Giants won super bowls with journeyman at some positions, including WR. Maybe a guy like Myles White can emerge as a decent player, even if not nearly elite. Maybe that's good enough to sort of hold things together. Maybe Cruz is in fact OK.

The Giants also likely draft a WR today or early tomorrow.





LMAO so we have a #2 and #3 but you just don't name who they are? Who are these people?


Do I really need to spell it out for you? Go check the frickin roster page if you need help. And I did name Myles White. And I think you know who Victor Cruz is. Granted he's a risk...HE IS on the roster. He just might play.
Back to the Corner