for display only
Big Blue Interactive The Corner Forum  
Back to the Corner

Archived Thread

What am I missing with the OL?

bigbluehoya : 4/29/2016 10:24 pm
I'm officially worried about about the right side of the OL.

Are there 3 draft picks left? Sure there are.

I'm not panicking, I'm not Reese-bashing, and I'm not detracting from the players drafted already.

But the right side of the OL is an enormous concern. A more reliable running game realistically could have meant 2 or more additional wins last year.

So I ask, simply, from here out, what's the best way forward? How realistic is an Anthony Davis deal? It simply can


Pages: 1 2 <<Prev | Show All |
RE: RE: RE: What you are missing  
bigbluehoya : 4/29/2016 10:52 pm : link
In comment 12935406 BillT said:
Quote:
In comment 12935395 bigbluehoya said:


Quote:


In comment 12935379 BillT said:


Quote:


Is that the draft isn't about filling needs its about acquiring talent. This has been explained here a hundred or so times but some refuse to believe it. You seem to be one of them.



Read the OP. This isn't about bashing the draft strategy -- it's about acknowledging that FA is substantially over, the draft is half over, what's the best way from here to patch a huge hole?


You can't have it both ways. You can't say "what am I missing" and not it be a criticism of the draft and the organization in this perspective. Yes, we need more talent at RT. We all get that.


It isn't just RT. It's the right side of the line as a whole. You're substantially saying that yes, "Can't fix em all" is correct and "no, you're not missing anything". thats a legitimate answer to the question. I wondered if there was an angle toward solving the problem
that I'm not seeing,
RE: RE: bigbluehoya  
BillT : 4/29/2016 10:53 pm : link
In comment 12935412 AcidTest said:
Quote:
In comment 12935401 Eric from BBI said:


Quote:


sorry to sound snippy, but if we drafted OL's, people would be bitching about DB or WR.

The team is a mess. We have a lot of holes.



Agreed. But part of the reason we have so many holes is that Reese has to keep redrafting the same positions.

And the main reason he has had to do that is because guys like Nicks and TT and Phillips are all retired due to injury.
RE: RE: bigbluehoya  
bigbluehoya : 4/29/2016 10:53 pm : link
In comment 12935418 chopperhatch said:
Quote:
In comment 12935401 Eric from BBI said:


Quote:


sorry to sound snippy, but if we drafted OL's, people would be bitching about DB or WR.

The team is a mess. We have a lot of holes.



WAS a mess....we came a long way the past two days. Talent and youth. Plus I think the Davis deal is coming soon.


Is this a hunch? A hope?

It's better than anything I've got, I just wonder how likely It really is.
Good post Eric.  
Mike B from JC : 4/29/2016 10:54 pm : link
We scored points and lost because of the defense. They fixed 3 major problems and will win more games because of it.there is still tomorrow and a possible trade for Davis. Relax
Has Reese given anyone an ounce  
Reb8thVA : 4/29/2016 11:01 pm : link
Of reason to believe he is capable of identifying late round OL talent. His track record is pretty damn poor
hoya  
BillT : 4/29/2016 11:03 pm : link
I just posted yesterday that the OL is still a problem. We all get that. Today is the draft. Can we talk about what's going on with that instead of what isn't. We don't know anything more than you do.
The trade-for-Davis talk is a pipe dream, in my opinion.  
Klaatu : 4/29/2016 11:04 pm : link
He hasn't even applied for reinstatement, yet, and there's no guarantee that he ever will.

Looks like the Giants are going to roll the dice with Jerry at RG and Newhouse at RT, with the hope that maybe, possibly, Bobby Hart can supplant Newhouse.

Those of you who advocated waiting until Day Three to look for O-Line help, well, it looks like you're about to get your wish.
RE: Sure  
Old Dirty Beckham : 4/29/2016 11:07 pm : link
In comment 12935318 Eric from BBI said:
Quote:
the OL could use more help.

But did you see our defense last year? Over 6,000 yards allowed again. We lost a game where Eli threw six touchdown passes.

At WR, we only had one sure thing: Beckham.

This team has a ton of needs.

Figure it out.


The offensive line should have been resolved in the offseason through free agency. Not only are newhouse and marshall marginal starters who the hell are their backups? Anthony Davis is the only answer.
RE: The trade-for-Davis talk is a pipe dream, in my opinion.  
Reb8thVA : 4/29/2016 11:07 pm : link
In comment 12935464 Klaatu said:
Quote:
He hasn't even applied for reinstatement, yet, and there's no guarantee that he ever will.

Looks like the Giants are going to roll the dice with Jerry at RG and Newhouse at RT, with the hope that maybe, possibly, Bobby Hart can supplant Newhouse.

Those of you who advocated waiting until Day Three to look for O-Line help, well, it looks like you're about to get your wish.
I hope everyone is just as happy when the Eagles are kicking our asses twice a year again next year because we can't stop their pass rush or run on them.
RE: hoya  
bigbluehoya : 4/29/2016 11:11 pm : link
In comment 12935461 BillT said:
Quote:
I just posted yesterday that the OL is still a problem. We all get that. Today is the draft. Can we talk about what's going on with that instead of what isn't. We don't know anything more than you do.


Did I mis-label this thread? There are plenty of places for you to discuss the draft. Those who want to discuss potential solutions on the OL can do so here. Some may even want to follow both discussions.

You seem intent on arguing. It isn't clear why, to me. And that's fine.
Enjoy the rest of your night and the rest of the draft.

John Jerry is not a backup.  
Klaatu : 4/29/2016 11:18 pm : link
At the risk of sounding like elimacaroon90210, the guy has started 61 out of 73 games in his career. He was signed by us in the event that Chris Snee was done, which turned out to be the case. The odds are that he'll be our starting RG in 2016.

Marshall Newhouse, on the other hand, was not signed to start. He was supposed to be a backup/swing tackle. He was thrust into a starting role when Beatty got hurt. He did have a couple of good years with the Packers - he started every game at LT when they went 15-1 and won the Super Bowl - but he crashed and burned shortly after that and they couldn't wait to get rid of him in Green Bay. He was a huge disappointment in his one year with the Bengals.

As of now, he's our starting RT, and God help us.
hoya  
BillT : 4/29/2016 11:23 pm : link
Yeah. It must be me on a thread that began with "what am I missing" and referred to the draft in its second sentence.
I wonder if  
Bluesbreaker : 4/29/2016 11:31 pm : link
a Vet cut may be in play not sure where
all the hype for Davis is coming from .
Once they start pairing down the rosters
or someone gets beat out maybe we pick
up a couple of Vets one to start and one
to back up .
Newhouse is not average  
SHO'NUFF : 4/29/2016 11:36 pm : link
he blows...he shouldn't be a backup...he shouldn't even be in the league. John Jerry is average and should be a backup and used sparingly. We are in fucking trouble up front. I would've went OL before FS in the 3rd. It's amazing Eli put up the numbers he did with that porous line and no running game. Maybe if we can run on 3rd and 1, we can sustain drives and keep our sorry ass D off the field.
RE: Newhouse is not average  
Klaatu : 4/29/2016 11:45 pm : link
In comment 12935543 SHO'NUFF said:
Quote:
he blows...he shouldn't be a backup...he shouldn't even be in the league. John Jerry is average and should be a backup and used sparingly. We are in fucking trouble up front. I would've went OL before FS in the 3rd. It's amazing Eli put up the numbers he did with that porous line and no running game. Maybe if we can run on 3rd and 1, we can sustain drives and keep our sorry ass D off the field.


Paraphrasing Ric Flair, Whether you like 'em or not, learn to love 'em.
RE: Think  
DCOrange : 4/30/2016 12:05 am : link
In comment 12935399 AcidTest said:
Quote:
about how many mid round OL picks Reese has drafted that did nothing:

Brewer.
Petrus.
Mosley.
McCants.
Herman.

Hart is the only one who has a chance to succeed. If even one of the others had become a decent RT, we’d be in a much better position.


Reese did sign the Canadian Mel Hein. How many teams can say that?
RE: Think  
Klaatu : 4/30/2016 12:09 am : link
In comment 12935399 AcidTest said:
Quote:
about how many mid round OL picks Reese has drafted that did nothing:

Brewer.
Petrus.
Mosley.
McCants.
Herman.

Hart is the only one who has a chance to succeed. If even one of the others had become a decent RT, we’d be in a much better position.


For years, the Giants couldn't draft a WR for love or money. And then BAM...Smith, Manningham, and Nicks, all in a row.

So maybe, just maybe, they get lucky with Hart, or they get lucky with someone else on Saturday.

Keep hope alive. Right now, that's all we have. Hope.
I think the logic is quite simple  
Vanzetti : 4/30/2016 12:11 am : link
The offense was 6th in scoring last year. Everybody is coming back except Randle.

So, replace Randle and then devote the bulk of your FA money and draft picks to the defense--which was historically bad last year.


Jerry and Newhouse are OK as stop gaps for one more year, especially with Hart in the wings.
The right side  
Osi Osi Osi OyOyOy : 4/30/2016 12:16 am : link
But we needed another weapon n got one
Why are people  
ryanmkeane : 4/30/2016 12:17 am : link
acting as if we are definitely trading for Davis? Is there a shred of evidence that we are even interested?

I love this draft so far - but I didn't see the OL as much of a problem as some. I was at the Buffalo game last season when our so called mediocre OL kicked the shit out of Buffalo's DL for 4 quarters.
Newhouse held up  
ryanmkeane : 4/30/2016 12:21 am : link
Adequately most of the season. People you think there's some cure all at RT just waiting to be plucked out of thin air need to relax. It's not realistic to have studs at every position.

I'd much rather invest in defense where he had players that don't belong in the NFL starting for us - than worry about taking a OL in the 3rd round who wouldn't start over Newhouse anyway (at least not yet).
We may have been 8th in scoring...  
Klaatu : 4/30/2016 12:22 am : link
But we were 18th in rushing, 22nd in converting on 3rd down, and 27th in time-of-possession.

As bad as the defense was - and it was historically bad - there's still plenty of room for improvement on offense.
^^^  
Sonic Youth : 4/30/2016 12:25 am : link
Seriously, how could anyone be confident we're going to trade for Davis? Has there been a rumor somewhere?

It makes sense theoretically..he's from Piscataway and went to Rutgers, so he's local, he wants out, and we need a RT... but the Giants are not the type of team to make a trade like this.

FWIW, I do agree with the premie of this thread. I am not unhappy with Apple (anymore), but I do think that O-Line was a bigger need than CB.

Solidifying the O-line goes beyond just helping Eli. It will help our terrible running game/running backs, which will also help us control the clock.

The approach is just bizarre though. After stocking up on the O-line in the last three drafts with Pugh, Richburg, and Flowers, there doesn't seem to be as much urgency to finish the job and get some players for the right said.

Newhouse and Jerry is a disaster waiting to happen.. and not only because they are, at best, marginal starters, but because you have to assume someone will get hurt, which means we'll have a backup's backup playing.

Eli is much more effective with a strong line (strong tackles at least), and we don't have a gamebreaking RB who can make it all happen themselves (those guys are rare as hell anyway). Rashad Jennings and Vereen can get it done, but they need a decent line.

I'd trade a 4th for Davis. Hell, I'd trade a 3rd if we could someone be assured he'd sign long term here. He is only 26 after all.
I'm sure they'll sign a veteran later  
chris r : 4/30/2016 12:30 am : link
the Giants have too many needs to target OL only in the draft.

RE: Newhouse held up  
Reb8thVA : 4/30/2016 12:34 am : link
In comment 12935594 ryanmkeane said:
Quote:
Adequately most of the season. People you think there's some cure all at RT just waiting to be plucked out of thin air need to relax. It's not realistic to have studs at every position.

I'd much rather invest in defense where he had players that don't belong in the NFL starting for us - than worry about taking a OL in the 3rd round who wouldn't start over Newhouse anyway (at least not yet).


Reese began the off-season by cutting Beatty and Schwartz so it was clear there would be vacancies on the OL. He also entered FA with money to spare. We still have close to $20 million in cap space. Reese could have easily targeted Mitchell Schwartz from the outset and we are not having this discussion. He consciously chose not to. Money was the issue. We still have lots of cap space. We also know from Hitdog that RT was never on the radar scope. So that leaves the draft and Jerry decides that he's willing to gamble on Newhouse. He doesn't exactly have a sound track record when he is in gambling mode. This is not about you can't have studs at every position. This is about Reese rolling the dice and it may very well blow up in his face.
We're there a lot of options for Tackle?  
geemanfan : 4/30/2016 12:35 am : link
In rounds 2 and 3 that I'm missing ? Spriggs and Colemen. If the Giants weren't crazy about either should they have taken them anyway?
RE: We're there a lot of options for Tackle?  
Sonic Youth : 4/30/2016 12:38 am : link
In comment 12935603 geemanfan said:
Quote:
In rounds 2 and 3 that I'm missing ? Spriggs and Colemen. If the Giants weren't crazy about either should they have taken them anyway?
I can't speak for anyone else but I am referring to FA as well. Then again, I can't remember off hte top of my head who was available. Either way, someone had to be an upgrade from Newhouse.
RE: We're there a lot of options for Tackle?  
Reb8thVA : 4/30/2016 12:42 am : link
In comment 12935603 geemanfan said:
Quote:
In rounds 2 and 3 that I'm missing ? Spriggs and Colemen. If the Giants weren't crazy about either should they have taken them anyway?
once the first round was over there really weren't any good options. The Titans taking Conklin certainly hurt. The problem is we should never have been forced into a position where we Have to rely on the draft
The Defense  
dcp : 4/30/2016 1:21 am : link
was historically bad. The Offense was OK. Gotta address the bigger problems first. Can't plug all the Resse leaks in one year.
the OT would have helped  
msh : 4/30/2016 2:57 am : link
the defence to rest ,better time of possession running the ball better,less emphasis on eli to OBJ if they could break off more big runs the safeties wouldnt be able to sit on the pass so much it ugrades so many areas i love the picks all very good in their own right

but i can see another losing record if they intend to play behind jerry and newhouse on that right side of the OL again i just pray that hart can surplant one of them and that they can snag a diehl type OL in the next 3 picks to relegate the other one to backup or they will be picking around the same spot a year from now
An offense can hide a team's defensive...  
M.S. : 4/30/2016 3:47 am : link
...deficiencies when they have the ability to run the ball, control the clock. (Look no further than the Dallas Cowboys of 2014.)

We've definitely improved a really bad defense via free agency and the Draft, but there hasn't been any help so far for an improved run game (unless you want to believe that Sterling Sheppard will help the team move the chains and keep possession of the ball.)

Here's to fixing the right side of our offensive line in the 2017 NFL Draft!

By the time  
Phil in LA : 4/30/2016 4:08 am : link
the second round ended, and really the first, it was no longer fixable for this year in this draft. They're going to have to figure out something else before the real games start. They can't blow another season because they didn't fix the OL.
I would have went for Tunsil in Rd 1 over Apple  
PatersonPlank : 4/30/2016 6:02 am : link
Although I admit Apple has grown on me, and is a need, to me OT was a much bigger need than a 3rd corner. Then our line would have been done. Now we still need a T.

I also believe that if we had a legitimate, average RT, then Jerry would be fine. He is ok, and gets more exposed because of the crap next to him. Here's hoping that Hart can be that guy.
We were  
ctc in ftmyers : 4/30/2016 6:57 am : link
the 8th rated offense last year and the O line was rated 7th with an injured rookie LT.

Our defense was atrocious. Where would the offense have been rated if they could have gotten on the field for 2 or 3 more series a game because the defense actually stopped someone by means other than letting them score?

We needed to rebuild the defense badly and it appears that we have gone a long way to doing that.

Now does the right side of the line need upgrading? you betcha. That's and understatement.

My take is that we have upgrade the offense by upgrading the defense and adding what appears to be quality WR.

It's impossible to do everything in one year with all the holes this team had and the the training camp rooster isn't even set yet.

Just my .02 cents.
Link - ( New Window )
Can we take a breath here  
blueblood'11 : 4/30/2016 7:04 am : link
Last year the defense was the worst in the league in just about every statistical category. They had to go heavy to try and fix it. Regardless of the OL deficiencies on the right side they ranked 8th in total offense. 100.6 rushing per game and 271.7 per game. If the Giants were at the very most an average defense or even a tick less then average they may very well have made the playoffs.

The addition of Sheppard, if he can make an impact right away, and if Victor Cruz is even close to what he once was, will only enhance an already top tier passing attack. And it should open up the running game even more regardless of who they have on the right side.
I believe O line  
joeinpa : 4/30/2016 7:09 am : link
Was bigger need than 3 Ed corner. I also believe Giants would have gone tackle in first round as was rumored. But due to guys falling it didn't t work out that way.

Can t reach hot need although not certain Tunsil was a reach.
Too many holes  
Giants2012 : 4/30/2016 7:10 am : link
They needed some extra picks within three Rounds to fill more.

It's kinda sad when the team spends two #1s and a #2 over the past three years and still has two,holes (unless Hart develops overnight) and no depth on the OL.
RE: I would have went for Tunsil in Rd 1 over Apple  
M.S. : 4/30/2016 7:23 am : link
In comment 12935662 PatersonPlank said:
Quote:
Although I admit Apple has grown on me, and is a need, to me OT was a much bigger need than a 3rd corner. Then our line would have been done. Now we still need a T.

I also believe that if we had a legitimate, average RT, then Jerry would be fine. He is ok, and gets more exposed because of the crap next to him. Here's hoping that Hart can be that guy.



Dead on... well said!
RE: I have no issues with  
TD : 4/30/2016 7:29 am : link
In comment 12935377 Reb8thVA said:
Quote:
Shepherd or Thompson. We undoubtedly needed another WR more than anything. Nevertheless Jerry could easily have addressed the RT issue in FA. We still have 20 million in space and could have grabbed several options if we were more aggressive in the early days of FA. Jerry chose not to. So Jerry is now in gambling mode and history shows his track record is not good when he gambles.


This!

It's like after one good day in free agency the front office went on vacation.

Lord knows we don't need all that cap space to lock up a ton of our own talent long term.
Here's what ur missing  
emobj999 : 4/30/2016 7:29 am : link
John Jerry.

Giants never intended on upgrading RG, John Jerry is the full time starter.
2 years in and nobody understands McAdoo's scheme  
emobj999 : 4/30/2016 7:32 am : link
His quick passing scheme is built on strong interior protection.

With the LG-C-RG being set with Pugh-Richburg-Jerry, Eli will have a wall up the middle to step up in the pocket against edge pressure.
This idiot again?  
Giants2012 : 4/30/2016 7:37 am : link
.
RE: John Jerry is not a backup.  
emobj999 : 4/30/2016 8:13 am : link
In comment 12935516 Klaatu said:
Quote:
At the risk of sounding like elimacaroon90210, the guy has started 61 out of 73 games in his career. He was signed by us in the event that Chris Snee was done, which turned out to be the case. The odds are that he'll be our starting RG in 2016.

Marshall Newhouse, on the other hand, was not signed to start. He was supposed to be a backup/swing tackle. He was thrust into a starting role when Beatty got hurt. He did have a couple of good years with the Packers - he started every game at LT when they went 15-1 and won the Super Bowl - but he crashed and burned shortly after that and they couldn't wait to get rid of him in Green Bay. He was a huge disappointment in his one year with the Bengals.

As of now, he's our starting RT, and God help us.



Bongo.

The notion that "Jerry is a backup" is a complete myth.

He's a starter and will start.
The answer to the OL problems could be  
aimrocky : 4/30/2016 8:27 am : link
Solari and the full shift to a zone blocking scheme.
The Giants are not done.  
Big Blue '56 : 4/30/2016 8:31 am : link
They could be very high on Hart for either G or T..
RE: The Giants are not done.  
emobj999 : 4/30/2016 8:35 am : link
In comment 12935799 Big Blue '56 said:
Quote:
They could be very high on Hart for either G or T..


Yeah, lining him up as 2nd team RT says that...

I can assure you that the Giants are  
Simms11 : 4/30/2016 9:53 am : link
Not done with RT. They went with their draft board and selected the best players available, who were also positions of need I'm just assuming that OTs were not rated as high. With that said, they will be scouring cuts after the draft, as well as looking at some veteran linemen, I'm sure, that are still available. They need at least a stopgap at RT this year. They can't fix this whole mess in one year. It's not possible, but they've made fairly good strides so far IMO. I'm sure they will address oline, even if not in the draft. Patience!
RE: RE: John Jerry is not a backup.  
Klaatu : 4/30/2016 11:06 am : link
In comment 12935767 emobj999 said:
Quote:
In comment 12935516 Klaatu said:


Quote:


At the risk of sounding like elimacaroon90210, the guy has started 61 out of 73 games in his career. He was signed by us in the event that Chris Snee was done, which turned out to be the case. The odds are that he'll be our starting RG in 2016.

Marshall Newhouse, on the other hand, was not signed to start. He was supposed to be a backup/swing tackle. He was thrust into a starting role when Beatty got hurt. He did have a couple of good years with the Packers - he started every game at LT when they went 15-1 and won the Super Bowl - but he crashed and burned shortly after that and they couldn't wait to get rid of him in Green Bay. He was a huge disappointment in his one year with the Bengals.

As of now, he's our starting RT, and God help us.




Bongo.

The notion that "Jerry is a backup" is a complete myth.

He's a starter and will start.


Not so fast, Red Ryder.

On the Giants, Jerry is a starter, but that's primarily by default. He's a decent pass-blocker, but a below-average run-blocker. Therefore, he's eminently upgradeable (sic).

2016, sure, plug him in. 2017? We'll see.

As for the love affair you see between McAdoo and Jerry, no coach is going to badmouth his own player, especially not when there's no acceptable alternative to that player in the immediate future.
'He's a starter and will start.'...  
Torrag : 4/30/2016 11:17 am : link
...if he does it's a failure of the front office. His play vacillates from average to awful on any given play. An upgrade is needed. Just because a guy starts doesn't mean he's worthy of that position. It may mean his team was unable to replace him. That would be the situation if Jerry is our starting RG.
Hopefully the agents are paying attention  
bigbluehoya : 4/30/2016 12:47 pm : link
To the fact that the Giants right side of the OL is unaddressed -- perhaps this becomes an attraction for the top end of the UDFAs on the OL.
Pages: 1 2 <<Prev | Show All |
Back to the Corner