for display only
Big Blue Interactive The Corner Forum  
Back to the Corner

Archived Thread

NFT: Knicks Talk: Frank Vogel An Option?

Jon in NYC : 5/3/2016 9:23 am
Quote:
Could Knicks move on Frank Vogel, a closet Phil Jackson fan?: There may be a new free-agent coach on the market with eyes on the Knicks job. Pacers coach Frank Vogel, who grew up in South Jersey an admirer of Phil Jackson, is on shaky ground after losing Game 7 on Sunday night in Toronto to seal a first-round playoff exit. -- New York Post

Link - ( New Window )
Pages: 1 2 | Show All |  Next>>
no way  
Greg from LI : 5/3/2016 9:25 am : link
He'll win too many games. We'll end up picking 11th or something like that.
fwiw  
Jon in NYC : 5/3/2016 9:25 am : link
I would prefer Vogel to Blatt.
Just no Rambis  
gmenrule : 5/3/2016 9:35 am : link
pppppllllleeeeaaaasssseeeeee !!!!!!
I feel like the trouble is  
mfsd : 5/3/2016 9:41 am : link
Jax really wants to coach himself...but physically he just can't do it. So what he really wants is someone he can coach through, not someone who might actually have their own ideas

Hence...Rambis remains at the top of his list.

Which is really awesome. If our goal is another tank year and lottery pick...

I still don't get the logic  
Aspano! : 5/3/2016 9:44 am : link
That Rambis is going to be the next coach, or that he's the favorite. It's been 3 weeks since the season ended and he hasn't been hired, and he's had the interim job for 3 months already.
I think Vogel...  
Italianju : 5/3/2016 9:47 am : link
is a very good coach. Not sure his style fits the team, but with solid defenders in Lopez/KP maybe it works. I never really thought the IND teams were overly talented outside of George, but they always had solid to good seasons.

A lot would depend on if Melo is coming back and who we think we can sign. If you add a Batum or a Conley and Melo returns then this could be a good team and a coach like Vogel would make sense. If there is a chance Melo leaves and/or we dont think we can get a good starter then i dont see the point in bringing in a Vogel level coach.
Would like Vogel  
Beezer : 5/3/2016 9:50 am : link
As Knicks coach.
Tommy  
DanMetroMan : 5/3/2016 9:52 am : link
Dee's explanation as to why Vogel would be a bad choice is absolutely ridiculous lol
RE: Tommy  
Jon in NYC : 5/3/2016 9:53 am : link
In comment 12942567 DanMetroMan said:
Quote:
Dee's explanation as to why Vogel would be a bad choice is absolutely ridiculous lol


That can't surprise you...
He  
DanMetroMan : 5/3/2016 9:56 am : link
argues that while Vogel is a good coach, defensive coaches have short shelf lives and the Knicks need to find a coach who will last longer term... uh... how about worrying about being good before we worry about something 5 seasons down the line.
SAS  
DanMetroMan : 5/3/2016 9:57 am : link
(yes consider the source). Claims Durant has zero interest in Washington and his most likely moves would either be signing 1 year with an opt out so he and Westbrook can be a package deal in a year or head to Miami.
RE: SAS  
nygiants16 : 5/3/2016 10:01 am : link
In comment 12942580 DanMetroMan said:
Quote:
(yes consider the source). Claims Durant has zero interest in Washington and his most likely moves would either be signing 1 year with an opt out so he and Westbrook can be a package deal in a year or head to Miami.


Miami would have to get rid of Whiteside Deng and wade to get durant
Package deal for those two  
Deej : 5/3/2016 10:16 am : link
is like 71 million. A team would have to have no more than ~30 million committed to land both as UFAs after accounting for cap holds. That's going to be insanely hard to get to if they dont take sub-max. Though not for nothing, but the Knicks could do it if they trade Melo this offseason. 2017 commitments would be Rolo (13.7), KP's option (4.5), Grant's option (1.7), KOQ (4). About 24 million. Gets dicier when you add in a high #1 plus the return for Melo, but Rolo and KOQ are easily tradable.

Durant, Westbrook, KP, Rolo, Grant, a high #1, and the Melo return are a better for than OKC. However, Durant and Westbrook wilt under the kid glove OKC press and I cant imagine that they're all that jazzed about Isola and Berman et al.
Not that it means much but-  
DanMetroMan : 5/3/2016 10:27 am : link
So is he predisposed to remaining a Hornet? “Why not? I don’t know (what will happen in) a crazy summer for a lot of people. But why not?” Batum said. “I want to talk to them first, for sure. July 1 will be a crazy day, but will Charlotte be my first call? Yes.” – via Charlotte Observer-Batum
I think it's assumed KD doesn't want to go  
giantsfan44ab : 5/3/2016 10:28 am : link
to DC at this point. Heck, Wall is trying to get the hell out of there. A few playoff berths disguise how truly abysmal that franchise has been. Don't see it getting much better anytime soon.
RE: Not that it means much but-  
giantsfan44ab : 5/3/2016 10:29 am : link
In comment 12942644 DanMetroMan said:
Quote:
So is he predisposed to remaining a Hornet? “Why not? I don’t know (what will happen in) a crazy summer for a lot of people. But why not?” Batum said. “I want to talk to them first, for sure. July 1 will be a crazy day, but will Charlotte be my first call? Yes.” – via Charlotte Observer-Batum


For the limitless number of teams that are supposedly interested in Batum, I wonder how many are at his door once Charlotte offers him a 5 year max. Same goes for Conley.
I'd expect the FA talent pool to dry up pretty quickly  
bceagle05 : 5/3/2016 10:38 am : link
once KD goes back to OKC for a year. Doc Rivers says he's not breaking up the big three in L.A., so that's one less big name on the trade market, too. At some point this summer teams will turn their attention to Carmelo.
If the knicks trade melo....  
Italianju : 5/3/2016 10:39 am : link
then putting a plan in place to have as much capspace as possible in 2017 makes sense. I would hope they wouldnt do it for the idea of adding durant/westbrook since thats so unlikely, but there are other FA that year. Also not adding long term salary and trading Melo would mean they are most likely pretty horrible next year which means a good pick. Of course it also means you basically have KP, Lopez, a top pick a gagillion dollars. You would have to convince at least 2 near superstars to sign with us since i doubt you get just one since they wouldnt see the knicks as contenders unless KP just makes an insane jump into the top 15 or so next year.
Just please let the Bulls trade Butler  
dep026 : 5/3/2016 10:44 am : link
and break the teenage drama between him and Rose. Ideally, getting rid of Rose is the smarter thing to do, but no one is trading for him.

Maybe Minny would take Butler for Dieng, Lavine, and their first!
RE: no way  
djm : 5/3/2016 10:47 am : link
In comment 12942505 Greg from LI said:
Quote:
He'll win too many games. We'll end up picking 11th or something like that.


This whole thing is kind of ridiculous. Just get a good coach in here and fucking win games god dammit. If they win 40 next year and pick 13th so be it. If they win 45 even better. If they happen to blow chunks next year and win the top 3 lottery that's all well n good but there will be negative fallout from a season like that and more than likely the bad will outweigh the good unless the Knicks get incredibly lucky and land a legendary player in that draft.

RE: Just please let the Bulls trade Butler  
Enzo : 5/3/2016 10:47 am : link
In comment 12942695 dep026 said:
Quote:
and break the teenage drama between him and Rose. Ideally, getting rid of Rose is the smarter thing to do, but no one is trading for him.

Maybe Minny would take Butler for Dieng, Lavine, and their first!

what makes you think Rose won't have more drama with other teammates? He's a whiny bitch.
RE: Just please let the Bulls trade Butler  
giantsfan44ab : 5/3/2016 10:48 am : link
In comment 12942695 dep026 said:
Quote:
and break the teenage drama between him and Rose. Ideally, getting rid of Rose is the smarter thing to do, but no one is trading for him.

Maybe Minny would take Butler for Dieng, Lavine, and their first!


That's interesting but that also would make Melo a lesser-demanded option so it's a no go in my book. Idk why Chicago would get rid of him unless they go for an all out tank.
RE: RE: no way  
giantsfan44ab : 5/3/2016 10:50 am : link
In comment 12942703 djm said:
Quote:
In comment 12942505 Greg from LI said:


Quote:


He'll win too many games. We'll end up picking 11th or something like that.



This whole thing is kind of ridiculous. Just get a good coach in here and fucking win games god dammit. If they win 40 next year and pick 13th so be it. If they win 45 even better. If they happen to blow chunks next year and win the top 3 lottery that's all well n good but there will be negative fallout from a season like that and more than likely the bad will outweigh the good unless the Knicks get incredibly lucky and land a legendary player in that draft.


That sounds awfully like the plan the Knicks had in place for the last 15 years. Try adding as much marginal talent to win as many games. The one year they fail to do that they win 17 and land KP. Hmmm...
Lavine  
DanMetroMan : 5/3/2016 10:52 am : link
Dieng and a top 10 pick for Butler seems insane to me. If I'm the Wolves I hang up the phone.
yeah well  
djm : 5/3/2016 11:01 am : link
I didn't say add marginal talent just to win 40 games.

Don't forget the future of this team is KP and Galloway and Grant. Young players. Those guys need to grow and learn and the only way they grow is to win, even if it's a slow process. They've lost enough by now. The Knicks need to establish a winning culture here and soon.

IF the Knicks can win 40 games next season that likely means KP and Grant and Galloway are playing well. IF Melo is here he won't be able to do it alone.

Losing fucking blows. Rarely does anything good come from losing. I'm tired of it. If we pick 15th next season so be it. The Knicks would still own that pick. They'd own cap room and they'd have assets to use if and when they want to add more talent. They would be in fine shape. Right now the Knicks are a joke. If they win 20 games next season they will be an even bigger joke.

This isn't 2005. The Knicks have a franchise young player. Progress with that player, even if limited, can only be a good thing. Knicks need to show progress or else the whole thing will blow up and god knows what that can lead to.
the Knicks need talent more than anything else  
Greg from LI : 5/3/2016 11:03 am : link
They've been losers for a decade and a half - what difference does it make if they do that for one more season to get the best possible talent?
Bulls RealGM  
Metnut : 5/3/2016 11:05 am : link
seems to think that Butler will go to Boston if Boston lands a top 2 pick in the lottery. Boston apparently offered the Brooklyn pick (plus other pieces) at the deadline but the Bulls wanted to see where the pick ended up first.
Penciling  
DanMetroMan : 5/3/2016 11:06 am : link
in Grant and Galloway as part of the "future" of the next good Knicks team is silly. Either one could improve enough to look like a legit NBA starter (less chance Galloway) or prove to be nothing more than a 7-9th man. Neither one is so talented that you build your team going forward focused on them. KP absolutely. Grant more interesting than others? Sure. But if you told me we are sitting here next year viewing JG and LG as pure backups I wouldn't be shocked in the least.
RE: RE: Just please let the Bulls trade Butler  
dep026 : 5/3/2016 11:10 am : link
In comment 12942706 Enzo said:
Quote:
In comment 12942695 dep026 said:


Quote:


and break the teenage drama between him and Rose. Ideally, getting rid of Rose is the smarter thing to do, but no one is trading for him.

Maybe Minny would take Butler for Dieng, Lavine, and their first!


what makes you think Rose won't have more drama with other teammates? He's a whiny bitch.


They cant trade Rose. Plus Butler doesnt seemed well liked by his teammates. Noah has publicly stated that he prefers Rose to Butler.
RE: RE: Just please let the Bulls trade Butler  
dep026 : 5/3/2016 11:10 am : link
In comment 12942709 giantsfan44ab said:
Quote:
In comment 12942695 dep026 said:


Quote:


and break the teenage drama between him and Rose. Ideally, getting rid of Rose is the smarter thing to do, but no one is trading for him.

Maybe Minny would take Butler for Dieng, Lavine, and their first!



That's interesting but that also would make Melo a lesser-demanded option so it's a no go in my book. Idk why Chicago would get rid of him unless they go for an all out tank.


Butler has burned many bridges.
Plenty of top NBA teams would disagree  
bceagle05 : 5/3/2016 11:10 am : link
that nothing good ever comes from losing. Seattle/OKC drafted KD and Westbrook, the Clippers drafted Blake (and other young players were traded for Chris Paul), Cleveland drafted Lebron and, later, Kyrie and Wiggins (which got them Kevin Love). Golden State didn't draft Steph or Klay with top three picks, but they were still lottery selections. KP gives us a chance down the road to build through free agency, but we have a window of time while he develops to really load up on young talent through the draft - it would be a shame if we wasted it to sign Kent Bazemore or acquire Darren Collison.
RE: Lavine  
dep026 : 5/3/2016 11:12 am : link
In comment 12942714 DanMetroMan said:
Quote:
Dieng and a top 10 pick for Butler seems insane to me. If I'm the Wolves I hang up the phone.


Throw Gibson or Mirotic in.

Rubio
Butler
Wiggins
Gibson or Mirotic
Towns

Thats a helluva starting 5. Bulls would only do it if they could land a top 2 pick I believe.

Rose
Lavine
Simmons/Ingram
Portis
Noah

Giddy up, lets go!
Galloway isn't the future  
Aspano! : 5/3/2016 11:12 am : link
He's a good bench guy, but not much else in my eyes.

Grant isn't going to be a premier PG in the league, but with shot consistency I think he ticks all the boxes for what Phil is looking for in a guard.
RE: yeah well  
giantsfan44ab : 5/3/2016 11:17 am : link
In comment 12942731 djm said:
Quote:
I didn't say add marginal talent just to win 40 games.

Don't forget the future of this team is KP and Galloway and Grant. Young players. Those guys need to grow and learn and the only way they grow is to win, even if it's a slow process. They've lost enough by now. The Knicks need to establish a winning culture here and soon.

IF the Knicks can win 40 games next season that likely means KP and Grant and Galloway are playing well. IF Melo is here he won't be able to do it alone.

Losing fucking blows. Rarely does anything good come from losing. I'm tired of it. If we pick 15th next season so be it. The Knicks would still own that pick. They'd own cap room and they'd have assets to use if and when they want to add more talent. They would be in fine shape. Right now the Knicks are a joke. If they win 20 games next season they will be an even bigger joke.

This isn't 2005. The Knicks have a franchise young player. Progress with that player, even if limited, can only be a good thing. Knicks need to show progress or else the whole thing will blow up and god knows what that can lead to.


Well what's the plan to win if the odds suggest we aren't gonna land KD/Horford/Superstar? It's gonna be adding marginal talent, no way around that, if that truly is the plan.

It takes more than one major player to be a 50+ win team, let alone a contender. KP isn't one now and Melo is not gonna be one in just a few years (I'd argue he may not be anymore than a 2nd or even 3rd wheel on a contending team now). The way I see it is that we are in a fairly similar situation to what the T-wolves were in 2 years ago. Sure, they're not gonna land Andrew Wiggins with Melo, but a similar talent can be obtained if say Boston gets involved somehow. If that happens you land a top pick and tank for the next year.

Landing top young players by losing doesn't accomplish anything? Then why did the best established coach available go a bottom 4 team? Why did the hottest assistant coach scoff at Melo and go to a 17 win team?

The way I see it is that KP gives us a special advantage when it comes to tanking in a way Hinkie didn't have the luxury of. We can tank without implanting the stigma that we're intentionally losing to get a top pick. There's already a foundation in place, with building blocks available via the draft.

I even have a hard time seeing that a Conley/Batum type even would get the Knicks in the playoffs. That would most likely mean letting Williams, Afflalo, and Thomas walk. Not only is there still a major whole in the starting lineup, the bench is completely gone. The Knicks finished 12 games out of the playoffs. I have a hard time seeing how that roster wins 12 more games, even ignoring the fact that both Milwaukee and Orlando looked much, much better in the 2nd half of the season. Where the fuck does that get us? We're stuck with vets, capped out, and can't make the playoffs.
Walked in to Panera  
gm7b5 : 5/3/2016 11:18 am : link
wearing my beautiful Knicks track jacket i bought recently. Guy at counter is like, Really? lol. Shame what this organizations become. Dont see it changing under Dolans ownership. Such is life
Walked in to Panera  
gm7b5 : 5/3/2016 11:20 am : link
wearing my beautiful Knicks track jacket i bought recently. Guy at counter is like, Really? lol. Shame what this organizations become. Dont see it changing under Dolans ownership. Such is life
RE: Galloway isn't the future  
giantsfan44ab : 5/3/2016 11:21 am : link
In comment 12942758 Aspano! said:
Quote:
He's a good bench guy, but not much else in my eyes.

Grant isn't going to be a premier PG in the league, but with shot consistency I think he ticks all the boxes for what Phil is looking for in a guard.


Yeah, I don't know what to make of Gallo at this point, he's a tweener with an erratic shot. He's not very young for a 2nd year player, either. I'd still keep him in hopes that he becomes a rotational player.

Grant I have much higher hopes for. If he can get his shot down, I see a lot of Jrue Holiday in his game. If not, I think he can still generate offense off the bench in a worst case scenario.
Id consider that trade if im MINN....  
Italianju : 5/3/2016 11:35 am : link
Not sure i would do it since we dont know where the pick ends up. Lavine in my mind has been overrated so far in his career and you would be replacing him with Butler anyway. I like Dieng, but he is replaceable. The pick is where id go one way or the other. If the pick ended up top 2 i def would not make the deal, but if it was 3 or lower id still consider it. Butler is an awesome player both defensively and offensively at this point. He has had PER over 21 the last two seasons which has put him in the top 3 at SG both years. You add him to Towns and Wiggins and thats a good young core.
RE: Id consider that trade if im MINN....  
giantsfan44ab : 5/3/2016 11:42 am : link
In comment 12942798 Italianju said:
Quote:
Not sure i would do it since we dont know where the pick ends up. Lavine in my mind has been overrated so far in his career and you would be replacing him with Butler anyway. I like Dieng, but he is replaceable. The pick is where id go one way or the other. If the pick ended up top 2 i def would not make the deal, but if it was 3 or lower id still consider it. Butler is an awesome player both defensively and offensively at this point. He has had PER over 21 the last two seasons which has put him in the top 3 at SG both years. You add him to Towns and Wiggins and thats a good young core.


Lavine is only 20. I wouldn't say he's a future superstar but he shot 39% from 3 and most of his efficiency stats have been bumped up from last year. I don't see him as a PG but he's the only real shooter on the team (Towns maybe another one). I can see him being a 20 PPG and 4 APG and 40% from 3 for the wolves over the next few years.

Not saying he's better or will be better than Butler, but flipping two young pieces in Lavine and Dieng will force them to play on Butler's timeline, rather than develop a corps of 4 players (+ whoever they pick this ear) that are on the same timeframe. Dieng the player is replaeable? Yes, but you aren't just flipping a good all around center you would be flipping a cost controlled player that they have the rights to keep for another 5-6 years.
Butler  
DanMetroMan : 5/3/2016 11:47 am : link
has proven to be injury prone for #1. Last 3 seasons he's missed 15, 17 and 15 games. Second I don't think Lavine is overrated if you take into account his age/how raw he was coming into the league. He JUST turned 21. He's a few months older than Porzingis yet LaVine is going into his 3rd NBA season. Post all-star break LaVine averaged 16.4 points 2.8 assists 2.5 boards on 48% from the field, 44% from 3. Throw in a very solid young center in Dieng + a likely high lottery pick and that's a TON to give up in my eyes. I'm not even sure LaVine/Dieng ends up "worse" than Butler in terms of value in the end (I'd likely have to pull the trigger on that one obviously) but LaVine/Dieng and a top 5-ish pick? No thanks.


Another note on LaVine... 33 games as a starter 17.3 points 2.8 boards 3.2 assists on 47% from the field 44% from 3. If anything I think he's on the brink of becoming an all-star caliber player. Will play all of next season as a 21 year old. Kris Dunn (a projected top 3-5 pick) is already 22 for comparison, Buddy Hield another projected top 5 pick is also 22. LaVine is a baby and already looks really good.
Knicks 2016-2017 off seasons  
GMEN46 : 5/3/2016 11:52 am : link
Love the idea of trading melo this offseason in some three way deal with Boston. I would actually skip the nets pick this year and take 1 of their later first this year (they have 4 of them) and 2 of their number 2's (they have 5 of them). Then I would take the 2017 #1brooklyn pick, better draft next year. I would also see if they want Lopez because long term the goal is for zinger to play the 5, plus it puts you in full tank mode for next season leading to a high lottery pick. Lopez gets you at least another #1 pick and prob a #2. Then you build off zinger Grant and 4 #1 picks between 2016 and 2017 of which 2 should be top 7 picks. Then you can go big in free agency. i happen to think if wroten is healthy he can be a force at point guard, again big if when it comes to health. If you can go into 2017 free agency with a 20-10 zinger and a bunch of young pieces there would be plenty of cap space to sign two max contracts and a few seasoned vets. I know it will never happen but just my thoughts.
Well its hard to argue...  
Italianju : 5/3/2016 12:00 pm : link
since we have very different opinions of Lavine. If you think he is closer to the post all star break player then of course you dont make that move. Im not willing to ignore the first half of the year. Ive watched a good amount of MINN and while i think Lavine def has potential and is a solid player im not ready to think he is going to be a star in this league. That said i can see how you think he would be.
RE: Well its hard to argue...  
giantsfan44ab : 5/3/2016 12:06 pm : link
In comment 12942854 Italianju said:
Quote:
since we have very different opinions of Lavine. If you think he is closer to the post all star break player then of course you dont make that move. Im not willing to ignore the first half of the year. Ive watched a good amount of MINN and while i think Lavine def has potential and is a solid player im not ready to think he is going to be a star in this league. That said i can see how you think he would be.


Regardless he's still a 20 year old. KP had a pretty subpar second half but I take it as a young player you're gonna have major downs. I'd be excited as a Minn fan if Lavine put that second half of the season up as a 25 year old, let alone 20.
RE: I'd expect the FA talent pool to dry up pretty quickly  
Deej : 5/3/2016 12:18 pm : link
In comment 12942680 bceagle05 said:
Quote:
once KD goes back to OKC for a year. Doc Rivers says he's not breaking up the big three in L.A., so that's one less big name on the trade market, too. At some point this summer teams will turn their attention to Carmelo.


This has been one of my points all year re Melo. Everyone who wants to make a splash cant sign KD. Only one team can. Horford isnt as good as Melo IMO, and in any event is likely to stay in Atlanta and can only sign with one team. Then what? LeBron isnt moving. Drummond and Beal are restricted. Derozen has said he will resign. Pau and Gasol (PTO) seem likely to stay. I wouldnt sign Dwight to a max deal for a ton of reasons (attitude, health, style). That's your Hoops Hype top 9 UFAs; after is Conley, Whiteside, Parson, Barnes (RFA), Dirk, Rondo, TD, Batum, AlJeff).

If you need a star scoring player, it's really KD or bust. Melo's value on July 4th is going to be higher than it is right now, and his motivation to leave will probably go up too.
RE: Butler  
dep026 : 5/3/2016 12:25 pm : link
In comment 12942826 DanMetroMan said:
Quote:
has proven to be injury prone for #1. Last 3 seasons he's missed 15, 17 and 15 games. Second I don't think Lavine is overrated if you take into account his age/how raw he was coming into the league. He JUST turned 21. He's a few months older than Porzingis yet LaVine is going into his 3rd NBA season. Post all-star break LaVine averaged 16.4 points 2.8 assists 2.5 boards on 48% from the field, 44% from 3. Throw in a very solid young center in Dieng + a likely high lottery pick and that's a TON to give up in my eyes. I'm not even sure LaVine/Dieng ends up "worse" than Butler in terms of value in the end (I'd likely have to pull the trigger on that one obviously) but LaVine/Dieng and a top 5-ish pick? No thanks.


Another note on LaVine... 33 games as a starter 17.3 points 2.8 boards 3.2 assists on 47% from the field 44% from 3. If anything I think he's on the brink of becoming an all-star caliber player. Will play all of next season as a 21 year old. Kris Dunn (a projected top 3-5 pick) is already 22 for comparison, Buddy Hield another projected top 5 pick is also 22. LaVine is a baby and already looks really good.


Well one thing is Thibs basically controls all the decision making as well. And Butler may be his favorite player ever. Lavine lackadaisical defense will not be tolerated. If you throw in Gibson and the Bulls 1st round pick, its not an absurd deal.
As  
DanMetroMan : 5/3/2016 12:26 pm : link
much as I love KP, I don't see how Carmelo Anthony can possibly look at the current Knicks situation (especially if they go with Rambis) and see anything less than at LEAST 1 more "lost" season barring adding someone like Durant. I guess Melo can be patient but at some point you'd think he'd want to be in a better situation.
I didnt say i dont think lavine...  
Italianju : 5/3/2016 12:29 pm : link
is any good or doesnt have star potential. I wasnt saying id trade him for Afflalo or something like that. You dont get a player like Butler for spare parts (at least not often).

And im not sure where you were going with KP having a poor second half, but KP has an extremely unique skill set. You arent going to find guys with his potential often. Lavine has a much more common skill set.
LaVine  
DanMetroMan : 5/3/2016 12:29 pm : link
was 19 as a rookie and 20 this year. Judging his defense is a bit unfair if you ask me. He came into the league an actual twig, he's still maturing physically. Even LaVine acknowledged as such

"“The [bigger guards] are always trying to post me up,” he said. “I just have to fight ’em, get ’em off the block. Then, on the offensive end, try to run ’em.”"

If anything I suspect Thibs turns him into a very strong (at least average) defensive player.
Frsscilla  
DanMetroMan : 5/3/2016 12:33 pm : link
seems obsessed with Sabonis. He tweets about him all the time lol. I think KP directly impacts some team into taking Dragan Bender earlier than he should go.
RE: Frsscilla  
giantsfan44ab : 5/3/2016 12:40 pm : link
In comment 12942929 DanMetroMan said:
Quote:
seems obsessed with Sabonis. He tweets about him all the time lol. I think KP directly impacts some team into taking Dragan Bender earlier than he should go.


Yeah I think people will get mistaken easily with Bender. He plays pretty differently. I'd still take him as a top 5 pick but would expect something different than the KP projections. I was originally very down on him, but I see a good role for him down the line. He is going to be a project. Unlike KP I don't think he has any prominent skills that he can utilize night in night out right away. I see his potential mainly as a run-and-jump center down the line that runs the floor very well and can hit an outside shot on occasion. I see him as like a 14 and 10 guy down the line, which isn't impressive but for how shallow this draft is, it should make him a top pick.
Pages: 1 2 | Show All |  Next>>
Back to the Corner