for display only
Big Blue Interactive The Corner Forum  
Back to the Corner

Archived Thread

Let's talk the starting 22...your best guess (long post)

j_rud : 5/7/2016 4:21 pm
Disclaimer: It is realistic if not probable that the team will make an addition or two after cuts and the possibility of a trade for Davis still lingers. I've also incorporated "11" personal and the nickel/3 safety sub packages due to the frequency with which they are utilized. So without further ado...

Slow Saturday, so I figured it could be interesting to discuss the possible lineup changes we will see Week 1. With the team rebuil...err...reloading after an unprecedented FA period and seemingly productive draft it could lead to some good debates. Instead of breaking it down as you normally would I'm going to separate positions by those that are locks, those that are up for grabs with an anticipated camp battle, and positions where a new face may eventually replace an incumbent. I've put in bold who I think are viable team captains

Offensive

Locks:
QB: Eli Manning
LT: Ereck Flowers
LG: Justin Pugh
C: Weston Richburg
RG John Jerry

WR1: Odell Beckham
WR2: Victor Cruz
WR3: Sterling Shepard

Battles
RT: Bobby Hart (winner) vs Marshall Newhouse
FB: Will Johnson (winner) vs Nikita Whitlock

Incumbents Giving Way
TE: Tye, giving way to Adams
RB: Jennings, giving way to Perkins

Rationale:
Along the OL I'm hopeful that Hart, who seems to have really dedicated himself this offseason after a decent rookie campaign (for a 7th rounder) can unseat JAG Newhouse.

Whitlock was a nice story last season with his versatility but let's be honest, if he's still seeing time at DT this season something is wrong. Further hurting his chances is the fact that Johnson a more consistent lead blocker (I personally thought Hynoski was too, FWIW). He also brings versatility to the table, and it's precisely the type McAdoo prefers, offering the ability to line up as a traditional FB while also being capable playing some H-back and even in-line TE. The Green Bay/McCarthy influence was on full display with this signing.

At RB I think they pick up where they left off last season when they finally settled on Jennings and he ran for 425 yards, half his seasons output, over the last four games. But he's far from a difference maker, and that just may be what they have in Perkins, who by all accounts was a steal in the 4th. I think the team will still utilize multiple backs, especially with Vereen and his niche role. Im also confident that Perkins will see the field early in spot duty, as early as week one. But if he adjusts well to the next level I think we'll see a flip-flop in terms of who gets the bulk of the carries, with Jennings being used to spell Perkins by mid season.

At TE Tye was a very nice surprise, earning all rookie team honors after going undrafted. Like 90% of TEs in the league today he must work on his blocking but he proved to be a reliable target with RAC ability. However Adams has all the tools to be a solid starter in this league and has prototypical size/speed for the position. Similar to Perkins, if he adjusts well to the pro game I can see him getting significant time by mid season, barring a big leap, breakout year two from Tye.

Defense

Locks
DE: JPP
DT: Jonathan Hankins
NT: Damon Harrison
DE: Olivier Vernon

WLB: JT Thomas
SAM: Devon Kennard

CB1: DRC
CB2: Jenkins
CB3: Apple (I, like many expect Apple to play outside with Jenkins sliding inside for slot duty when the package calls for 3 corners)

SS: Landon Collins

Battles:
FS: Darian Thompson (winner) vs Nat Berhe, Mykelle Thompson, and Bennett Jackson
MLB: Keenan Thompson (winner) vs Jasper Brinkley, BJ Goodson.
3rd Safety: Berhe (winner) vs Cooper Taylor

Rationale:
Despite all that's made of the scheme employing versatile safeties who can man both spots the need for a coverage safety is glaring. Berhe might be the most talented holdover but like the others lacks any kind of meaningful NFL experience and is also more of a SS-type. Darian Thompson, although a rookie, is the most athletic safety on the roster and his range, ball skills, and football IQ gives him the leg-up in this competition.

At MLB Brinkley may have the upper hand when it comes to playing in this scheme and is also more of a traditional run stopper. But he's a one dimensional, 2 down LBer who is a liability in anything other than coming downhill. Robinson is aggressive and has solid instincts. He is also versatile and can not only stay on the field on 3rd down, but can even play some OLB. Hes not as stout at the point as Brinkley or Goodson but playing behind Hank and Snacks should mitigate that deficiency. He's struggled to to stay healthy and has missed time in each of his first 4 seasons so expect to see Brinkley at some point. But I wouldn't sleep on Goodson either, and it's not out of the question to see him earn the primary backup role.

Which brings me to an outside possibility, one that IMO would be a best case scenario but is probably a year away: if Reese and company *finally* hit on a mid round LBer we might just see a LB corp of Robinson(WLB)/Goodson(MLB)/Kennard(SAM). I think that's the best case scenario but as I said, we might be a year or two away from.

Also felt it was necessary to discuss the 3rd safety, as its prominent in the D. Although Berhe may not earn the starting role he by all accounts has been working so hard for, I think there's still a role for him as a regular contributor. His downhill, hard-hitting, attacking style is a perfect match for Spagnuolo's 3rd safety spot. Line him up in the box and let him chase the ball. While he may never be a starter at this level this is the perfect role for him, and one I can see him excelling at.

So, in summation, my prediction for the week 1 lineup

Offense
QB: Manning
RB: Jennings
FB: Johnson

WR1: Beckham
WR2: Cruz
WR3: Shepard
TE: Tye

LT: Flowers
LG: Pugh
C: Richburg
RG: Jerry
RT: Hart

Defense
RDE: Vernon
DT: Hankins
NT: Harrison
LDE: JPP

WIL: Thomas
MLB: Robinson
SAM: Kennard

CB1: DRC
CB2: Jenkins
CB3: Apple (playing outside in 3 corner sets)

SS: Collins
FS: Thomas
Sub-package S: Berhe

So, what do you think? Any chance we'll see something close to this on opening day? Who do you think the starting 22 (and key sub package personnel) will be? General thoughts?






....  
BleedBlue : 5/7/2016 4:26 pm : link
QB: Eli Manning
RB: Jennings/Perkins with Vareen out of backfield
FB: Johnson
WR1: OBJ
WR2: Shepard
WR3: Cruz(slot)
TE: Tye and Adams
2 possibilities
1
LT: Flowers
LG: Pugh
C: Richburg
RG: Jerry
RT: Anthony Davis
2
LT: Flowers
LG: Slauson
C: Richburg
RG: Jerry
RT: Pugh


Defense:

FS: D. Thompson
SS: Collins
CB1: DRC
CB2: Jenkins
CB3: Apple
WLB: Robinson
MIKE: Goodson
SLB: Kennard
LDE: JPP
DT: Hankins
DT: Harrison
RDE: Vernon
Good job  
BillT : 5/7/2016 4:46 pm : link
I think most of that makes sense.

I think you, like many here, underestimate Tye. I think he will be the starter and will keep that job. His receiving skill are too valuable to take off the field and his blocking is likely to be good enough to keep him as the starter. Adams, given he's currently a better blocker than receiver, won't be better than the #2 TE. He'll need this year to polish his pass catching.

I agree about Robinson at MLB. However, given his injury history, Goodson or Brinkley could be starting at any time.

I'd love to see Thompson win the FS job but it's hard to step in as a starter when you are a rookie. That will be interesting.

I agree that they'll give Hart the chance to be the starting RT rather than the RG. I would be great to see that. However, a new player that isn't here yet is also a possibility.
You guys are way  
bluepepper : 5/7/2016 4:48 pm : link
too optimistic about the rookies. Look at our recent draft history past the first couple of rounds. Now all of sudden we're getting 3/4 guys in round 3-6 who start or play big roles as rookies? Would love to believe it but odds are at least a couple are never going to be any good much less be good year 1.
BB  
j_rud : 5/7/2016 4:52 pm : link
Maybe I should have made it more clear but like I mentioned in the disclaimer about the possibility of adding new bodies. The idea was to give your best Gas on the starting 22 plus key sub-package players with who is already currently on the roster. No big deal though, Just makes for more conversation. I have to admit though, I'd rather keep Pugh at LG. I think he really came into his own last season and paired with Flowers Guess the Giants are very strong left side. If they upgrade anyway offensive line positio. I hope its RT. For all the hand-wringing and gnashing of teeth regarding John Jerry, Newhouse Is the true weak link
RE: You guys are way  
BleedBlue : 5/7/2016 4:55 pm : link
In comment 12949425 bluepepper said:
Quote:
too optimistic about the rookies. Look at our recent draft history past the first couple of rounds. Now all of sudden we're getting 3/4 guys in round 3-6 who start or play big roles as rookies? Would love to believe it but odds are at least a couple are never going to be any good much less be good year 1.


just because they start doesnt mean we believe they do well lol...goodson starts because he is a better player than what else we have. robinsons skills translate well to play WILL. thompson is going to start because he is just a better athlete and player, doesnt mean he wont struggle, but who is better? mkyelle thompson? the 5th rounder who shouldnt have been drafted who is coming off a major injury? berhe who is really a SS moved to FS coming off a major injury or bennet jackson who is a CB moving to FS who is coming off a major injury? see my point? the FS job is his to lose IMO. again i said robinson and goodson start over the trash we currently have there. shepard is a pro ready WR who will make an impact. i had perkins splitting time with jennings thats not to insane to ask of him
yeah  
gidiefor : Mod : 5/7/2016 5:02 pm : link
some of those guys are not going to be on the opening roster - anywhere from 3-7 of them because the questions and optimism about them have yet to be borne

a) Hart - still a question mark.
b) Tye is still a maybe -- Donnel may supplant him if healthy.
c) Jennings is always an injury issue.
d) The free safety position is very much a competition - I wouldn't write off Behre yet either
e) Robinson is an injury question at MLB
f) you are ruling out last year's #1 FB and we haven't even had a snap yet
g) Kennard -- can he stay healthy
h) who out there on that list may have a fluke injury we don;'t or can;'t foresee


you see what I mean -- I'd like to see a few snaps happen in training camp before I start making these predictions myself
g) Thomas at will - ok I think there's still some contest that's going to take place there

g) Cruz? hasn't been playing for nearly 2 years and you have him penciled in as a starter?

yes  
BleedBlue : 5/7/2016 5:10 pm : link
obviously without taking a snap our predictions are assuming no injuries. clearly and unfortunately it wont be that way but
Opening day If every starter is healthy  
Jay on the Island : 5/7/2016 5:11 pm : link
QB: Eli
RB: Jennings
FB: Johnson
TE: Tye
OL: Flower Pugh Richburg Jerry Newhouse
DL: Vernon Harrison Hankins JPP
LB: Kennard Brinkley Robinson
CB: Jenkins DRC
S: Collins Thompson

I think Hart replaces Newhouse at RT and Goodson ends up beating out Brinkley later in the year as well. My bold prediction is that Perkins will be the starting RB to finish the year.
nice thread idea j_rud  
Moondawg : 5/7/2016 5:53 pm : link
.
Will Tye is the most underrated guy  
Lowell : 5/7/2016 5:55 pm : link
on the whole roster probably because people can't believe a 6:2 tight end is for real.

From Rotoworld: Tye emerged as an offensive weapon last season after Larry Donnell went down with a neck injury, recording 32 receptions for 368 yards and three touchdowns over the final seven games. With Donnell's future in question, Giants GM Jerry Reese said he expects Tye to "be a big piece" of the offense moving forward.
RE: You guys are way  
Moondawg : 5/7/2016 5:57 pm : link
In comment 12949425 bluepepper said:
Quote:
too optimistic about the rookies. Look at our recent draft history past the first couple of rounds. Now all of sudden we're getting 3/4 guys in round 3-6 who start or play big roles as rookies? Would love to believe it but odds are at least a couple are never going to be any good much less be good year 1.


How much was Coughlin vs. McAdoo? Maybe the new guy wants to give them more of a chance early on.
RE: yeah  
Mason : 5/7/2016 6:00 pm : link
In comment 12949435 gidiefor said:
Quote:
some of those guys are not going to be on the opening roster - anywhere from 3-7 of them because the questions and optimism about them have yet to be borne

a) Hart - still a question mark.
b) Tye is still a maybe -- Donnel may supplant him if healthy.
c) Jennings is always an injury issue.
d) The free safety position is very much a competition - I wouldn't write off Behre yet either
e) Robinson is an injury question at MLB
f) you are ruling out last year's #1 FB and we haven't even had a snap yet
g) Kennard -- can he stay healthy
h) who out there on that list may have a fluke injury we don;'t or can;'t foresee


you see what I mean -- I'd like to see a few snaps happen in training camp before I start making these predictions myself
g) Thomas at will - ok I think there's still some contest that's going to take place there

g) Cruz? hasn't been playing for nearly 2 years and you have him penciled in as a starter?


There's nothing Donnell does better than Tye.
1) Not catching
2) Not ball security
3) Not blocking

Donnell is my annual starter to be cut candidate. I'm think Donnell main supporter on the coaching staff isn't here anymore.
RE: You guys are way  
AcidTest : 5/7/2016 6:08 pm : link
In comment 12949425 bluepepper said:
Quote:
too optimistic about the rookies. Look at our recent draft history past the first couple of rounds. Now all of sudden we're getting 3/4 guys in round 3-6 who start or play big roles as rookies? Would love to believe it but odds are at least a couple are never going to be any good much less be good year 1.


Tend to agree. All the rookies and some UDFAs should make the team, but Thompson is the only one I see starting. Apple will be the third corner.
The positions in question;  
JPinstripes : 5/7/2016 6:15 pm : link
FB Will Johnson
RT Bobby Hart
TE Will Tye
MLB Kelvin Sheppard
FS Darian Thompson

In general the LBs will be a mixed bag based on down and distance.

Good thread OP.
Injuries will play a huge part  
5BowlsSoon : 5/7/2016 6:25 pm : link
I know this is not cool, but with all the injuries we see in NY year in and year out, I do not feel optimistic the guys who usually get injured will be healed.
So, I'm not expecting to see Cruz, Robinson, Behre, Donnell, or Kennard on the field much. I hope I'm wrong.
Nice post.  
ZGiants98 : 5/7/2016 6:39 pm : link
Good rationale. I agree with just about everything.
I think Adams is very likely  
ZGiants98 : 5/7/2016 6:41 pm : link
the best blocking TE from day one which might give him a leg up early.
Perkins  
BSIMatt : 5/7/2016 7:17 pm : link
Will be interesting. I think his playing time will be proportional to the amount of time the Giants are playing with a lead vs playing from behind.
You guys are way  
j_rud : 5/7/2016 7:49 pm : link
In comment 12949425 bluepepper said:
Quote:
too optimistic about the rookies. Look at our recent draft history past the first couple of rounds. Now all of sudden we're getting 3/4 guys in round 3-6 who start or play big roles as rookies? Would love to believe it but odds are at least a couple are never going to be any good much less be good year 1.


I hear you but this isn't the typical draft class of the last three to four years. No typical reaches on small school developmental players or athletes in football pads. It's by no means a stretch to think Apple will lock down the third cornerback role. In fact its expected. Perkins will be involved in the running back rotation, hes arguably the best pure runner on the roster, with Jennings providing the only counter-argument. Tye has a very good shot of holding onto the starting gig but when they go 2 TEs ny midseason there's a good shot its Adams. Same goes for Goodson. He'll start in a reserve role and work his way up. Given the propensoty for injuries and a general lack of talent (Robinson and Brinkley, respectively), he may find his way onto the field this season as well.

Im not saying they'll have 5 rookie starters, but they might have one on opening day in Thompson and by seasons end in Perkins, and several others, most notably Apple, will be a major contributor with the D lining up in some variation of the nickle about 60% of the time.

Its important to note that while a handful of rookies may see the field it isnt because they're all-world talents, but because in many cases the talent in front of them is marginal.
Not bad, however,  
Simms11 : 5/7/2016 7:55 pm : link
I think Hart has a better chance to be the starting RG then RT. He's just better inside and is no better then Newhouse at tackle IMO.
a you forgot to remove 6 guys  
Anonymous Stranger Online : 5/7/2016 7:58 pm : link
who will no doubt be on reserve by opening day
Tye and Jennings  
Glover : 5/7/2016 8:08 pm : link
will be the starters and will get the majority of snaps.
Adams may take over eventually, and that would be great, because Tye was a good player last year, so if Adams gets more reps then he will be very effective.
Perkins won't start or get more snaps than Jennings, barring injury. He's pretty much the same player, with less power. His only advantage is that he is younger.
RE: Tye and Jennings  
BleedBlue : 5/7/2016 8:22 pm : link
In comment 12949560 Glover said:
Quote:
will be the starters and will get the majority of snaps.
Adams may take over eventually, and that would be great, because Tye was a good player last year, so if Adams gets more reps then he will be very effective.
Perkins won't start or get more snaps than Jennings, barring injury. He's pretty much the same player, with less power. His only advantage is that he is younger.


mmm i am going to disagree about perkins and jennings. Jennings isnt as complete a back as perkins is. Perkins is WAY more elusive. jennings is a one hole and go
I didnt read through the whole thread but  
robbieballs2003 : 5/7/2016 8:51 pm : link
I don't see how you can just plug Jerry at RG. The OL we have brought in have been OT and that tells me that they see Hart as more of a G than a T. If we were to land a player like Okung I think they would be satisfied with Jerry amd Hart battling it out for that RG spot with Newhouse as the swing T or at least the backup RT with Pugh being the backup LT. That means we need a guy to backup LG and that would probably be the loser of the RG job. Just my 2 cents.
John Jerry a lock at RG  
Steve in South Jersey : 5/7/2016 8:54 pm : link
how depressing.
RE: RE: Tye and Jennings  
robbieballs2003 : 5/7/2016 8:57 pm : link
In comment 12949568 BleedBlue said:
Quote:
In comment 12949560 Glover said:


Quote:


will be the starters and will get the majority of snaps.
Adams may take over eventually, and that would be great, because Tye was a good player last year, so if Adams gets more reps then he will be very effective.
Perkins won't start or get more snaps than Jennings, barring injury. He's pretty much the same player, with less power. His only advantage is that he is younger.



mmm i am going to disagree about perkins and jennings. Jennings isnt as complete a back as perkins is. Perkins is WAY more elusive. jennings is a one hole and go


Being a complete back means that a back can play on alk three downs and in all situations. Perkins eventually may be a complete back but in no way is he more of a complete back than Jennings. The problem with Jennings is that is is prone to injuries and getting worn down. Otherwise, he has power, vision, he can pass block, he can catch, etc. The word complete is not the right word. Maybe you are thinking of potential. Being elusive and being a one hole and go running back are two totally different things and have nothing to do with being a complete back. And, I disagree that Jennings is a one hole and go back. Jennings works well with our OL because he is patient, allows his blocks to get set up, has great vision, and has enough burst to get through the hole. I think people forget how productive Jennings has been for us when given a significant role.
RE: John Jerry a lock at RG  
The_Boss : 5/7/2016 9:22 pm : link
In comment 12949587 Steve in South Jersey said:
Quote:
how depressing.


Let's hope Hart can give him a run. I believe last year, Reese and Ross said they project him to G moreso than OT after the draft. And, I believe that's 100% the case. I think, sadly, the actual lock right now, is Newhouse at RT.
apple  
area junc : 5/7/2016 9:32 pm : link
is already playing the slot. fyi. they paid janoris a lot of $$$ to play outside - lots of responsibility
RE: apple  
robbieballs2003 : 5/7/2016 9:45 pm : link
In comment 12949610 area junc said:
Quote:
is already playing the slot. fyi. they paid janoris a lot of $$$ to play outside - lots of responsibility


I don't know how true that is right now.
well, he admitted  
area junc : 5/7/2016 9:48 pm : link
it. so there's that...
RE: well, he admitted  
robbieballs2003 : 5/7/2016 9:54 pm : link
In comment 12949622 area junc said:
Quote:
it. so there's that...


My point is that playing the slot is extremely difficult not just physically but mentally as well. It seems like it is a difficult position to put him in as a rookie. It doesn't mean he won't be able to handle it. It is just that the coaches at this stage of the game are going to throw shit against the wall and see what sticks. They want to see what the players are capable of handling. It is always easier to slow things down for a player as opposed to speed things up. If they just have him as an outside corner and in the preseason just try expanding his role he will be so far behind hin his development it wilk have about a zero percent chance of working. Long story short, take anything at this time of year with a grain or salt.
RE: well, he admitted  
gidiefor : Mod : 5/7/2016 10:00 pm : link
In comment 12949622 area junc said:
Quote:
it. so there's that...


actually what he admitted was that he played the outside and was studying all the positions
Agree with the above locks  
PatersonPlank : 5/7/2016 10:02 pm : link
I think the Linebackers will be Kennard, Robinson, and Goodson.

I think Hart wins at RT.
I think Thompson wins a FS.
he admitted he  
area junc : 5/7/2016 10:03 pm : link
was playing the slot and that it was a tough transition
RE: Will Tye is the most underrated guy  
Coach Mason : 5/7/2016 10:09 pm : link
In comment 12949473 Lowell said:
Quote:
on the whole roster probably because people can't believe a 6:2 tight end is for real.

From Rotoworld: Tye emerged as an offensive weapon last season after Larry Donnell went down with a neck injury, recording 32 receptions for 368 yards and three touchdowns over the final seven games. With Donnell's future in question, Giants GM Jerry Reese said he expects Tye to "be a big piece" of the offense moving forward.


There is a strong chance Tye will be a damn good receiving TE for us. Extrapolate his numbers from the last 7 games over a full season and you have roughly 70 catches and 825yds. Great complementary production to OBJ.
These are my starters:  
Anakim : 5/7/2016 10:23 pm : link
QB - Eli
RB - Jennings/Vereen
FB - Johnson
WR - OBJ
WR - Cruz
WR - Shepard
TE - Adams

LT - Flowers
LG - Pugh
OC - Richburg
RG - Louis Vasquez/John Jerry
RT - Anthony Davis

DE - JPP
DE - Vernon
DT - Snacks
DT - Hankins

WLB - Robinson
MLB - Goodson
SLB - Kennard

CB - DRC
CB - Jenkins
CB - Apple
FS - Darian Thompson
SS - Collins

PK - Josh Brown
P - Brad Wing
RE: These are my starters:  
BleedBlue : 5/7/2016 10:29 pm : link
In comment 12949655 Anakim said:
Quote:
QB - Eli
RB - Jennings/Vereen
FB - Johnson
WR - OBJ
WR - Cruz
WR - Shepard
TE - Adams

LT - Flowers
LG - Pugh
OC - Richburg
RG - Louis Vasquez/John Jerry
RT - Anthony Davis

DE - JPP
DE - Vernon
DT - Snacks
DT - Hankins

WLB - Robinson
MLB - Goodson
SLB - Kennard

CB - DRC
CB - Jenkins
CB - Apple
FS - Darian Thompson
SS - Collins

PK - Josh Brown
P - Brad Wing


i would LOVE that starting team if there were no injuries. in addition i can see perkins getting some carries
RE: ....  
bigfish703 : 5/7/2016 11:23 pm : link

LT: Flowers
LG: Pugh
C: Richburg
RG: Jerry
RT: Anthony Davis


I like your line-up, especially Anthony Davis who as far as I know has not even applied for reinstatement in the NFL. Then there is the little matter of negotiating with the 49ers and trying to sign him. Keep dreaming though.
Barring injury, the opening day starters are going to be:  
SGMen : 5/8/2016 12:32 am : link
Offensive

QB: Eli Manning
LT: Ereck Flowers
LG: Justin Pugh
C: Weston Richburg (B. Jones)
RG John Jerry
RT Robert Newhouse (Bobby Hart)

WR1: Odell Beckham
WR2: Victor Cruz
WR3: Sterling Shepard

FB: Will Johnson (Nikita Whitlock may still stick...)

TE: W. Tye (Rookie Adams)
RB: RB S. Vereen and Dwarka (Perkins backup)
RE: apple  
Klaatu : 5/8/2016 12:58 am : link
In comment 12949610 area junc said:
Quote:
is already playing the slot. fyi. they paid janoris a lot of $$$ to play outside - lots of responsibility


You pull more stuff out of your ass than Richard Gere.

From Raanan, yesterday:

Quote:
1. Eli Apple played on the outside
When the players took the field for practice, first-round pick Eli Apple was on the outside playing cornerback. He started where he's most familiar, much like first-round pick Ereck Flowers did last year.

There's been a lot of talk about Apple playing in the slot. After all, the Giants already have Janoris Jenkins and Dominique Rodgers-Cromartie on the outside. They could use help on the inside.

If it's going to happen, it didn't happen yet, even if they're prepping Apple for the possibility.

"I'm learning a little bit of everything," he said. "I've had a couple of meetings so far and I'm just looking at the nickel, looking at the outside corners just trying to learn everything."
TC would rarely  
bobstevensbob : 5/8/2016 2:52 am : link
allow a rookie be a starter. I have no idea what McAdoo thinks about this subject unless someone has heard him answer this somewhere b4 and I just haven't hear his take on rookie starters.
RE: RE: yeah  
chris r : 5/8/2016 6:41 am : link
In comment 12949477 Mason said:
Quote:
In comment 12949435 gidiefor said:


Quote:


some of those guys are not going to be on the opening roster - anywhere from 3-7 of them because the questions and optimism about them have yet to be borne

a) Hart - still a question mark.
b) Tye is still a maybe -- Donnel may supplant him if healthy.
c) Jennings is always an injury issue.
d) The free safety position is very much a competition - I wouldn't write off Behre yet either
e) Robinson is an injury question at MLB
f) you are ruling out last year's #1 FB and we haven't even had a snap yet
g) Kennard -- can he stay healthy
h) who out there on that list may have a fluke injury we don;'t or can;'t foresee


you see what I mean -- I'd like to see a few snaps happen in training camp before I start making these predictions myself
g) Thomas at will - ok I think there's still some contest that's going to take place there

g) Cruz? hasn't been playing for nearly 2 years and you have him penciled in as a starter?




There's nothing Donnell does better than Tye.
1) Not catching
2) Not ball security
3) Not blocking

Donnell is my annual starter to be cut candidate. I'm think Donnell main supporter on the coaching staff isn't here anymore.


Donnell and his basketball frame is a much better redzone target.
RE: yeah  
OC2.0 : 5/8/2016 11:15 am : link
In comment 12949435 gidiefor said:
Quote:
some of those guys are not going to be on the opening roster - anywhere from 3-7 of them because the questions and optimism about them have yet to be borne

a) Hart - still a question mark.
b) Tye is still a maybe -- Donnel may supplant him if healthy.
c) Jennings is always an injury issue.
d) The free safety position is very much a competition - I wouldn't write off Behre yet either
e) Robinson is an injury question at MLB
f) you are ruling out last year's #1 FB and we haven't even had a snap yet
g) Kennard -- can he stay healthy
h) who out there on that list may have a fluke injury we don;'t or can;'t foresee


you see what I mean -- I'd like to see a few snaps happen in training camp before I start making these predictions myself
g) Thomas at will - ok I think there's still some contest that's going to take place there

g) Cruz? hasn't been playing for nearly 2 years and you have him penciled in as a starter?

Jesus, the man's just throwing it out there. You gotta pick everything apart?
It's may 8th. Don't pay attention to who plays where in OTAs  
Ten Ton Hammer : 5/8/2016 11:20 am : link
.
Full Back  
stoneman : 5/8/2016 12:01 pm : link
I am not so sure that the new non-Coughlin offense will migrate to the new-age full passing attack and hardly use the FB position. Just a thought.
RE: Full Back  
BleedBlue : 5/8/2016 12:06 pm : link
In comment 12949966 stoneman said:
Quote:
I am not so sure that the new non-Coughlin offense will migrate to the new-age full passing attack and hardly use the FB position. Just a thought.

mcadoo's offense uses a fullback
I believe that the RT  
Jay in Toronto : 5/8/2016 1:21 pm : link
Is not yet on the roster and whenever he will be, Hart replaces Jerry inside
.....  
Route 9 : 5/8/2016 1:38 pm : link
O Line Left to Right: Flowers, Pugh, Richburg, Mystery Free Agent RG, Hart
QB: Eli Manning
RB: Jennings, Vereen, Perkins, Darkwa
WR: OBJ, Cruz, Shepard, Harris, Davis
TE: Tye, Donnell, Adams

DE Left to Right: JPP, Harrison, Hankins, Vernon
LB: Kennard, Brinkley, Sheppard
CB: DRC, Jenkins, Apple
SS: Collins,
Fs: Bennett Jackson

….Did a little extra
RE: apple  
djm : 5/8/2016 5:52 pm : link
In comment 12949610 area junc said:
Quote:
is already playing the slot. fyi. they paid janoris a lot of $$$ to play outside - lots of responsibility


False.
How far removed is Cruz from the bubble?  
wgenesis123 : 5/8/2016 7:43 pm : link
I know if his health stays a question mark he is in trouble at some point this year. What I am wondering is if the Giants bring in another WR (There are always some available). Well fast forward and Cruz isn't ready to be Cruz. Does Cruz get the chance to make the team as a back-up WR?
Back to the Corner