for display only
Big Blue Interactive The Corner Forum  
Back to the Corner

Archived Thread

Jets Offered their 2nd Rounder to the Giants to Trade Up?

area junc : 5/13/2016 7:55 am
Let's forget the fact we passed up on a potential Hall of Fame LT because he smokes pot.

Jets were looking for Tunsil. Offered same deal to TB (11th) and Saints (12th).

Why on Earth did Reese not accept this deal??

As it turns out, Treadwell, Docston and CB William Jackson were all on the board at 20.

The following players were on the board with the Jets 2nd round pick:

RG/RT Cody Whitehair
CB Mackensie Alexander
WR Tyler Boyd
FS Vonn Bell

To drop down 10 spots (after our target was off the board) we could've gotten a starting OL or secondary player. Those guys cost a fortune in premium picks or free agency. (That's called value.)

Really think Reese dropped the ball here. He just had to have Eli Apple so bad?? Or did he panic?
Pages: 1 2 3 | Show All |  Next>>
.  
Danny Kanell : 5/13/2016 7:58 am : link
Because its not enough value to move from 10 to 20. Not even close actually.

And this is an old story.

Jesus Christ.
So  
Giantology : 5/13/2016 8:01 am : link
No update on that Anthony Davis trade?
Lost me at the first line  
Bill L : 5/13/2016 8:02 am : link
A false foundation causes everything else to crumble.
Time will tell.  
Carl in CT : 5/13/2016 8:03 am : link
If Apple turns out to be Revis we will all laugh at that offer.
Over or Under  
JPinstripes : 5/13/2016 8:04 am : link
on 10,000 views for this thread?

I am taking the over...
This is beating a dead horse at this point I think  
USAF NYG Fan : 5/13/2016 8:12 am : link
As already mentioned, just a 2nd was not enough to drop 10 spots. Also the fact that TB and the Saints passed should say something. I think the Saints needed to fill more holes than the Giants did.

However, as I've said in the last thread this similar subject, here's what I would have done (with the benefit of hindsight) without changing the Giants picks (except the 1st rounder);

Jets 1st: Darren Lee
Jets 2nd: Cody Whitehair (Vonn Bell would have been nice too)

However, they get paid to do this and I don't. 2 other teams passed up the same deal. We also now know that Apple would have likely gone to TB or Miami. Reese has been above average with 1st round picks. Although he hasn't done so well in later rounds, I think they killed it this year so I have no complaints.
well  
Eric from BBI : Admin : 5/13/2016 8:12 am : link
the short answer - right or wrong - is that Reese legitimately felt Eli Apple was a top 10 pick.
Tunsil could also become the next Tony Mandarich  
Mike in NY : 5/13/2016 8:13 am : link
While Apple becomes a hall of famer.

Value board says they needed to offer a 2 and a 4. Also, it is possible that we had Apple so far above the other names you mentioned that getting the extra 2nd was not enough for drop in quality. Dave Te Thomas did an excellent look at the top corners that showed Jackson was by far the worst in coverage and he played lesser WR than the other top CB's. Moreover, there is no guarantee that, by altering how one team drafts, the same players would be their at 20 or the Jets 2nd Round pick. If Jets trade up for Tunsil, does Tampa take Apple or Hargreaves at 11? Dolphins at 13? You can't look at who was there with hindsight.
Why didn't..  
FatMan in Charlotte : 5/13/2016 8:15 am : link
TB and NO jump at the offer?

Because it wasn't a fair offer.

By the way, any tidbits on Davis signing? It's been over a week since the deal was imminent....
Mike  
area junc : 5/13/2016 8:17 am : link
Tampa wanted Hargreaves. They still take him at 11. And the Dolphins wanted Apple at 12. So nothing changes. Everyone else takes who they took.
.  
arcarsenal : 5/13/2016 8:17 am : link
Anything out of the Balki camp? Still stalling?
RE: well  
M.S. : 5/13/2016 8:18 am : link
In comment 12956234 Eric from BBI said:
Quote:
the short answer - right or wrong - is that Reese legitimately felt Eli Apple was a top 10 pick.

Let's sure hope he is!
Dolphins  
area junc : 5/13/2016 8:18 am : link
take Apple 13th*
i don't even think Reese believes that.  
area junc : 5/13/2016 8:20 am : link
Reese basically said the draft unfolded in an unfortunate way and Apple was the "best, cleanest player available".

not exactly a ringing endorsement that you loved the guy top 10.
RE: Time will tell.  
Mendenhall : 5/13/2016 8:23 am : link
In comment 12956222 Carl in CT said:
Quote:
If Apple turns out to be Revis we will all laugh at that offer.


And if he doesn't?
RE: Mike  
Mike in NY : 5/13/2016 8:25 am : link
In comment 12956240 area junc said:
Quote:
Tampa wanted Hargreaves. They still take him at 11. And the Dolphins wanted Apple at 12. So nothing changes. Everyone else takes who they took.


I think it was Jint Fan in Buc Land who said that Apple was Tampa's choice not Hargreaves and traded down because they thought that Tunsil was going to be a Giant so they could get an extra 4th and still get the guy they wanted. Hargreaves was only the pick AFTER Apple was gone. Are they really going to say publicly that they really wanted someone else and trades down too far?
The ultimate question is  
Coach Mason : 5/13/2016 8:26 am : link
Does one of Lee (a 4.4 40 LB), Doctson,Treadwell,or Jackson AND one of Cody Whitehair, Carl Nassib ,Bullard, Kaufusi,Von Bell, or Tyler Boyd less than or greater than Eli Apple.

That's basically what we passed up. And although the Giants couldn't know exactly who would be on the board they would have a pretty good idea that this was a fairly deep red Chip draft and that 1 or 2 guys in their higher tier groupings would have likely been available.

This is where relying on the chart too much doesn't really account for drafts that may be well stocked with higher value red chippers deeper into the draft.

I can understand not doing it if the target who had the really high value to you (Floyd) was not on the board. But I really don't see Apple as the type of shutdown corner that will be better than having two high caliber redchippers from the groupings mentioned above on the team.

RE: Mike  
Mike in NY : 5/13/2016 8:27 am : link
In comment 12956240 area junc said:
Quote:
Tampa wanted Hargreaves. They still take him at 11. And the Dolphins wanted Apple at 12. So nothing changes. Everyone else takes who they took.


And if Miami takes a DB at 13, they likely don't trade up for Howard in Round 2 and that plays out differently
Eric cut to the chase  
JonC : 5/13/2016 8:29 am : link
Their grade on Apple was that high, the value of the trade offer wouldn't have been enough. Stick to your board.
RE: The ultimate question is  
Mike in NY : 5/13/2016 8:29 am : link
In comment 12956249 Coach Mason said:
Quote:
Does one of Lee (a 4.4 40 LB), Doctson,Treadwell,or Jackson AND one of Cody Whitehair, Carl Nassib ,Bullard, Kaufusi,Von Bell, or Tyler Boyd less than or greater than Eli Apple.

That's basically what we passed up. And although the Giants couldn't know exactly who would be on the board they would have a pretty good idea that this was a fairly deep red Chip draft and that 1 or 2 guys in their higher tier groupings would have likely been available.

This is where relying on the chart too much doesn't really account for drafts that may be well stocked with higher value red chippers deeper into the draft.

I can understand not doing it if the target who had the really high value to you (Floyd) was not on the board. But I really don't see Apple as the type of shutdown corner that will be better than having two high caliber redchippers from the groupings mentioned above on the team.


You don't, must maybe our scouts and coaches do. Please tell me what team you scout for and how much actual film of these players have you watched?
was  
PaulBlakeTSU : 5/13/2016 8:31 am : link
the info that Tunsil is a potential Hall of Famer inside information from a source, or just your opinion?
RE: RE: The ultimate question is  
Big Blue '56 : 5/13/2016 8:32 am : link
In comment 12956252 Mike in NY said:
Quote:
In comment 12956249 Coach Mason said:


Quote:


Does one of Lee (a 4.4 40 LB), Doctson,Treadwell,or Jackson AND one of Cody Whitehair, Carl Nassib ,Bullard, Kaufusi,Von Bell, or Tyler Boyd less than or greater than Eli Apple.

That's basically what we passed up. And although the Giants couldn't know exactly who would be on the board they would have a pretty good idea that this was a fairly deep red Chip draft and that 1 or 2 guys in their higher tier groupings would have likely been available.

This is where relying on the chart too much doesn't really account for drafts that may be well stocked with higher value red chippers deeper into the draft.

I can understand not doing it if the target who had the really high value to you (Floyd) was not on the board. But I really don't see Apple as the type of shutdown corner that will be better than having two high caliber redchippers from the groupings mentioned above on the team.




You don't, must maybe our scouts and coaches do. Please tell me what team you scout for and how much actual film of these players have you watched?


Mike, good morning..It's Jersey Joe
Right..  
GiantsRage2007 : 5/13/2016 8:34 am : link
But when you trade down you have no idea who would still be there. You can say, oh look these guys were still there... .but that was with the Giants picking @ 10. No way to know who would have been on the board.

Plus this was a huge thread a week ago.
junk  
gidiefor : Mod : 5/13/2016 8:36 am : link
!!!
have you been in a coma since the draft, area junc?  
Victor in CT : 5/13/2016 8:40 am : link
Old news. They offered a 1 and 2 to switch when a 1,2 and 4 was required for equal value on the point scale. Reese did not drop the ball, he did the responsible thing.

Stop the stupid.
RE: well  
pjcas18 : 5/13/2016 8:42 am : link
In comment 12956234 Eric from BBI said:
Quote:
the short answer - right or wrong - is that Reese legitimately felt Eli Apple was a top 10 pick.


I think the premise of the thread is silly, the Giants simply didn't think the offer to move back was strong enough. Period.

But do you really believe what you wrote Eric? Post-draft has Reese ever said anything other than how much they loved the player they picked. I can see a situation where Reese was unhappy with the way the draft unfolded. Two previously assumed top 10 guys didn't get selected and the Giants were the team left out, or sure the Giants could have just had Apple rated higher than most others. who knows what to believe.

my point is I don't trust almost anything that comes out of the mouths of these GMS's (any of them) post-draft.

LOL..  
FatMan in Charlotte : 5/13/2016 8:42 am : link
Quote:
Plus this was a huge thread a week ago.


Junk tends to be behind by at least a week.........
This is old news.  
Mr. Bungle : 5/13/2016 8:47 am : link
Why are you reacting to it now?
.  
arcarsenal : 5/13/2016 8:50 am : link
Thomas/Greenpoint/area junk has been busy trying to get the word out of Anthony Davis and Balki's camp so forgive him for not realizing this had already been discussed a week ago.
Any word..  
Chris in Philly : 5/13/2016 8:58 am : link
from the Apple camp?
RE: This is old news.  
Chris in Philly : 5/13/2016 8:58 am : link
In comment 12956281 Mr. Bungle said:
Quote:
Why are you reacting to it now?


Because he's not getting enough attention?
Yes..  
FatMan in Charlotte : 5/13/2016 8:59 am : link
Quote:
Any word..
Chris in Philly : 8:58 am : link : reply
from the Apple camp?


All the files are on his MaCintosh
pj  
JonC : 5/13/2016 8:59 am : link
In all likelihood, they stuck to their value board and Apple was the BPA. We know they strongly value CB and there was plenty of talk of wanting a CB at #10 in weeks leading up to the draft, confirmed by hitdog as well.

It's not to say they might have wanted Floyd above Apple, but picking tenth in a red chip draft they had to know there was a good chance a highly rated pass rusher would be gone.
Call Now!  
Ten Ton Hammer : 5/13/2016 9:00 am : link
I would have taken that deal, I wanted Doctson  
Andy in Halifax : 5/13/2016 9:01 am : link
based on who was available at 10 (though I did not think he'd drop to 20). But the Giants really liked Apple and knew he wouldn't be there at 20. I have no issues with them staying there and taking the guy they wanted.

It's a coin flip imo and the giants do well with their #1 pick.

Ironically, at the time of the draft I thought I would want to either a) stay at 10 and take Doctson or b) try and trade down and take Apple, Decker or Treadwell.

Goes to show how little I know.
For the moment let's forget the trade value convo,  
Big Blue '56 : 5/13/2016 9:02 am : link
close to 40% of the 31 teams in Round 1 (no Pats' pick) passed on Tunsil..Granted, some were more interested in QBs, but he has character concerns from what I've been able to learn, having zero to do with pot..

The Giants did the right thing in passing on him..imo
Reese didn t do what I would have done  
joeinpa : 5/13/2016 9:07 am : link
Therefore he blew it. A refrain often repeated on BBI.
RE: pj  
pjcas18 : 5/13/2016 9:07 am : link
In comment 12956299 JonC said:
Quote:
In all likelihood, they stuck to their value board and Apple was the BPA. We know they strongly value CB and there was plenty of talk of wanting a CB at #10 in weeks leading up to the draft, confirmed by hitdog as well.

It's not to say they might have wanted Floyd above Apple, but picking tenth in a red chip draft they had to know there was a good chance a highly rated pass rusher would be gone.



Yeah, I'm not saying they didn't stick to their board, and Apple wasn't their highest remaining player, I am saying I'd be skeptical of Reese saying they felt Apple was a top 10 player.

Myles Jack and Tunsil falling I think potentially hurt the Giants and they possibly got a player they had ranked 12 or so at 10. For example.

Read every review of every player Reese drafted - even the unmitigated disasters, same theme, loved the player, drafted right where they should he should be drafted, etc.

I'd think it's more likely than not that Apple was NOT in the top 10 on the Giants draft board. Completely my opinion.

And I have zero issue with it and I think he can work out fine, just my opinion.
This was discussed at length a week ago.  
Big Blue Blogger : 5/13/2016 9:08 am : link
Redundant, obvious troll is redundant and obvious.
Previous thread on NYJ offer. - ( New Window )
I really dont know why people  
bhill410 : 5/13/2016 9:11 am : link
are responding to this post.
Future hall of famer  
UConn4523 : 5/13/2016 9:14 am : link
Riiiiiiight
It just dawned..  
FatMan in Charlotte : 5/13/2016 9:15 am : link
on me. Shouldn't a vaunted insider like Junk know the answer to this thread before posting it??

What in the holy fuck?
potential future Hall of Famer...  
BillKo : 5/13/2016 9:18 am : link
....????
RE: .  
shabu : 5/13/2016 9:23 am : link
In comment 12956216 Danny Kanell said:
Quote:
Because its not enough value to move from 10 to 20. Not even close actually.

And this is an old story.

Jesus Christ.


LOL.

because jerry said so ? if you check the value chart, its like 3 points shy of equal value.
As  
AcidTest : 5/13/2016 9:24 am : link
BBB and others have said, this was discussed on another thread. But I would have taken the deal. The draft chart is just a guide, and the strength of this draft was in the second and third rounds. In any event, I wonder if the Giants considered also asking for a pick from next year.
RE: RE: .  
Ten Ton Hammer : 5/13/2016 9:31 am : link
In comment 12956337 shabu said:
Quote:
In comment 12956216 Danny Kanell said:


Quote:


Because its not enough value to move from 10 to 20. Not even close actually.

And this is an old story.

Jesus Christ.



LOL.

because jerry said so ? if you check the value chart, its like 3 points shy of equal value.


Or perhaps they got a player they wanted at 10, and would have had to settle for a lesser player at 20.
Reese should have taken it  
PA Giant Fan : 5/13/2016 9:33 am : link
You could have picked up a slot corner in FA. There are several good ones still available and filled three holes with three good players. Eli Apple better be great not good but great or it was bad.
Alot of fans underrating  
JonC : 5/13/2016 9:38 am : link
a prospect NYG seems to have graded the top CB in the draft.
You have more risk tolerance then I do  
rasbutant : 5/13/2016 9:38 am : link
I want nothing to do with Tunsil.

What a mess.....
Link - ( New Window )
Pot also remains an IQ test  
JonC : 5/13/2016 9:40 am : link
.
Pages: 1 2 3 | Show All |  Next>>
Back to the Corner