|
|
Â
|
| Quote: |
| The theoretical physicist Michio Kaku claims to have developed a theory that might point to the existence of God. The information has created a great stir in the scientific community because Kaku is considered one of the most important scientists of our times, one of the creators and developers of the revolutionary String Theory which is highly respected throughout the world. To to come to his conclusions, the physicist made & #8203;& #8203;use of what he calls “primitive semi – radius tachyons “. Tachyons are theoretical particles capable to “unstick ” the Universe matter or vacuum space between matter particles, leaving everything free from the influences of the surrounding universe. After conducting the tests, Kaku came to the conclusion that we live in a “Matrix”. “I have concluded that we are in a world made by rules created by an intelligence”, he affirmed. “Believe me, everything that we call chance today won’t make sense anymore.” “To me it is clear that we exists in a plan which is governed by rules that were created, shaped by a universal intelligence and not by chance.” |
Vince Lombardi comes home after a cold night practice in Green Bay. When he walks in his house, he's greeted by his wife who says to him "God, your hands are freezing"
He turns to her and says "Honey, around the house its OK to call me Vince"
Yet, these same people will swear to all that is holy that Bill Nye the Science guy mechanical engineer is an expert on Global Warming. lol
Bill Nye...#1 on Gene-O's Pinko List.
Chris in Philly : 2:19 pm : link : reply
to scintillating observations from noted intellectual Gene. Preferably while angrily mashing his phone in the parking lot the family restaurant.
If I recall correctly it was voice to text while driving with his family in the car.
Which tries to establish if the concept of God exists?
Then please reexamine all of that after deconstructing both the particular language and the semantics used in your assertion and whatever "proof" you found
or
or you could just believe whatever you believe for any "reason" and allow everyone to do the same
Quote:
I look forward...
Chris in Philly : 2:19 pm : link : reply
to scintillating observations from noted intellectual Gene. Preferably while angrily mashing his phone in the parking lot the family restaurant.
If I recall correctly it was voice to text while driving with his family in the car.
Even better!
Trust me, the real problem is Kaku. It took me 3 months to figure out what a 'wector' was.
That's hardly definitive proof of anything by virtue of the fact that it's based in faith. It's certainly not science or any motivating factor in science.
That's hardly definitive proof of anything by virtue of the fact that it's based in faith. It's certainly not science or any motivating factor in science.
The problem isn't trying to see or seeing god in everything and anything, it's trying to resolve every last detail with their faith. There are faiths that go so far as to discourage this behavior, and for good reason.
BTW: I've always liked Michio Kaku because he can explain some complex things in a way that even I can understand it.
I put my teeth on the curb and begged from someone to stomp.
"It's okay, sweetie. Daddy has to teach the bad people."
BTW: I've always liked Michio Kaku because he can explain some complex things in a way that even I can understand it.
I Just think that the only people who reply are the anti-god faction. The rest of us know its a rathole to post on these threads.
When scientists venture into the world of "forecasting" or "explaining things that were never witnessed or cannot possibly be replicated", it's no longer science but a sort of voodoo politics.
Best guess estimates are that the earth is roughly 4 1/2 billion years old. I find it amusing that science books show charts of periods that are roughly the same size and can be shown on a single page. But if time was proportioned in reality, a timeline would have to be approximately 10 miles long and the last 150 years (the age of enlightened science) would be represented by a "period" roughly .003" in diameter. And in that time represented by a period, men like to explain everything that happened in that 10 mile stretch based on a few old bone fragments and some geological anomalies. Not only that, the whole science of evolution is based on a foregone conclusion by manmade charts and all data is then force fit into the pre-conceived models...the exact opposite of how science is supposed to work.
Personally, I see intelligence and a guiding hand behind the marvel that is the human race and the nature all around us. Does that prove there is a God? To some yes, to others no. It's good enough for me. Every man has to make up their own minds and conclude the reason we exist and the purpose of our lives.
Science is a marvelous thing when used in the right way. When it is used to predict ancient past - it's literally no different than blind faith in a omnipotent power that guides us and the universe. There is no logical argument to justify your faith based purely in science. It's the age old question that every generation before us has tried to answer and every generation forthcoming, "what the hell are we and where did we come from?" The answer will not be found on a sports message board, LOL
When scientists venture into the world of "forecasting" or "explaining things that were never witnessed or cannot possibly be replicated", it's no longer science but a sort of voodoo politics.
Best guess estimates are that the earth is roughly 4 1/2 billion years old. I find it amusing that science books show charts of periods that are roughly the same size and can be shown on a single page. But if time was proportioned in reality, a timeline would have to be approximately 10 miles long and the last 150 years (the age of enlightened science) would be represented by a "period" roughly .003" in diameter. And in that time represented by a period, men like to explain everything that happened in that 10 mile stretch based on a few old bone fragments and some geological anomalies. Not only that, the whole science of evolution is based on a foregone conclusion by manmade charts and all data is then force fit into the pre-conceived models...the exact opposite of how science is supposed to work.
Personally, I see intelligence and a guiding hand behind the marvel that is the human race and the nature all around us. Does that prove there is a God? To some yes, to others no. It's good enough for me. Every man has to make up their own minds and conclude the reason we exist and the purpose of our lives.
Science is a marvelous thing when used in the right way. When it is used to predict ancient past - it's literally no different than blind faith in a omnipotent power that guides us and the universe. There is no logical argument to justify your faith based purely in science. It's the age old question that every generation before us has tried to answer and every generation forthcoming, "what the hell are we and where did we come from?" The answer will not be found on a sports message board, LOL
Most of this is utter horseshit.
Science can't delve into history? So you don't believe genetics can trace back your ancestors, or predict illness? Weird.
You don't believe those heaps of bones we are finding everywhere are fossils of dinosaurs? What are they then?
You don't believe in the speed of light, blue shifts, etc that tells us the Universe is probably a lot older than the 3000 years your book tells you?
You don't believe in the speed of light, blue shifts, etc that tells us the Universe is probably a lot older than the 3000 years your book tells you?
"Your book" doesn't contain a date for creation.
Yes, as in "Fantasy."
Quote:
You don't believe in the speed of light, blue shifts, etc that tells us the Universe is probably a lot older than the 3000 years your book tells you?
"Your book" doesn't contain a date for creation.
So you win by default?
But the more we learn about the Universe, the more it becomes clear to me that the ultimate answer will not lie with some God-like creator and intelligent design. I think that instead the ultimate answer will somehow be related to our concept of time, which we grossly oversimplify. Time is what we think we understand, but we really don't.
In any case, here's a link to Stephen Hawking talking about Ed Witten's M-Theory....
And how it makes God unnecessary.... - ( New Window )
Quote:
You don't believe in the speed of light, blue shifts, etc that tells us the Universe is probably a lot older than the 3000 years your book tells you?
"Your book" doesn't contain a date for creation.
Pretty ckear you chose to sidestep the questions in order to engage in semantics.
It's okay. I'll let you off the hook.
Was there ever an origin and what makes you think so?
That just limits the realm of possibilities.
As Milton stated above, we are out to 7 dimensions now proving how little we know.
I remained convinced to this day.
That might be a decent argument if not for the millions of years of evolution and ten(s) of thousands of years of cultivation and hybridization by man. But it is a good example of the beauty and perfection in nature, that inspires many to find spirituality.
Or he/she/it may just be washing dishes?
Whoever said that it's a "complete accident?" Aside from you, of course.
You don't need faith when you rely on evidence.
What is interesting with some of our space observation advances is that they are finding a shit-ton of planets in the goldilocks zone, which would be a similar comparison to our proximity to the sun. Earlier, many thought ours was a unique scenario.
Quote:
that the existence of the universe, the beginning of life on earth, the marvel of the human mind etc. etc. etc is all a complete accident than it does to believe there's an intelligent cause behind it all.
It takes far more faith to believe that a two year old dying of cancer has an intelligent cause behind it than it being a random act of genetics. environment, etc.
Believing a two year was given cancer because some superior being has a better plan for them it isnt faith, it's idiocy.
Arnie D. : 9:47 am : link : reply
that the existence of the universe, the beginning of life on earth, the marvel of the human mind etc. etc. etc is all a complete accident than it does to believe there's an intelligent cause behind it all.
Under a condition of infinity, anything can happen, an infinite number of times. And please STOP placing the term "accidental" in other posters' mouths.