for display only
Big Blue Interactive The Corner Forum  
Back to the Corner

Archived Thread

NFT: NHL Off-season Thread

NYerInMA : 6/13/2016 10:07 am
Now that the calamity of another Pens' Cup has occurred, everyone can move on to the business of getting to June 2017. The Rangers, obviously, have a lot of work to do to get back to being a contender. Word is the salary cap may actually shrink, which puts several teams, including NYR, CHI, and PIT in crunches. Should be an interesting couple of months!
Pages: 1 2 3 ... 10 11 12 <<Prev | Show All |  Next>>
Ok, Canes  
bigbluehoya : 6/15/2016 12:14 pm : link
Now bring back Eric Staal.

And then the Rangers will take Bickell off your hands and send you back Marc Staal. We'll throw in this lightly used Marek Hrivik if you insist.

K? Thx. Bai.
RE: There are other and better players for the Vegas Team to draft  
BrettNYG10 : 6/15/2016 12:15 pm : link
In comment 12994857 Anakim said:
Quote:
to reach the cap floor. I simply don't think Girardi is going anywhere anytime soon unless he's packaged with an asset or two.


I don't expect him to be picked. But it allows the Rangers to protect a different dman.
RE: In order to keep Kane  
BrettNYG10 : 6/15/2016 12:16 pm : link
In comment 12994856 pjcas18 said:
Quote:
Toews, Keith, Seabrook, Crawford, etc.

the Blackhawks need to let guys like Sharp, Teravainen, Byfuglin, etc. go.


Crawford had a really good year, but I would have traded him and even Seabrook.
RE: RE: There are other and better players for the Vegas Team to draft  
Anakim : 6/15/2016 12:17 pm : link
In comment 12994866 BrettNYG10 said:
Quote:
In comment 12994857 Anakim said:


Quote:


to reach the cap floor. I simply don't think Girardi is going anywhere anytime soon unless he's packaged with an asset or two.



I don't expect him to be picked. But it allows the Rangers to protect a different dman.


Yes, but Girardi would still be on the books for the Rangers. We need to get rid of him now.
And where'd you hear about the Marc Staal rumors?  
Anakim : 6/15/2016 12:18 pm : link
I highly doubt a team trades for him straight up unless another bad contract is coming back.
RE: RE: In order to keep Kane  
pjcas18 : 6/15/2016 12:24 pm : link
In comment 12994867 BrettNYG10 said:
Quote:
In comment 12994856 pjcas18 said:


Quote:


Toews, Keith, Seabrook, Crawford, etc.

the Blackhawks need to let guys like Sharp, Teravainen, Byfuglin, etc. go.




Crawford had a really good year, but I would have traded him and even Seabrook.


both those two are owed way too much money (Seabrook is already 31 and still owed almost 50M and Crawford 24M) at this point to be traded IMO. I expect either or both will be exposed in the expansion draft (I don't remember how goalies work).



Why do they need to get rid of Girardi now instead of waiting a year?  
BrettNYG10 : 6/15/2016 12:57 pm : link
Especially if getting rid of him entails trading an asset (say, Hayes)? I don't see how that enhances the teams chances of winning the Cup immediately, much less over the next 3-5 years.

pj, I should have been more clear - I meant prior to signing. I was wrong on Crawford's quality, though, so it's not a horrendous deal. I think Seabrook's is bad. They should have traded him for prospects.
Assuming Girardi can be exposed in the draft  
bigbluehoya : 6/15/2016 1:06 pm : link
I agree 100%.
RE: RE: RE: Seguin is a stretch  
Deej : 6/15/2016 1:20 pm : link
In comment 12993086 pjcas18 said:
Quote:
In comment 12992558 Deej said:


Quote:


In comment 12992493 pjcas18 said:


Quote:


and Crosby, Malkin and MAF were 11, 12 and 13 years ago.

that's some fancy work by a GM keeping those guys together and MAF did little to nothing to help this cup.



Agree re Boston. Dont agree that it is fancy work keeping together Sid and Geno. How often have we seen players of that caliber actually walk in free agency, in their 20s?



Ok, fair point, I should have said it's some good GM work keeping those three and remaining competitive.

in fact they've added players like Kessel to the mix instead of just maintaining.

Chicago has stayed competitive too.

the Bruins paid Bergeron, Chara and Krejci after their cup and it cost them they had to trade guys like Boychuk, Lucic, and Hamilton among others. Some teams can't make it work.

the fact the Penguins and Blackhawks have kept their core together this long is impressive to me.


I'd argue that the Pens did a shitty job post Cup #1 staying competitive. Those rosters were the few big names and then barren. Terrible drafts too. Turned it around THIS year, and I'd have to study exactly how. But IMO the franchise going 6 years with just one conference finals appearance (no SCF) while having Sid and Geno (and Letang) isnt impressive, even conceding that each guy has had material injury issues.

Blackhawks have been a lot more impressive.
Since going to back to back  
pjcas18 : 6/15/2016 1:32 pm : link
cups, the Pens have made the playoffs every single year, won at least one series in 4 out of 7 seasons, and finished lower than 2nd in their division once.

Chicago is definitely more impressive because of the cups obviously, but the Penguins, when compared with say the Bruins or the teams who won the cup immediately before the first Pens cup with Crosby the Ducks, Red Wings or Hurricanes, I find the Penguins impressive.

You don't. Cool, I agree to disagree.
RE: Since going to back to back  
arcarsenal : 6/15/2016 1:36 pm : link
In comment 12995077 pjcas18 said:
Quote:
cups, the Pens have made the playoffs every single year, won at least one series in 4 out of 7 seasons, and finished lower than 2nd in their division once.

Chicago is definitely more impressive because of the cups obviously, but the Penguins, when compared with say the Bruins or the teams who won the cup immediately before the first Pens cup with Crosby the Ducks, Red Wings or Hurricanes, I find the Penguins impressive.

You don't. Cool, I agree to disagree.


Right before the lockout and Crosby they missed the playoffs like 4 or 5 straight years. They were terrible.
.  
arcarsenal : 6/15/2016 1:37 pm : link
Oh, you're referring to them going to back to back Cups.. (1 win, 1 loss) in 07-09.. my fault. I misread that post and thought you were talking about the early 90's when they won back to back.
RE: .  
pjcas18 : 6/15/2016 1:44 pm : link
In comment 12995098 arcarsenal said:
Quote:
Oh, you're referring to them going to back to back Cups.. (1 win, 1 loss) in 07-09.. my fault. I misread that post and thought you were talking about the early 90's when they won back to back.


Yeah. I guess Deej's point is when you have the best player in the league and another one not far behind, the "success" the Pens had in between cups is not impressive.

I just don't think hockey works like basketball where the best player is enough to make your team one of the best. Hockey is just too reliant on depth, system, hate to say it "puck luck" - which I'm not going to debate but hopefully people get what I mean, than just having the best players.

I included MAF in their core, but him being kept might have actually hurt more than helped the pens. I am not a fan of his, but either way, it's hard to keep players when you're successful in the NHL.

I mentioned this before, the Bruins had to trade Boychuk, Lucic, and Hamilton, and that's omitting Seguin who I also won't get into but I don't think they had to trade him for the same reasons.
.  
arcarsenal : 6/15/2016 1:49 pm : link
I think the Pens just did a bad job putting a Cup caliber team around Crosby for a lot of those years in between this Cup and his first one. Weak blue lines, little depth, etc. But having Crosby and Malkin gets you a long ways in and of itself. I think getting to 3 SCF's and winning 2 in a decade is pretty impressive in this era no matter who is on your team. Outside of the Hawks, you really can't make a case for anyone having a better post-lockout run save for maybe LA.. but their success is clustered into a small window with some unimpressive years surrounding it.
RE: .  
pjcas18 : 6/15/2016 1:56 pm : link
In comment 12995128 arcarsenal said:
Quote:
I think the Pens just did a bad job putting a Cup caliber team around Crosby for a lot of those years in between this Cup and his first one. Weak blue lines, little depth, etc. But having Crosby and Malkin gets you a long ways in and of itself. I think getting to 3 SCF's and winning 2 in a decade is pretty impressive in this era no matter who is on your team. Outside of the Hawks, you really can't make a case for anyone having a better post-lockout run save for maybe LA.. but their success is clustered into a small window with some unimpressive years surrounding it.


That's the price you pay IMO for keeping Crosby and Malkin. On CHI both Kane and Toews make 10M plus each. How do you build a roster around that?

Crosby and Malkin are a little less than that, but it's not easy to spread that around.

the Kings IMO just show how a hot goalie can carry a team. Sure the Kings have talent with guys like Doughty and Kopitar, but Quick was really the story of those two cups.

the first one more so than the 2nd, but when their backs were to the wall, Quick responded like an elite goalie.
Expansion tool  
Davisian : 6/15/2016 2:19 pm : link
For each team
Who ya gonna protect? - ( New Window )
I thought there  
bigbluehoya : 6/15/2016 2:30 pm : link
Was also a rule that teams need to expose 25% of their salary cap. No??
RE: Why do they need to get rid of Girardi now instead of waiting a year?  
Anakim : 6/15/2016 2:40 pm : link
In comment 12994987 BrettNYG10 said:
Quote:
Especially if getting rid of him entails trading an asset (say, Hayes)? I don't see how that enhances the teams chances of winning the Cup immediately, much less over the next 3-5 years.

pj, I should have been more clear - I meant prior to signing. I was wrong on Crawford's quality, though, so it's not a horrendous deal. I think Seabrook's is bad. They should have traded him for prospects.


Because they have to fill this roster with a bunch of players. While we have the cap space, the number of guaranteed roster players is very low. We need cap space for not only quality players but quantity ones as well. Hence, players like Nash, Girardi, Staal and Glass must go.
An interesting point about expansion  
pganut : 6/15/2016 2:54 pm : link
Quote:
Another wrinkle has come up that wasnt a part of any of the initial reports. Teams will be required to offer at least one defenseman and two forwards who are under contract for the 2017-18 season. Those players must have played a minimum of 40 NHL games in the 2016-17 season, or at least 70 games between the 2015-16 and 2016-17 seasons. Teams will also have to offer a goaltender who is under contract for the 2017-18 season or an RFA-to-be in 2018.
Looking at defense, speaking from the Islanders camp, the games played component means (depending on who the Isles choose to protect or get buy-in to waive an NMC), that means that we'd lose one of Boychuk, Leddy, Hamonic, CDH, Hickey or Pulock, if LV was so inclined to choose them. Article on expansion draft rules below.
The Hockey Writers - Expansion Draft Rules Gain Clarity - ( New Window )
RE: RE: That might be the only way to get out of Girardi and Staal's contracts  
arcarsenal : 6/15/2016 3:06 pm : link
In comment 12994852 BrettNYG10 said:
Quote:
In comment 12994830 Anakim said:


Quote:


without buying them out. I wouldn't trade Skjei or Buchnevich but a guy like McIlrath I'd include if it meant getting rid of Girardi.



I wouldn't - he has value as someone who can be exposed in the expansion draft. Further, the buyout is significantly more palatable next year. I think the team needs to look at the next 3-4 years, not just next year.

I read somewhere that teams were inquiring about Staal.


Do you remember where you saw that teams were inquiring about Staal?
No idea if this is legit.  
Davisian : 6/15/2016 7:17 pm : link
Rangers maybe trading Stepan

Who is Jimmy Murphy? - ( New Window )
RE: No idea if this is legit.  
Anakim : 6/15/2016 7:26 pm : link
In comment 12995607 Davisian said:
Quote:
Rangers maybe trading Stepan Who is Jimmy Murphy? - ( New Window )


Uncle Larry posted a while back about the Wild being interested in bringing in the hometown kid. I want Dumba and Coyle for Stepan.
That same guy tweeted almost the same thing  
bigbluehoya : 6/15/2016 7:48 pm : link
A few days ago.

Short of a really incredible haul, there's no way they should be retaining a penny of salary. The whole thing sounds like wild (no pun intended) speculation, but he better be incorrect about that point.

I would be hard to see Steps go, but I can appreciate that you don't make an omelette without breaking a few eggs. It's all about what's coming back.
Coyle and Dumba for Stepan would be great  
Anakim : 6/15/2016 8:12 pm : link
About fair too with a slight edge to us I think.
RE: Coyle and Dumba for Stepan would be great  
bigbluehoya : 6/15/2016 8:23 pm : link
In comment 12995652 Anakim said:
Quote:
About fair too with a slight edge to us I think.


I think that's clearly in the Rangers favor, but I wouldn't trade Stepan for much less.

Maybe the Rangers add one of the handful of nice young goalies they have in the system.
RE: An interesting point about expansion  
timintey : 6/15/2016 9:31 pm : link
In comment 12995227 pganut said:
Quote:
Looking at defense, speaking from the Islanders camp, the games played component means (depending on who the Isles choose to protect or get buy-in to waive an NMC), that means that we'd lose one of Boychuk, Leddy, Hamonic, CDH, Hickey or Pulock, if LV was so inclined to choose them.


If that's the case, I'd make it deHaan or Hickey
RE: RE: An interesting point about expansion  
pganut : 6/15/2016 9:58 pm : link
In comment 12995697 timintey said:
Quote:
Looking at defense, speaking from the Islanders camp, the games played component means (depending on who the Isles choose to protect or get buy-in to waive an NMC), that means that we'd lose one of Boychuk, Leddy, Hamonic, CDH, Hickey or Pulock, if LV was so inclined to choose them.

If that's the case, I'd make it deHaan or Hickey
Totally agreed, and hopefully the former rather than the latter (and I happen to like CDH).
I don't  
SethFromAstoria : 6/16/2016 7:51 am : link
think the Rangers have "A lot of work to do to" to be contenders again. I don't think the Rangers want to get rid of Staal or Girardi. These are all things that people talk about as though they are facts just like "the Rangers are not even close to being contenders" in the same season they make a Cup run to the Finals. Or "the Mets are a clown franchise run by owners who will never have a team that can win as long as they are the owners" and they are "Cheap and will never add any salary" and "there will never be players who want to play for the Mets and their joke franchise" as guys talk about how much they love playing here for this awful manager etc etc etc....

There's a high probability  
bigbluehoya : 6/16/2016 8:24 am : link
That both Girardi and Staal are on the team next year, but that doesn't make you right.

Not being able (NMCs) or not being willing to do what it takes (buyouts) are a hell of a lot different than not wanting to get rid of them.

It's almost undeniable that if they could go back in time and not do those deals, they'd take that offer in a heartbeat.
RE: RE: RE: That might be the only way to get out of Girardi and Staal's contracts  
BrettNYG10 : 6/16/2016 8:26 am : link
In comment 12995242 arcarsenal said:
Quote:
In comment 12994852 BrettNYG10 said:


Quote:


In comment 12994830 Anakim said:


Quote:


without buying them out. I wouldn't trade Skjei or Buchnevich but a guy like McIlrath I'd include if it meant getting rid of Girardi.



I wouldn't - he has value as someone who can be exposed in the expansion draft. Further, the buyout is significantly more palatable next year. I think the team needs to look at the next 3-4 years, not just next year.

I read somewhere that teams were inquiring about Staal.



Do you remember where you saw that teams were inquiring about Staal?


Quote:
NHL Rumors ‏@NHLRumorsDaily Jun 8
Colorado and Dallas have shown preliminary interest in Marc Staal, banking on the fact that the NYR will retain anywhere from 20-30% of cap


Quote:
NHL Rumors ‏@NHLRumorsDaily Jun 8
I wouldn't say Staal trade is anywhere near likely right now. Will heat up closer to draft. Staal also has a NTC/NMC that would be a factor


I've seen this guy get a couple things right in the past, but don't consider him a high-quality source. So, I take it with a grain of salt. I thought I read it on Sportsnet or something more credible initially, but I couldn't find the article so I'm probably wrong about that.
Twitter - ( New Window )
.  
arcarsenal : 6/16/2016 8:35 am : link
Thanks.
Not to mention eating up to 30% of Staal's cap space....  
MetsAreBack : 6/16/2016 8:51 am : link
uggh.
I do understand why Stepan is being dangled  
MetsAreBack : 6/16/2016 8:53 am : link

but without him and Yandle this year, I do doubt we'll make the playoffs. If that's the route we choose to go and it might be the right call... I'd prefer a more drastic overhaul.

A slow bleed isn't a good strategy.
.....  
BrettNYG10 : 6/16/2016 9:10 am : link
MAB, I think an interesting route the team could take is to make moves to maximize the 2017-2020 Cup window instead of trying to get back to being an elite team ASAP. They can make moves to get back to contention quickly this year, but clearing space, signing the RFA's to long term deals, trading some guys for youth and making a run at Hedman/Benn (or a few less shiny guys) next off-season might prove a better strategy to maximizing Hank's window. Thinking in one year increments has proved damaging. I have no issue with taking a step back for a year.
Eating a few bucks on Staal  
bigbluehoya : 6/16/2016 9:15 am : link
Would be smart if it gets a deal done for the fact alone that they wouldn't need to use one of their 3 Dmen protections on him.

Based on what I've read, I think Skjei and Buchnevich are in fact going to have to be protected -- sounds like AHL and KHL years are counted in the "professional experience".

So right out of the gate you're protecting McDonagh and Skjei. Being able to use the third spot on Yandle or his replacement or even McIlrath instead of Staal is really important.

Even if they can find a palatable deal for Staal, they need to do what the can to get him to waive the NMC before the expansion draft. If push came to shove, I'd even consider telling him we'd bring Eric Staal back on a one year deal if he agrees to permanently waive his NMC. (Obviously lots of variables there, but just an example of stupid shit id be willing to do not to have to use the protection slot.

ten buyout candidates  
pjcas18 : 6/16/2016 9:17 am : link
opened up yesterday.

also PK Subban is "not being moved" per Bergevin. I don't want him traded, but his NMC kicks in July 1 and then he's much harder to move, so if he is going to be traded it would be in the next two weeks.

Obviously Bickell won't be bought out by CHI now that he's been traded, but maybe CAR. No one interests me on here. Maybe Dustin Brown for cheap depth but I think he thinks he's worth more than he is.

Quote:
10 NHL Buyout Candidates

Jared Clinton of The Hockey News: Looking at 10 players who could be bought out by their teams. The NHL buyout period opens up today.

Eric Nystrom Nashville Predators
Bryan Bickell Chicago Blackhawks
Dave Bolland Florida Panthers
Chris Higgins Vancouver Canucks
R.J. Umberger Philadelphia Flyers
Thomas Vanek Minnesota Wild
Kari Lehtonen Dallas Stars
Jared Cowen Toronto Maple Leafs
Fedor Tyutin Columbus Blue Jackets
Dustin Brown Los Angeles Kings


RE: ten buyout candidates  
pganut : 6/16/2016 9:20 am : link
In comment 12995985 pjcas18 said:
Quote:
opened up yesterday.

also PK Subban is "not being moved" per Bergevin. I don't want him traded, but his NMC kicks in July 1 and then he's much harder to move, so if he is going to be traded it would be in the next two weeks.

Obviously Bickell won't be bought out by CHI now that he's been traded, but maybe CAR. No one interests me on here. Maybe Dustin Brown for cheap depth but I think he thinks he's worth more than he is.



Quote:


10 NHL Buyout Candidates

Jared Clinton of The Hockey News: Looking at 10 players who could be bought out by their teams. The NHL buyout period opens up today.

Eric Nystrom Nashville Predators
Bryan Bickell Chicago Blackhawks
Dave Bolland Florida Panthers
Chris Higgins Vancouver Canucks
R.J. Umberger Philadelphia Flyers
Thomas Vanek Minnesota Wild
Kari Lehtonen Dallas Stars
Jared Cowen Toronto Maple Leafs
Fedor Tyutin Columbus Blue Jackets
Dustin Brown Los Angeles Kings
Cowan was bought out last night. I can also easily see DAL buying out Lehtonen...$10M of salaries between 2 goalies they don't trust, you know at least one will come off the books.
Apparently  
NYerInMA : 6/16/2016 10:42 am : link
CAR is going to re-sign Cam Ward for 2 more years. I don't think that's a good move; Cam is definitely past his expiration date.
Ward's deal  
NYerInMA : 6/16/2016 1:53 pm : link
is for 2 years, with an AAV of $3.3M and a limited NTC. I presume this is in preparation for the expansion draft next summer.
Please, take Staal  
Giants2012 : 6/16/2016 2:23 pm : link
anybody

RE: Ward's deal  
pjcas18 : 6/16/2016 2:47 pm : link
In comment 12996582 NYerInMA said:
Quote:
is for 2 years, with an AAV of $3.3M and a limited NTC. I presume this is in preparation for the expansion draft next summer.


Probably so, but I think that's a fair deal for Ward. I don't think the Hurricanes are legit contenders, and I'd guess most starting goalies make more than $3M. Ward made 6M last year.
Five less-heralded free agents who could provide the biggest bang for  
Mike in Long Beach : 6/16/2016 3:05 pm : link
#3...
Quote:
Maybe it's because he has spent his entire career with an Islanders team that never drew widespread attention. Or perhaps it's because he's been slotted behind John Tavares for the past seven seasons. Whatever the reason, the multifaceted Dane has never truly been acknowledged for the versatility he consistently brings to the rink. A key contributor on the Islanders' power play and penalty kill, Nielsen is also among the league's most consistent shootout scorers. Nielsen has expressed his intention to stay with the Islanders, but general manager Garth Snow will have some difficult decisions to make with several key forwards entering free agency, including Nielsen, Okposo and Matt Martin.

Link - ( New Window )
Girardi has a NMC for all five years. ALL FIVE FREAKING YEARS.  
Anakim : 6/16/2016 3:30 pm : link
His agent deserves a firm handshake and Sather deserves a slap in the back of the head.
I wonder if the Stars now will be in the Marc Staal picture  
Anakim : 6/16/2016 4:41 pm : link
Nichushkin for Staal! Make it happen!
RE: Girardi has a NMC for all five years. ALL FIVE FREAKING YEARS.  
SethFromAstoria : 6/16/2016 4:48 pm : link
In comment 12996739 Anakim said:
Quote:
His agent deserves a firm handshake and Sather deserves a slap in the back of the head.


Dude let me ask you something since this is hilariously obsessed over everyday....

If the Rangers called Dan Girardi and his agent into their offices and said

"Dan you were a representative player here but quite frankly we agree with Anakim and Brett among others that you sir, suck a fucking ball sack at hockey and you do have this NMC however we'd heavily prefer you consider letting us know some teams you may want to go to. We are looking to make changes due to factors a, b, c, d, and we'd like to find common ground for you to go to a contender in a city you'd play in and part ways at this point. Your role on the team is no longer tenable and we don't want to scratch you every night or consider buying you out etc... So lets figure out where you'd play"


Do you truly think this guy would say no i refuse to move and wish to continue to sit on this roster that my team wants me off of aSap? I mean has it ever happened that way? I'm genuinely curious if there is a player who flat out refused to move and instead sat in the press box or played 1 minute per game.

Seth  
Anakim : 6/16/2016 4:55 pm : link
What's your point? Either way, it severely limits our options. Plus, a contender wouldn't necessarily be an interested party. Why? Because Girardi sucks and they allocate their cap space in more efficient ways than shitty teams do. A shitty team, however, that needs to reach the cap floor might be interested in Girardi's contract. However, not that we know he has a full NMC for the duration of his contract, I think it's safe to say that he won't waive it to go to a shitty team and/or a shitty city.
RE: RE: Girardi has a NMC for all five years. ALL FIVE FREAKING YEARS.  
NYerInMA : 6/16/2016 4:58 pm : link
In comment 12996862 SethFromAstoria said:
Quote:
In comment 12996739 Anakim said:


Quote:


His agent deserves a firm handshake and Sather deserves a slap in the back of the head.



Dude let me ask you something since this is hilariously obsessed over everyday....

If the Rangers called Dan Girardi and his agent into their offices and said

"Dan you were a representative player here but quite frankly we agree with Anakim and Brett among others that you sir, suck a fucking ball sack at hockey and you do have this NMC however we'd heavily prefer you consider letting us know some teams you may want to go to. We are looking to make changes due to factors a, b, c, d, and we'd like to find common ground for you to go to a contender in a city you'd play in and part ways at this point. Your role on the team is no longer tenable and we don't want to scratch you every night or consider buying you out etc... So lets figure out where you'd play"


Do you truly think this guy would say no i refuse to move and wish to continue to sit on this roster that my team wants me off of aSap? I mean has it ever happened that way? I'm genuinely curious if there is a player who flat out refused to move and instead sat in the press box or played 1 minute per game.


I actually agree with you here Seth. I've always thought that, for these guys, the desire to play supersedes the obsession with staying with one team. If a team tells a player that they're going to be benched or marginalized if they don't accept a trade, the player is most likely going to accept the trade, unless it's a trade to a dumpster fire of a team. It doesn't excuse the stupidity of management for handing out NMCs like candy, but it's not a guarantee that a player won't be moved. I think people need to be more upset that the Rangers can't see that Girardi/Staal/Glass are black holes that need to be moved ASAP. Where there's a will, there's a way.
It's also not a full NMC for all 5 years  
NYerInMA : 6/16/2016 5:00 pm : link
It's a full NMC for this year, then it becomes a NMC for demotion to the minors, but there's a modified NTC that kicks in which allows a trade to 15 teams.
Look at the Coyotes per Brett's post by some unknown guy  
Anakim : 6/16/2016 5:01 pm : link
They have more cap space than they know what to do with. They MIGHT be interested in Girardi to reach the cap floor.

But would Girardi waive his NMC to go to Arizona? Methinks not. Why would he? Is Arizona appealing? Maybe, but are the Coyotes any good? In the future, maybe but next year? Probably not.
RE: It's also not a full NMC for all 5 years  
Anakim : 6/16/2016 5:02 pm : link
In comment 12996884 NYerInMA said:
Quote:
It's a full NMC for this year, then it becomes a NMC for demotion to the minors, but there's a modified NTC that kicks in which allows a trade to 15 teams.


General Fanager ‏@generalfanager
Some NTC/NMC updates... first off:
Dan Girardi (#NYR) NMC includes all years of his deal
Pages: 1 2 3 ... 10 11 12 <<Prev | Show All |  Next>>
Back to the Corner