for display only
Big Blue Interactive The Corner Forum  
Back to the Corner

Archived Thread

Fennelly: Giants' offensive line is not as bad as you think

gidiefor : Mod : 7/13/2016 9:41 am
Quote:
Ask any Giant fan, pundit, reporter or casual observer what the Giants' biggest roster need is, and a good portion of them will respond: "Offensive line."

But the reality is the Giants' offensive line is not as bad as the public perceives. The website FootballOutsiders.com ranked the Giants' line 11th in overall run blocking and sixth in pass protection in the 2015 season. But it is the failure to land a top offensive tackle this offseason that has left many with doubts.

Last year, the Giants played the entire season with a rookie, first-round pick Ereck Flowers, at left tackle and a little-wanted journeyman in Marshall Newhouse on the right side. They will return this summer as starters along with center Weston Richburg and guards Justin Pugh and John Jerry.

Pro Football Focus is ranking the Giants' offensive line 20th overall going into the 2016 NFL season:


- more from John Fennelly for SNY -
giants-offensive-line-ranked-20th-in-nfl-last-season - ( New Window )
I agree  
Big Blue '56 : 7/13/2016 9:55 am : link
and wtf cares what PFF says? There are stats that teams around the league can use no doubt, but most of what they post and grade is as accurate as Jason Cole prediction..

As one of the former Giants OL(name escapes me) said recently, how can a person who never played one second on the OL in their life, accurately assess any OL? Oh wait, "there are metrics they can use."
How does Fennelly know how I think?  
Jimmy Googs : 7/13/2016 10:04 am : link
.
The offensive line  
Old Dirty Beckham : 7/13/2016 10:12 am : link
is not good. Doesnt mean it's awful either.

If they can be better in short yardage and allow Eli to have more deep drops for down field passing it will make a world of difference this year.
RE: How does Fennelly know how I think?  
Big Blue '56 : 7/13/2016 10:13 am : link
In comment 13031140 Jimmy Googs said:
Quote:
.


If I know, he knows...😜
It is not as bad as most  
ANGPASS : 7/13/2016 10:35 am : link
make it sound. But it is not as good as it needs to be to be a legit contender as of today.
It's a mixed bag  
Greg from LI : 7/13/2016 10:39 am : link
Two excellent young starters in Richburg and Pugh, one talented and promising young starter in Flowers, and two weak links in Jerry and Newhouse.
The Giants have demonstrated they can run right?  
Giants2012 : 7/13/2016 10:42 am : link
.
what is very concerning  
mdc1 : 7/13/2016 10:56 am : link
are these continual rah rah things coming from the media. This team has not beaten anyone really in 4 years and suddenly everything has changed? I wonder if things are not really that good and someone is stoking up the marketing to cover for that.

Count me in with those  
Pete in 'Vliet : 7/13/2016 11:20 am : link
expecting Jerry to be much improved this season. The weak link is Newhouse, but the rest of the line is promising .
RE: what is very concerning  
drkenneth : 7/13/2016 11:22 am : link
In comment 13031237 mdc1 said:
Quote:
are these continual rah rah things coming from the media. This team has not beaten anyone really in 4 years and suddenly everything has changed? I wonder if things are not really that good and someone is stoking up the marketing to cover for that.


You're probably right. Major cover-up. Fold the franchise.

RE: The offensive line  
BigBlueDownTheShore : 7/13/2016 11:27 am : link
In comment 13031154 Old Dirty Beckham said:
Quote:
is not good. Doesnt mean it's awful either.

If they can be better in short yardage and allow Eli to have more deep drops for down field passing it will make a world of difference this year.


We would be better on short yardage if they didn't telegraph who was getting the ball by putting Williams in. Jennings didn't do to bad in short yardage last year.
the line should be better than last year  
GiantsFan84 : 7/13/2016 11:30 am : link
first reason is continuity alone

second reason is it's a young line on the left with flowers, pugh, and richburg so an additional year experience should help all of them considerably

third is say what you want about john jerry but he worked his tail off this offseason and should be better than he was last year

fourth is solari should help this unit improve

this doesn't make it a top line in the nfl by any stretch but it should be better than last year
RE: I agree  
shabu : 7/13/2016 11:35 am : link
In comment 13031121 Big Blue '56 said:
Quote:
and wtf cares what PFF says? There are stats that teams around the league can use no doubt, but most of what they post and grade is as accurate as Jason Cole prediction..

As one of the former Giants OL(name escapes me) said recently, how can a person who never played one second on the OL in their life, accurately assess any OL? Oh wait, "there are metrics they can use."


You know Kevin Gilbride works for PFF as a grader and many teams are using PFF stats right ?
how can they be 11th...  
BillKo : 7/13/2016 11:39 am : link
in run blocking?

I'm no expert, but you see zero push most times, and a ton of penetration.

Watch the OL from 2005-2010 block.

They got push.
a year under their belt and plenty of time to work on shortcoming  
George from PA : 7/13/2016 11:44 am : link
Is great and should improve but at the least..... depth at tackle is scary

I will believe it when I see it.  
Giant John : 7/13/2016 11:53 am : link
Put on the pads.
Starters aren't the red flag  
x meadowlander : 7/13/2016 12:08 pm : link
It's depth
The problem is  
area junc : 7/13/2016 12:12 pm : link
why the f#ck cant we block PHI, WAS or any other team that ratchets the intensity up front..we can talk big about continuity and improvements but getting your ass handed to you is a problem thats tough to get rid of
.  
arcarsenal : 7/13/2016 12:14 pm : link
That's why the Anthony Davis signing is to be announced shortly....
RE: I agree  
Jerz44 : 7/13/2016 12:18 pm : link
In comment 13031121 Big Blue '56 said:
Quote:
and wtf cares what PFF says? There are stats that teams around the league can use no doubt, but most of what they post and grade is as accurate as Jason Cole prediction..

As one of the former Giants OL(name escapes me) said recently, how can a person who never played one second on the OL in their life, accurately assess any OL? Oh wait, "there are metrics they can use."


I'm not disagreeing on PFF but there are a ton of people who have never played sports professionally who can make accurate estimations on play based on metrics.
RE: It's a mixed bag  
ColHowPepper : 7/13/2016 12:37 pm : link
In comment 13031199 Greg from LI said:
Quote:
Two excellent young starters in Richburg and Pugh, one talented and promising young starter in Flowers, and two weak links in Jerry and Newhouse.

It is a mixed bag; to boot the link in the OP contained this stat, which maybe because it was not commented on is widely known here, but not to me:
Quote:
Key stat: Ereck Flowers allowed 69 pressures last year, the most among NFL offensive linemen.

Newhouse is a weak link, but we need the notion attributed to Westburg by some writers that Flowers is unwilling to take coaching and vet advice to be either i) not true or ii) attributable to his inability to work with PF.

It's a big year for him in more ways than one.
None of them are domiant  
UberAlias : 7/13/2016 12:48 pm : link
Richburg is the best of the bunch right now and is a borderline probowl center. The right side is the issue as everyone knows --Jerry is only okay and Newhouse is not starting material and the weak link.

Aside from the obvious issue of depth, we really need Flowers to pick up his game. He's a top 10 pick and the team appears all in on him despite his rookie struggles.

The wild card is Hart. I really liked him in the few clips I've seen of from college. If he were to overtake Newhouse and prove to be a decent starter, I would have a very different outlook on this group. We didn't see any signs of this in the spring, but camp will be the real test. Seems like a bit of a long shot as we stand though.
Uber Alias  
ColHowPepper : 7/13/2016 1:50 pm : link
Hart does become more of a ? the longer he fails to crack some starting time, and especially at RT, where Newhouse sets a very low bar to jump over. Guys who have talent and can play wind up seeing the field sooner rather than later, and Hart this season is on the cusp of losing out on sooner. I just hope he does not fall in the Mosley/Brewer redux category, in which JR and his Princeton acolyte specialize.
I Seem to Recall That  
OntheRoad : 7/13/2016 2:39 pm : link
when the Giants' OL improved in the early-mid 1980s, it was due more to tenure and cohesion than bringing in better talent.
First of all, I agree they aren't as bad as perception  
Matt M. : 7/13/2016 3:22 pm : link
But, I don't care what metrics you use, 11th in run blocking just seems absurd. They were a bad run blocking unit.

Second of all, this is one of those cases where I don't think it is hyperbole to say, "let's wait until the games start." Whatever the OL is, this will be the first year the 5 guys as a unit will have played together as a unit. Last year was a rookie season at LT, a first season at LG, a first season at OC. So, it is still premature to have any realistic expectations for these guys outside of what we hope for. there just isn't enough history. As for RG and RT, we still don't know who will start there.

If it's Jerry and Newhouse, I think they are veterans who, while not great, are not as bad as made out to be. That said, I would love to see at least one of those positions upgraded. But, I would also retain both of those guys. They are each a high quality backup at multiple positions.

I am really very interested to see Hart at both positions and I'd love to bring in a vet that gets cut loose. But, the reality is, there is a very good chance we won't end up with someone better than Jerry and Newhouse. That may still be OK and better than most will allow for.
RE: It's a mixed bag  
Victor in CT : 7/13/2016 3:27 pm : link
In comment 13031199 Greg from LI said:
Quote:
Two excellent young starters in Richburg and Pugh, one talented and promising young starter in Flowers, and two weak links in Jerry and Newhouse.


perfectly said
If Penmanship ever carries a team to the Superbowl  
ghost718 : 7/13/2016 3:54 pm : link
It's gonna be the Giants
Richburg was not so hot his Rookie season  
BigBlueDownTheShore : 7/13/2016 4:24 pm : link
And now playing in his natural position is boarderline pro-bowler.

All you Flower haters, need to realize he was a Rookie and a very young one too. He has potential to grow from year 1 to year 2.
RE: Uber Alias  
UberAlias : 7/13/2016 5:42 pm : link
In comment 13031488 ColHowPepper said:
Quote:
Hart does become more of a ? the longer he fails to crack some starting time, and especially at RT, where Newhouse sets a very low bar to jump over. Guys who have talent and can play wind up seeing the field sooner rather than later, and Hart this season is on the cusp of losing out on sooner. I just hope he does not fall in the Mosley/Brewer redux category, in which JR and his Princeton acolyte specialize.
No doubt. Though in terms of this year specifically, I would not be overly concerned about his not working his way in at the moment because of how limited things are in OTAs and minicamp in shorts. But if it doesn't happen in training camp, I agree --not a good sign.
RE: Uber Alias  
Klaatu : 7/13/2016 5:49 pm : link
In comment 13031488 ColHowPepper said:
Quote:
Hart does become more of a ? the longer he fails to crack some starting time, and especially at RT, where Newhouse sets a very low bar to jump over. Guys who have talent and can play wind up seeing the field sooner rather than later, and Hart this season is on the cusp of losing out on sooner. I just hope he does not fall in the Mosley/Brewer redux category, in which JR and his Princeton acolyte specialize.


A 7th round pick may not pan out, may not become a starter? No way! Reese has to go if that happens!
'not as bad as you think'...  
Torrag : 7/13/2016 7:10 pm : link
...more importantly they aren't as good as they need to be.
The offensive line is probably not as bad as we think  
eclipz928 : 7/13/2016 7:41 pm : link
but it's still a weakness for the team. Last year, Eli Manning was releasing his passes faster than almost all of the other QB's in the league. I doubt that's something that's considered in how the OLine was rated by Outsiders - with a different QB the offensive line may have given up twice as many sacks last year.
Fennelly is just exposing himself as not knowing what FO's numbers  
Devon : 7/13/2016 8:25 pm : link
mean and how to use them.

They weren't 6th in pass protection -- they were 6th in adjusted sack rate. There's a major difference there.

No one has tried to hammer home how sack avoidance is a great QB skill more than FO over the years.
Whatever sure seems to me that  
Bluesbreaker : 7/13/2016 8:35 pm : link
they want to add a starting type RT or at the very least
quality depth .
If you didn't see improvement in the offensive line  
WillieYoung : 7/13/2016 9:11 pm : link
over the course of last season, you should keep your opinions to yourself because you don't know jack shit about football.
Stats, smats....  
Doomster : 7/14/2016 2:47 pm : link
11th overall in run blocking? If you break it down to when they needed yardage on a run vs every acorn falling close to a tree, it was nowhere near 11th.......2nd to last in rushing td's? The running game picked up at the end of the season, when games didn't matter and we played we basically playing out the string....

As for 6th in passing, OBj, Eli, and the system had more to do with that 6th ranking, than the line did....

I think the line will be better, just by the fact that the musical chairs of the last two seasons has ended......the guys who finished the season, will be back in place at the start of the season....each guy knows his job.....the guy to the left/right/or both of them, has a better feel for each other, as far as blocking schemes go, when defenses shake it up a bit....an OL has to play together to get cohesion.....at least they have that from last year.....

Hopefully, Flowers, with a year of NFL experience takes that next step.....another year at guard should help Pugh....Richburg is the rock of the line.....Jerry and Newhouse were counted on as backups, and are now the starters......I think they will be better...they are not going to be great, but I think better.....there is still the chance of someone being traded for or picked up, but this should only happen if they are a serious upgrade....I hope McAdoo uses the TE as a chip block more often.....I hope we increase the depth of this OL, because basically there is none....
the running game  
fkap : 7/15/2016 3:48 am : link
also improved when we went away from an erratic and insanely extensive RBBC rotation.

maybe this year we'll see better TE blocking, which will help a lot, too.

add in the factor of mgt finally realizing that a new OL coach was needed, and there's plenty of room for optimism.
Concern is HEALTH.  
x meadowlander : 7/15/2016 9:37 am : link
No depth. If Flowers goes down? Richburg? --*shiver*--

Praying for a Victor Cruz miracle out of training camp.
I think it's interesting to note that prior to the 2015 draft...  
Klaatu : 7/15/2016 12:25 pm : link
Much of the debate here focused on Brandon Scherff, Andres Peat, and Ereck Flowers, with all three having their supporters and detractors. Fast forward to 2016, and Flowers - for better or worse - is the only one of the three who's still playing OT. I'm sure the Giants would have preferred that he begin his pro career at RT, but destiny took a hand (as Bogie would say), and he was thrust into starting at LT as a rookie. To say that he experienced some growing pains would be an understatement.

Clearly, the Giants would like to leave him there, and the hope is that if can avoid another injury, and if he takes to Solari's coaching more than he did to Flaherty's, then his game will improve. We can only hope. We know he's tough, and we know he's smart. I hope he's tough enough and smart enough to embrace criticism when it's constructive, and to put in the work that will turn him from a liability to an asset.

I think the Giants like John Jerry more than most of us do (if not as much as the Jerry-Troll does), and if his time at Bentley's camp pays dividends for him, especially with his run-blocking, then there's a good chance the Giants will re-sign him after this year.

Marshall Newhouse is a bit of an enigma to me. They couldn't wait to run him out of Green Bay, and then he crashed an burned in Cincinnati. Signed as a backup/swing tackle, he, too, was thrust into a starting role. Was he as bad as many fans believe? I honestly don't know, but it sure seemed like the Giants weren't desperate to replace him. Their efforts in free agency were half-hearted at best, and they didn't address their O-Line at all in the draft, or even after the draft with any UDFAs. Are they waiting, hoping, that an upgrade will be found prior to the start of the season? Maybe, but that's awfully risky.

It just seems to me that the Giants are quite content to begin the 2016 season with the same O-Line they fielded at the end of the 2015 season. My guess is that they feel that cohesion is key, better coaching will help, and that with a year under their belts their performance will improve across the board. Again, we can only hope.
BS meter going off WRT PFF  
DonQuixote : 7/15/2016 4:30 pm : link
So PFF has them ranked 11th against the run and 6th against the pass last year. With no real changes to the line, the same outfit now projects them at 20th.

I have no idea how good the OL will be but one (or both) of PFFs "analysis" of this is BS.

Back to the Corner