for display only
Big Blue Interactive The Corner Forum  
Back to the Corner

Archived Thread

Keys to this year's offense outside of Eli and OBJ

SGMen : 7/16/2016 4:33 pm
The key to this year's offense could be WR V. Cruz. If he recovers to be an 85-1050-7 TD guy, a solid #2 and clear improvement over WR Randle, this offense could truly get to the next level. We need some luck with injuries this year and our #1 hopeful is WR Cruz.

A second key is the TE position. I think we really have some possibilities here with TE W. Tye especially. With OBJ drawing and beating double coverages if our other positional players improve and /or heal this pass offense could be special.

My big question is our running game and who will start at RB. Does Jennings have another year left in him or does Dwarka need to step up? Who runs the ball?

This offense can be special if it stays healthy and the young guys develop.

What players do you think really need to step up?
Pages: 1 2 | Show All |  Next>>
Imo Flowers and Shephard are keys, as is the health of the OL.  
yatqb : 7/16/2016 4:35 pm : link
If an OT gets injured we could be in trouble unless we sign someone before the season begins.
RE: Imo Flowers and Shephard are keys, as is the health of the OL.  
SGMen : 7/16/2016 4:42 pm : link
In comment 13035107 yatqb said:
Quote:
If an OT gets injured we could be in trouble unless we sign someone before the season begins.
Flowers must improve for sure and stay healthy. We do lack OL depth as do many teams. My hope is Hart shows enough to be a RT. I mean, if injuries hit we'd have to move Pugh to OT for sure.

And yes, I think Shepherd is key too. I have this feeling he'll be solid out of the gates as a 4th WR and develop into our #3 during the season. An effective #3.
good thread SGMen  
gidiefor : Mod : 7/16/2016 4:55 pm : link
!
RE: good thread SGMen  
SGMen : 7/16/2016 4:57 pm : link
In comment 13035123 gidiefor said:
Quote:
!
Thanks. I just have visions of Cruz rebounding back to form and really feeding off OBJ. I also see nifty TE Tye doing some special things too. I like out TE's in general.
here's my keys  
gidiefor : Mod : 7/16/2016 5:04 pm : link
if the Oline can gel a little better -- Flowers, Pugh, Richburg, Jerry and Newhouse all starting out together after a full year under their belts --

if Tye and Donnell stay healthy and produce, if Will Johnson is the multi tool back he appears to be and if Sheppard can earn at least 20 snaps a game and Cruz can be a real participant, and if Perkins and Rainey can push the RB corps -- this will be a top 3 offense and really light it up

I realize these are a lot of ifs -- but everything above is definitely in play
...  
Toth029 : 7/16/2016 5:10 pm : link
Shepard will be the #2 by years end most likely. He will be a very critical piece to the offense.
The O-line, for sure .....  
Manny in CA : 7/16/2016 5:22 pm : link

If the line can help offense can expand it's repertoire (incorporate a play-action, long passing attack) ...

If the line can help the running game be more effective (and eat up the clock), the defense will improve because it is better rested


I think the key to a great offense is  
Simms11 : 7/16/2016 5:25 pm : link
still a solid running game. Allows play-action to work better, keeps our defense off the field and allows us to better sustain drives. 4 minute offense takes on a whole new meaning for us. If we can somehow get the right side of the oline to improve run blocking, then we could potentially have a very solid offense.
After Eli and OBJ, keys are  
BlueLou : 7/16/2016 5:30 pm : link
1) OL play mostly Flowers and Newhouse playing better.
2) Sheppard
3) The TE/FB group producing in all aspects.

I leave Cruz as a bonus, the whipped cream and nuts atop the sundae.

If we get #1 & #3, the running game will fall into place whoever totes the rock.
RE: After Eli and OBJ, keys are  
SGMen : 7/16/2016 6:14 pm : link
In comment 13035148 BlueLou said:
Quote:
1) OL play mostly Flowers and Newhouse playing better.
2) Sheppard
3) The TE/FB group producing in all aspects.

I leave Cruz as a bonus, the whipped cream and nuts atop the sundae.

If we get #1 & #3, the running game will fall into place whoever totes the rock.
I think Johnson does a great job at FB for us. I also read he is a great locker room guy and special teamer. My question is does Whitlock make the team as a situational pass rusher and backup FB? No team carries two pure FB's anymore. At least not that I know of.
If Johnson stays healthy, Whitlock is gone.  
BlueLou : 7/16/2016 6:19 pm : link
Can't carry that many FB or ST guys and even as an STer, he won't make the team over Shepard the LB.
RE: If Johnson stays healthy, Whitlock is gone.  
SGMen : 7/16/2016 6:43 pm : link
In comment 13035181 BlueLou said:
Quote:
Can't carry that many FB or ST guys and even as an STer, he won't make the team over Shepard the LB.
Yeah, but I still wonder if Whitlock can be a superb situation pass rusher? He was in college and flashed in spots last year and has now bulked up. You can never have enough good pass rushers. I would LOVE to see him just surprise and dominate as a specialist pass rusher and backup FB and special teams ace.
First Off Let's Qualify All of This  
Aloha Alan : 7/16/2016 6:44 pm : link
Last year we were pretty good offensively in total. It's the Defense that has to become adequate and stop some people consistently. Now that's out of the way, a lot of great points above and great thread SGMEN.

Shephard/Cruz will be better than Randle. If, like you said, Cruz has those numbers or anyway close, the league will be in difficult position to stop us. Add Tye and an effective FB/H-Back Johnson and that makes it more difficult to stop us on a continued basis.

If what we are hearing from the coaches/reporters than Williams has been much improved, that would be a wow and it would be extremely nice to have a 1000 yard runner on this team. I do not care who does it.

Of course, there is the line. Weston and Pugh are gold. If Jerry is technically better (didn't he go to some camp?) then the middle three could be solid. Flowers was hurt and played hurt a good chunk of the year, and was out of "position" (he should be on the right side, but we gots what we gots). We can hope Solari tweaks him enough to be good. I am on my knees praying that Newhouse can be good, too. Keeping Eli afloat (that's the Navy in me) and adding a running game conceivably makes us playoff capable.

Again, great thread, and yes there can be a lot of positives on offense this year.

Offensively we could be that good to great and I am more hopeful this year than in the past couple due to the offenses potential.

Then there's the D.....
RE: First Off Let's Qualify All of This  
SGMen : 7/16/2016 7:00 pm : link
In comment 13035191 Aloha Alan said:
Quote:
Last year we were pretty good offensively in total. It's the Defense that has to become adequate and stop some people consistently. Now that's out of the way, a lot of great points above and great thread SGMEN.

Shephard/Cruz will be better than Randle. If, like you said, Cruz has those numbers or anyway close, the league will be in the difficult position to stop us. Add Tye and an effective FB/H-Back Johnson and that makes it more difficult to stop us on a continued basis.

If what we are hearing from the coaches/reporters than Williams has been much improved, that would be a wow and it would be extremely nice to have a 1000 yard runner on this team. I do not care who does it.

Of course, there is the line. Weston and Pugh are gold. If Jerry is technically better (didn't he go to some camp?) then the middle three could be solid. Flowers was hurt and played hurt a good chunk of the year, and was out of "position" (he should be on the right side, but we gots what we gots). We can hope Solari tweaks him enough to be good. I am on my knees praying that Newhouse can be good, too. Keeping Eli afloat (that's the Navy in me) and adding a running game conceivably makes us playoff capable.

Again, great thread, and yes there can be a lot of positives on offense this year.

Offensively we could be that good to great and I am more hopeful this year than in the past couple due to the offenses potential.

Then there's the D.....
If RB Williams does in fact finally develop and learn how to follow his blockers as well as finally playing behind a real FB in Johnson well then this offense will in fact be damn freaking good. But I'm not sold on Williams yet just based on what I've seen to date.
As for the defense, I agree it was our weak point last year and may in fact have been the league's worst defense by far. However, I do believe the DL this year will be better due to signings and return to health of Hankins and JPP. I think Bromley and Wynn will improve as well. A big key is Kennard at LB being a force because he has ability.
I still just want one damn  
ZGiants98 : 7/16/2016 7:09 pm : link
G/T brought in. Even if its just a solid backup at this point. One injury to the line and we are in deep shit.

Assuming we can do that I love our offense....

We were what? 8th last year? I see us as slightly better across the board with potential to be top 5.

-Cruz/Sheppard easily is much better than Randle/Harris

-Will Johnson should be better than Whitlock

-Our running back stable should be stronger with some real play making ability in Perkins. Vereen should be deadly underneath year two in our system/better WR core.

-Our TE stable has two guys that have now been around the block in this system who are no longer green (Donnel/Tye) and a really solid 3rd TE to groom in Adams.

-Our line should be at LEAST as good as last year. Another year of improvement for Flowers, Pugh, and Richburg. Jerry is supposed to be in fantastic shape. (again I still want another body added though)

How many running backs are we going to keep?  
ZGiants98 : 7/16/2016 7:12 pm : link
I see four MAX. Jennings, Vereen, and Perkins are locks. That leaves Williams, Darkwa, and Rainey probably fighting for one spot. I guess it could go to Williams if he's ready to take on a short yardage/endzone type role.
RE: How many running backs are we going to keep?  
SGMen : 7/16/2016 7:15 pm : link
In comment 13035222 ZGiants98 said:
Quote:
I see four MAX. Jennings, Vereen, and Perkins are locks. That leaves Williams, Darkwa, and Rainey probably fighting for one spot. I guess it could go to Williams if he's ready to take on a short yardage/endzone type role.
I am NOt sold on Jennings being a lock only because he is 31. There haven't been many runners with big years at age 31. I like Perkins, Vereen, Williams (if reports of developing are true....) and Dwarka. Jennings could be a late cut and told to stay in shape. Just a hunch.
no way Jennings gets cut unless he's  
gidiefor : Mod : 7/16/2016 7:17 pm : link
unable to go for some reason - even then he would be IRed

The Giants really like Jennings
RE: no way Jennings gets cut unless he's  
SGMen : 7/16/2016 7:24 pm : link
In comment 13035229 gidiefor said:
Quote:
unable to go for some reason - even then he would be IRed

The Giants really like Jennings
I agree the Giants like Jennings and he carried the rock well late last year. He is reliable and a good locker room guy. But he is now going to be 31. That is all I am saying. He can lose half a step and well that is all she wrote. I'm just not sold that he is a "lock" due to his age.
the way he takes care of himself  
gidiefor : Mod : 7/16/2016 7:27 pm : link
I just don't see that happening -- but him getting injured is always a possibility
RE: the way he takes care of himself  
SGMen : 7/16/2016 7:29 pm : link
In comment 13035235 gidiefor said:
Quote:
I just don't see that happening -- but him getting injured is always a possibility
You can stay in great shape, workout, take care of yourself, but father time can still take that half step. A WR can lose a shade at an older age and still produce but rarely a RB.
RE: RE: How many running backs are we going to keep?  
ZGiants98 : 7/16/2016 7:43 pm : link
In comment 13035227 SGMen said:
Quote:
In comment 13035222 ZGiants98 said:


Quote:


I see four MAX. Jennings, Vereen, and Perkins are locks. That leaves Williams, Darkwa, and Rainey probably fighting for one spot. I guess it could go to Williams if he's ready to take on a short yardage/endzone type role.

I am NOt sold on Jennings being a lock only because he is 31. There haven't been many runners with big years at age 31. I like Perkins, Vereen, Williams (if reports of developing are true....) and Dwarka. Jennings could be a late cut and told to stay in shape. Just a hunch.


Wow. I would be shocked if Jennings was cut barring some sort of injury in Training camp/Pre-season. He's the likely starter let alone one of their top 4. He might get phased out or replaced as the year moves along but I can't see him cut early if healthy.
Most running backs do start to wear down by 31  
ZGiants98 : 7/16/2016 7:44 pm : link
But I dont think Jennings has a lot of wear on his tires.
RE: RE: RE: How many running backs are we going to keep?  
SGMen : 7/16/2016 7:48 pm : link
In comment 13035249 ZGiants98 said:
Quote:
In comment 13035227 SGMen said:


Quote:


In comment 13035222 ZGiants98 said:


Quote:


I see four MAX. Jennings, Vereen, and Perkins are locks. That leaves Williams, Darkwa, and Rainey probably fighting for one spot. I guess it could go to Williams if he's ready to take on a short yardage/endzone type role.

I am NOt sold on Jennings being a lock only because he is 31. There haven't been many runners with big years at age 31. I like Perkins, Vereen, Williams (if reports of developing are true....) and Dwarka. Jennings could be a late cut and told to stay in shape. Just a hunch.



Wow. I would be shocked if Jennings was cut barring some sort of injury in Training camp/Pre-season. He's the likely starter let alone one of their top 4. He might get phased out or replaced as the year moves along but I can't see him cut early if healthy.
I would LOVE for Jennings to show well and carry the rock early like he did late last year. Trust me, he's an asset. But I'm also a realist in that I know there have not been many 31 year old stud starters in this league. Runners take a beating. Holding out hope he runs well. His locker room presence is key to me too.
Many good points above  
Makogman : 7/16/2016 7:56 pm : link
I know many are on pins and needles about the OL but, I'm banking on coach Solari. His lines have been dominant especially in the running game. Lets remember that we have memories of some of the most intense trench wars between his SF OL vs our DL.

Listening to Jennings on NFL Network just, reinforces my feeling on Victor Cruz. I think he will make it back to form to pair with Beckham and Shepard, giving the Giants a lethal WR corps.

Will Johnson will be a terror in run blocking with flexibility in the passing game as an H-back FB or TE.

The stable of TE's may prove to be a strength as well. The competition will be intense this preseason making the final contingent solid.

The RB rotation will be decided during the preseason but, I think Perkins will become impactful as the season evolves, like Bradshaw 2007. Jennings will be the workhorse early but will be complimented will solid depth.

That is one of the parallels to 2007 when major contributions came from draft class: CB Ross 1st round, WR Smith 2nd round, TE Boss 5th round and RB Bradshaw 7th round. 2016 we have CB Apple 1st round, WR Shepard 2nd round, RB Perkins 5th round and TE Adams 6th round.

Last year the O was top 10 with only one true dynamic play-maker. This year Eli will have a plethora of options, with Beckham, Cruz and Shepard single coverage will prove to be a nightmare. Given coach Solari's track record the run blocking should much improved, with the stable of RB's this years Offense may be the Best in franchise history.
RE: Many good points above  
SGMen : 7/16/2016 8:08 pm : link
In comment 13035267 Makogman said:
Quote:
I know many are on pins and needles about the OL but, I'm banking on coach Solari. His lines have been dominant especially in the running game. Lets remember that we have memories of some of the most intense trench wars between his SF OL vs our DL.

Listening to Jennings on NFL Network just, reinforces my feeling on Victor Cruz. I think he will make it back to form to pair with Beckham and Shepard, giving the Giants a lethal WR corps.

Will Johnson will be a terror in run blocking with flexibility in the passing game as an H-back FB or TE.

The stable of TE's may prove to be a strength as well. The competition will be intense this preseason making the final contingent solid.

The RB rotation will be decided during the preseason but, I think Perkins will become impactful as the season evolves, like Bradshaw 2007. Jennings will be the workhorse early but will be complimented will solid depth.

That is one of the parallels to 2007 when major contributions came from draft class: CB Ross 1st round, WR Smith 2nd round, TE Boss 5th round and RB Bradshaw 7th round. 2016 we have CB Apple 1st round, WR Shepard 2nd round, RB Perkins 5th round and TE Adams 6th round.

Last year the O was top 10 with only one true dynamic play-maker. This year Eli will have a plethora of options, with Beckham, Cruz and Shepard single coverage will prove to be a nightmare. Given coach Solari's track record the run blocking should much improved, with the stable of RB's this years Offense may be the Best in franchise history.
Excellent analysis and comparisons. I mean it is early and much has to be proved but on paper this offense really does have potential. I would not be shocked to see FB Johnson spearhead a solid running game. I also think our OL, assuming it stays healthy, will be super solid and provide us with run blocking. If we can run the ball very well and our wideouts are as good as I think they can be we may have a top 3 offense. I mean, why not? Manning and company can do iit.
Does anyone think we may carry 4 TE's?  
SGMen : 7/16/2016 8:23 pm : link
I like Lacosse as a blocker.

I also wondered before the draft if we'd trade TE Donnell and a pick for an opportunity to move up and draft a RT. I didn't happen.

I really see great production from TE this year. I see us moving the ball on the ground; throwing short; and even surprising with TE Adams later in the year as he has speed but just needs to learn.

Oddly, but I also think TE plus FB Johnson will be the reason our redzone offense will really improve.
Red zone offense  
SGMen : 7/16/2016 9:33 pm : link
Last word but I think this is the year we show a truly solid redzone offense.

TE Donnell is a really big body and if he stays healthy I think he'll key the redzone. When he is in along with FB Johnson teams won't know whether to key on the run or pass.

Also, Cruz is a solid short area receiver when healthy and he appears to be healthy.

I have a good feeling we will produce inside the 20 yard line this year.
I agree with everything you said Makogam  
ZGiants98 : 7/16/2016 9:38 pm : link
I just can't take a chance with the o-line for all the reasons you mentioned. It seems like Eli is going to have a bunch of weapons this year for the first time in a while. I'd hate for it all to go down the drain because Flowers twisted an ankle in week 2. We have to bring somebody else in still IMO, even if it's only for depth purposes.
RE: I agree with everything you said Makogam  
SGMen : 7/16/2016 9:48 pm : link
In comment 13035340 ZGiants98 said:
Quote:
I just can't take a chance with the o-line for all the reasons you mentioned. It seems like Eli is going to have a bunch of weapons this year for the first time in a while. I'd hate for it all to go down the drain because Flowers twisted an ankle in week 2. We have to bring somebody else in still IMO, even if it's only for depth purposes.
We could definitely use a starting RT. We tried to get one in free agency but it didn't work out. I wonder if something will happen during camp in terms of a trade? If not, remember, Pugh could play LT as can Newhouse in a pinch. Hart is learning RT. You hope for the best.
I understand your misgivings Z  
Makogman : 7/16/2016 9:52 pm : link
A T may still be added, but Stingley may surprise and Hart has the college experience at OT. What is troublesome is the unknown, but that is when you look at position coach. Coach Solari may be the best OL technique instructor in the NFL. If the OL have talent he will get the most out of them.

His former player swear by his coaching ability, therefore the discerning mind should lean in favor of optimism. I believe he will know fairly quickly what potential they can achieve. One thing I can asure you they will be well prepared and function as a cohesive unit. Sometimes that can make all the difference.
RE: I understand your misgivings Z  
SGMen : 7/16/2016 9:59 pm : link
In comment 13035359 Makogman said:
Quote:
A T may still be added, but Stingley may surprise and Hart has the college experience at OT. What is troublesome is the unknown, but that is when you look at position coach. Coach Solari may be the best OL technique instructor in the NFL. If the OL have talent he will get the most out of them.

His former player swear by his coaching ability, therefore the discerning mind should lean in favor of optimism. I believe he will know fairly quickly what potential they can achieve. One thing I can asure you they will be well prepared and function as a cohesive unit. Sometimes that can make all the difference.
Everything I have read about coach Solari has been solid. If he produces as expected our OL will be much improved. I believe for example E. Flowers will run block like a man passed and his pass blocking will improve. I have a feeling Pugh will be borderline probowl and OC Richburg is already probowl in my mind. We have to hope that Jerry and Newhouse "peak" as they say and just be improved. I am telling you I think both our pass and run games will be improved. I also think we will turn it over less, especially with WR Randle gone as he ran wrong routes. Cruz won't do that. If we run the ball really well that will open the passing game up.
At this point Ive given up on expecting a  
ZGiants98 : 7/16/2016 10:25 pm : link
starting RT brought in. I just want another "Newhouse" but preferably a guy that is a vet that has logged some time at LT in his career. Who plays LT if Flowers goes down? Pugh? Newhouse? Hart? I don't like any of those options.
RE: At this point Ive given up on expecting a  
SGMen : 7/16/2016 10:31 pm : link
In comment 13035391 ZGiants98 said:
Quote:
starting RT brought in. I just want another "Newhouse" but preferably a guy that is a vet that has logged some time at LT in his career. Who plays LT if Flowers goes down? Pugh? Newhouse? Hart? I don't like any of those options.
Newhouse has played LT in his career. Pugh could play it too. Just saying there is at least some options.
To me, the number one key,  
Doomster : 7/16/2016 10:39 pm : link
is Shepard.......

And Cruz is the reason.....one, until he goes out there and can show he has the same cutting ability and quickness.....two, that, that knee can take a hit......and three, that he can play a full season......we have been let down by him, the last three seasons......to count on him is a mistake....he should be looked at as a bonus, if he indeed does play....

That's why Shepard is the #1 key to this offense.....he has to replace Randle, by game one......That is a lot of pressure to put on a rookie receiver, especially if Cruz fails or comes around slowly......

If Cruz fails, that's OBj, SS, and Harris......we need someone to step up, and be the 3rd or 4th guy.....

It seems that the Giants are prepared to go with the OL that finished the year......these 5 have played together for a year.....I think they will be better...but there is no depth......we have to hope Reese finds someone's outcast, as an upgrade to the backups we have....

It seems to be the same situation with the TE's....they are going with what they have...

We needed a RB, and we were lucky that Perkins was still on the board....but he is a rookie, and while potentially better than what we already have, he is still an unknown.....We will probably ride Jennings as long as we can, but Vereen, Darkwa, Williams, and Co. are not the answer......

This is a team, with no depth on offense or defense.....we have to avoid major injuries.......we can probably tolerate minor injuries to key players.....

If we get lucky with Cruz, if Perkins and Shepard, can work their way into the starting lineup, and if we can avoid the injury bug that has plagued us for several seasons, there is no reason this team can't take the division, and make the playoffs....
RE: To me, the number one key,  
SGMen : 7/16/2016 10:52 pm : link
In comment 13035402 Doomster said:
Quote:
is Shepard.......

And Cruz is the reason.....one, until he goes out there and can show he has the same cutting ability and quickness.....two, that, that knee can take a hit......and three, that he can play a full season......we have been let down by him, the last three seasons......to count on him is a mistake....he should be looked at as a bonus, if he indeed does play....

That's why Shepard is the #1 key to this offense.....he has to replace Randle, by game one......That is a lot of pressure to put on a rookie receiver, especially if Cruz fails or comes around slowly......

If Cruz fails, that's OBj, SS, and Harris......we need someone to step up, and be the 3rd or 4th guy.....

It seems that the Giants are prepared to go with the OL that finished the year......these 5 have played together for a year.....I think they will be better...but there is no depth......we have to hope Reese finds someone's outcast, as an upgrade to the backups we have....

It seems to be the same situation with the TE's....they are going with what they have...

We needed a RB, and we were lucky that Perkins was still on the board....but he is a rookie, and while potentially better than what we already have, he is still an unknown.....We will probably ride Jennings as long as we can, but Vereen, Darkwa, Williams, and Co. are not the answer......

This is a team, with no depth on offense or defense.....we have to avoid major injuries.......we can probably tolerate minor injuries to key players.....

If we get lucky with Cruz, if Perkins and Shepard, can work their way into the starting lineup, and if we can avoid the injury bug that has plagued us for several seasons, there is no reason this team can't take the division, and make the playoffs....
Very good reply. My only major contention is that I actually like Dwarka at RB. In spots he flashed last year and now he knows the offense. I like Perkins, good pick, but like you said he is a rookie and therefore an unknown. Vereen isn't a starting running back but he'll play some and be the 3rd down back.

And yes Shepherd could indeed end up being a key piece to the offense should Cruz falter.
Could Hart be the backup or starter on the right side?  
SGMen : 7/16/2016 11:21 pm : link
I realize Jerry and Newhouse are the returning starter veterans but I do wonder if Hart might just step up. I have read good things about him just don't know if he has the experience to over-take either of the two?
Make Andre Williams watch this video . . . . .  
TC : 7/17/2016 12:40 am : link
over, and over, over, and over, and over again!!!

New Coaching for Williams - ( New Window )
RE: Make Andre Williams watch this video . . . . .  
SGMen : 7/17/2016 1:36 am : link
In comment 13035423 TC said:
Quote:
over, and over, over, and over, and over again!!! New Coaching for Williams - ( New Window )
Andre Williams has physical tools but not sure he is nifty enough to use blockers to best effectiveness and such. We shall see.
Lets say Andre Williams does develop  
SGMen : 7/17/2016 2:04 am : link
But I get the impression he is best behind a FB like Johnson. I don't see him as a single set back so much.

Anyone know how developed Perkins is? Is he sort of NFL ready with the ability to pick up the blitz and so forth?

I am really hoping Dwarka, Perkins, Vereen are all ready out the gates. I know Vereeen is but he isn't a regular back.
Shepard, a RB coming out of the wood work, and TE consistency  
adamg : 7/17/2016 2:17 am : link
Honestly, while the O-line can seem concerning, there's only so much progress we can expect this year with Newhouse as a starter. I think next off season we're going to get the final piece of that puzzle and be done with it for a few years (after extending Jerry).

So for 2016, Shepard showing up as the guy he's been purported to be is the biggest key to this offense. Randle had his flaws, but he also scored a lot of touchdowns. We need someone to offer similar production. If Shepard even copies the production and doesn't make the mental errors that would be a huge plus. And I think that would guarantee a potential repeat of Eli's production last year.

Secondly, a RB coming out behind Jennings proving to be a future starter would also be a huge boon. Either Williams or Perkins, if they can carry the ball over a hundred times for near 4.5 yards a carry, that too would be a huge pick up for our offense. (This is obviously assuming Rashad starts the whole season.)

Lastly, while Tye produced good numbers, he's not a threatening offensive weapon. If he or Donnell can show some consistency at that position that would give the team some stability. Even if it's not those two, a consistent starter from the TE position would really help this offense going forward. If Adams can get off the line and make some catches, that duel threat - like with the RB position - would give Eli a lot of flexibility and defenses a lot of difficulty with trying to plan for Eli's attack.
RE: Shepard, a RB coming out of the wood work, and TE consistency  
SGMen : 7/17/2016 2:40 am : link
In comment 13035432 adamg said:
Quote:
Honestly, while the O-line can seem concerning, there's only so much progress we can expect this year with Newhouse as a starter. I think next off season we're going to get the final piece of that puzzle and be done with it for a few years (after extending Jerry).

So for 2016, Shepard showing up as the guy he's been purported to be is the biggest key to this offense. Randle had his flaws, but he also scored a lot of touchdowns. We need someone to offer similar production. If Shepard even copies the production and doesn't make the mental errors that would be a huge plus. And I think that would guarantee a potential repeat of Eli's production last year.

Secondly, a RB coming out behind Jennings proving to be a future starter would also be a huge boon. Either Williams or Perkins, if they can carry the ball over a hundred times for near 4.5 yards a carry, that too would be a huge pick up for our offense. (This is obviously assuming Rashad starts the whole season.)

Lastly, while Tye produced good numbers, he's not a threatening offensive weapon. If he or Donnell can show some consistency at that position that would give the team some stability. Even if it's not those two, a consistent starter from the TE position would really help this offense going forward. If Adams can get off the line and make some catches, that duel threat - like with the RB position - would give Eli a lot of flexibility and defenses a lot of difficulty with trying to plan for Eli's attack.
I thought Te was pretty nifty last year and improved. I think Adams has the most physical talent and upside. I also believe the OL, if healthy and together through camp, will be better due to experience and coach Solari. Good reply and I appreciate much of what you say.
RE: RE: Shepard, a RB coming out of the wood work, and TE consistency  
adamg : 7/17/2016 2:47 am : link
In comment 13035434 SGMen said:
Quote:

I thought Te was pretty nifty last year and improved. I think Adams has the most physical talent and upside. I also believe the OL, if healthy and together through camp, will be better due to experience and coach Solari. Good reply and I appreciate much of what you say.


I like Tye, but I think his height limits his use in certain situations. I also think Donnell is better at contested grabs. Both together offer options that are valuable. But, yeah, is Adams can become Donnell like in his offensive value, that would be a huge option for Eli.

I agree about the OL getting better with experience, but I think we may draft a RT next year and I think that would be a good thing. I don't dislike Newhouse, but I think we could use a more solid run blocker on the right side though. Newhouse as depth would be fantastic.
RE: RE: RE: Shepard, a RB coming out of the wood work, and TE consistency  
SGMen : 7/17/2016 4:23 am : link
In comment 13035437 adamg said:
Quote:
In comment 13035434 SGMen said:


Quote:



I thought Te was pretty nifty last year and improved. I think Adams has the most physical talent and upside. I also believe the OL, if healthy and together through camp, will be better due to experience and coach Solari. Good reply and I appreciate much of what you say.



I like Tye, but I think his height limits his use in certain situations. I also think Donnell is better at contested grabs. Both together offer options that are valuable. But, yeah, is Adams can become Donnell like in his offensive value, that would be a huge option for Eli.

I agree about the OL getting better with experience, but I think we may draft a RT next year and I think that would be a good thing. I don't dislike Newhouse, but I think we could use a more solid run blocker on the right side though. Newhouse as depth would be fantastic.
Tye is short, yes, but he still can get open. He got better as last year moved along. Donnell is good at contested grabs. But Adams offers the most upside and my hope he is the "Boss" of 2016 who comes on as the year goes along and creates mismatches.
The key to this offense is not Cruz  
chopperhatch : 7/17/2016 5:19 am : link
Coming back to form. I think the OP's projected numbers are wildly optimistic and unrealistic if we want this team to be successful. Ideally, we will have too many options for teams to defend in the passing set. ODB and Shep should provide a ton of production or at least attn from the defense. Tye should be able to get open up the seam, Donnell can go up and get it and Vereen or Jennings coming out of the backfield is a handful for any team. Our pass blocking was pretty damn solid last year.

But if you want a "key" to the O, it's run blocking. We have a nice stable of backs. No real game breakers, but Jennings is reliable as an every down back as long as he's healthy, Vereen changes things as a receiving threat where they can split him out and Perkins as apparently our future full timer will be a dynamic back when giving Jennings a break assuming he can block. Who knows what Williams is gonna do. I'd like to believe he can thrive behind some good run blocking because him getting to the 2nd and 3rd levels sounds scary to me for other teams to have to deal with.

If we can get a viable, and consistent running game to go with what we can do through the air, we will be a top five offense in the league with arguably the most clutch an. You give Eli options to audible in and out of, he is literally the best an in the game. Then, it's all up to the defense.

Man I have a very good feeling about this year.
I get the concern of Jennings being 31  
slickwilly : 7/17/2016 5:45 am : link
But he hasn't had 1 year over 200 carries. Granted some of that was because of injuries and some was him playing behind MJD, but he doesn't have the 250+ carries per year that normally wears these guys down. I think he has at least another year, maybe two of solid production.
Link - ( New Window )
Let's hope a consistant  
hammock man : 7/17/2016 5:48 am : link
clutch player emerges who can make that key play in the final minutes/seconds of the game.
RE: Let's hope a consistant  
SGMen : 7/17/2016 5:50 am : link
In comment 13035449 hammock man said:
Quote:
clutch player emerges who can make that key play in the final minutes/seconds of the game.
Clutch is key. I like Vereen, OBJ, and Tye for good reason.
Shepard is going to be the key guy  
Jimmy Googs : 7/17/2016 8:11 am : link
outside of ELi/OBJ this season...
RE: Shepard is going to be the key guy  
JPinstripes : 7/17/2016 8:20 am : link
In comment 13035465 Jimmy Googs said:
Quote:
outside of ELi/OBJ this season...


Agree with this.
Pages: 1 2 | Show All |  Next>>
Back to the Corner