for display only
Big Blue Interactive The Corner Forum  
Back to the Corner

Archived Thread

Offensive line

steve in ky : 8/22/2016 9:41 am
I'm no expert so this is simply my take as a fan.

IMO it's too early for so much panic. The team has a new coach at the position so I think its fair to assume there is a certain amount a "learning" curve with a new system before the unit comes together and plays up to their full abilities.

Anyone remember when Spags came on board the first time around how awful the defense looked during preseason and even into the first few games of the season but then once they came together the defense became a team strength? And the OL is even more dependent on players working together for it to play well.

I'm not predicting they will be a team strength or even play well but I certainly think it is too soon to form any conclusions.

Of course overreaction is a long standing BBI tradition so it doesn't surprise me to read post after post about how the OL is going to be a disaster and every suggestion offered from bringing in new guys to trading away a draft pick for players but my take is simply lets just wait and see how it plays out before we panic. This is the team the organization put together. They obviously have some confidence there is something there. Lets just hope for no injuries so we can find out if they were correct.
The offensive line has been a disaster for the past four seasons.  
Britt in VA : 8/22/2016 9:45 am : link
I think people are looking for a glimmer of hope, and are not seeing one.

I don't think it's an overreaction based on the past four seasons.

I think the Giants will still be a productive offense, but the state of the offensive line is a concern.
Preseason..  
FatMan in Charlotte : 8/22/2016 9:48 am : link
weeds out a lot of the chaff from the wheat. Not on the team, but on BBI.

Every year, we see the same nonsense. How many times has a thread been starting theorizing that Nassib needs to play more at Eli's expense based on preseason results? This year, people are ready to set Nassib on a flaming ship to the Arctic Circle.

How many times to people latch onto a preseason hero, whether it be Sean Bennett, Frank Ferrerra, or Corey Washington, and then spend most of the year bitching about the idiot coaches who refuse to play these guys?

How often do we cheer a preseason game where our scrubs win but the starters lost or jeer a game where the starters leave with a lead and then the backups get shellacked?

How many threads are created trying to say that the coaches are asleep at the wheel with creativity - remember the Coughlin needs to tyry trick plays in the preseason threads? McAdoo is getting killed for the offensive showing this year. But it is floated out there that he's the smartest guy in the room trying to play Jedi mind tricks by sitting Eli week 1.

The only thing consistent about pre-season is it gives an excellent idea just who is and who isn't a good poster. Sort of like a game thread.
The offensive line  
Old Dirty Beckham : 8/22/2016 9:52 am : link
isnt going to be a strength but I dont think it will be a disaster like it appeared to be on Saturday.

The Giants made a point to run the ball to the right. Generally speaking that's not going to be their bread and butter.

The line needs more talent but I dont see the offense being much different then it was last year. It will make big plays and score enough points to put us in position to win games. Not a great offense but definitely will be a good one.
RE: Preseason..  
mdc1 : 8/22/2016 9:55 am : link
In comment 13080987 FatMan in Charlotte said:
Quote:
weeds out a lot of the chaff from the wheat. Not on the team, but on BBI.

Every year, we see the same nonsense. How many times has a thread been starting theorizing that Nassib needs to play more at Eli's expense based on preseason results? This year, people are ready to set Nassib on a flaming ship to the Arctic Circle.

How many times to people latch onto a preseason hero, whether it be Sean Bennett, Frank Ferrerra, or Corey Washington, and then spend most of the year bitching about the idiot coaches who refuse to play these guys?

How often do we cheer a preseason game where our scrubs win but the starters lost or jeer a game where the starters leave with a lead and then the backups get shellacked?

How many threads are created trying to say that the coaches are asleep at the wheel with creativity - remember the Coughlin needs to tyry trick plays in the preseason threads? McAdoo is getting killed for the offensive showing this year. But it is floated out there that he's the smartest guy in the room trying to play Jedi mind tricks by sitting Eli week 1.

The only thing consistent about pre-season is it gives an excellent idea just who is and who isn't a good poster. Sort of like a game thread.


With all of that behind us now, what do you think of the offensive line?

Don't like Hart at LG. If Pugh is out for any extended period  
Victor in CT : 8/22/2016 10:06 am : link
they should move Jerry to LG, Hart to RG. Jerry more experienced, an his strength (as it were) is pass pro, weak at run blocking. Leave the young kid Hart on the right side.

As for Nassib, he sucks. I'm tired of hearing Dottino blow smoke about how he has "seen every practice" and he looks great. He looks like shit in games. If Eli gets hurt they are fucked.
Yes, it's offensive  
jeff57 : 8/22/2016 10:07 am : link
.
I think the OL..  
FatMan in Charlotte : 8/22/2016 10:07 am : link
is adequate enough to keep us a top 10 offense. Solari's coaching should pay dividends as well.

I'm the first to admit that evaluating the OL is tough because it is the unit on the field that the average fan has the least amount of info. Most of us don't know what to look for and we sure as hell don't know what the scheme is supposed to be to see if the players are adhering to it properly. The "name players" we know are ones that talking heads discuss, but we have very little first-hand knowledge on who is good and who isn't.

And to proclaim the OL shitty, great or mediocre based on two preseason games is pretty bad. It is even bad to make a determination after 4 preseason games, but people do it anyway. My take is that the OL needs to maintain status quo from last year and teh improvements on the D should translate into 3-4 more wins, which will be good enough for a playoff berth.
RE: Don't like Hart at LG. If Pugh is out for any extended period  
jeff57 : 8/22/2016 10:08 am : link
In comment 13081036 Victor in CT said:
Quote:
they should move Jerry to LG, Hart to RG. Jerry more experienced, an his strength (as it were) is pass pro, weak at run blocking. Leave the young kid Hart on the right side.

As for Nassib, he sucks. I'm tired of hearing Dottino blow smoke about how he has "seen every practice" and he looks great. He looks like shit in games. If Eli gets hurt they are fucked.

And Pugh to LT and Flowers to RT.
I get tired trying to get my point across, but if FMiC et  
Big Blue '56 : 8/22/2016 10:08 am : link
continue to try, then I will continue as well..

This is about sorting out the roster, who fits best where and who stands the best chance to move this team forward. They only have 12-13 practices, an in and out process of evaluation each game. You will NEVER see continuity during pre-season, especially with the constant shuffling and vanilla O and D...Some teams look great during pre-season, others don't. Either way it MEANS NOTHING or very little. In fact you're not going to see major continuity until at least a fourth of the season has played out, regardless of record, imv..

I perused the PFT headlines this morning and noted that Seattle and Philly are still addressing their OL..Most others are doubtless doing the same
RE: I get tired trying to get my point across, but if FMiC et  
djstat : 8/22/2016 10:20 am : link
In comment 13081050 Big Blue '56 said:
Quote:
continue to try, then I will continue as well..

This is about sorting out the roster, who fits best where and who stands the best chance to move this team forward. They only have 12-13 practices, an in and out process of evaluation each game. You will NEVER see continuity during pre-season, especially with the constant shuffling and vanilla O and D...Some teams look great during pre-season, others don't. Either way it MEANS NOTHING or very little. In fact you're not going to see major continuity until at least a fourth of the season has played out, regardless of record, imv..

I perused the PFT headlines this morning and noted that Seattle and Philly are still addressing their OL..Most others are doubtless doing the same
Well said. For all of you panicked. Eli has thrown a total of 9 passes this pre-season. Chill out
Pierre-Paul says Giants’ preseason struggles are no reason to worry  
gidiefor : Mod : 8/22/2016 10:22 am : link
So stop worrying : )
Link - ( New Window )
RE: Pierre-Paul says Giants’ preseason struggles are no reason to worry  
Big Blue '56 : 8/22/2016 10:24 am : link
In comment 13081078 gidiefor said:
Quote:
So stop worrying : ) Link - ( New Window )


Though TO ME, anything JPP says I divide by 10, there is little to no reason to worry..Unless hit hard by injuries, no team really should at this point, imo
Did I miss  
ryanmkeane : 8/22/2016 10:26 am : link
last season when we had the worst defense in NFL history? Look, the OL isn't perfectly and certainly not great. But it was above average last season and at times very effective. This notion that it was a "disaster" it just not accurate. Should be better this season, too.
SOMETIMES, The Corner Forum is correct.  
x meadowlander : 8/22/2016 10:27 am : link
The 2013 OL WAS a disaster. The 2010 Safety Unit WAS a horror show.

And SOMETIMES, the Corner is wrong.

The 2011 WR Unit was a STRENGTH, not a disaster.

Odell Beckham over Zack Martin was a GOOD pick.

Eric Ebron was NOT necessary to fix the TE issue.

And so on...

It's preseason. Enjoy it.
Amen fatman,,,  
BCD : 8/22/2016 10:40 am : link
....
Fat Man is dead on  
Dave on the UWS : 8/22/2016 10:44 am : link
One of the stupidest points made every year in pre season is how the back up OL looks. 5 guys thrown together and they are expected to look good as a unit ? Come on I never expect that and I doubt the coaches do either. They evaluate EACH guy with little nuances. I watched Flowers and Hart (at both positions ) as close as my untrained eye could see. I saw some good technique and sloppiness both on good plays and bad. What was pretty obvious though was when they were next to each other they were both tentative, unsure which makes sense to me they've never been next to each other before. Hart looked more sure of himself at RT.
I think when all is said and done they will have 6 serviceable or better OL. ( and I think Cleary has some promise too. Hart has upside he should start at RT sonNewhouse can go back to being a solid backup. I honk and hope this will be a pretty decent line by years end.
Let's see if they bounce back in what is termed "dress rehearsal" game  
micky : 8/22/2016 10:48 am : link
vs jets.

If same from starters. Then it's only preseason. If better, then this line is going to HOF.
The o-Line is STILL  
nicky43 : 8/22/2016 10:50 am : link
our weakest component on the team. Jerry just doesn't know how to fix it or he doesn't see it but it's very obvious to me. We are back where we were two years ago with the running backs getting tackled at the same time they are getting the ball. Really sad that after identifying this weakness 5 years ago it is still a major problem.

We won't be making the playoffs until this gets fixed!

The run blocking issues have as much to do  
Dave on the UWS : 8/22/2016 11:01 am : link
With the atrocious TE play as anything. Johnson from the Steelers will help dramatically when he gets on the field. Donnell and Tye will have their asses on the bench if they don't improve period. The coaches see what we see (and more ). BM is a smart guy. For he's the right coach he will figure this out.
Why anyone thought  
area junc : 8/22/2016 11:03 am : link
wed b that much better up front is crazy, we opted for continuity. Continuing the subpar play of recent years. Even if Flowers improved markedly (he hasnt) this was still not going to be a very good blocking team

That being said, the criticism of the oline is out of hand. As pointed out by Banks and several BBI posters the TEs whiffing on blocks made the OL look bad. Indeed on several of the early handoffs if Donnell makes his blick there is a big hole up the gut. Im not as mad about keeping the OL intact as I am trying to sell us Larry Donnell and our "depth at TE" BS we've heard this month.

Also Will Johnson can help tremendously when he returns
UWS  
area junc : 8/22/2016 11:06 am : link
I just hope WJ is coming back, stingers are scary especially for lead blockers. We need him to play a major role
RE: Did I miss  
Old Dirty Beckham : 8/22/2016 11:09 am : link
In comment 13081085 ryanmkeane said:
Quote:
last season when we had the worst defense in NFL history? Look, the OL isn't perfectly and certainly not great. But it was above average last season and at times very effective. This notion that it was a "disaster" it just not accurate. Should be better this season, too.


If we stay healthy and flowers improves the line should be as good if not better than last year.

3 big Ifs.
I think the bigger issue in the run game is that the TEs  
Victor in CT : 8/22/2016 11:15 am : link
especially Donnell, can't block or set the edge.
The O-line was a major issue and concern last year  
Beer Man : 8/22/2016 11:16 am : link
Nothing was done during the off-season to change and improve it. At this point its reasonable to believe the O-line will continue to be a major concern; even more so when you look at how poorly they have performed in both preseason games.
We have to see more from Flowers IMO.....  
Simms11 : 8/22/2016 11:24 am : link
he should be showing more development at this point, perhaps it's going to take him a little longer to develop. Additionally, my concern is more on blocking from the TE position. It will be very difficult to establish any running game without the TEs doing their job and both Donnell and Tye have been underwhelming!! The fact that Pugh has been out was also a factor in the interior Oline play last week and so I'm not as concerned about the interior of the line right now. Jerry also has been a little better then first expected. As far as RT, Newhouse is what he is, a very average to below average starter. Could we do better there, yes, but I don't think he'll be that bad there. We need a TE that can help on the outside in the worst way.....maybe LaCosse or Adams can help there.
Well they will be tested This Week ...  
Bluesbreaker : 8/22/2016 11:24 am : link
Jets front four is dynamic and the linebackers aren't
to shabby either .
RE: The O-line was a major issue and concern last year  
Big Blue '56 : 8/22/2016 11:25 am : link
In comment 13081183 Beer Man said:
Quote:
Nothing was done during the off-season to change and improve it. At this point its reasonable to believe the O-line will continue to be a major concern; even more so when you look at how poorly they have performed in both preseason games.


Major concern for many on here, but yet we easily could have been 10-6 had we had a D we've hopefully just rebuilt(or on the way to being) last year..And that's with a meh running game
Compare 1st quarters of the 2 games so far  
njm : 8/22/2016 11:27 am : link
Buffalo probably has a better DL than Miami, but I found the drop off of run blocking was significant. The solid left side was not as good. That suggests that there is not the depth we hoped for on the OL.

Also, fair points have been raised about how atrocious the TE blocking has been. I focused on that last Saturday and it truly was pathetic.

Now, it's not the end of the world, but I'm not going to go all Bobby McFerrin either.
RE: RE: The O-line was a major issue and concern last year  
micky : 8/22/2016 11:32 am : link
In comment 13081206 Big Blue '56 said:
Quote:
In comment 13081183 Beer Man said:


Quote:


Nothing was done during the off-season to change and improve it. At this point its reasonable to believe the O-line will continue to be a major concern; even more so when you look at how poorly they have performed in both preseason games.



Major concern for many on here, but yet we easily could have been 10-6 had we had a D we've hopefully just rebuilt(or on the way to being) last year..And that's with a meh running game


wonder how many of those games with L's in last few minutes of the game, would've been W's if they could run a 4 minute offense by running the ball..which they couldn't then leaving it to all the defenses fault (which D was bad granted)?
RE: RE: RE: The O-line was a major issue and concern last year  
Big Blue '56 : 8/22/2016 11:35 am : link
In comment 13081218 micky said:
Quote:
In comment 13081206 Big Blue '56 said:


Quote:


In comment 13081183 Beer Man said:


Quote:


Nothing was done during the off-season to change and improve it. At this point its reasonable to believe the O-line will continue to be a major concern; even more so when you look at how poorly they have performed in both preseason games.



Major concern for many on here, but yet we easily could have been 10-6 had we had a D we've hopefully just rebuilt(or on the way to being) last year..And that's with a meh running game



wonder how many of those games with L's in last few minutes of the game, would've been W's if they could run a 4 minute offense by running the ball..which they couldn't then leaving it to all the defenses fault (which D was bad granted)?


Could be..But, we HAD THEM ANYWAY despite a poor/inept running game..If you're saying a decent running game would have helped us avoid being put in the final seconds position in the first place, I'd have to agree..
Pugh didn't play  
RetroJint : 8/22/2016 11:47 am : link
and that means a lot. However, what Giant Fan might have expected was that the line would pick up where they left off last Dec when they looked presentable by & large save for the Vikings game, which really was a case of no Beckham and Eli being Eli against Minny.

Nobody expected these guys to be a great unit. But Flowers is healthy. The guys on the right were together for a good part of last season. They are not old men. These are your 2016 Giants. Play better.
OL  
stretch234 : 8/22/2016 12:10 pm : link
Who were all these OL available to get to help fix this OL

The team has a top C, has a very good LG and and top 10 draft pick at LT -

Here are the FA RT who signed for more than 1 year: M. Schwartz, B. Massie, J. Webb, D. Penn - that is it. There is nothing special there. Did you really want M. Adams as a RT

How about LT - They looked at Okung - he has his issues. Is K. Beachum really a 9M LT. R. harris, C. Hairston & D. Stevenson - really.

Guards: K. Osemele, B. Brooks, J. Allen, JR. Sweazy & A. Boone all signed for over 6.7M per year, with Osemele at 11M. Is that list really that inspiring. Is Osemele worth 27M more than Yanda who is a better player

Do the Chargers have any remorse on signing O. Franklin in 2015 for his hefty price. He missed 6 games and was not good when he did play

It is hard to find OL
RE: OL  
Beer Man : 8/22/2016 12:30 pm : link
In comment 13081297 stretch234 said:
Quote:
Who were all these OL available to get to help fix this OL

The team has a top C, has a very good LG and and top 10 draft pick at LT -

Here are the FA RT who signed for more than 1 year: M. Schwartz, B. Massie, J. Webb, D. Penn - that is it. There is nothing special there. Did you really want M. Adams as a RT

How about LT - They looked at Okung - he has his issues. Is K. Beachum really a 9M LT. R. harris, C. Hairston & D. Stevenson - really.

Guards: K. Osemele, B. Brooks, J. Allen, JR. Sweazy & A. Boone all signed for over 6.7M per year, with Osemele at 11M. Is that list really that inspiring. Is Osemele worth 27M more than Yanda who is a better player

Do the Chargers have any remorse on signing O. Franklin in 2015 for his hefty price. He missed 6 games and was not good when he did play

It is hard to find OL
No one is saying it isn't hard, but regardless of reason, the problems with the right side of the O-line were not addressed this past off-season.
IT'S PRESEASON  
Kevin(formerly Tiki4Six) : 8/22/2016 12:59 pm : link
did they look good.... Heck no...

But it's obvious they tried to come out and run the ball to the right. Which is what these meaningless games are for.

Regular season, they will Pass to set up the run.
forget the O-line blocking...  
SHO'NUFF : 8/22/2016 4:15 pm : link
we should be worried about the TE blocking...
RE: I get tired trying to get my point across, but if FMiC et  
shabu : 8/22/2016 8:58 pm : link
In comment 13081050 Big Blue '56 said:
Quote:
continue to try, then I will continue as well..

This is about sorting out the roster, who fits best where and who stands the best chance to move this team forward. They only have 12-13 practices, an in and out process of evaluation each game. You will NEVER see continuity during pre-season, especially with the constant shuffling and vanilla O and D...Some teams look great during pre-season, others don't. Either way it MEANS NOTHING or very little. In fact you're not going to see major continuity until at least a fourth of the season has played out, regardless of record, imv..

I perused the PFT headlines this morning and noted that Seattle and Philly are still addressing their OL..Most others are doubtless doing the same


This is true, i don't recall a pre-season without "issues" under coughlin, but the giants were pretty competitive week 1 most years.

I know its hard for many to be patient, but its likely going to take time for a team to gel with this many changes... try to just enjoy folks !
RE: I think the OL..  
joe48 : 8/22/2016 9:49 pm : link
In comment 13081043 FatMan in Charlotte said:
Quote:
is adequate enough to keep us a top 10 offense. Solari's coaching should pay dividends as well.

I'm the first to admit that evaluating the OL is tough because it is the unit on the field that the average fan has the least amount of info. Most of us don't know what to look for and we sure as hell don't know what the scheme is supposed to be to see if the players are adhering to it properly. The "name players" we know are ones that talking heads discuss, but we have very little first-hand knowledge on who is good and who isn't.
We were really not a top 10 offense. That stat is so misleading. We never could establish a running game and were forced to pass extensively in the 2nd half of games. Gained a lot of yards trying to catch up. We could not score in the red zone. Our offense was Eli to Beckham.
Why couldn't we move the ball on the ground against 2 mediocre teams. I am tired of watching our Oline get pushed around even in preseason.

And to proclaim the OL shitty, great or mediocre based on two preseason games is pretty bad. It is even bad to make a determination after 4 preseason games, but people do it anyway. My take is that the OL needs to maintain status quo from last year and teh improvements on the D should translate into 3-4 more wins, which will be good enough for a playoff berth.
Funny how our mediocre opponents perform at a higher level  
joe48 : 8/22/2016 9:56 pm : link
Our Oline got pushed around the last 2 games. We are not physical enough.
Do you not..  
FatMan in Charlotte : 8/22/2016 10:12 pm : link
realize it is preseason? The quality of the opponent rarely matters. The past 10 SB winners combined are under .500 in the preseason.

You're tired of seeing us pushed around? When the starters left the first game, we were up 10-0. Man, those "mediocre opponents" were just kicking the shit out of us!
I think the biggest problem people have is that  
Essex : 8/22/2016 10:27 pm : link
they thought we could fix this mess in one year. The OL is not good, and we didn't have a good chance to upgrade there. Flowers is a huge question mark. I thought the Giants spent their money wisely in the off season and saw no real good opportunities to upgrade at OL. If the Giants want to wait until next year to do so after hopefully finding out if Flowers is really a LT instead of a RG/RT, I can't fault that plan. I mean it is a lot different cost wise if you need to upgrade at LT as opposed to RT and I didn't see any cant miss guys worth spending on this offseason. We forget as inconsistent as our OL was last year we still did enough offensively in many games to win and have top 10 offense. We allocated our resources correctly, imv given our needs and what was out there.
a whole off season  
Paulie Walnuts : 8/23/2016 12:15 am : link
and we have the same right side of the line and zero quality depth

that is a sin with a HOF QB finishing his last few years
Back to the Corner