Our starting offensive line does not look like they have regressed from last year. The problem is the supporting cast and backups have. Hart, Vereen, and Malleck all missed multiple assignments or were simply beaten. I'm not saying our offensive line did not miss some assignments, they clearly did, but you cannot have everybody missing assignments. With Pugh going in that solves the Hart problem. The Vereen is proven and just had a bad couple of plays. And hopefully we can get Will back as a blocking tight end. I believe that will solve a lot of problems. We will then be back to "simply" having to worry about an average offensive line with no depth.
We need another Boothe.
I thought the Oline was getting pushed back pretty hard also... did that not show up in review ?
If we can get Bobby Hart playing better than Newhouse, we have a chance at an above average OL.
Didn't zone in on Flowers' pass set, but he didn't seem to be a liability.
We are a right guard or right tackle away from being good. The lack of depth is a real issue. I would expect we add someone via Cuts or trade. We need an extra player.
Anyone check out Stingly?
Yep they sucked. and the depth is horrifying. OL Will be the weak link all year.
I still don't get how we didn't address it.
Flowers-Pugh-Richburg-Jerry-Trade
Hart-Newhouse-trade or FA as depth...
thats three servicable backups
1st - Blitzing LB brought down Jennings, no one bothered to look at him
2nd - Good protection completed pass
3rd - Manning tripped
4th - DL stood up OL for no gain
5th - OL stood up by DL, 2 yd gain
1st- TE couldn't block, no gain on run
2nd - Hole there but Vareen only got 3 yds
3rd - Pass blitz and sack by LB, rb (Vareen) no where to be found
1st- Good pass protection, completion to Donnell (who of course immediately falls to the ground)
2nd - Jennings for 3 yds
3rd- TE Mallack gets abused, Jennings loses 5 yds. Everything else looked good,could have been a good run
4th - Fine, completed pass to Vareen
5th - Decent but not great protection, Eli had to let it go 1 second too early and under threw Cruz
1st- Good protection, but OBJ pulled up on route, so the Manning pass was an Int
1st - Decent protection, completed pass to OBJ
2nd - Quick pass complete to Shepard, but Revis tackles him for no gain
3rd - False start on Hart
4th - Good protection, completed to Adams
5th - Safety blitz, no one picked it up, Vareen hit behind the line
6th - Donnell misses the pre-snap read on a blitz, so he doesn't look for the pass
7th - Blitz not picked up, not sure where the RB or TE was. DL looked picked up, but blitzers ran free. Incomplete
1st - good protection, Eli just missed OBJ on the sideline
2nd - delayed draw, no gain, brought down by LB
3rd - draw, good run by Vareen but not enough for first (9 yds).
both are good players, but the OL is a joke and Reese blows
he had this off season to fix it, and did nothing, this is almost criminal
HOF QB, and they put this line in front of him? fucking pissed
We also had several runs where we ended up with a TE trying to handle Wilkerson 1-on-1 and we're not just talking a quick seal where the formation put them in a favorable angle - we're talking turning him out of the hole.
Not sure if we're having communication issues or limiting changes at the line but I'd think some of that would be stuff we'd check out of. Maybe it was just putting the TE's feet to fire and see who could handle it. WTF knows...
Bottom line? We can do rather well with what we fielded on O last year. We also have added Shepard and (hopefully) Cruz..The D (on paper) shoukd be much better this season, imv..THAT is what was needed to compete with the big boys
I was referring to the overall O..We were one of the best last year...True, had we had a decent running game, we wouldn't have put ourselves into 4 last play situations. But, had we had this year's D (on paper) for those 4 last play losses, we're 10-6 and Eli's in the playoffs..
I don't care HOW we move the ball, as long as we can out up points as we did last year. And yes, ideally a solid running game would make it a lot easier, but improving the D was, to this fan, the number 1 priority
If none of these guys can dominate one on one matchups then what do you expect from them in " meaningful" play? They won't magically get tougher.
Free agency had more defensive solutions than offensive ones. So they clearly went with what the market had to offer.
A rookie offensive linemen isn't fixing this line. Rookies have been our best players the last two years. If rookies are your best players, your team is garbage.
Perkins??! I'miss no draft guru, but I doubt taking Perkins in the 5th came at the expense of a lineman who'd help us out this year.
Quote:
Until you get into meaningful games with live game planning. You can't compare performances in preseason to regular season. This isn't an Oline that is going to dominate one on one matchups. You have to wait and see how they perform in meaningful play. And as McAdoo said, it hasn't all been on the line.
If none of these guys can dominate one on one matchups then what do you expect from them in " meaningful" play? They won't magically get tougher.