for display only
Big Blue Interactive The Corner Forum  
Back to the Corner

Archived Thread

The much maligned shotgun draw

jcn56 : 9/19/2016 11:59 am
I'll preface this with the caveat that I saw only bits of the game yesterday as I was at an event, but having read the game thread and some of the others, it seems people are once again out to get the shotgun draw.

Don't get me wrong - from my incomplete viewing of the game it does seem like we got a bit conservative and tried to force the run, but the shotgun draw around here has become the offensive analog to the zone blitz - people have seen it not work a few times and they want it ripped from the playbook entirely.

I like the play - certainly not crazy with the call in certain circumstances (and it's a play that I think gets audibled in and out of plenty, so sometimes you hate it but it was plan B because there was nothing else available). Given the personnel on the field and the flexibility, and Eli's ability to read and adjust to defenses, I think it's a great tool for this offense.

So I'm curious - if you hate the play, what's your reasoning?
I dont really think its a draw  
cjac : 9/19/2016 12:02 pm : link
Its just a running play

Eli being under center makes no difference. its just a running play
I don't hate it  
mfsd : 9/19/2016 12:02 pm : link
I agree that I think Eli audibles to it often if he thinks we have an opening.

I also think there's value in running it a few times to set up play action, and lure the linebackers and safeties into creeping up

practise audibling into a double reverse pass  
gtt350 : 9/19/2016 12:02 pm : link
just to entertain us and freak the other team out
what I really hated  
giantfan2000 : 9/19/2016 12:03 pm : link
was when we were on the goal line and RB was lined up as WR and then Eli brought him in motion to be in the back field ..
and then boom shotgun draw
this fool NOONE

but now that they did this play
I just hope they do this again when they are close to the goal line sometime in the future and fake the handoff and throw the ball
It's not the play  
djl8699 : 9/19/2016 12:04 pm : link
that sucks. Its that they seemed to run it almost every first down. I personally have no problem with the play. I only think they should run behind the left side of the line more instead of behind Newhouse and Jerry.
I don't haytes the play  
gidiefor : Mod : 9/19/2016 12:04 pm : link
but yesterday's version of it -- was -- well --- awkward as all get out
The fact that people maligning the play  
Enoch : 9/19/2016 12:04 pm : link
continue to refer to a power run-- complete with pulling Guard-- as a "draw" tells me exactly how much to care about their opinions.

That said, NYG has run a couple of actual draws this season, which isn't something that we've seen much of from them since Tiki was the guy getting the handoff.
This is not a draw. - ( New Window )
It's not being used properly IMO  
Mike in Long Beach : 9/19/2016 12:06 pm : link
That play has actually worked wonders for us when mounting a comeback, but in tight games where the run is still an expected part of the gameplan.. it simpkly doesn't work.
Idiots that hate the play  
Young Elijah : 9/19/2016 12:07 pm : link
look at it as a stand alone play and result. Thats just plain stupid. First of all, we have a decent amount of success with the play overall, I would venture to guess our average yards per carry on the play is not far behind the league average on any run play. Secondly, being able to run out of a pass formation gives us endless opportunities, hence it being our go-to. Thirdly, and most important. The consistency in which we use it, keeps teams honest. There is no greater evidence of this than the multitude of play action passes that Eli completed in the 5-12 yard range yesterday and for the past few years.

For those that hate the play so much, add in the production gained from the play action out of the same looks and average it all out - then see if youre complaining, bc none of that is possible without dedication to actually running it, successful or not.
RE: practise audibling into a double reverse pass  
jcn56 : 9/19/2016 12:09 pm : link
In comment 13130262 gtt350 said:
Quote:
just to entertain us and freak the other team out


I love Eli, but something tells me trying a double reverse might end up with one of the most comically tragic results of his career, no thanks.
It serves a purpose, for sure  
Johnny5 : 9/19/2016 12:10 pm : link
But we historically (and presently) run it way too much for my tastes.
Bah, and of course I read double reverse  
jcn56 : 9/19/2016 12:10 pm : link
but was thinking flea flicker...
Not sure why anyone would be against  
widmerseyebrow : 9/19/2016 12:12 pm : link
the one thing that prevents the defense from dropping 8 people into coverage.
Running from the shotgun  
PEEJ : 9/19/2016 12:15 pm : link
can be limiting. Almost always if the back is to the QB's right, the run will be left and vice versa. There are a few wrinkles that we haven't seen yet. The pitch wide to the same side as the RB and the fake with an end around. I don't think play action works as well either.
I don't hate the play......  
Simms11 : 9/19/2016 12:17 pm : link
it's just that we don't execute it all that well and it looks like a bad play for us most of the time.
RE: RE: practise audibling into a double reverse pass  
gtt350 : 9/19/2016 12:19 pm : link
In comment 13130284 jcn56 said:
Quote:
In comment 13130262 gtt350 said:


Quote:


just to entertain us and freak the other team out

but you would be entertained

I love Eli, but something tells me trying a double reverse might end up with one of the most comically tragic results of his career, no thanks.
It's often how it's used that drives us crazy, IMO.  
Crispino : 9/19/2016 12:32 pm : link
Seriously, who here hasn't said out loud "here comes the draw" and sure enough, they run it for no gain. It seems so predictable. Incomplete pass, followed by draw for little or no gain on second down, leaving us in third and long.
think the bashing is largely  
ColHowPepper : 9/19/2016 12:35 pm : link
the result of personnel limitations, as others have suggested. We haven't had a reliable, powerful ground game in years. An effective running attack makes the passing game that much more credible: without that, when Eli drops back or is in shotgun, the Saints (and other d's) are not selling out.

A day like yesterday when the passing game was the only game working should have been a good set-up for the draw, but it wasn't because a mediocre Saints' d was able to drop six and adequately defend with five, or even four, because they were getting penetration. The OL has trouble with stunts, leaving big gaps, and our TEs can't block.

During the Pats' (?) exhibition, or maybe Jets, we ran TKing on a fake handoff and end around that worked well: but success depends on the contain and seal at the point of attack. We need to show some variation out of the set, successful variation.
Yeah its very predictable  
giantgiantfan : 9/19/2016 12:41 pm : link
despite that we have some success with it. I feel the play calling is very predictable. I watched the Sunday night game with some Packers fans, they said the same thing of their offense. Is it a packers tree thing? Or is it an every fan thing? Who knows.
RE: I dont really think its a draw  
OntheRoad : 9/19/2016 12:55 pm : link
In comment 13130259 cjac said:
Quote:
Its just a running play

Eli being under center makes no difference. its just a running play

I believe the key element of a draw is that it simulates a passing play in the same way a play-action pass simulates a running play.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draw_play
RE: Idiots that hate the play  
stillpoe : 9/19/2016 12:56 pm : link
In comment 13130279 Young Elijah said:
Quote:
look at it as a stand alone play and result. Thats just plain stupid. First of all, we have a decent amount of success with the play overall, I would venture to guess our average yards per carry on the play is not far behind the league average on any run play. Secondly, being able to run out of a pass formation gives us endless opportunities, hence it being our go-to. Thirdly, and most important. The consistency in which we use it, keeps teams honest. There is no greater evidence of this than the multitude of play action passes that Eli completed in the 5-12 yard range yesterday and for the past few years.

For those that hate the play so much, add in the production gained from the play action out of the same looks and average it all out - then see if youre complaining, bc none of that is possible without dedication to actually running it, successful or not.


I get the frustration when it doesn't work, but it's like any play - you call it in anticipation of something and trust your teammates to do the rest. Often times, they audible to this play because Eli reads the defense and decides that the play called (regardless of what it originally was) would not be a good play against the current alignment based on what they saw on film. Sometimes it results in a good gain and other times it's stuffed. It doesn't necessarily make it a bad call, but maybe just the execution end (or the defense doing a good job) failed. Eli has to trust his team, trust the system, and trust his own judgment of the pre-snap read.
my objection is  
ed90631 : 9/19/2016 1:00 pm : link
he hands the ball to a runner who is standing still.
everyone on the defense seems to have time to adjust and attack the ball carrier before he reaches full speed.

virtually every other running play involves handing the ball to a running back who is already on the move, hopefully towards the goal line, who has a better chance of gaining a yard or two at least before the defense reacts.

right of wrong I hate the play because it seems to not work very often, often losing yardage.

RE: Idiots that hate the play  
ed90631 : 9/19/2016 1:03 pm : link
In comment 13130279 Young Elijah said:
Idiots? up yours.
I don't hate it and it has a purpose  
PatersonPlank : 9/19/2016 1:06 pm : link
Its our standard running play out of a shotgun formation. If the defense changes then Eli audibles to to. I don't even consider it a real draw play.
RE: my objection is  
jcn56 : 9/19/2016 1:14 pm : link
In comment 13130454 ed90631 said:
Quote:
he hands the ball to a runner who is standing still.
everyone on the defense seems to have time to adjust and attack the ball carrier before he reaches full speed.

virtually every other running play involves handing the ball to a running back who is already on the move, hopefully towards the goal line, who has a better chance of gaining a yard or two at least before the defense reacts.

right of wrong I hate the play because it seems to not work very often, often losing yardage.


Not everyone though - someone on the D has to be accounting for the runner, who could just as easily break off into a route and have to be covered. I think the fact that he's not moving towards the LOS at the snap makes the play more versatile.
How is it much maligned?  
AP in Halfmoon : 9/19/2016 1:22 pm : link
From game threads? It's probably the common play in football and will be here as long as Eli is QB
RE: How is it much maligned?  
jcn56 : 9/19/2016 1:22 pm : link
In comment 13130516 AP in Halfmoon said:
Quote:
From game threads? It's probably the common play in football and will be here as long as Eli is QB


Can you think of an offensive play that gets crapped on more often on BBI than the shotgun draw?
RE: I dont really think its a draw  
Giants2012 : 9/19/2016 1:23 pm : link
In comment 13130259 cjac said:
Quote:
Its just a running play

Eli being under center makes no difference. its just a running play


+1

I also think the slight delay allows the OL to make their blocks (especially if the guard pulls).
It's a basic football play  
HomerJones45 : 9/19/2016 1:26 pm : link
, used by all teams, and has been since the renovation of the shotgun formation. It's not some exotic running play.
It seems to me that yesterday we had some  
Thunderstruck27 : 9/19/2016 1:45 pm : link
success with it early and just kept trying to force it. I didn't like the call on 2nd and goal from the 1 with Vereen moving horizontal across the line. I get that we were trying to spread the defense but he had barely any momentum to move a pile when there was no hole
Put me in the "I hate it" category"  
George from PA : 9/19/2016 2:22 pm : link
when it's called twice on 1st and 2nd down from the 2 yard line with both WR wide open....especially when failing to convert a TD on 3rd and 4th down against a team like the NO Saints.

I do not view myself an idiot with a 144 IQ, won a HS state championship playing in the backfield, recruited by Div. 3 colleges but settle on playing rugby for 20 years :)
The old school classic plays  
idiotsavant : 9/19/2016 2:38 pm : link
Always have a role if you know when to call them.

Right now maybe the designed QB runs off misdirection and or clearing the dbs via wr routes away from the play .

Obviously we dont want to risk the QB right now though.

Overall, very simple very quick to develop RB runs towards the center gaps,..you really need those to keep the DL s from teeing off.ditto quick to stsrt FB type runs, QB sneaks, under center formations , plays that don't have an iota of delay about them.
Too many here just lump all shotgun runs  
Matt M. : 9/19/2016 2:41 pm : link
as a draw. The Giants do run often out of the shotgun, but they do not run the draw all that often.
Posters complain all the time about how predictable  
SwirlingEddie : 9/19/2016 2:53 pm : link
the 'shotgun draw' is, but I would bet you if I showed you 20 pre-snap images of our shotgun formation with 1 RB in the backfield, most BBI posters couldn't correctly identify what the ensuing play call was any better than 50% random guessing would.

Also keep in mind that the shotgun handoff isn't the same run every time. Sometimes it follows the pulling RG (the "Jerry Curl" as I like to call it), other times it is a quick pitch off tackle, and others it's a cutback to the right.

Remember, it was this same maligned run play that helped us run down the clock so effectively against Dallas in Week 1. Yes, I was disappointed we didn't run as effectively against the Saints, but one poor week after one good one is hardly a sound basis for condemning the strategy.
People forget that it's often automatic or a check at the line  
widmerseyebrow : 9/19/2016 2:55 pm : link
Based on the defensive front.
Running plays are always predictable and sucky  
AP in Halfmoon : 9/19/2016 2:56 pm : link
when they gain less than 2 yards. They're awesome when you gaining 4 +
I wish we'd finally run some trick plays...  
jnoble : 9/19/2016 3:01 pm : link
...now that Mr Conservative No Funny Stuff Coughlin isn't here anymore...a flea flicker, HB option pass, fake punt....something out of ordinary. Hell, Dan Reeves's playbook was straight from 1955 and HE called the flea flicker with us at least a couple times a year!
I mean  
idiotsavant : 9/19/2016 3:06 pm : link
Never equate simplicity with stupidity.

In this context it all depends in situation and what a D throws at you.

Wide 9? Boom, run it super quick straight middle.
It is..  
FatMan in Charlotte : 9/19/2016 3:32 pm : link
an IQ test of sorts. When I hear people screaming about the play, I know they really aren't going to give an analytic view - and that's fine. You can even be disappointed when it is used, but without that inside handoff, a lot of plays, especially around the goalline aren't as effective, including the plays to Donnell and Cruz that we've seen already this year. Watch how it freezes the LB's. That alone makes the play worth running.
I wish we actually ran that play on 3rd and 2  
SHO'NUFF : 9/20/2016 2:29 am : link
into the endzone...before the failed 4th down pass. I didn't like the play selection nor the execution. I liked the aggressiveness, though. I still would've walked away with 3 had the run out of shotgun failed.
Back to the Corner