Police were going to let it go and continue on their original mission until an officer spotted a weapon in the vehicle, Putney said.
“It was not lawful for him to possess a firearm,” Putney said. “There was a crime he committed and the gun exacerbated the situation.
Given that NC is an open carry state, how did they know that this individual in particular having a gun in his vehicle was a crime? Did they stop and do a backgroup check before gunning him down?
Police were going to let it go and continue on their original mission until an officer spotted a weapon in the vehicle, Putney said.
“It was not lawful for him to possess a firearm,” Putney said. “There was a crime he committed and the gun exacerbated the situation.
Given that NC is an open carry state, how did they know that this individual in particular having a gun in his vehicle was a crime? Did they stop and do a backgroup check before gunning him down?
Link - ( New Window )
Open carrying and brandishing a firearm are two different things.
Police were going to let it go and continue on their original mission until an officer spotted a weapon in the vehicle, Putney said.
“It was not lawful for him to possess a firearm,” Putney said. “There was a crime he committed and the gun exacerbated the situation.
Given that NC is an open carry state, how did they know that this individual in particular having a gun in his vehicle was a crime? Did they stop and do a backgroup check before gunning him down?
Link - ( New Window )
Ran his plates? I don't know for sure in this instance, but you may be surprised at how many people get their plates run on a daily basis. Considering the situation, is it really surprising if they called in a plate check and found he was a convicted felon?
Police were going to let it go and continue on their original mission until an officer spotted a weapon in the vehicle, Putney said.
“It was not lawful for him to possess a firearm,” Putney said. “There was a crime he committed and the gun exacerbated the situation.
Given that NC is an open carry state, how did they know that this individual in particular having a gun in his vehicle was a crime? Did they stop and do a backgroup check before gunning him down?
Link - ( New Window )
Legal or not is irrelevant. Even if you are carrying a legal gun and the police order you to drop it and you refuse to do so after multiple orders they will view you as a threat.
Police were going to let it go and continue on their original mission until an officer spotted a weapon in the vehicle, Putney said.
“It was not lawful for him to possess a firearm,” Putney said. “There was a crime he committed and the gun exacerbated the situation.
Given that NC is an open carry state, how did they know that this individual in particular having a gun in his vehicle was a crime? Did they stop and do a backgroup check before gunning him down?
Link - ( New Window )
They witnessed drugs and a gun-a big no no. I'll post a press release in a second.
Quote:They are rioting because they are being paid too by Soros, and other ultra-liberal big $ backers. I saw a stat somewhere that 70% of the people arrested in Charlotte were from out of state.
I don't know how after reading that any reasonable person would fault the police officers.
It depends how people came into this thinking. With many, they make their minds up before any facts come out, then try to defend their initial thoughts at all costs. Truth be damned. If someone decided initially that the cops killed a black man without reason, they will always feel that way. No matter what comes out.
Quote:They are rioting because they are being paid too by Soros, and other ultra-liberal big $ backers. I saw a stat somewhere that 70% of the people arrested in Charlotte were from out of state.
Holy whack-a-doodle!
Stop with the "wackadoodle" stuff just because it doesn't fit your narrative. Its all over the news. I linked a video from the Charlotte police.
I don't know how after reading that any reasonable person would fault the police officers.
Of course. I mean, it's not like a police chief would ever write up a self-serving report that shades the truth or ignores facts in order to clear officers of any wrongdoing.
I mean, I'm sure their internal investigation showed that all relevant procedures were followed to the letter and the shooting was completely justified. And shouldn't that be enough for anyone?
PatersonPlank : 7:52 pm : link : reply
I saw a stat somewhere that 70% of the people arrested in Charlotte were from out of state.
Quote:
Charlotte police union official acknowledges ‘I didn’t quote facts’ on out-of-state protesters
Yep I found the article in the Charlotte Observer. The quote is "Of the 43 people arrested late Wednesday night and early Thursday morning, 34 – or 79 percent – live in Charlotte, the Observer found. Most of the others live elsewhere in North Carolina, including Albemarle, Gastonia and Greensboro. Three others were arrested Thursday night; of those, two were from Charlotte and the third had not been identified by midafternoon Friday.
“I didn’t quote facts,” Todd Walther, spokesman for the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Fraternal Order of Police told the Observer on Friday. “It’s speculation. That’s all it was.”"
It's almost impossible to say that this was anything other than police doing their job with a lot of restraint and proper procedure, even to go as far as putting police vests on.
However, anyone who lumps this event with that of Tulsa from either side to bolster their own arguments are still assholes. That one was a total fuckup on the female officer. This one was an unfortunate case of a police officer doing what he had to do based on the continued and apparent threat.
I don't know how after reading that any reasonable person would fault the police officers.
Of course. I mean, it's not like a police chief would ever write up a self-serving report that shades the truth or ignores facts in order to clear officers of any wrongdoing.
I mean, I'm sure their internal investigation showed that all relevant procedures were followed to the letter and the shooting was completely justified. And shouldn't that be enough for anyone?
Whenever there is a shooting like this there is always an investigation. Evidence needs to be supported.
Odd your take is to automatically assume the police lied at the scene and I guess planted evidence and that there is now an organized cover up from the department.
Even if you have that much disdain for police do you really think so many involved would so casually risk personal ruin?
I'm with you. While there's a chance that what was reported may have not been 100% truthful, to automatically accuse them of lying seems to be extremely cynical to the point of conspiracy theory seeking.
I don't know how after reading that any reasonable person would fault the police officers.
Of course. I mean, it's not like a police chief would ever write up a self-serving report that shades the truth or ignores facts in order to clear officers of any wrongdoing.
I mean, I'm sure their internal investigation showed that all relevant procedures were followed to the letter and the shooting was completely justified. And shouldn't that be enough for anyone?
Whenever there is a shooting like this there is always an investigation. Evidence needs to be supported.
Odd your take is to automatically assume the police lied at the scene and I guess planted evidence and that there is now an organized cover up from the department.
Even if you have that much disdain for police do you really think so many involved would so casually risk personal ruin?
No matter the evidence some people refuse to change their opinion when police are involved. Im not surprised at his position even after everything was released.
Veteran who deployed once, never fired weapon, now expert on police use of force
THE INTERNET — Army veteran Ryan Smith, who deployed once to Iraq in 2011 and never fired his weapon in anger, has now transferred these experiences into critiquing police use of force within the United States on social media, sources confirm.
I don't know how after reading that any reasonable person would fault the police officers.
Of course. I mean, it's not like a police chief would ever write up a self-serving report that shades the truth or ignores facts in order to clear officers of any wrongdoing.
I mean, I'm sure their internal investigation showed that all relevant procedures were followed to the letter and the shooting was completely justified. And shouldn't that be enough for anyone?
Holy crap Gary!! That is all I can say.
My first response on this thread.
Just what are your credentials and education to make such a statement?
What is your knowledge of criminal investigations and what procedures must be followed before the Chief of a major city and county could make that statement under the review of the federal attorney general and the states attorneys general offices?
You truly don't think that an African American Police Chief with the eyes of the nation on him just shot off from the hip?
With all due respect, you're an idiot for making that statement.
Pretty concerning the police caved to the mob mentality Â
Releasing the videos only makes sense from the standpoint of potentially stopping rioting. Decisions on whether the officers made a huge mistake or no mistakes or should be charged should not be done in the court of public opinion.
Quote:They are rioting because they are being paid too by Soros, and other ultra-liberal big $ backers. I saw a stat somewhere that 70% of the people arrested in Charlotte were from out of state.
Holy whack-a-doodle!
Nice try but I never posted that.
I dare you to find it not highlighted in yellow
Wacko
Is the in thing to do. You will never change their minds. Its about fight the Authority and Peter Pan syndrome. To make the Authority the bad guy.
Yet life is about choices and our choices lead to consequences. Do I obey the Law and stay on the right path or do I do what I want. Do I escape reality and do drugs, If I don't have money for something I want I steal it. Hell nobody tells me what and what not I can do. I think both dead men fell into this category.
This sidewalk was turned into a memorial of sorts, with the names of various black people killed by the police. The name in the foreground, Dahir Adan, is the guy who went on a stabbing rampage through a mall in Minnesota. Outstanding work there.
Just so you know, "hitting a nerve" can fall into at least two categories.
There's the "someone just posted an uncomfortable truth" category.
And then there is the "oh my god, that comment is fucking nuts" category.
Your comment falls nicely and comfortably into the latter. Knowing that you think it falls into the former just turns a few more stomachs, or hits a few more nerves.
I'm not saying anyone is lying
Gary from The East End : Admin : 9/24/2016 9:44 pm : link : reply
I'm saying that the official report of a police chief in this type of situation is essentially worthless.
What the fuck? It isn't just the report. It is the whole series of events. They have the recording of the officers calling in the incident before it escalated. Two plainsclothed officers were in a car waiting to serve a warrant and Scott pulled up next to them, rolled a joint and had a gun in his hand.
They backed the car out, called for backup, and reapproached his vehicle. The call for backup is recorded.
From day one, the police chief has maintained that his officers had reasonable cause, he's admitted that videos don't show the totality of the situation.
It is one thing to think that things aren't as reported, but to insinuate that the report is worthless is just an idiotic take.
Seem to match up pretty well from what I can tell. And unlike the family members account of what happened, the police account of what happened has been pretty consistent since this was first reported.
PatersonPlank : 7:52 pm : link : reply
I saw a stat somewhere that 70% of the people arrested in Charlotte were from out of state.
Quote:
Charlotte police union official acknowledges ‘I didn’t quote facts’ on out-of-state protesters
Yep I found the article in the Charlotte Observer. The quote is "Of the 43 people arrested late Wednesday night and early Thursday morning, 34 – or 79 percent – live in Charlotte, the Observer found. Most of the others live elsewhere in North Carolina, including Albemarle, Gastonia and Greensboro. Three others were arrested Thursday night; of those, two were from Charlotte and the third had not been identified by midafternoon Friday.
“I didn’t quote facts,” Todd Walther, spokesman for the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Fraternal Order of Police told the Observer on Friday. “It’s speculation. That’s all it was.”"
I am so sick of this crap, from both sides.
Oh, so you mean Soros isn't secretly building up an army of professional protesters on his payroll that he flies around from state to state?
I don't know how after reading that any reasonable person would fault the police officers.
Of course. I mean, it's not like a police chief would ever write up a self-serving report that shades the truth or ignores facts in order to clear officers of any wrongdoing.
I mean, I'm sure their internal investigation showed that all relevant procedures were followed to the letter and the shooting was completely justified. And shouldn't that be enough for anyone?
Whenever there is a shooting like this there is always an investigation. Evidence needs to be supported.
Odd your take is to automatically assume the police lied at the scene and I guess planted evidence and that there is now an organized cover up from the department.
Even if you have that much disdain for police do you really think so many involved would so casually risk personal ruin?
No matter the evidence some people refuse to change their opinion when police are involved. Im not surprised at his position even after everything was released.
PatersonPlank : 7:52 pm : link : reply
I saw a stat somewhere that 70% of the people arrested in Charlotte were from out of state.
Quote:
Charlotte police union official acknowledges ‘I didn’t quote facts’ on out-of-state protesters
Yep I found the article in the Charlotte Observer. The quote is "Of the 43 people arrested late Wednesday night and early Thursday morning, 34 – or 79 percent – live in Charlotte, the Observer found. Most of the others live elsewhere in North Carolina, including Albemarle, Gastonia and Greensboro. Three others were arrested Thursday night; of those, two were from Charlotte and the third had not been identified by midafternoon Friday.
“I didn’t quote facts,” Todd Walther, spokesman for the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Fraternal Order of Police told the Observer on Friday. “It’s speculation. That’s all it was.”"
I am so sick of this crap, from both sides.
Oh, so you mean Soros isn't secretly building up an army of professional protesters on his payroll that he flies around from state to state?
Two points for my response. First, the spokesman for the police exaggerated/lied about the 70% stat. After this being pointed out to me I rescinded the comment. How was I supposed to know he was outright lying? Second, Soros has given at least $33 million in one year to support already-established groups that emboldened the grass-roots, on-the-ground activists in Ferguson. This is according to the most recent tax filings of his nonprofit Open Society Foundations. So yes, he is indirectly funding the groups that apply protesters to all these events. There are groups orchestrating things behind the scenes in most of these events.
That body cam is very inconclusive. No way of telling much of anything definitive.
People will see what they want to see with this.
“It was not lawful for him to possess a firearm,” Putney said. “There was a crime he committed and the gun exacerbated the situation.
Given that NC is an open carry state, how did they know that this individual in particular having a gun in his vehicle was a crime? Did they stop and do a backgroup check before gunning him down?
Link - ( New Window )
Quote:
Police were going to let it go and continue on their original mission until an officer spotted a weapon in the vehicle, Putney said.
“It was not lawful for him to possess a firearm,” Putney said. “There was a crime he committed and the gun exacerbated the situation.
Given that NC is an open carry state, how did they know that this individual in particular having a gun in his vehicle was a crime? Did they stop and do a backgroup check before gunning him down?
Link - ( New Window )
Open carrying and brandishing a firearm are two different things.
Quote:
Police were going to let it go and continue on their original mission until an officer spotted a weapon in the vehicle, Putney said.
“It was not lawful for him to possess a firearm,” Putney said. “There was a crime he committed and the gun exacerbated the situation.
Given that NC is an open carry state, how did they know that this individual in particular having a gun in his vehicle was a crime? Did they stop and do a backgroup check before gunning him down?
Link - ( New Window )
Ran his plates? I don't know for sure in this instance, but you may be surprised at how many people get their plates run on a daily basis. Considering the situation, is it really surprising if they called in a plate check and found he was a convicted felon?
Quote:
Police were going to let it go and continue on their original mission until an officer spotted a weapon in the vehicle, Putney said.
“It was not lawful for him to possess a firearm,” Putney said. “There was a crime he committed and the gun exacerbated the situation.
Given that NC is an open carry state, how did they know that this individual in particular having a gun in his vehicle was a crime? Did they stop and do a backgroup check before gunning him down?
Link - ( New Window )
Legal or not is irrelevant. Even if you are carrying a legal gun and the police order you to drop it and you refuse to do so after multiple orders they will view you as a threat.
Quote:
Police were going to let it go and continue on their original mission until an officer spotted a weapon in the vehicle, Putney said.
“It was not lawful for him to possess a firearm,” Putney said. “There was a crime he committed and the gun exacerbated the situation.
Given that NC is an open carry state, how did they know that this individual in particular having a gun in his vehicle was a crime? Did they stop and do a backgroup check before gunning him down?
Link - ( New Window )
They witnessed drugs and a gun-a big no no. I'll post a press release in a second.
Quote:They are rioting because they are being paid too by Soros, and other ultra-liberal big $ backers. I saw a stat somewhere that 70% of the people arrested in Charlotte were from out of state.
Holy whack-a-doodle!
I don't know how after reading that any reasonable person would fault the police officers.
I don't know how after reading that any reasonable person would fault the police officers.
It depends how people came into this thinking. With many, they make their minds up before any facts come out, then try to defend their initial thoughts at all costs. Truth be damned. If someone decided initially that the cops killed a black man without reason, they will always feel that way. No matter what comes out.
Quote:
In comment 13138218 shelovesnycsports said:
Quote:They are rioting because they are being paid too by Soros, and other ultra-liberal big $ backers. I saw a stat somewhere that 70% of the people arrested in Charlotte were from out of state.
Holy whack-a-doodle!
Stop with the "wackadoodle" stuff just because it doesn't fit your narrative. Its all over the news. I linked a video from the Charlotte police.
Link - ( New Window )
Link - ( New Window )
I saw a stat somewhere that 70% of the people arrested in Charlotte were from out of state.
I don't know how after reading that any reasonable person would fault the police officers.
Of course. I mean, it's not like a police chief would ever write up a self-serving report that shades the truth or ignores facts in order to clear officers of any wrongdoing.
I mean, I'm sure their internal investigation showed that all relevant procedures were followed to the letter and the shooting was completely justified. And shouldn't that be enough for anyone?
Quote:
PatersonPlank : 7:52 pm : link : reply
I saw a stat somewhere that 70% of the people arrested in Charlotte were from out of state.
Quote:
Charlotte police union official acknowledges ‘I didn’t quote facts’ on out-of-state protesters
Yep I found the article in the Charlotte Observer. The quote is "Of the 43 people arrested late Wednesday night and early Thursday morning, 34 – or 79 percent – live in Charlotte, the Observer found. Most of the others live elsewhere in North Carolina, including Albemarle, Gastonia and Greensboro. Three others were arrested Thursday night; of those, two were from Charlotte and the third had not been identified by midafternoon Friday.
“I didn’t quote facts,” Todd Walther, spokesman for the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Fraternal Order of Police told the Observer on Friday. “It’s speculation. That’s all it was.”"
I am so sick of this crap, from both sides.
However, anyone who lumps this event with that of Tulsa from either side to bolster their own arguments are still assholes. That one was a total fuckup on the female officer. This one was an unfortunate case of a police officer doing what he had to do based on the continued and apparent threat.
Quote:
Thanks for posting that.
I don't know how after reading that any reasonable person would fault the police officers.
Of course. I mean, it's not like a police chief would ever write up a self-serving report that shades the truth or ignores facts in order to clear officers of any wrongdoing.
I mean, I'm sure their internal investigation showed that all relevant procedures were followed to the letter and the shooting was completely justified. And shouldn't that be enough for anyone?
Whenever there is a shooting like this there is always an investigation. Evidence needs to be supported.
Odd your take is to automatically assume the police lied at the scene and I guess planted evidence and that there is now an organized cover up from the department.
Even if you have that much disdain for police do you really think so many involved would so casually risk personal ruin?
Quote:
In comment 13138976 steve in ky said:
Quote:
Thanks for posting that.
I don't know how after reading that any reasonable person would fault the police officers.
Of course. I mean, it's not like a police chief would ever write up a self-serving report that shades the truth or ignores facts in order to clear officers of any wrongdoing.
I mean, I'm sure their internal investigation showed that all relevant procedures were followed to the letter and the shooting was completely justified. And shouldn't that be enough for anyone?
Whenever there is a shooting like this there is always an investigation. Evidence needs to be supported.
Odd your take is to automatically assume the police lied at the scene and I guess planted evidence and that there is now an organized cover up from the department.
Even if you have that much disdain for police do you really think so many involved would so casually risk personal ruin?
No matter the evidence some people refuse to change their opinion when police are involved. Im not surprised at his position even after everything was released.
THE INTERNET — Army veteran Ryan Smith, who deployed once to Iraq in 2011 and never fired his weapon in anger, has now transferred these experiences into critiquing police use of force within the United States on social media, sources confirm.
Link - ( New Window )
Fool me once....
Quote:
Thanks for posting that.
I don't know how after reading that any reasonable person would fault the police officers.
Of course. I mean, it's not like a police chief would ever write up a self-serving report that shades the truth or ignores facts in order to clear officers of any wrongdoing.
I mean, I'm sure their internal investigation showed that all relevant procedures were followed to the letter and the shooting was completely justified. And shouldn't that be enough for anyone?
Holy crap Gary!! That is all I can say.
My first response on this thread.
Just what are your credentials and education to make such a statement?
What is your knowledge of criminal investigations and what procedures must be followed before the Chief of a major city and county could make that statement under the review of the federal attorney general and the states attorneys general offices?
You truly don't think that an African American Police Chief with the eyes of the nation on him just shot off from the hip?
With all due respect, you're an idiot for making that statement.
Quote:
In comment 13138218 shelovesnycsports said:
Quote:They are rioting because they are being paid too by Soros, and other ultra-liberal big $ backers. I saw a stat somewhere that 70% of the people arrested in Charlotte were from out of state.
Holy whack-a-doodle!
Nice try but I never posted that.
I dare you to find it not highlighted in yellow
Wacko
Yet life is about choices and our choices lead to consequences. Do I obey the Law and stay on the right path or do I do what I want. Do I escape reality and do drugs, If I don't have money for something I want I steal it. Hell nobody tells me what and what not I can do. I think both dead men fell into this category.
THIS IS WHAT I POSTED.
Must have hit a nerve
This sidewalk was turned into a memorial of sorts, with the names of various black people killed by the police. The name in the foreground, Dahir Adan, is the guy who went on a stabbing rampage through a mall in Minnesota. Outstanding work there.
There's the "someone just posted an uncomfortable truth" category.
And then there is the "oh my god, that comment is fucking nuts" category.
Your comment falls nicely and comfortably into the latter. Knowing that you think it falls into the former just turns a few more stomachs, or hits a few more nerves.
Gary from The East End : Admin : 9/24/2016 9:44 pm : link : reply
I'm saying that the official report of a police chief in this type of situation is essentially worthless.
What the fuck? It isn't just the report. It is the whole series of events. They have the recording of the officers calling in the incident before it escalated. Two plainsclothed officers were in a car waiting to serve a warrant and Scott pulled up next to them, rolled a joint and had a gun in his hand.
They backed the car out, called for backup, and reapproached his vehicle. The call for backup is recorded.
From day one, the police chief has maintained that his officers had reasonable cause, he's admitted that videos don't show the totality of the situation.
It is one thing to think that things aren't as reported, but to insinuate that the report is worthless is just an idiotic take.
Seem to match up pretty well from what I can tell. And unlike the family members account of what happened, the police account of what happened has been pretty consistent since this was first reported.
Quote:
Quote:
PatersonPlank : 7:52 pm : link : reply
I saw a stat somewhere that 70% of the people arrested in Charlotte were from out of state.
Quote:
Charlotte police union official acknowledges ‘I didn’t quote facts’ on out-of-state protesters
Yep I found the article in the Charlotte Observer. The quote is "Of the 43 people arrested late Wednesday night and early Thursday morning, 34 – or 79 percent – live in Charlotte, the Observer found. Most of the others live elsewhere in North Carolina, including Albemarle, Gastonia and Greensboro. Three others were arrested Thursday night; of those, two were from Charlotte and the third had not been identified by midafternoon Friday.
“I didn’t quote facts,” Todd Walther, spokesman for the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Fraternal Order of Police told the Observer on Friday. “It’s speculation. That’s all it was.”"
I am so sick of this crap, from both sides.
Oh, so you mean Soros isn't secretly building up an army of professional protesters on his payroll that he flies around from state to state?
Quote:
In comment 13138989 Gary from The East End said:
Quote:
In comment 13138976 steve in ky said:
Quote:
Thanks for posting that.
I don't know how after reading that any reasonable person would fault the police officers.
Of course. I mean, it's not like a police chief would ever write up a self-serving report that shades the truth or ignores facts in order to clear officers of any wrongdoing.
I mean, I'm sure their internal investigation showed that all relevant procedures were followed to the letter and the shooting was completely justified. And shouldn't that be enough for anyone?
Whenever there is a shooting like this there is always an investigation. Evidence needs to be supported.
Odd your take is to automatically assume the police lied at the scene and I guess planted evidence and that there is now an organized cover up from the department.
Even if you have that much disdain for police do you really think so many involved would so casually risk personal ruin?
No matter the evidence some people refuse to change their opinion when police are involved. Im not surprised at his position even after everything was released.
Pot, meet Kettle.
Quote:
In comment 13138985 GiantFilthy said:
Quote:
Quote:
PatersonPlank : 7:52 pm : link : reply
I saw a stat somewhere that 70% of the people arrested in Charlotte were from out of state.
Quote:
Charlotte police union official acknowledges ‘I didn’t quote facts’ on out-of-state protesters
Yep I found the article in the Charlotte Observer. The quote is "Of the 43 people arrested late Wednesday night and early Thursday morning, 34 – or 79 percent – live in Charlotte, the Observer found. Most of the others live elsewhere in North Carolina, including Albemarle, Gastonia and Greensboro. Three others were arrested Thursday night; of those, two were from Charlotte and the third had not been identified by midafternoon Friday.
“I didn’t quote facts,” Todd Walther, spokesman for the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Fraternal Order of Police told the Observer on Friday. “It’s speculation. That’s all it was.”"
I am so sick of this crap, from both sides.
Oh, so you mean Soros isn't secretly building up an army of professional protesters on his payroll that he flies around from state to state?
Two points for my response. First, the spokesman for the police exaggerated/lied about the 70% stat. After this being pointed out to me I rescinded the comment. How was I supposed to know he was outright lying? Second, Soros has given at least $33 million in one year to support already-established groups that emboldened the grass-roots, on-the-ground activists in Ferguson. This is according to the most recent tax filings of his nonprofit Open Society Foundations. So yes, he is indirectly funding the groups that apply protesters to all these events. There are groups orchestrating things behind the scenes in most of these events.
He documented gave 650k recently to BLM, he and his foundation denied it, but then hackers revealed the truth.
Hackers may be criminal, but these days I trust them much more than the MSM or even most people.
He documented gave 650k recently to BLM, he and his foundation denied it, but then hackers revealed the truth.
Hackers may be criminal, but these days I trust them much more than the MSM or even most people.
And the Koch brothers slated $889 million for political spending for 2016. What's the point here.
Quote:
absolutely funds and encourages the protestors or even just lobbyism/social activism.
He documented gave 650k recently to BLM, he and his foundation denied it, but then hackers revealed the truth.
Hackers may be criminal, but these days I trust them much more than the MSM or even most people.
And the Koch brothers slated $889 million for political spending for 2016. What's the point here.
The point was about George Soros influence on BLM or paid protestors and it's absolutely true.
I didn't think it was a pissing match or "only Soros does this" but if your post makes you feel better than I'm glad you added it.