for display only
Big Blue Interactive The Corner Forum  
Back to the Corner

Archived Thread

Interesting stat on DL

BleedBlue : 10/11/2016 4:06 pm
WOW! Just saw that JPP + OV have the most QB hurries among ANY DE Duos in the NFL!
Thats crazy and would have never guessed that. They just have to start getting home!
I guess serious credit due to the packers OL?

Either way happy we coming home off two VERY tough games to play Baltimore this weekend in what is IMO a MUST WIN.
dallas on the road vs GB and either skins or eagles have to take a loss considering they are playing each other. chance to gain a game on TWO of the Three in front of us in the division.
Can that even be correct.  
Matt M. : 10/11/2016 4:08 pm : link
I don't recall a lot of hurries from either.
please. they haven't had a whiff of a QB in weeks  
Victor in CT : 10/11/2016 4:10 pm : link
Rodgers could have written a novel back there. Same for Bradford. Cousins looked mighty comfy back there too.
they were stoned so many times  
I Love Clams Casino : 10/11/2016 4:10 pm : link
on Monday night.....seriously?

Like just dead stopped in their tracks.

How can this be?
Saw where?  
BillT : 10/11/2016 4:13 pm : link
Source?
Well, not the most, but they're both in the top 10  
jcn56 : 10/11/2016 4:15 pm : link
I guess if you were looking at QB hurries per team, the Giants would be up there.
http://www.sportingcharts.com/nfl/stats/defensive-hurries/2016/ - ( New Window )
Of course they do  
superspynyg : 10/11/2016 4:16 pm : link
Other teams actually get sacks instead
as a duo  
BleedBlue : 10/11/2016 4:16 pm : link
they have the most...
I would then ask what constitutes a hurry  
Go Terps : 10/11/2016 4:17 pm : link
.
they've palyed fairly well  
bc4life : 10/11/2016 4:19 pm : link
the Packers were the only ones that really made them look bad
Looks and sounds  
Kivorkian : 10/11/2016 4:22 pm : link
Like whip cream on shit!
RE: I would then ask what constitutes a hurry  
BleedBlue : 10/11/2016 4:22 pm : link
In comment 13169697 Go Terps said:
Quote:
.


a hurry is an NFL statistic so i guess we would have to find the NFL's definition
RE: RE: I would then ask what constitutes a hurry  
Les in TO : 10/11/2016 4:42 pm : link
In comment 13169706 BleedBlue said:
Quote:
In comment 13169697 Go Terps said:


Quote:


.



a hurry is an NFL statistic so i guess we would have to find the NFL's definition
I'm not sure if there is an official nfl statistic, but other sites define it as forcing the QB out of the pocket or pressuring the QB into a throw to avoid a sack.

while hurries are definitely positive, we need more impact plays from the D. sacks, interceptions, forced fumbles. hopefully with a healthier secondary we will start to see those money plays.
RE: Well, not the most, but they're both in the top 10  
giants#1 : 10/11/2016 4:45 pm : link
In comment 13169692 jcn56 said:
Quote:
I guess if you were looking at QB hurries per team, the Giants would be up there. http://www.sportingcharts.com/nfl/stats/defensive-hurries/2016/ - ( New Window )


Based on that list, they're both tied for 4th in the league, which would easily make them the best "duo" (assuming that site's accurate).
^actually they are 2nd  
giants#1 : 10/11/2016 4:48 pm : link
to Dunlap/Johnson from CIN who also have 5 sacks combined.
That's almost impressive  
rsjem1979 : 10/11/2016 4:55 pm : link
Of course they'd have fewer hurries if they got to the QB once in a while.
they are 1  
BleedBlue : 10/11/2016 5:06 pm : link
dunlap duo gets sacks so they dont tally hurries. i wonder if this stat is one of those keep it up and eventually you will get there or is it like ahh good effort but you have to do more to get there
Our issue on DL  
Saos1n : 10/11/2016 5:08 pm : link
Is hankins and Snacks not getting push up the middle... hard to run against but QBs are able to simply step up because there is no rush
Tough to imagine that is correct after watching every single snap  
Jimmy Googs : 10/11/2016 5:09 pm : link
of every single Giant game this year. I almost feel i can remember each hurry because they have been so few.

Do we lead the league in most pass attempts against?
RE: Our issue on DL  
Peppers : 10/11/2016 5:16 pm : link
In comment 13169770 Saos1n said:
Quote:
Is hankins and Snacks not getting push up the middle... hard to run against but QBs are able to simply step up because there is no rush


This. We need more pressure up the middle. Spags should up the dosage of A Gap blitzes.
^4th  
giants#1 : 10/11/2016 5:17 pm : link
Pitt - 216 passing plays
Falcons - 214
Chargers - 211
Giants - 206

Giants have ~5-7 more passing plays against them than the average.

Texans are #1 for non-bye teams with 144

Here's one stat for you  
BigBlueinChicago : 10/11/2016 5:20 pm : link
when it comes to "negative pass plays" (sack or INT), the Giants are forcing a negative play on the QB once for every 35 (THIRTY FIVE) pass attempts through 5 games.

To put that into perspective, the 2nd worst team in terms of this is the Colts, who get a negative play from there defense on the QB once every 24.3 pass attempts.

This is insane.
Ridiculous  
Marty866b : 10/11/2016 5:25 pm : link
Just go by what your eyes tell you when the opposing quarterback sits in the pocket for an eternity and NO ONE is near him. Reminds of the days when Ken Stabler went back to pass against the Giants many years ago and when he saw that there was no chance any defensive player could get near him, he dropped his arms to the side with football in hand to mock the Giants. It was pathetic. It isn't much better today
Second year  
Metnut : 10/11/2016 5:26 pm : link
in a row where the giants are dead last in the league at % in converting hurries into sacks. Crazy.
They play the most snaps  
Jesse B : 10/11/2016 5:33 pm : link
Inflates the numbers too
Another reason I keep asking  
jgambrosio : 10/11/2016 5:39 pm : link
why Spags doesn't send another defender more often. Our front four appears to be getting enough pressure to occupy the 5 linemen, RB and sometimes TE, we just need someone else to get through to the QB. It's mind boggling that we don't pressure with more guys, one guy if he gets in quickly enough, while depending on the QB will result in a completion, also will result in a sack.
RE: Another reason I keep asking  
Jimmy Googs : 10/11/2016 5:41 pm : link
In comment 13169801 jgambrosio said:
Quote:
why Spags doesn't send another defender more often. Our front four appears to be getting enough pressure to occupy the 5 linemen, RB and sometimes TE, we just need someone else to get through to the QB. It's mind boggling that we don't pressure with more guys, one guy if he gets in quickly enough, while depending on the QB will result in a completion, also will result in a sack.


You would rather send another guy into pressure the QB versus bouncing off Randall Cobb 10 yards down the field?
RE: Our issue on DL  
joe48 : 10/11/2016 6:02 pm : link
In comment 13169770 Saos1n said:
Quote:
Is hankins and Snacks not getting push up the middle... hard to run against but QBs are able to simply step up because there is no rush

We knew that Snacks did not pass rush. He was a 2 down lineman with the Jets.
Lol  
JohnVB : 10/11/2016 6:42 pm : link
Knew something like this was coming. Complete bullshit stat.
RE: Of course they do  
markky : 10/11/2016 6:59 pm : link
In comment 13169694 superspynyg said:
Quote:
Other teams actually get sacks instead


this
No interior pass rush at all  
djm : 10/11/2016 7:11 pm : link
No edge rushers (LBs) to compliment Vernon and JPP and absolutely no DL depth at all.

Vernon and jpp ain't the problem but it would help if they'd got a big play or two under their belts.
And Spags needs a good month of DC work -- stat.  
djm : 10/11/2016 7:15 pm : link
..
Vernon and JPP ain't the problem? OK...  
Go Terps : 10/11/2016 7:22 pm : link
I could swear I just watched Aaron Rodgers getting 5+ seconds in the pocket while neither guy could win a one on one battle. I also remember NBC cameras pointing it out several times. And I also remember Al Michaels moving the signing of Vernon by saying "Him?" like he's talking to George Michael Bluth about his girlfriend Ann.

If you're listing the most important players on the Giants, those guys are #3 and #4. And they ain't getting it done.
Mocking not moving  
Go Terps : 10/11/2016 7:22 pm : link
.
RE: Well, not the most, but they're both in the top 10  
Mike in Long Beach : 10/11/2016 7:25 pm : link
In comment 13169692 jcn56 said:
Quote:
I guess if you were looking at QB hurries per team, the Giants would be up there. http://www.sportingcharts.com/nfl/stats/defensive-hurries/2016/ - ( New Window )


The OP said as a duo. So their combined number is evidently more than any other DE teammates. That's astounding, I feel like I could count them on 1 hand combined.
Both guys have been good so far  
KWALL2 : 10/11/2016 7:33 pm : link
There were a few snaps vs GB where Rodgers had a lot of time. He's excellent in the pocket and extends plays vs everybody. Overall the D did a good job vs Rodgers.

Now you can only look at a few plays with a lot of time for QB, mention the lack of sacks, and think you know what you're talking about. Or you can consider the overall play of both Vernon and JPP, consider play vs the run, and QB pressures, and maybe not come to the conclusion they suck, were a waste of money, or are the primary problems here. They aren't.

Eli and the OL are the reasons the team isn't sitting here with a better record.

The defense has been very good. The DL and DBs. We have some here crying about lack of INTs as a sign that our DBs are a problem. It's laughable to evaluate a group like that after 4 games. Same with sacks. I just saw Joey Bosa pick up 2 sacks this week. He's awesome right!!!!! Of course both sacks came after about 5 seconds while the QB fell into his lap. But he has 2 sacks. Hes on pace for double digits this year!

The free agents and young draft picks (especially Collins, Behre, Thompson and Apple when they were healthy) have been excellent. Again, the D and the DL (especially JPP and Vernon) is not the problem with this team.

RE: Vernon and JPP ain't the problem? OK...  
JohnVB : 10/11/2016 7:37 pm : link
In comment 13169882 Go Terps said:
Quote:
I could swear I just watched Aaron Rodgers getting 5+ seconds in the pocket while neither guy could win a one on one battle. I also remember NBC cameras pointing it out several times. And I also remember Al Michaels moving the signing of Vernon by saying "Him?" like he's talking to George Michael Bluth about his girlfriend Ann.

If you're listing the most important players on the Giants, those guys are #3 and #4. And they ain't getting it done.


This. There were several plays where the cameras showed Vernon and JPP playing patty cake while the OL stuffs them 1 v 1. The weak ass spin move by Vernon was a nice touch.
The D did a good job because the back seven covered well  
Go Terps : 10/11/2016 7:37 pm : link
You can't tell me the front four, and the high prices defensive ends specifically, did anything other than an abysmal job rushing the quarterback.

It couldn't possibly have been more obvious. Give me a break already.
RE: Both guys have been good so far  
JohnVB : 10/11/2016 7:45 pm : link
In comment 13169899 KWALL2 said:
Quote:
There were a few snaps vs GB where Rodgers had a lot of time. He's excellent in the pocket and extends plays vs everybody. Overall the D did a good job vs Rodgers.

Now you can only look at a few plays with a lot of time for QB, mention the lack of sacks, and think you know what you're talking about. Or you can consider the overall play of both Vernon and JPP, consider play vs the run, and QB pressures, and maybe not come to the conclusion they suck, were a waste of money, or are the primary problems here. They aren't.

Eli and the OL are the reasons the team isn't sitting here with a better record.

The defense has been very good. The DL and DBs. We have some here crying about lack of INTs as a sign that our DBs are a problem. It's laughable to evaluate a group like that after 4 games. Same with sacks. I just saw Joey Bosa pick up 2 sacks this week. He's awesome right!!!!! Of course both sacks came after about 5 seconds while the QB fell into his lap. But he has 2 sacks. Hes on pace for double digits this year!

The free agents and young draft picks (especially Collins, Behre, Thompson and Apple when they were healthy) have been excellent. Again, the D and the DL (especially JPP and Vernon) is not the problem with this team.


The defense as a whole has played good enough to be 5-0. That doesn't mean JPP and Vernon are above scrutiny.

They're both being paid to be playmakers, especially Vernon. They aren't making enough.

Maybe I'm spoiled seeing Osi, Strahan, Tuck, Robbins, and 5 fingered JPP, but those guys made a hell of a lot more plays with way less talent behind them in the secondary.
Just funny  
KWALL2 : 10/11/2016 7:53 pm : link
Commentary on BBI again.

I'm talking 5 games in and the DL has been fine. A strength actually including the DL.

Check out those scout comments from the GB paper. Said he was playing both pass and run at a high level. That's what I see. And you have number of sacks as your constant rebuttal.
I never used the word sacks  
Go Terps : 10/11/2016 7:57 pm : link
I did refer to Rodgers routinely having 5 seconds to throw the ball. NBC could not have emphasized the extent to which Vernon and JPP were being whipped more.
JPP from NFL executive  
KWALL2 : 10/11/2016 7:58 pm : link
Quote:
Pierre-Paul can still do it,” an executive in personnel said. “He’s playing at a high level in both phases. He can convert speed to power, has the length to get in throwing lanes and has the ability to finish.


This guy or you quoting sack numbers or a few plays where they did what...played "patty cake"....Who has it right?
Didn't you in another thrwad  
KWALL2 : 10/11/2016 7:58 pm : link
Rip the DL for lack of sacks?
I can't keep up with your constant ripping  
KWALL2 : 10/11/2016 8:00 pm : link
On JPP. You're wrong about he guy and what he brings. He's been excellent this year and if he just plays the same way he has through 5 teams will be lining up to grab him.

Why? Because what he is doing brings value to the team. It's that simple but you refuse to recognize any of it.
I've been topping the DL all off-season and this season  
Go Terps : 10/11/2016 8:01 pm : link
So yeah at some point I'm sure I did.

And after five games the extent to which I was right is about as significant as the amount of time Rodgers has to throw the ball on Sunday.
Ripping  
Go Terps : 10/11/2016 8:01 pm : link
.
KWALL, you're wrong on Vernon  
Overseer : 10/11/2016 8:08 pm : link
he was okay vs run, positively awful putting pressure on Rodgers. Minor pressure getting low around the tackle on the 1st Jenkins INT, other than that virtually zero. Really poor game from him. Spags should have been blitzing L Collins more since the CBs were mostly covering well.

JPP was marginally better and at this point the better DE.
You're wrong across the boatd  
KWALL2 : 10/11/2016 8:09 pm : link
On he DL, JPP, and the contributions of the free agents on defense.

You called us "dopes" for believing the free agents have helped? Or were good signings? That's BS plain and simple.

The dope is the guy who doesn't see it after 5 games. This defense was one of the worst in leave history last year. The front office made a number of good moves to fix to wth FA and draft picks. The improvement on defense has been enormous in one year. Whos the dope here?

The back 7 is very athletic and can matchup with 3-4 WR sets now. They need to work on generating some pressure outside of JPP and Vernon because they are the only guys doing it to this point.

The defense and DL have been a big part of the solution. Your boy Eli needs to play much better. You want to cherry pick plays form GB? Plenty of missed opportunities form Eli in that one and every game this year.

OL has been a problem too. Problem so far this year is the OL and QB. Not the money spent on the DL or anybody on the defense.

Oversee  
KWALL2 : 10/11/2016 8:14 pm : link
I'm talking more about overall play through 5 games. Vernon has been better than I expected .

My main beef around here is the treatment of JPP. He plays his ass off and has been a 2 way force this season: yes Qb pressures are impact plays!

Vs GB he was a beast vs the run. Controlling his side like he used to. And shedding blocks and making plays. Pass rush vs GB was an issue at times . But part of that was the QB.

Spags has to do better finding others to get pressure.
.  
Go Terps : 10/11/2016 8:16 pm : link
Money spent on the DL is money that could have been spent much more efficiently and effectively on the OL and elsewhere on the offense to assist the team's two best players.

That isn't what happened, and now we're pointing to QB hurries as a rationalization and hoping that Will Beatty of all people saves the day.
.  
Go Terps : 10/11/2016 8:22 pm : link
And if you're offended by my use of the term dope I apologize as I think you're a great poster. I doubt I'll get apologies from the people that said far worse about me all off-season because I had an unpopular opinion.
RE: .  
David in LA : 10/11/2016 8:23 pm : link
In comment 13169963 Go Terps said:
Quote:
Money spent on the DL is money that could have been spent much more efficiently and effectively on the OL and elsewhere on the offense to assist the team's two best players.

That isn't what happened, and now we're pointing to QB hurries as a rationalization and hoping that Will Beatty of all people saves the day.


Eli is one of the least sacked QB's, and has not been playing well. I'm guessing QB hurries largely has to do with that, but it's not an important stat when it goes against your agenda.
I think JPP has been playing fairly well, yes  
Overseer : 10/11/2016 8:24 pm : link
vs GB Vernon was really bad. Exhibit A in the clip below when Bakhtiari immediately threw him down like he was a featherweight.

Pierre-Paul, who gets held a lot (like on the SB46 hail mary), better but not great. Spags needed to blitz more and spy Rodgers on 3rd down.

Flacco has decent legs too so they will need to get pressure. I don't watch Baltimore much so haven't seen their Oline this year.
Link - ( New Window )
RE: RE: .  
Go Terps : 10/11/2016 8:29 pm : link
In comment 13169968 David in LA said:
Quote:
In comment 13169963 Go Terps said:


Quote:


Money spent on the DL is money that could have been spent much more efficiently and effectively on the OL and elsewhere on the offense to assist the team's two best players.

That isn't what happened, and now we're pointing to QB hurries as a rationalization and hoping that Will Beatty of all people saves the day.



Eli is one of the least sacked QB's, and has not been playing well. I'm guessing QB hurries largely has to do with that, but it's not an important stat when it goes against your agenda.


That says nothing for the impotent performance of JPP and Vernon. My agenda is calling it like I see it, not the way I want it to be.

And if you don't think there's a group of posters here who will only say good things about the team because they're "fans" you're kidding yourself. Those people do more damage to the discussion on this board than the trolls.
Who should they have signed at OL?  
KWALL2 : 10/11/2016 8:31 pm : link
I would have liked to see one signed but who was out there especially at OT? Not a lot.

Instead they added quality players on defense in FA and it has been a positive for the team.
"Call it like you see it"  
KWALL2 : 10/11/2016 8:33 pm : link
Just like Trump, you don't see it the right way.
Our ends are on pace  
dep026 : 10/11/2016 8:35 pm : link
to get 6 combined sacks. Thats not good.
"Pointing to QB pressure as a rationalization"  
KWALL2 : 10/11/2016 8:38 pm : link
I'm surprised such a BS comment comes from you.

It's not a rationalization of anything. QB hurries and pressures are impact plays. End of story. If you don't see it that way you simply don't understand what you're watching. The simpleton points to sacks.
And right on cue....  
KWALL2 : 10/11/2016 8:39 pm : link
We have dep.....

On pace for 6 sacks? Thanks for that.
You have a clear axe to grind with JPP since he blew up his hand  
David in LA : 10/11/2016 8:41 pm : link
haven't wavered one iota, you only ended up doubling down on your take. I'm ok with criticism of performance, but you conveniently dismissing other metrics like QB pressure, when it's the first metric Eli apologists will post to place the blame at the feet of the OL just shows inconsistent logic. When it favors a position you take, it's a great stat. When it doesn't support your previous take, it doesn't matter.
RE: And right on cue....  
dep026 : 10/11/2016 8:48 pm : link
In comment 13169993 KWALL2 said:
Quote:
We have dep.....

On pace for 6 sacks? Thanks for that.


Well aren't they?
RE: You have a clear axe to grind with JPP since he blew up his hand  
Go Terps : 10/11/2016 8:51 pm : link
In comment 13169996 David in LA said:
Quote:
haven't wavered one iota, you only ended up doubling down on your take. I'm ok with criticism of performance, but you conveniently dismissing other metrics like QB pressure, when it's the first metric Eli apologists will post to place the blame at the feet of the OL just shows inconsistent logic. When it favors a position you take, it's a great stat. When it doesn't support your previous take, it doesn't matter.


Eli is playing like shit. I haven't said otherwise. Again, nothing to do with our defensive ends.
And I've had a problem with JPP since before the hand  
Go Terps : 10/11/2016 8:53 pm : link
It's not my fault he lived down to my low expectation for what he would give this team after the 2012 season. Starting in 2013 I said he'd be a problem. He has been that.
Dep, have to consider the schedules  
David in LA : 10/11/2016 9:00 pm : link
Dak has the best OL in the business, solid ground game to account for. Brees is one of the toughest players to sack due to his quick release. Packers had 2 weeks to prepare for us, when our guys were coming off a short week. Thought the Vikings game was a missed opportunity. Point is that the sacks will come sooner rather than later.
RE: And I've had a problem with JPP since before the hand  
David in LA : 10/11/2016 9:03 pm : link
In comment 13170018 Go Terps said:
Quote:
It's not my fault he lived down to my low expectation for what he would give this team after the 2012 season. Starting in 2013 I said he'd be a problem. He has been that.


Please, you're the high expectations asian dad meme of this board. Players are either too demonstrative, or not quite elite enough for your taste. My point on Eli is that is a take from many apologists, not you per se. Where are all these sacks against Eli since our OL is so shitty? Quick release or not, they should be there, right?
The sacks might not be,  
Go Terps : 10/11/2016 9:27 pm : link
but the shitty throws are. The interceptions are.

I heard Mike Lombardi on Bill Simmons's podcast a couple weeks ago make an interesting point. He said that sacks are a result of coverage (QB holds ball too long), and turnovers are a result of pressure (QB makes poor throw/decision under duress, fumbles, etc.).

To this point the Giants have had success doing neither. Their two picks of Rodgers were, incredibly, the first two turnovers forced by the defense thus far this season. And both of those picks had to do with Rodgers being uncharacteristically inaccurate at times this season.

By any measure the defensive ends are not making an impact in the passing game. They certainly aren't making the impact you would expect from two players making so much money. Actually, I believe Vernon's cap hit is low this year...so we have that expense to look forward to in future years. Awesome.
JPP and Vernon would both do well  
SHO'NUFF : 10/11/2016 9:33 pm : link
on Dancing with the Stars.
Hurries, smurries.....  
Doomster : 10/11/2016 10:25 pm : link
That's open to interpretation....all I know is, BOTH OF THEM, got caught in the middle and Rogers rolled to the outside and had all kinds of time.....

What is a hurry? Is it still considered a hurry if the qb completes the pass?

found this:A quarterback hurry is counted when a defender either forces a quarterback out of the pocket or pressures the throw. It doesn't necessarily mean that the defender actually forced the quarterback to make a bad throw.
"By any measure" Terps?  
KWALL2 : 10/12/2016 2:16 am : link
Wrong again. By your measure? Maybe? But that's limited to sacks and INTs apparently.

[/quote]By any measure the DE are not impacting the passing game?[/quote]

That is a just a horseshit comment.

Doomster you can give up to? A guy gets QB pressure but a QB makes a play and completes a ball? Guess what? That's still a good play by the pass rusher.

Sometimes the other guy makes a play WHILE AT THE SAME TIME the defender is doing a good job.
RE: I never used the word sacks  
djm : 10/12/2016 8:03 pm : link
In comment 13169920 Go Terps said:
Quote:
I did refer to Rodgers routinely having 5 seconds to throw the ball. NBC could not have emphasized the extent to which Vernon and JPP were being whipped more.


The pass rush was shaky but Rodgers also bought time and i have a hard time blaming the best pass rushers on the team for the psss rush struggles. Where's Hankins? Where's the edge LB? Where's the well time blitz? Where the hell is Owa?????

We have two good pass rushers on this team and by season's end their sack numbers will probably be there. We need two more pass rushers.

Youre gonna kill jpp and Vernon and that's cool. But there are about 10 things wrong with the Giants right now. Jpp and Vernon aren't playing great but they aren't THE problem.
RE: And I've had a problem with JPP since before the hand  
djm : 10/12/2016 8:09 pm : link
In comment 13170018 Go Terps said:
Quote:
It's not my fault he lived down to my low expectation for what he would give this team after the 2012 season. Starting in 2013 I said he'd be a problem. He has been that.


Jpp was great in 2014 but you ignore that every time. That's cool too. Just like you ignore that QB hurries indicate that the DEs are close to getting home. Hurries don't necessarily equate to success but it's a sign that the DE's are capable and able bodied. More often than not the hurries do less to bigger and better things. It's also been only five games. No one was killing the D after two weeks and even the skins game was more mistakes than lack of D.

Everyone needs to play better on this team. Can we agree on that? Two guys that appear to be close to making game changing plays are Vernon and jpp.
They are a huge part of the problem  
Go Terps : 10/13/2016 4:28 am : link
They aren't disrupting opposing quarterbacks, putting our back seven at a disadvantage. We have to blitz in more predictable situations as well.

These two guys are supposed to be, with Eli and Beckham, the backbone of the team.

Sunday night is beyond rationalization. It was picked up by the cameras time and again because the NBC broadcasters KNEW going in that they hadn't performed in the first four games and they were going to be a focal point of the coverage as a result.

It was poor throughout the game with moments bordering on the embarrassing. It could not have been more clear.

They are, as much as anyone else, THE problem.
We're coming up on week six  
Go Terps : 10/13/2016 4:31 am : link
We're all still waiting for the first game changing play.
Try week 1  
KWALL2 : 10/13/2016 11:14 am : link
Giants score late in 4th to take the lead. Need a 3 and out right? JPP forced quick throwaways on 2nd and 3rd down with quick pressure. Dallas punts. Giants win.

Carry on.....
Go Terps is gonna die on this hill whether it's worth it or not  
Ten Ton Hammer : 10/13/2016 11:21 am : link
(It's not).
You are missing the point....  
Doomster : 10/14/2016 8:21 pm : link
KWALL2 : 10/12/2016 2:16 am : link : reply

Doomster you can give up to? A guy gets QB pressure but a QB makes a play and completes a ball? Guess what? That's still a good play by the pass rusher.


But people are trying to equate pressures with sacks, and they are not....a DE gets a pressure, but the qb still completes the pass...a qb gets sacked, he doesn't complete the pass....big difference....
Von miller is that far down?  
Giants2012 : 10/14/2016 8:46 pm : link
Stop
Clowney  
Giants2012 : 10/14/2016 8:51 pm : link
Wonder if Houston would move him. Could see New England trying.

Reese? Doubt it
Spags doesn't seem to care...  
trueblueinpw : 10/14/2016 10:39 pm : link
Hard to figure, but Spags said he doesn't even track sacks as a KPI. I think said he does track hurries. I don't understand why any D-co wouldn't emphasize sacks. But I also think stats are essentially worthless in football.

Until they get the big stops in the big spots, they suck.

Such a misleading stat  
HugeS : 10/15/2016 12:02 am : link
When quarterbacks are getting 4+ sec to scan the field before being flushed out of the pocket. Even Dallas is generating better pressure with their patchwork front four. People fail to realize that as much as individual guys like Trevin Wade have struggled, our defense has been saved over and over by exceptional play in the secondary. Janoris Jenkins is playing at an All Pro level and the secondary as a unit has kept the defense from looking like utter trash in every game so far this season.
Back to the Corner