for display only
Big Blue Interactive The Corner Forum  
Back to the Corner

Archived Thread

NFT: BBI Poker Players - Questions about Tournament Play?

NYG27 : 10/20/2016 3:52 pm
I don't play regularly and only tournament I've played in until very recently was a charity one, which I did fairly well in but most of that was luck because I didn't really know all the rules.

As a hobby and just for fun, I want to get into playing in tournaments at my local casino once a month. Nothing serious, most of them $100 No Limit or satellite's to bigger tournaments.

In my first live tournament, I won a seat from a $80 satellite to play in a larger tournament this weekend. Although I do have a few questions which I'm not familiar with and needed help understanding. Here's the info....

Quote:

$500 WITH $200 BOUNTY NLH

$50,000 GUARANTEED!
Players start with 20,000 in tournament chips.
Levels change every 30 minutes. 40 minutes after level 8.
Late and re-entries are allowed for first 6 levels.
$260 from each entrant goes to the prize pool, $35 is the house revenue, $200 is the bounty, $5 is withheld for registration staff.
$20 Dealer add on for 5,000 chips at the table.
Breaks will be 15 min approximately every 2 hours.
Dinner break will be 45 min after level 11.
Guarantee includes the bounties.


I get that buy-in are $500 but what is $200 bounty? Do they award $200 for every player you knock out?

What does it mean "$20 Dealer add on for 5,000 chips at the table"? Does it mean that they give me 20,000 chips for my inital buy-in but when I sit down at the table, I can buy 5,000 more extra chips (25,000 total) directly from my table's dealer for just $20 more?

Final question, since this will be a much larger tournament then the satelite I played in, what is the best strategy? I was planning to play very tight early on until after level 6 where there are no more re-entries. Then when the blinds go up, loosen up a bit and play suited connectors and see a few more flops. Any tips? Thanks.


From the breakdown  
giants#1 : 10/20/2016 3:57 pm : link
it sounds like the $200 bounty is included within your $500 buy-in. So out of the $500 you buy in with, $200 goes to the player that knocks you out.
Bounty is a prize  
Deej : 10/20/2016 3:57 pm : link
for knocking another player out. I've never played a bounty tournament, but I can only imagine that it really impacts strategy.

Add on I believe is you getting a chance to buy the 5000 chips for $20, but it's not when you sit. It should be at a set time, likely the end of the rebuy period I think. I think at the table means to distinguish it from being knocked out and losing your seat. You keep your seat when adding on at the table.
So...  
Metnut : 10/20/2016 4:00 pm : link
(1) A bounty means that a portion of the prize pool goes to paying bounties instead of going to the top finishers. Bounties are generally paid out when you knock out another player.

(2) The dealer add-on is typical. It's usually a significant amount of chips compared to the original starting stack, so you're basically compelled to pay for it. The dealer add-on doesn't go into the prize pool so consider it additional rake/vig.

(3) There's more than one strategy to play a tournament. Generally, I'd say you should look for opportunities to acquire chips from the first hand and take smart gambles. Understanding the ratios between stack sizes and the blinds/antes is crucial to tournament success.

When the blinds get bigger you'll generally want to player more aggressive and try to steal the blinds (or re-steal on a weak raiser with an all-in shove if the stacks are big enough) as much as possible. The blinds usually go up fast in live tournaments, so don't be afraid to shove all-in (note, that's very different than calling all-in) before the blinds eat you up. Better to be all-in as a 40/60 dog with 10K tournament chips than to get blinded to 6K and get it allin as a 60/40 favorite.
I would imagine that the bounty format  
Deej : 10/20/2016 4:08 pm : link
means you'll get a lot of marginal calls on all ins or hands where it looks like you could end up all in quickly.

Tight tends to be best IMO until you know the people at your table. Particularly early on in a rebuy tournament. Alternatively, play loose if you're willing to do multiple rebuys.

I've always been a tight player. I make 90% of my money from 10-20% of the hands Im in on.
Thanks for the info guys  
NYG27 : 10/20/2016 4:21 pm : link
Outside of the $20 deal add-on, I'm not planning to do any re-buys\re-entries. So once my chips are gone, I'm done.

Good tip about the $200 bounty effecting game play. If you knock 3 players out, you already made a profit, so I have to be careful about getting put All-in out of position.

Early on, I just try to collect a couple of small pots just to pay for my blinds before I loosen up my play. Plus that would give me a good read on who the aggressive players are at my table who are gambling to knock people out for the bounties.
Be very careful if you just plan on buying in one time  
loafin : 10/20/2016 5:00 pm : link
It is difficult to win when most players will be playing very loose in the beginning because of the rebuy. I personally dislike allowing re-buys but completely understand why the "house" wants to allow it.
RE: Be very careful if you just plan on buying in one time  
NYG27 : 10/20/2016 5:10 pm : link
In comment 13182963 loafin said:
Quote:
It is difficult to win when most players will be playing very loose in the beginning because of the rebuy. I personally dislike allowing re-buys but completely understand why the "house" wants to allow it.


Oh, I definitely will be careful during the re-buy period which runs to level 6. Until then I plan to play very tight and only play if I have a strong hand or in position to collect the blinds.
Can someone recommend a good...  
Crispino : 10/20/2016 7:44 pm : link
poker teaching tool. A book or video that you like? I play casual poker with friends but have never played tournament style hold 'em. I love watching the WSOP on TV, but I'm lost with some of the terminology and strategy. Where did you guys learn to play tournament hold'em?
RE: Can someone recommend a good...  
adamg : 10/20/2016 7:52 pm : link
In comment 13183145 Crispino said:
Quote:
poker teaching tool. A book or video that you like? I play casual poker with friends but have never played tournament style hold 'em. I love watching the WSOP on TV, but I'm lost with some of the terminology and strategy. Where did you guys learn to play tournament hold'em?


Theory of Poker by David Sklansky imo is the best book you can get to learn basic poker strategy. You need to know the odds and things like that. Doyle Brunson's Supersystem is overrated imo too. It's good for seeing one style of play but isn't an instant help like Sklansky would be.

I know people like Poker Tournament books by Harrington. I haven't read those though.
Jonathan Little..  
FatMan in Charlotte : 10/20/2016 7:54 pm : link
has an awesome series of poker tournament books from small stakes tourneys to professional tournament poker.

I'm a mid-stakes player, but I got more out of his books than any others. I'd recommend:

1) Beating small stakes tournaments
2) Secrets of professional tourneys Part 1
3) Secrets of professional tourneys Part 2

The 3rd volume is all hand histories, which is OK, but not something I really get into reading.
Thanks....  
Crispino : 10/20/2016 9:05 pm : link
for the info guys.
A few things  
JohnVB : 10/21/2016 10:32 am : link
1. It's a rebuy tournament. This means players are going to be more willing to gamble in high variance spots early because they can rebuy if they get knocked out. Strategically players do this in an attempt to accumulate a lot of chips early so that they have an advantage later. You can choose to employ the same strategy if you have the roll for it but it doesn't seem like you do. You can play tight early but just realize you may be involved in some big multi way pots where other players have big draws that can send you home early.

2. Essentially half the prize pool is allocated for bounties. That means there's going to be value in knocking out players that doesn't exist in a traditional freeze out tournament. Combined with point 1 above, there's going to be a ton of action early in the tournament.

3. The 5k add on for $20 is just that. At the end of the rebuy period, you have the option of adding an additional 5k chips for 20. I recommend doing that if you get that far.

4. You mentioned the blind levels but you didn't say how the blinds start/increase at each level. There's a huge difference between blinds starting at 24/50 then going 50/100, 75/150, etc vs starting at 250/500 and going up from there. My guess is it's a faster tournament which means you're going to need to accumulate chips early.

What you should do from a strategy standpoint really depends on how many rebuys you're prepared to bring, if any. It seems like you probably won't rebuy, so you should probably focus on playing good starting hands in position and trying to see cheap flops w spec hands in the hope you smash the flop. Be wary of playing big pots with top pair or over pairs on draw heavy boards. Don't be afraid to get it in pre w bigger pairs as you'll be ahead of your opponents ranges.

There's a ton of info out there on strategy, someone mentioned the Little series. That's pretty good although a little dated. The Sklansky and Harrington books are way too old.

Good luck!
RE: A few things  
steve in ky : 10/21/2016 10:45 am : link
In comment 13183636 JohnVB said:
Quote:

There's a ton of info out there on strategy, someone mentioned the Little series. That's pretty good although a little dated.



I'm curious, do strategies get dated that quickly and in what way; how so?

Which books would you recommend that you consider more current?

RE: RE: A few things  
JohnVB : 10/21/2016 2:16 pm : link
In comment 13183657 steve in ky said:
Quote:
In comment 13183636 JohnVB said:


Quote:



There's a ton of info out there on strategy, someone mentioned the Little series. That's pretty good although a little dated.





I'm curious, do strategies get dated that quickly and in what way; how so?

Which books would you recommend that you consider more current?


Some say strategy can get dated in as short as 6 months. It's not a static game -- good players see what other players are trying to do and adjust. Good players see what the gen pop of players do from a general strategy perspective and adjust. That's how good players keep their edge.

An easy example is blind play. Early on pros stole blinds relentlessly from amateurs at a profitable rate. Then amateurs learned this and started stealing themselves. Then pros adjusted by 3 betting light out of the blinds. Then stealers adjusted by 4 betting light. So on and so forth.

I think  
Metnut : 10/21/2016 2:25 pm : link
Harrington's tournament book is still the best reference for someone starting out with tournaments. Introducing concepts like "M" is really helpful for someone starting out and how stack size to blind ratio is something you need will vary throughout a tournament and something that you need to understand. You'd be shocked at how many people still just "play their cards" in these types of games.

If OP already understands and has experience with this stuff then, yea, the book might be dated and can be avoided, but just spending a few hours reading it will really help get a good mindset for a tourney IMO.

Sort of off-topic but does anyone on BBI still play a lot? With online shut down for those of us in NY, it's hard to find games. I get to AC and play the borg when I can, but only a couple times a year due to distance. Most of the NYC underground games have insane rakes and characters that might be a little too "interesting" for me.

RE: RE: A few things  
JohnVB : 10/21/2016 2:36 pm : link
In comment 13183657 steve in ky said:
Quote:
In comment 13183636 JohnVB said:


Quote:



There's a ton of info out there on strategy, someone mentioned the Little series. That's pretty good although a little dated.





I'm curious, do strategies get dated that quickly and in what way; how so?

Which books would you recommend that you consider more current?


As far as strategy/book recommendations, I'd check out the 2+2 poker forum. They have strategy threads and discuss recently released books/material.
2+2..  
FatMan in Charlotte : 10/21/2016 9:14 pm : link
is where you are going to get the most current discussion, but it is difficult to find it sometimes on that site.
Maybe I'm way off on this and  
steve in ky : 10/21/2016 11:12 pm : link
Admittedly since I have never play in a tournament I may be way off about this but I can't help but think you aren't going to fool anyone if you try and follow the "latest" strategy that is agreed upon on a public forum. Assuming one knows the game it seems to me going with your own strategy would be more efficient and harder for opponents to quickly read.

But again maybe I'm way off on this.
From my POV,  
adamg : 10/22/2016 12:40 am : link
strategy being fickle is why I recommended Sklansky's Theory of Poker. That book teaches the odds of hands more than anything else. And that doesn't change. I think it's really important to understand that aspect of the game and then get into hand ranges and things like that in order to develop a strategy. It's hard to start with a strategy if you don't have all the fundamentals.
RE: Maybe I'm way off on this and  
JohnVB : 10/22/2016 11:17 am : link
In comment 13184493 steve in ky said:
Quote:
Admittedly since I have never play in a tournament I may be way off about this but I can't help but think you aren't going to fool anyone if you try and follow the "latest" strategy that is agreed upon on a public forum. Assuming one knows the game it seems to me going with your own strategy would be more efficient and harder for opponents to quickly read.

But again maybe I'm way off on this.


It's not necessarily about following the latest strategy, it's about knowing what your opponents are trying to do to you. If you can recognize what your opponents are doing then you can counter that and exploit what they're doing. That's how you profit -- exploiting your opponents. Assuming the OP is relatively new to tournament poker, I'd recommend:

Harrington on Hold Em series
Kill Phil/Kill Everyone
Winning poker tournaments one hand at a time series
The Raiser's Edge



Thank so for the advice guys  
NYG27 : 10/22/2016 5:36 pm : link
This was my just only my second "real" tournament, first was winning the satellite to this bigger bounty tournament.

I got a couple of decent hole cards real early and took several early blinds. Then I had suited connectors and flopped a straight. That enabled me to knock out two other players who went all in against me in position and I called. One had a set and the other had a flush draw.

With a large early chip count, I made the mistake to play very loose and kept on trying to knock more people out. I knocked two more out but overall I was too loose as the early chip leader trying to cash in on more bounties. Overall not bad, played $80 satellite, then knocked out four guys for a bounty of $800.

Need to read up on more books. Need help calculating pot odds better and playing with a large stack which I wasn't accustomed too.
RE: RE: Maybe I'm way off on this and  
steve in ky : 10/22/2016 11:03 pm : link
In comment 13184660 JohnVB said:
Quote:
In comment 13184493 steve in ky said:


Quote:


Admittedly since I have never play in a tournament I may be way off about this but I can't help but think you aren't going to fool anyone if you try and follow the "latest" strategy that is agreed upon on a public forum. Assuming one knows the game it seems to me going with your own strategy would be more efficient and harder for opponents to quickly read.

But again maybe I'm way off on this.



It's not necessarily about following the latest strategy, it's about knowing what your opponents are trying to do to you. If you can recognize what your opponents are doing then you can counter that and exploit what they're doing. That's how you profit -- exploiting your opponents. Assuming the OP is relatively new to tournament poker, I'd recommend:

Harrington on Hold Em series
Kill Phil/Kill Everyone
Winning poker tournaments one hand at a time series
The Raiser's Edge




Thanks
That's really good...  
FatMan in Charlotte : 10/23/2016 1:54 pm : link
Quote:
Thank so for the advice guys
NYG27 : 10/22/2016 5:36 pm : link : reply
This was my just only my second "real" tournament, first was winning the satellite to this bigger bounty tournament.

I got a couple of decent hole cards real early and took several early blinds. Then I had suited connectors and flopped a straight. That enabled me to knock out two other players who went all in against me in position and I called. One had a set and the other had a flush draw.

With a large early chip count, I made the mistake to play very loose and kept on trying to knock more people out. I knocked two more out but overall I was too loose as the early chip leader trying to cash in on more bounties. Overall not bad, played $80 satellite, then knocked out four guys for a bounty of $800.

Need to read up on more books. Need help calculating pot odds better and playing with a large stack which I wasn't accustomed too.


In a bounty the object is to knock people out and you did that!

I played in a tourney at Maryland Live a couple months ago that awarded $100 for each person knocked out. I finished at the final table in 4th place, which only payed out $725, but I ended up knocking 12 people out of the game. You played it well - and being loose in a bounty tourney is a good strategy.
Thanks FMiC  
NYG27 : 10/24/2016 10:16 am : link
My schedule freed up last night and I decided to enter my 3rd tournament in 4 days at Maryland Live's Sunday $100 NLH Re-Entry for first 6 levels. Since I played in a smaller satellite and bounty tournaments, I wanted to try a bigger regular one this time around.

This tournament had 44 players enter and prize pool a little under $4k. After the $10 dealer add-on, I started with 20,000 in chips. My strategy was to play it tight till the first break after the first 2 hours, which also marked the end of the late\re-entry levels. I did pretty good and played really tight and got up to 25k in chips at the break.

Although almost just after the break, I flopped a set of 7's and called on another guys All-In on someone who shoved with a flush draw. He made his flush on the river, which left me with only 1,200 in chips. With ante's being 100 and that I had 6 more hands till I was in the Big Blind, I decided that I had 5 hands to risk all my remaining chips. I got absolute garbage with 2/7, 3/9, 4/10 and 2/10 all off suit and folded all of them hoping to get a decent opportunity to shove my remaining 800 chips.

On my next hand before I was back on the Big Blind, I got a 5/6 off suit and decided to commit my remaining 800 in chips thinking I just didn't want to get blinded out. Flop was a 3/7/A but I hit the river 4 for my straight and got a little over 5k. I then just got on a incredibly hot streak and kept shoving my remaining chips and built back up close to 60,000 in chips about 30 minutes from our next break. I was feeling good about the remaining 4 other players at my table and had pretty good reads on everyone I was playing with.

Unfortunately, once the 19th person busted out, they split my table to form two final tables. Three guys went to one table and I went to the second with another guy. Didn't play with 5 of the 9 guys there yet and as I was stacking my chip as I sat down, another guy busted out of the tournament.

Very next hand, we're at level 10 with blinds at 1k/2k with 300 ante, I picked up a suited K/J. I had 4 just people call the big blind in front of me and with around 13k in the pot, I decided to raise to a pot size bet to see who was serious about playing. Everyone folded except a guy with just a little bigger stack then mine and he re-raised to 25k. At this point, since he called the big blind first time around and re-raised me with a big bet, I placed him a mid pocket pair, something like two 9's or two 10's. I decided that I would go All-In with my King/Jack, as he'd either fold and save half his remaining stack or we'd race and I'd have two suited over cards. He did a quick call and showed Ace/King off suit. I could still catch a Jack but when the flop came down with another Ace, I was finally out.

Overall, I was real happy with my play with finishing 17th out of 44 and I learned a lot from the 4 hours last night. Especially with my short stack play as I build 800 chips back close to 60k. Another thing that I learned and will apply to future tournaments, if I get moved to a new table, I need to real tight for a few turns around the table to get a better read on the new players I'm playing with.

Lastly, I played a combined 10+ hours of poker in the last 3 tournaments I played in the past 4 days. I'm physically F'n drained, I don't know how those guys on the big TV tournaments can play 10+ hours for 5-7 days in a row. LOL
It's funny..  
FatMan in Charlotte : 10/24/2016 10:24 am : link
how draining it can be. I was out in Vegas three years ago during the WSOP, and I was trying to win enough money at cash games to pay for an entry. I was up about $400 when I decided to play a SummerSeries tourney at Golden Nugget. Tourney started at Noon and I ended up chopping 5 way for 1st place. When we got paid our $1800 each, it was 4AM. Got back to the hotel, slept about 3 hours, got up, had breakfast and decided to enter a Noon $320 buy-in at Caesar's Palace.

Took 1st place for $12,000! But we didn't finish until 6AM. At that point, I was too damn tired to enter a WSOP tourney.

I did play one the following year. $2,500 NLH. Uneventful. Busted out just after dinner break on Day 1. Queens were cracked with an Ace on the river. But the best story was on the first hand. A guy proud as a peacock talked about how this was his first WSOP event ever. Really jacked up. Very first hand, he and another guy keep re-raising each other until it gets all-in. They both flip up pocket Aces. Second guy flushes out on the river, sending Mr. Happy to be there home on the first hand he ever played!
That's a great story  
NYG27 : 10/24/2016 10:37 am : link
I can't even think about how sick it must have been to be pumped to play in your first WSOP event, get pocket A's, go All-In and bust out! LOL

Funniest story from last night, a new guy joined my table really late at level 6 and took a picture of his starting stack. He won 2-3 pots and took another picture of his stack. At this point, the entire table just started to give this guy no slack about taking those pictures. When he busted out and had no more chips, they guy next to him took out his phone and took a picture of him without no chips and asked him what email should he send that picture too?
LOL..  
FatMan in Charlotte : 10/24/2016 10:55 am : link
that's awesome!
Back to the Corner