accomplished?
Okay, he shit the bed with the S situation in '09. He has admitted as much. Probably slow to work on the OL, but has drafted rather well with Pugh, Richburg and Flowers despite some work in progress there. You hate Flowers? Fine..I'll wait for this aggressive, 21 year-old to have another season or two before weighing in and even then, would I really know what I'm seeing from TV? I'll trust in Solari's ongoing work with him before disparaging his play..Maybe ORT will be his landing place. The Giants know better than I do..
We had to re-build arguably the worse D in history and he has done a tremendous job in just one off season. Last year's "lousy" trade up for Collins, is suddenly not so lousy..
He tried to fortify the OL with FAs. He either was unable to quickly pull the trigger on some OL while putting together his D, or some FAs simply did not want to come here, or many were simply damaged goods..
With his recent drafting record, we can all pretty much assume he'll go Offense this offseason and possibly lure some young FA OL talent..
He drafted a TE in Adams. Were there any TEs available in the draft that could have helped us this year that we should have taken in the early rounds instead of who we took? How about FA? Who was available that would have made a huge difference? Maybe along with the OL, he'll draft one high next year? No idea..
So what GMs have done a better job of late? Dallas? Perhaps..The Pats? BB turns shit into gold, so who knows what that story is..Ozzie Newsome? Check his record the last bunch of years..I'm sure you can name some, but few of them could turn things around outside of possibly Dallas, imo..
Bottom line? After some lousy draft choices, bad injury luck and some omissions he has admitted to, he has been doing some fine work here, especially on D, imo
Perhaps other complaints should be pinned on possible choice of OC?PC(some borne out of necessity to mitigate some weaknesses at present)?Possible HC choice? Something else? Just asking.
The bashing gets old and is outdated imv..
81 Ladarius Green TE SD PIT (4 years, $24 million)
88 Dwayne Allen TE IND IND (4 years, $29 million)
91 Zach Miller TE CHI CHI (2 years, $6 million)
98 Coby Fleener TE IND NO (5 years, $36 million)
then of course you have guys like Bennett or Vernon Davis, even a Ben Watson. All of who are superior to anyone on our roster. We do not have an NFL caliber TE on our roster.
For years, he ignored the defence and we saw the result of that. We had to spend a ridiculous amount of money to fix that problem.
Now, it seems the same has been done on the offense with the OL, TE and RB positions. Again, this is just fact based on performance. As Troy Aikman noted yesterday, the Giants had only 14 sacks going into the game because of Eli not because the OL is doing a good job. We cannot run the ball to any great extent and we really have only one threat...albeit a great one.
I don't understand when everyone gets so upset when these facts are pointed out. Hell, it cost TC his job. Does anyone believe we would not be a better team right now had this spending spree been done under TC's watch. It is obvious the game planning and play calling have suffered dramatically not to mention the use of basically one personnel set 95% of the time. This is all the result of a porous offensive line.
We can all point to the fact that he has ignored drafting LBs or TE and no more perfect example was set than yesterday when the Steelers best offensive player, Antonio Brown, was held in check but Ben had other options besides Brown. He had two TEs that did the job plus a great running back.
A coach can only coach what he is given and what has Mac been given in terms of offensive talent. I am not excusing him by the way...but the fact is unless OBJ is out of this world, we have no chance. The selection and gathering of players is Reese's responsibility and he has failed in this regard. Comparing him to other GMs whose teams are not doing so well is ridiculous. We are Giant fans and I want the Giants to succeed...I don't give a damn about other teams.
Reese has been a reactive GM, only doing something when things get really desperate. His drafting and his assemblage of depth talent has been horrible, in my opinion. But I certainly have no agenda...I wish he had done a great job, would be thrilled. Fact is, he hasn't.
I can't fully get behind Jerry Reese until he builds a competent offensive line, something that he's been struggling to do for nearly five years.
In addition, it's hard to watch an offense that's struggling to protect the QB, without a TE, without an every down RB, and a couple of slot receivers backing up OBJ.
If we're being realistic, we have a lot of holes that still need to be filled on offense. And you have to ask, how did we get there?
That's not bias, those are the facts.
He fixed the defense last offseason. He gets credit for that. I guess I'll wait and see what he does this offseason in regards to offense.
You can make the argument he's undervalued the position, which would be fair. The Giants had great success while spending little in terms of resources on the TE position, but that hasn't been the case for awhile and they should probably reconsider (see LB).
The quality of play stinks across the league. OL play is an issue across the league.
The OL is a mess and it's filled with Reese draft picks and FA signings. Add TE to the pile as well. The offense is anemic and flat out unable to function at times. Eli rarely ever has a clean pocket and the running game is historically weak.
On the other hand, Reese nailed the defense in FA and it looks like he did well with Apple and Thompson in the draft.
It's a bottom line business. The question is, if the Giants miss the playoffs, what happens to Reese?
I think the Giants need to try another spot on the line or bench him. It is impacting Eli and the offense has no rhythm.
Have we learned nothing from "scholarship" players like Sinorice Moss or Ramses Barden?
If football teams in the NFL learn nothing else from the Patriots, learn just cut the cord when it's time to move a player (McCourty from CB to safety) or time to move on from the player completely (Chandler Jones, etc.).
But to your points about Reese:
You are correct,Reese has rebuilt the defense. Question how did it get so depleted in the first place.
Reese has not shown he can develop an offensive line. I hope you are right about Pugh, Richburg and Flowers, but up to now, his two championships were with Ernie's lines.
Reese continues to undervalue the tight end position despite the fact that all around the league tight ends are a huge part of good offenses.
And as befuddling as it seems, he also undervalues the very position that can help minimize the impact these tight ends have against the Giants, that being linebackers.
If the Giants do not make the play offs this season, and that should not be the case, Reese will have had 4 years since his latest success. That resume will be 3 awful seasons, and a total collapse. That should be grounds for a change.
So I guess, if I were the owner, the next 4 games determined his future with the team.
If the Giants don't get some incredibly lousy luck in terms of injuries and career-ending accidents the Giants and JR would be lauded as one of if not the best drafting teams in the league.
What I don't get about those who criticize JR for our current OL is.. Who was he supposed to go out and get? It's not like an established top-tier OL heading into the prime of his career is available in free agency on a regular basis. I'd argue it's extremely rare. Over the past 5 years he's had the opportunity to take OL 3 times by having a relatively high draft pick with a quality OL available when the Giants are selecting. Those players are Flowers, Richburg and Pugh.
Do people just expect every OL to pan out? Look at the rest of the OL taken in those drafts and tell me who you can resoundingly say is a guy we dropped the ball on drafting?
I think a lot of people need to realize the league is a lot different now, you can't just draft a massive kid with great talent and expect them to step right in and play Pro Bowl calibre football. It takes time for these guys to adapt to the pro game, to develop their skills. Hell 2 years ago people were saying Pugh was a bust now everyone thinks he's our best OL.
Arm-chair quarterbacking is really easy to do when you aren't looking below surface level at the nature of how offenses run these days. I'll give an example: 5-10 years ago everyone would say "you can't draft a WR and expect them to make any impact until at least year 2, probably year 3." Meanwhile linemen were going extremely high in drafts because everyone knew they can typically step right in and play very well in a starting role.
Now? Rookie WR's are easily inserted into pass-heavy offenses and it is the linemen who are taking more time to adapt and develop their skills because they are being asked to pass protect a lot more. And against far more athletic d-linemen, some being veterans who are just more educated, in far more sophisticated defensive fronts that take a great deal of experience and intelligence.
Tyron Smith's first 2 years in the NFL were very hard for him as he had to adapt and develop as a tackle. Now he's arguably the best at his position in the NFL. Reminds me a lot of Flowers. Not saying they're the same or Flowers will even become as good as Smith is now. But the kid is 22.
I don't disagree - and replacing him with Gilbride Jr. just made no sense (seeing as he had no experience ever playing or coaching TE).
I don't know where some of these calls are coming from, though. Was that TC? Mara? Reese? You guys just can't assume the GM controls everything. He's accountable for the roster, but how much direct responsibility he has over position coaches is anyone's guess.
Reese has done a lousy job and, as mentioned above, basically ruined Eli's career since SB 46. And it's not just the Oline..it is TE position, RB, another viable receiver (Shepard has been okay, not great, maybe he will be next year).
NFL history shows that if you do have someone who can dominate middle of the field you are in trouble. So, my bashing of Reese is based simply on facts and results. As someone said so smartly above, this is a results based business and, on that basis, he deserves to be fired if we do not make the playoffs.
Do you all really expect Reese to be able to plug in younger or arguably less-talented players once certain positions become depleted whether by old-age (retirement), free agency, or injury?
He can't go out every offseason and spend the kind of money like he did this year. There is a process to the replenishment of talent on any roster. It doesn't happen in one offseason completely across the board at every position of need.
The offense? That's on everyone. Its on Reese for not getting better talent, but its on this coaching staff for not getting the most out of what it has to work with. Its also on the players themselves not getting better (Flowers) or regressing (Richburg).
In sum, I'd take Reese over most other GM's since I'm looking at other NFL rosters and I really only see a handful of teams (Pats, Broncos, Steelers, Cowboys, Seahawks off the top of my head) that have better rosters than us. I'm sure there are a couple others but its atleast arguable with some of them since teams like Arizona and Carolina have massive issues as well.
Reese has done a lousy job and, as mentioned above, basically ruined Eli's career since SB 46. And it's not just the Oline..it is TE position, RB, another viable receiver (Shepard has been okay, not great, maybe he will be next year).
NFL history shows that if you do have someone who can dominate middle of the field you are in trouble. So, my bashing of Reese is based simply on facts and results. As someone said so smartly above, this is a results based business and, on that basis, he deserves to be fired if we do not make the playoffs.
You are miserable. You aren't posting facts. You are saying we are bad at X so that must be (insert person)'s fault. You are the definition of someone who talks out of their ass.
Newsflash, there's a boatload of blame to be passed around. Keep beating your drum though, its all you know how to do.
Smith started at RT from day 1 as a rookie with Doug Free at LT. After his rookie year Smith proved to be much better than Free so they swapped them in year 2. And while there was a slight adjustment period from right to left tackle comparing Tyron Smith to Ereck Flowers is beyond taking some liberties.
The results have been better than you'd expect with some marginal talent. Yes, they did ply a lot of resources into their OL, but they've managed to get good return on meager resources on the defensive side of the ball.
But again, my only question is this: who did Reese drop the ball on by not going out and getting them through free agency or the draft? What would the price have been?
And again, what if David Wilson doesn't have his career ended? What if Kenny Phillips' knee doesn't end his career? What if Chad Jones doesn't get in that car accident? What if Nicks' knee didn't end his? Cruz having to go on 3-year hiatus because of his injury? JPP blows his hand up and basically forfeits an entire year? The list goes on..
I'm not saying these are excuses per-se, but they certainly need to be taken into account when people fly off the handle about how poor a job Reese has done in drafting and filling personnel need through free agency.
I would respectfully and humbly disagree.
Heck look as recently as the past 2 year where he's drafted what many expect to be the future of our safety position through 2 drafts! None of which are first round picks. But, Thompson & Thompson (write that one down) are injured so we don't have them playing.
TE is a disaster but again.. who the heck is REALLY a good TE we should have drafted or gone after??
Let's all relax, take it easy, it's one loss in a game a lot of people didn't expect us to win considering Pittsburgh's need for that win to stay in the playoff hunt.
I still think the Giants can win a SB this year, with the talent we have on this roster as it is. The NFC does not scare me in the least and I don't see anyone in the AFC that makes me tremble either.
By his standards sure. His third year in the league he had 1 holding penalty and allowed 1 sack. He's been a perennial all-pro since his 3rd year in a position voted on more by reputation than maybe any other position. Hard to break into.
I'm just saying while I absolutely agree the book is not closed on Ereck Flowers, you're dreaming if you are using Smith as the comp. I won't pretend to be a Tyron Smith expert or an OL expert, but my sense is Flowers gets moved to another OL spot before he experiences Smith-like success.
And that isn't a knock on Reese. Look at the 2013 draft. Many of those OL drafted before Pugh to be LT's are not LT's. Pugh is a guard. I just think move Flowers because he's hurting the team. Not because of any agenda against Reese.
Problem is they probably don't have a better option than Flowers. Beatty just has to be in terrible shape, at his worst he wasn't as bad as Flowers.
are becoming questionable .
We don't have 200 million to fix the offense as we had to
with the defense .
Watch as the window closes on Eli because of the so called
plan to rebuild the offensive line . Whatever year that
happens we will see what we have in goldenboy Nassib that
he wasted two picks on ...
How about getting rid of TC and keeping so many of the
coaches . Instead of cleaning house is that also on the
owners . Give me one good reason why Quinn is still here
and who again is our offensive coordinator ?
You sure last year we didn't have swiss cheese of a d-line and secondary?
Now, that is fact.
Now, that is fact.
Or injured? Troll harder, asshole
Now, that is fact.
That's objective proof? Where? Which players weren't signed to second contracts that went on to outperform elsewhere? Aside from Linval Joseph, anyone else?
Or do you mean we should have signed the corpses of Hakeem Nicks, Kenny Phillips and David Wilson to second contracts after their bodies gave out on them?
Quote:
TE, OL, LB. See a pattern?
You sure last year we didn't have swiss cheese of a d-line and secondary?
I said same problems every year.
Look up two posts from your original one Fishie ;)
Quote:
the need for a FB here? Name one GM that does not have a FB on roster?
Look up two posts from your original one Fishie ;)
How did you sneak that in there?
Exactly. The I-formation is long gone. Or any power running plays are done here.
The quality of play stinks across the league. OL play is an issue across the league.
Bingo. Giants ol is average or better.
Dallas Oakland Buffalo have good Olines everyone else is pretty Similar
Quote:
struggle with what the NFL in 2016 is all about.
The quality of play stinks across the league. OL play is an issue across the league.
Bingo. Giants ol is average or better.
Dallas Oakland Buffalo have good Olines everyone else is pretty Similar
Yup.
Lol
Man those digs at Schwartz are getting old.
Let go of it already!
;)
Stellar LTs are often not available to mediocre, as opposed to bad, teams and sometimes not even then.
In hindsight, you could argue for a signing of Okung, but I honestly believe that JR was taking the long view and did not consider the Giants to seriously challenge this year.
I consider Flowers development to be key for this group. If he is not an LT, I think we are in trouble unless we get lucky.
IF you want to focus on 2012-2015 and bitch about a bad draft 2011-2012 draft period and leave out the injuries to good drafted players in the 2008-2010 range, have at it. But it's a new era now and the young talent brought in from 2013-present day is taking shape. Giants have had a lot of hits lately. With cap space and continued solid drafting no reason to think the Giants can't field a pretty scary team next season.
If they collapse here down the stretch it will leave a bad taste in our mouths but they haven't collapsed yet. ONe loss doesn't equal 4.
Just get to wins. Develop a winning culture here again. If they do that I will be happy with the current build.
You can look at things two ways. Let's take Eric Flowers. Reese spent a top 10 pick on the offensive line which genuinely everyone thought was needed. he was a highly regarded prospect from a big college program. You could stop there and say "great job addressing the line" and argue Flowers' play is not on him. Or you can take the other approach, and say he spent a top 10 pick that so far is not living up to what most would expect. Then you can Reese have it for poor drafting. Neither is right or wrong, its a matter of perspective.
Reese went into the offseason with the (apparent) #1 goal of fixing the offense. That looks to be a resounding success. We also all know the Oline needed help, and so far the Oline has been a disappointment. He has succeeded in some areas and not in others. I think you don't have to be a pro-Reese guy or an anti-Reese guy.
Can't blame Coughlin anymore.
Can't blame Coughlin anymore.
+1
81 Ladarius Green TE SD PIT (4 years, $24 million)
88 Dwayne Allen TE IND IND (4 years, $29 million)
91 Zach Miller TE CHI CHI (2 years, $6 million)
98 Coby Fleener TE IND NO (5 years, $36 million)
then of course you have guys like Bennett or Vernon Davis, even a Ben Watson. All of who are superior to anyone on our roster. We do not have an NFL caliber TE on our roster.
Gary Barnidge TE CLE (3 years, $12 million)
This is the guy I would have gone after.
"I tell you, Gary Barnidge is probably one of my most favorite players I've ever coached,'' said DeFilippo before the news was official. "He really is. He's the same guy every day. He's productive. He works, he keeps his mouth shut. If you give him a coaching point, he takes it to heart and it shows on the field. And I'll tell you what, if that report is true, then the Cleveland Browns just got better today.''
Would have worked well with Eli.
Flowers not working out as a LT will be a blemish on Reese's record. As far as TE is concerned, there were rumors that the Giants wanted Hunter Henry, who was taken by SD.
In any event, Reese isn't going anywhere.
Inflated during garbage time?
The Giants lost 7 games last year when they were leading or tied with less than 2 minutes remaining in the 4th quarter. What garbage time?
+1
Rome wasn't built in a day, but posters blame Reese for not fixing the O and no one seems to hold Coughlin responsible for having six wins in two straight seasons.
By the way -- Coughlin's record with Jax and the NYG are identical in the last three years of his tenure with each team.
Yeah, we lost last year due to defense folding like a cheap suit 7 times. Who assembled that defensive roster? Was that Coughlin, too? You don't think Coughlin could have coached this current team with a 200 million dollar defense?
Those of you who are tired of the Reese bashing, the other side is equally fed up with the excuse making.
I can praise Reese for his moves to strengthen the Defense. They seem to be paying off. Its obvious that he made a calculated move to fix the defense hoping that he could get through another year with the OL and entire offense mostly as is. I will refrain from judgment on that strategy until the end of the year. Even so at 8-4 and playing relevant football in November and December, its not looking like a bad choice. I can also compliment him on what I think will be a very good draft class. His first in a very long time. Even if you want to praise his recent draft classes, they aren't looking so good the farther you move from draft day.
That said, I won't fully get behind Reese until he successfully rebuilds the OL. You can argue whether he has ignored the OL or not. The point seems moot to me. Is it better to ignore a problem or fail to fix it. Truth be told we are not where we need to be on the OL. Some of the blanket statements of the Reese supporters that most NFL teams are having OL problems are ridiculous and not accurate. I know there are 30 teams out there that are better than us at running the ball. Is it asking too much to be up around 18? This team will not be a contender for real until it fixes the OL and can run the ball.
And I'm sure both sides can find some unity on this issue, Can we please get a LB who can reliably cover a TE?
Quote:
the majority of it is from butthurt Coughlin apologists who are still looking for someone to blame, and didn't think he had anything to do with keeping stalwarts on the OL a year too long, or keeping a S&C coach who was costing us valuable resources in the roster replenishment department. Must be nice to not be held accountable for clock management, and having the blame laid at Reese's feet when things go bad. Where were these threads when we were winning? Fucking pathetic.
+1
Rome wasn't built in a day, but posters blame Reese for not fixing the O and no one seems to hold Coughlin responsible for having six wins in two straight seasons.
By the way -- Coughlin's record with Jax and the NYG are identical in the last three years of his tenure with each team.
Isn't losing your job being held accountable?
Rome wasn't built in a day, and the New York Giants offensive line is taking 5 years and counting to build.
Coughlin is irrelevant to this discussion. As in the one that's taking place about Reese, right now.
Not a completely unrelated thread from about six weeks ago that had nothing to do with Jerry Reese, who was irrelevant to that discussion.
Quote:
Yes, I'm aware of how many close games we lost last season. Those are games we are winning now. Our defense was historically bad last season, and we made it a priority to address that this year. Our 3 top signings look like home runs, Keenan Robinson was a nice pickup, and our most recent draft class looks very promising, and yet people are pining over TC lamenting we let the wrong guy go.
Yeah, we lost last year due to defense folding like a cheap suit 7 times. Who assembled that defensive roster? Was that Coughlin, too? You don't think Coughlin could have coached this current team with a 200 million dollar defense?
Did Jerry Reese blow up JPP's hand? How come Coughlin never moved on from Palmieri when we had 3 straight seasons of leading the league in losing players to injuries? How come Coughlin gets a pass on injuries when the coach is in charge of hiring the S&C coach, but Reese gets laid the blame for assembling a poor roster? Very inconsistent in how it's applied, that's the very definition of not being held accountable (to the Coughlin apologists, we know the Giants held Coughlin accountable).
I know... Heady stuff.
On the other hand, we have found that:
- Reese is terrible drafting in rounds 3-5
- Every position that he has neglected or thought he could address with late round picks and castoffs has come back to bit this team in the ass.
If Reese would fix the Offensive line, I'd be 100% fine with him.
I guess that makes me a "hater".
Ok, and for a self proclaimed "big picture guy", you come off as very whiney, with this chicken little "sky is falling" rhetoric. It's blatantly obvious you chime in with these posts to indirectly take shots at Reese and/or McAdoo to hoist your golden boy. Very peculiar you chime in here fresh off a loss, but kept your mouth shut during the winning streak. Reese is certainly not above criticism. A nuanced discussion about the FO is welcome, but it's certainly not coming from you. You showed your ass during your meltdown when we played Carolina.
I've been here every week. Are you saying I haven't been complaining about the offensive line for 4 years, now?
It's you that are seeing boogeymen... People out to get Reese's blood.
It's what he does.
Pics or GTFO?
Yes. For the love of god, please.
Quote:
but Coughlin is relevant to this discussion, because this is where the Reese disdain comes from. Again, you showed your ass during the Carolina game.
Pics or GTFO?
Shit this discussion was doing so well until my buddy Paul came on...😜
If this team wins 10 games and makes the playoffs- Will you still feel the same?
Are you familiar with Landon Collins?
Paul, just playin' with ya..😎
This sums it up for me. It's a team building philosophy. We got cute too many times with skill position players while letting the core of our team, the offensive and defensive lines, fall apart.
That is the whole argument for me, right there. That's it.
Quote:
Was his pick. That is the one guy that he got on that defense. He also added Nicks and Cruz who were very instrumental for our second ring. But I always believe that championships are won with the front lines and this is where he has failed miserably.
This sums it up for me. It's a team building philosophy. We got cute too many times with skill position players while letting the core of our team, the offensive and defensive lines, fall apart.
That is the whole argument for me, right there. That's it.
That's easier said than done. We have a top DL, the OL needs work- We knew this prior to the season.
And when did "we get cute"?
The OL has two #1s and a #2. It needs more help.
This idea that Reese has ignored the OL is simply false.
I'm talking about accountability from a fan perspective, not the organization. Where is it from your end?
That's an example of bad philosophy. Picking a 1st round RB thinking it will solve the rushing problem, when it's the guys that do the blocking that make the RB in most cases.
the Patriots invest very little in their lines. Some say Solder, their only 1st round pick on the OL is a liability. No one else higher than a 3rd round pick on their OL and no high priced FA's.
on their DL one 1st round pick. the rest JAG's that get coached up. More investment in the back 7 (slightly).
Think the Patriots are an anomaly?
Look at the Broncos OL from the SB.
no 1st round picks, in fact a couple 3rd's and late round picks, low $$ FA's. They had DL investment. But not more than the Giants. A lot of their investment is in the back 7.
Look at the Seahawks. OL, very little investment. DL some investment, but again mostly back 7 investment.
I looked at all 12 playoff teams from last year and the same theme is generally true, not much OL investment in terms of high draft picks and high $$ FA's - as a rule.
And definitely not on both lines.
The Cowboys this year will be an anomaly. And they haven't won anything yet.
I believe it's as much or more coaching based on results we're seeing on-field today.
Can't blame Coughlin anymore.
The personnel is better and people are supposed to blame... the GM? The D is certainly significantly better, if the O is better too, I would say that is a decent enough job.
That's an example of bad philosophy. Picking a 1st round RB thinking it will solve the rushing problem, when it's the guys that do the blocking that make the RB in most cases.
I wanted Cordy Glenn as well...No argument here. But we have 3 high picks on the OL.
He got cute there. But, how long you gonna hold that over his head?
That's an example of bad philosophy. Picking a 1st round RB thinking it will solve the rushing problem, when it's the guys that do the blocking that make the RB in most cases.
Given the HC's penchant to go to bat for coordinators like Fewell and KG, you don't think he went to bat to squeeze out more years out of Diehl, Beatty, Boothe, Baas, and Snee? The team collectively thought the window was more wide open than it was. Basically, you want to shove the GM out the door who built the 2011 SB team, because he didn't make the pick you wanted the year after? Does he get credit for 2011, or nah? Who knows where we'd be with Wilson, the kid was a dynamic player who had shitty luck with injuries. DW actually would be dynamic with OBJ.
Am I happy with the way the O is playing? Of course not, but I find it really difficult to bitch and moan about an 8-4 team.
But that's just me.
Even if TC thought Diehl and Snee were ready to be Pro Bowlers again going into 2013, it's the GM's job to know his coaches blind spots and overrule him. I liked TC a ton and was sad to see him go, but he had blinders on when it came to certain players. Reese has to jettison those anchors. And maybe the organizational structure didn't allow for him to do so - I have no insight into the Giants decision making, so I find it hard to properly allocate blame with any certainty.
Even if TC thought Diehl and Snee were ready to be Pro Bowlers again going into 2013, it's the GM's job to know his coaches blind spots and overrule him. I liked TC a ton and was sad to see him go, but he had blinders on when it came to certain players. Reese has to jettison those anchors. And maybe the organizational structure didn't allow for him to do so - I have no insight into the Giants decision making, so I find it hard to properly allocate blame with any certainty.
Great post Brett.
the Patriots invest very little in their lines. Some say Solder, their only 1st round pick on the OL is a liability. No one else higher than a 3rd round pick on their OL and no high priced FA's.
on their DL one 1st round pick. the rest JAG's that get coached up. More investment in the back 7 (slightly).
Think the Patriots are an anomaly?
Look at the Broncos OL from the SB.
no 1st round picks, in fact a couple 3rd's and late round picks, low $$ FA's. They had DL investment. But not more than the Giants. A lot of their investment is in the back 7.
Look at the Seahawks. OL, very little investment. DL some investment, but again mostly back 7 investment.
I looked at all 12 playoff teams from last year and the same theme is generally true, not much OL investment in terms of high draft picks and high $$ FA's - as a rule.
And definitely not on both lines.
The Cowboys this year will be an anomaly. And they haven't won anything yet.
I believe it's as much or more coaching based on results we're seeing on-field today.
Or is it an ability to identify talent? The Broncos and Patriots may be that good to where they can identify solid talent in later rounds. Others are less fortunate and need to draft earlier where the likelihood of finding a keeper is higher.
For all his faults, Reese isn't bad at identifying CB and WR talent. OL not so much.
I mean come on
Ok, I see that aspect now and yeah there is to a degree. But you would also have to say that there is a contingent that denies Reese has any accountability with regards to our current situation also.
It's hard to say what could have been done to improve the line, I think Joe Thomas might have been the missed opportunity there but I don't know for sure. I do think though the ignoring of better TE's than what we have is a glaring omission on his part though that could have drastically helped
You are so full of shit, or just plain dense. I'm leaning towards both.
I said nothing of the sort. What I said was how do you know how good or job a bad of a job reigning in Beckham Coughlin had done, considering that he didn't have any issues for nearly two full seasons prior to the end of season meltdown last year, at which point he was coaching for his job.
I said that since it carried over into this season, and McAdoo also was having trouble reigning him in, perhaps it was just another in a long list of shit that posters like you heap at Coughlin's feet, which by the way didn't get any better after his ouster.
The dip in the offense should have been expected by every single Giants fan. It was clear as day that this would happen back in March.
Here's how you chose to lead off that thread.
Britt in VA : 12/20/2015 2:20 pm
Beckham drops a TD.
DRC Drops another Pick 6.
Jennings fumbles away a promising drive.
If they fire Coughlin, it's a BIG FUCKING MISTAKE.
I'll take showing my ass that way, I guess... Well, over literally showing my ass to my coworkers, or nah?
Granted, he has tried to address the oline and TE position but I think that is even a worse indictment of his performance. His attempts have not been good.
I didn't delete that other thread. Mods likely did it out of pity for you.
I didn't delete that other thread. Mods likely did it out of pity for you.
Absolutely hilarious.
You fabricate something I said about Tom Coughlin not being responsible for reigning Beckham in, I correct you, then you dig up some old post to "prove" I said it, which has absolutely zero to do with what you accused me of saying. THEN, you have the audacity to say that I'm not capable of having a rational conversation about it!
Can't make it up.
Also, why in the world would the mods pity me? I wasn't even on the thread, which is even more lame, considering I wasn't even around and you were trying to bash me, at which point many other posters bashed you.
Got any more old threads to dig up? How about some Cutler threads where you followed me around for years with?
Like I said, hilarious.
I wear it as a badge of honor. The guy is a HOF coach, and took us to two championships. Both probably the greatest sports events I'll ever see in my lifetime, including the greatest upset of all time in all of sports.
Show some fucking respect, something you've lacked to for years. You've bashed the guy relentlessly for years, and continue to now that he's gone. That reflects way more poorly on you that anybody that defends the guy, IMO.
After awhile you are what your record says you are. its been enough years. Incomplete NFl average to below average records...NFL average to below average GM
I remind us he has a number of years and unlike most NFL GMS he inherited a NFL franchise QB who never got injured and still produced NFL average results ( and may again this year and next...hopefully not...but the likely pick is that the past is close to the future).
I dont buy he has had bad luck...his luck is average after a few years ( ie there is little good or bad luck by five years out...results resemble capability...NFL average to below considering he has the biggest piece to start which few other GMS had...a franchise QB who did not get injured.
just imho. Hopefully he is learning on the job
I wear it as a badge of honor. The guy is a HOF coach, and took us to two championships. Both probably the greatest sports events I'll ever see in my lifetime, including the greatest upset of all time in all of sports.
Show some fucking respect, something you've lacked to for years. You've bashed the guy relentlessly for years, and continue to now that he's gone. That reflects way more poorly on you that anybody that defends the guy, IMO.
You accuse me of bashing TC, when I suggest his best days were behind him, and things that he should be accountable for. Your most recent nickname was well earned.
Quote:
were won on the lines, but now I feel that's an old school concept.
the Patriots invest very little in their lines. Some say Solder, their only 1st round pick on the OL is a liability. No one else higher than a 3rd round pick on their OL and no high priced FA's.
on their DL one 1st round pick. the rest JAG's that get coached up. More investment in the back 7 (slightly).
Think the Patriots are an anomaly?
Look at the Broncos OL from the SB.
no 1st round picks, in fact a couple 3rd's and late round picks, low $$ FA's. They had DL investment. But not more than the Giants. A lot of their investment is in the back 7.
Look at the Seahawks. OL, very little investment. DL some investment, but again mostly back 7 investment.
I looked at all 12 playoff teams from last year and the same theme is generally true, not much OL investment in terms of high draft picks and high $$ FA's - as a rule.
And definitely not on both lines.
The Cowboys this year will be an anomaly. And they haven't won anything yet.
I believe it's as much or more coaching based on results we're seeing on-field today.
Or is it an ability to identify talent? The Broncos and Patriots may be that good to where they can identify solid talent in later rounds. Others are less fortunate and need to draft earlier where the likelihood of finding a keeper is higher.
For all his faults, Reese isn't bad at identifying CB and WR talent. OL not so much.
Probably a combination of both.
What I look at in New England is how bad their OL was the last two years (even winning a SB), so they lured Dante Scarnecchia out of retirement to take back OL coaching responsibilities and it has turned things around very quickly.
Someone like B in Alb or a former player would know, because I'm surprised coaching can have so much impact, but having never been an OL that's my opinion.
After awhile you are what your record says you are. its been enough years. Incomplete NFl average to below average records...NFL average to below average GM
I remind us he has a number of years and unlike most NFL GMS he inherited a NFL franchise QB who never got injured and still produced NFL average results ( and may again this year and next...hopefully not...but the likely pick is that the past is close to the future).
I dont buy he has had bad luck...his luck is average after a few years ( ie there is little good or bad luck by five years out...results resemble capability...NFL average to below considering he has the biggest piece to start which few other GMS had...a franchise QB who did not get injured.
just imho. Hopefully he is learning on the job
Bill, Reese has essentially been an extended period of Accorsi with some minor nuances. Same philosophy, particularly on the defensive side, and same areas of deficiency, particularly the offensive line. Ernie might have been better in free agency, Reese better in drafting and UDFA. If you think deeper about the parallels, there are a bunch.
I tried man, I tried.
Quote:
for good discussion. Not often that an entire thread can be mostly informative..
I tried man, I tried.
You always do, sir..😊