I was re-watching some of the came and noticed this play. I don't know if anyone else caught it.
It was 3rd and 5 for the Giants at their own 15. The Cowboys were trying to get some quick substitutions, and Eli does a good job going for a quick snap and catching the defense with too many men on the field. Unfortunately the refs missed it. Collinsworth misses badly on his description too. He shows the replay and highlights that what Eli is trying to do, but doesn't comment on the fact that the 2 of the Cowboys had not gotten off the field when the ball was snapped.
The question is, should McAdoo have challenged the play since that is one of the few penalties that are reviewable. The penalty would have likely gotten them a first down, though it's possible it would have been 3rd and inches.
You never know when you will need the challenges, but I tend to think this was a missed opportunity by the coaches. If you can get a first down rather than be forced to punt, I think you do it. I'm not sure what camera view the coaches have access to in order to make these decisions, so it could be excusable, but it was definitely unfortunate the refs missed it.
Here is a screen shot that shows the extra men.
Because in this screen grab, while the players are still on the field, the ball hasn't been snapped yet.
This is all I have. But, at the time of the screen shot the ball is inbetween Richburg's legs on the way to Eli. The play has started.
But thanks NBC for not showing the all 22 when the ball was snapped, so we could tell if was a bad call or not.
Challenge? Not sure he'd want to risk a 2nd half TO, then, after the refs did not catch it, not to may have been the better choice.
It was a BS play should have been a flag.
If there are two unsportsmanlike penalties or personal fouls on one team, both will be enforced. Also, a personal foul on a delay of game will result in two fouls being enforced, but that might be because one is considered a dead ball foul.
CC didn't really miss it, he just didn't focus on it. He made a snarky comment about rushing the play, which was interesting, because Rodgers did this twice yesterday - one was a penalty and one offset because the offense wasn't set fully, but each time, they talked about what a genius Rodgers is at knowing what the opponent is doing. CC seemed to act as if Eli just rushed the play for fuck's sake.
I'm sure the all 22 video will show it more clearly, but I think it seems pretty clear that at least number 95 is still on the field. You can't tell how far on the field, and it looks like number 59 is pretty far out on the field as well and looks like he is walking.
A screenshot from the all 22 video would show just how egregious the missed call was, but I feel confident that it was definitely a missed call.
Quote:
Is there another play where you can accept two penalties?
If there are two unsportsmanlike penalties or personal fouls on one team, both will be enforced. Also, a personal foul on a delay of game will result in two fouls being enforced, but that might be because one is considered a dead ball foul.
Good point, I wonder if a dead ball foul makes it different allowing two penalties to be accepted.
only thing I can think of why the rule is that way.
Worse - it isn't just in games against us which means it is serially ignored. It's become a joke among the fans I know.
Worse - it isn't just in games against us which means it is serially ignored. It's become a joke among the fans I know.
Usually it's just Smith jumping early (at least that I've noticed). And Jason Peters gets away with it early often too.
Last night was the first time I noticed their OGs leaving early. It wasn't even close on one play. I think Leary was engaged with the DT before Prescott even had the ball.
Quote:
Is there another play where you can accept two penalties?
If there are two unsportsmanlike penalties or personal fouls on one team, both will be enforced. Also, a personal foul on a delay of game will result in two fouls being enforced, but that might be because one is considered a dead ball foul.
I think the difference is that both penalties occured during the play. If the play was over and blown dead, and then the roughing happened, I think you would have had the PI and the roughing call. When two fouls both happen during the play, I don't think they ever enforce both.
Worse - it isn't just in games against us which means it is serially ignored. It's become a joke among the fans I know.
Dallas got away with a couple delay of games too. Each time I was calling for the penalty, and then expecting to see the flag after the Giants made the defensive stop.....
Do the referees use the scoreboard clock or do they have another device they use to see delay of game.
I mean it's kind of hard for them to watch both the ball and the game clock on the scoreboard, how do they see both the clock and the ball? stopwatch in their hand?
Do the referees use the scoreboard clock or do they have another device they use to see delay of game.
I mean it's kind of hard for them to watch both the ball and the game clock on the scoreboard, how do they see both the clock and the ball? stopwatch in their hand?
I believe the back judge is responsible for calling delay. Most stadiums have a game clock field level and he usually has an angle where he can see that clock and the snap.
This has been going on FOREVER. Remember Andre Gurode and his snaps that were routinely a half second after the rest of the OL moved? That was never called.
If there are multiple personal fouls or unsportsmanlike penalties, all of them will be enforced - if they are on the same team.
However, this rarely happens since most unsportsmanlike penalties are dead ball fouls.
Since so little has been said (I'm not going anywhere near the game thread), and virtually ZIP was said last night ...
Anyone know what the explanation was on the defensive holding on the D-line? Was it Hank or Snacks? Can't recall. (Thinking Hank.)
Neither guy in the booth said a word.
It wouldn't wipe out the too many men issue.
The two many men on the field should have been contested by McAdoo.
The two many men on the field should have been contested by McAdoo.
That last Dallas play was infuriating. All the Giants LB's are calling for the flag and they still hadn't snapped the ball.
No. Refs would've (or should've) prevented the snap if that was the case.
We would've won a challenge, but you can't use a possible last challenge to get 5 yards at that point in the game, IMO. That's why the ref who looked right at the fumble and didn't rule Free down screwed us.
Hell, wasn't one of them against the Giants in a Super Bowl? I think it was Blackburn that he caught with a foot on the field.
This was a head scratcher for sure. I've never seen an DLineman called for holding on a run before.
NWE challenged the too many players on field ruling, and the play was overturned. Penalty on Chase Blackburn: Defensive 12 On-field, 5 yards (no play)
I had to look that one up because I don't think I've ever seen that call either. Apparently a DL can't hold a pulling OL. That's the only thing I could find that would explain such a call.
Vaguely remember another Giants DT being called for holding in the last ~5 years or so too.
Vaguely remember another Giants DT being called for holding in the last ~5 years or so too.
That was on a screen pass, which is not as unusual. Problem with that one was that Hamilton didn't hold anyone.
Because in this screen grab, while the players are still on the field, the ball hasn't been snapped yet.
I think you're wrong. Richburg's right hand is in motion and off the ground. The ball is hidden behind him but it's been snapped. I believe.
That is supposed to be considered holding, yet one series later, the flag comes out - on us!
Quote:
of this with the ball being snapped and 12 (or more) Cowboys still on the field.
Because in this screen grab, while the players are still on the field, the ball hasn't been snapped yet.
I think you're wrong. Richburg's right hand is in motion and off the ground. The ball is hidden behind him but it's been snapped. I believe.
Someone posted one that shows the ball snapped and players on the field. In the original the ball is not seen, so it's impossible to say I'm wrong based on that screen shot.
Quote:
In comment 13262902 pjcas18 said:
Quote:
of this with the ball being snapped and 12 (or more) Cowboys still on the field.
Because in this screen grab, while the players are still on the field, the ball hasn't been snapped yet.
I think you're wrong. Richburg's right hand is in motion and off the ground. The ball is hidden behind him but it's been snapped. I believe.
Someone posted one that shows the ball snapped and players on the field. In the original the ball is not seen, so it's impossible to say I'm wrong based on that screen shot.
The original photo shows Richburg's right arm between his legs as he is snapping the ball. You can't see the ball, since it is behind him, but it is clearly after the snap.
Regardless, I'd love to see a shot from the all-22 video that would show how far on the field the players were. I suspect it was not even close, and was an awful missed call by the refs.