for display only
Big Blue Interactive The Corner Forum  
Back to the Corner

Archived Thread

Dallas - Too many men on the field

cnewk : 12/12/2016 9:52 am
I was re-watching some of the came and noticed this play. I don't know if anyone else caught it.

It was 3rd and 5 for the Giants at their own 15. The Cowboys were trying to get some quick substitutions, and Eli does a good job going for a quick snap and catching the defense with too many men on the field. Unfortunately the refs missed it. Collinsworth misses badly on his description too. He shows the replay and highlights that what Eli is trying to do, but doesn't comment on the fact that the 2 of the Cowboys had not gotten off the field when the ball was snapped.

The question is, should McAdoo have challenged the play since that is one of the few penalties that are reviewable. The penalty would have likely gotten them a first down, though it's possible it would have been 3rd and inches.

You never know when you will need the challenges, but I tend to think this was a missed opportunity by the coaches. If you can get a first down rather than be forced to punt, I think you do it. I'm not sure what camera view the coaches have access to in order to make these decisions, so it could be excusable, but it was definitely unfortunate the refs missed it.

Here is a screen shot that shows the extra men.
Pages: 1 2 <<Prev | Show All |
RE: RE: What about the  
Greg from LI : 12/12/2016 11:02 am : link
In comment 13263205 Wuphat said:
Quote:
This was a head scratcher for sure. I've never seen an DLineman called for holding on a run before.


I had to look that one up because I don't think I've ever seen that call either. Apparently a DL can't hold a pulling OL. That's the only thing I could find that would explain such a call.
It would be interesting to see a pic showing whole field  
micky : 12/12/2016 11:02 am : link
and where the side judge was and where he was looking at this time.
it's rarely called  
giants#1 : 12/12/2016 11:08 am : link
though it's been called on the Giants a few times. Wasn't Keith Hamilton called for it in the SB negating Armstead's pick 6?

Vaguely remember another Giants DT being called for holding in the last ~5 years or so too.
RE: it's rarely called  
Greg from LI : 12/12/2016 11:14 am : link
In comment 13263253 giants#1 said:
Quote:
though it's been called on the Giants a few times. Wasn't Keith Hamilton called for it in the SB negating Armstead's pick 6?

Vaguely remember another Giants DT being called for holding in the last ~5 years or so too.


That was on a screen pass, which is not as unusual. Problem with that one was that Hamilton didn't hold anyone.
point being that defensive holding on a running play is almost unheard  
Greg from LI : 12/12/2016 11:15 am : link
of
RE: Do you have a screen shot  
BillT : 12/12/2016 11:55 am : link
In comment 13262902 pjcas18 said:
Quote:
of this with the ball being snapped and 12 (or more) Cowboys still on the field.

Because in this screen grab, while the players are still on the field, the ball hasn't been snapped yet.

I think you're wrong. Richburg's right hand is in motion and off the ground. The ball is hidden behind him but it's been snapped. I believe.
What is ironic..  
FatMan in Charlotte : 12/12/2016 12:00 pm : link
is that the Cowboys just the previous series used their DL to take out two Giants OL to free up another pass rusher.

That is supposed to be considered holding, yet one series later, the flag comes out - on us!
RE: RE: Do you have a screen shot  
pjcas18 : 12/12/2016 12:10 pm : link
In comment 13263452 BillT said:
Quote:
In comment 13262902 pjcas18 said:


Quote:


of this with the ball being snapped and 12 (or more) Cowboys still on the field.

Because in this screen grab, while the players are still on the field, the ball hasn't been snapped yet.



I think you're wrong. Richburg's right hand is in motion and off the ground. The ball is hidden behind him but it's been snapped. I believe.


Someone posted one that shows the ball snapped and players on the field. In the original the ball is not seen, so it's impossible to say I'm wrong based on that screen shot.
RE: RE: RE: Do you have a screen shot  
cnewk : 12/12/2016 12:15 pm : link
In comment 13263496 pjcas18 said:
Quote:
In comment 13263452 BillT said:


Quote:


In comment 13262902 pjcas18 said:


Quote:


of this with the ball being snapped and 12 (or more) Cowboys still on the field.

Because in this screen grab, while the players are still on the field, the ball hasn't been snapped yet.



I think you're wrong. Richburg's right hand is in motion and off the ground. The ball is hidden behind him but it's been snapped. I believe.



Someone posted one that shows the ball snapped and players on the field. In the original the ball is not seen, so it's impossible to say I'm wrong based on that screen shot.


The original photo shows Richburg's right arm between his legs as he is snapping the ball. You can't see the ball, since it is behind him, but it is clearly after the snap.

Regardless, I'd love to see a shot from the all-22 video that would show how far on the field the players were. I suspect it was not even close, and was an awful missed call by the refs.
I see it now  
pjcas18 : 12/12/2016 12:18 pm : link
I saw the Cowboys players helmet and didn't see Richburg's hand with the ball and thought it was still on the ground, my bad.
There is always an extra second on the delay of game call  
Mighty : 12/12/2016 12:24 pm : link
One of the refs is looking solely at the play clock. When the clock hits zero he looks up and if it isnt snapped then he throws the flag. So in that split second after it hits zero and he looks up you can get away with it. ! of the two plays though i thought it was a good 2 seconds after the play clock expired
Pages: 1 2 <<Prev | Show All |
Back to the Corner