The Giants’ weakest link has been free safety, where rookie free agent Andrew Adams was exposed and later benched against Washington.
Leon Hall, a Pro Bowl cornerback in a nine-year career with the Bengals, replaced Adams in Washington and might start Sunday. Backup Nat Berhe, a forceful hitter, might be ready to return from a concussion.
It’s not ideal but it’s better than the other guy (Adams),” one personnel man said, referring to Hall at safety. “Smaller guy, but savvy. Veteran guys can match back there just because of their awareness. He can match up OK against tight ends in man coverage.”
THIS IS OUT OF BOB MCGINN's SCOUTING REPORT ON THE THREAD BELOW. DID NOT NOTICE THAT THIS HAPPENED THIS PAST SUNDAY VS THE REDSKINS. THOUGHT IT DESERVED ITS OWN THREAD. I WOULD PREFER TO SEE THE VETERAN BACK THERE THIS SUNDAY IMO.
IMO, Hall should get the start on Sunday, some veteran experience would figure to help here.
Aaron Rodgers firing away at undrafted rookie free agent Andrew Adams is a scary proposition....
I know I did. He's been much better of late in my eyes. Obviously there is only so much I am able to see on tv, but he seems much more willing to hit guys and he seems to be around the ball more. Early in the season he avoided contact and got burnt a lot.
Either way, I'm sure those guys will rotate plenty.
Rodgers starting "running the table" when Cook returned to the fold.
I would rather have the experienced pass covering Hall patrolling centerfield than the rookie Adams in a big playoff game on their turf
I don't have any problems with Adams, feel like he's played well in his role all year, no one is perfect. But he is still a UDFA rookie and in this environment, in this big of a game, the experience may make all the difference.
Granted Hall had the one bone head play vs Pittsburgh on the Bryant TD but since then he's been pretty solid.
I don't think it was a benching and i don't think Hall starts next week.
1. I think part of the game plan was to use Hall against Jordan. There was a similar plan vs. Eifert and the Eagles TE. I think They like matching Hall up Vs. the more dynamic TE. With the emergence of Cook, this could again be the case.
2. I think they just wanted to get Hall some extra reps at FS because he is the primary back up there and does not have a ton of experience in that role. IDK what the deal is with Berhe but i think Hall is 1 st off the bench as a safety
3. Adams did have a bad play or 2, but he has mostly been solid, very few errors. Being the weak link on the best secondary in Giants history is not exactly a slap in the face
At any rate, Adams did an admirable job filling in, and I think we'd be OK with either. Not my first choice on either count, but as reserves hard to beat.
Behre may only get very limited snaps as Collins is the SS and Adams / Hall are likely staying at free safety the kid can hit and stuff the run well. Hope that long concussion protocol was all about making sure he was OK.
I wish they had pursued a veteran FA last Spring. Waddle?
I didn't re-watch the game but on one play Adams got beat, missed the tackle and laid on the ground rather than get up and chase. I think that was the one that put him on the bench
I wish they had pursued a veteran FA last Spring. Waddle?
To be fair, they drafted a kid they really like who looked like he was taking the job by by the horns from day 1. He got hurt. What can you do.
I know...I was so disappointed when he went down...didn't know it would be the entire year....sucks
Weddle brings concussion issues, NYG wasn't spending open market dollars on him.
I like Adams and believe he has steadily improved..We are allowed to have UDFAs grow into being decent players every so often
Adams has been making mistakes for weeks prior to Washington. He is close to non-existent in supporting the deep passing game and lately has been missing badly with tackles.
He has "survived" because of the strength of our Corners who have been basically holding their own without FS help.
Hall is the lesser of the two evils
Adams has improved every week. We don't notice him because he doesn't often make mistakes. That is a good thing.
Yes...he does not "Make Plays" often, but I don't think that is an indictment on the kid. If he makes HALF the improvement from yr1 to yr 2 as Collins does, He would be a plus player.
Quote:
So Adams has been the starter for most of the season. His play has allowed Jenkins and Collins to go do what they do. Guys like Adams only get noticed when something goes wrong. The defense has been a dominant defense for most of the season with Adams taking care of the deep threat. Some have marveled at how he has grown and came on so fast. Yet he makes a mistake and right away we have fans calling him a weak link. Really do you think the other DBS on the Giants feel that way
Adams has been making mistakes for weeks prior to Washington. He is close to non-existent in supporting the deep passing game and lately has been missing badly with tackles.
He has "survived" because of the strength of our Corners who have been basically holding their own without FS help.
Hall is the lesser of the two evils
I have to agree with this assessment. I've seen Adams whiff at tackles in recent weeks only to allow big gains. Hall might now be the better of two evils. I think Hall has finally figured out what he needs to do. He doesn't have the speed he once did, but he serves a role, perhaps more like Deon Grant.
Long term, Hall is not the answer. But in this game, where I think Spags will need to dial up lots of blitzes using players from the secondary (due to Rodger's speed / elusiveness), having Hall "guard the back" is worthwhile IMHO.
Quote:
So Adams has been the starter for most of the season. His play has allowed Jenkins and Collins to go do what they do. Guys like Adams only get noticed when something goes wrong. The defense has been a dominant defense for most of the season with Adams taking care of the deep threat. Some have marveled at how he has grown and came on so fast. Yet he makes a mistake and right away we have fans calling him a weak link. Really do you think the other DBS on the Giants feel that way
Adams has been making mistakes for weeks prior to Washington. He is close to non-existent in supporting the deep passing game and lately has been missing badly with tackles.
He has "survived" because of the strength of our Corners who have been basically holding their own without FS help.
Hall is the lesser of the two evils
Yup. I agree with your take here and pretty much feel the same way on all points.
Obviously Hall was really a CB through his career and not a safety but he's been around a while and knows what he's doing.
I think Adams has filled in admirably but I do worry about him making a mistake that comes with lack of experience. You do not want your FS getting caught out of position against Rodgers.
Guys! Please read what you've written before you post. The rules of football are a lot more complex than the rules of grammar, so if you can master football's rules...etc.
Guys! Please read what you've written before you post. The rules of football are a lot more complex than the rules of grammar, so if you can master football's rules...etc.
Not sure what's confusing you..
The OP says it's from McGinn's scouting report. He says Adams was benched for Hall and that Hall may be starting @ FS on Sunday. McGinn's opinion is that Hall is a better option than Adams.
Someone later in the thread said that Hall is now ahead of Adams on the depth chart.
If Adams matches up better given what GB does on its schemes then its coach's option.