More important than all the Beckham storminess is Reese saying that they seriously need to evaluate college QB prospects within the next two seasons. Here are some quotes from NFL.com's story:
1. "We always think about every position, but Eli is 36," general manager Jerry Reese conceded, via the New York Daily News, in Monday's season-ending press conference. "We have started to think about who's the next quarterback, who's in line. So we'll look into that as we move through the offseason."
2. "Thirty-six, I don't think that's ancient for a quarterback," Reese continued. "I think he's probably on the back nine, but I don't think that's ancient for a quarterback."
Eli on - (
New Window )
Damn, it really sucks
If it's a project you want, guys like Gunner Kiel (I think he was the highest rated QB coming out of HS) and Wes Lunt would be fine, but will probably go undrafted this year.
Damn, it really sucks
If we draft Lmar fucking Jackson or Luke fucking Falk, we will be drafting top 10 for years.
Lamar Jackson fucking sucks as a QB.
Still brought them to within one with a bomb right before the D collapsed. Eli was scrambling for the first down trailing four scores with under a minute to go. Crazy? Yes, but that is never say die Eli.
Please improve the offensive line.
Quote:
Josh Rosen, Lamar Jackson, Luke Falk...
Damn, it really sucks
If we draft Lmar fucking Jackson or Luke fucking Falk, we will be drafting top 10 for years.
Lamar Jackson fucking sucks as a QB.
Yeah, it sucks...
Torn ACL so he'll drop.
Damn, it really sucks
Sam Darnold is 2018 draft eligible
Quote:
In comment 13318793 Anakim said:
Quote:
Josh Rosen, Lamar Jackson, Luke Falk...
Damn, it really sucks
If we draft Lmar fucking Jackson or Luke fucking Falk, we will be drafting top 10 for years.
Lamar Jackson fucking sucks as a QB.
Yeah, it sucks...
Mason Rudolph or Rosen should be the first QB chosen.
Quote:
Josh Rosen, Lamar Jackson, Luke Falk...
Damn, it really sucks
Sam Darnold is 2018 draft eligible
Yeah, but with USC QBs struggling to make it in the NFL (exception being Carson Palmer)? IDK, he has a lot to overcome. But yeah, forgot to mention him.
2. Ruldolph
3. Rosen - he still has a lot to show though.
2. Ruldolph
3. Rosen - he still has a lot to show though.
Yuck. Almost as bad as the QB class this year
the garbage at The TE position RB position
WR position ....
A bunch of Bogeys
I bet the kind EA looks for as he did with eli
Damn, it really sucks
I think we're (at least) a year away from discussing drafting a quarterback in the first round, anyway.
I bet the kind EA looks for as he did with eli
That Rose Bowl performance was something else.
Pretty ugly.
He was asked. It wasn't random.
Q: With Eli at age 36, do you feel there is a little more urgency to add a player or two around him?
A: Of course. Everybody has a job. Eli has a job to do and everyone around him has a job to do. 36, I don’t think that is ancient for a quarterback. I think he is probably on the back nine, but I don’t think that is ancient for a quarterback, and he is taking care of himself really well, and I thought he finished the season strong. I thought he was in a really good rhythm last night. We were protecting, running the ball a little bit, he was hitting guys, and we just had some untimely drops right there that hurt him.
1. how fucking lucky we were to have a true franchise QB for a decade plus
2. how unlucky we really were with fluke/dumb injuries or otherwise to offensive playmakers through Eli's prime (Steve Smith, Nicks, Cruz, Wilson, Plax, etc...)
3. how asinine it was that we couldn't rebuild an OL that for a couple year stretch was one of the best in football and get said franchise QB a legit TE weapon over the course of his prime. there is no excuse for a team with Eli Manning to miss the playoffs 6 times in 7 years in the prime of his career. a travesty.
A: Of course. Everybody has a job. Eli has a job to do and everyone around him has a job to do. 36, I don’t think that is ancient for a quarterback. I think he is probably on the back nine, but I don’t think that is ancient for a quarterback, and he is taking care of himself really well, and I thought he finished the season strong. I thought he was in a really good rhythm last night. We were protecting, running the ball a little bit, he was hitting guys, and we just had some untimely drops right there that hurt him.
Excellent job TTH. As usual this thread headline was shitty click bait. If you read the whole answer it was hardly a scathing commentary on the end of Eli's career. It was very supportive of him and intimated Eli has at least a few good years left. What do we expect? Eli to be a franchise QB at 40 or 41?
Quote:
A: Of course. Everybody has a job. Eli has a job to do and everyone around him has a job to do. 36, I don’t think that is ancient for a quarterback. I think he is probably on the back nine, but I don’t think that is ancient for a quarterback, and he is taking care of himself really well, and I thought he finished the season strong. I thought he was in a really good rhythm last night. We were protecting, running the ball a little bit, he was hitting guys, and we just had some untimely drops right there that hurt him.
Excellent job TTH. As usual this thread headline was shitty click bait. If you read the whole answer it was hardly a scathing commentary on the end of Eli's career. It was very supportive of him and intimated Eli has at least a few good years left. What do we expect? Eli to be a franchise QB at 40 or 41?
Eli's contract runs to the end of the 2019 season, where he will be 39 at season's end. I don't think Eli plays at 40 seeing how Peyton declined dramatically and the number of hits Eli's taken (some of them pretty brutal shots that have KO'ed other QBs). I think the contract was mutually set up by Reese and Eli to allow him to retire a Giant after 2019
You act like Reese makes the Back 9 comment all the time. I'm pretty sure if Eli had a better year, Reese wouldn't be asked that question. But really...who cares? It's not a negative comment and everything else he said was complimentary. Eli's played 12 years, of course he's on the back nine. Nothing to see here.
I also think it would be a mistake to go draft a QB just because Eli is 36. We need the right QB, not another Nassib
You either tank in a year with a good QB crop, or string together a bunch of years with projects and journeymen. The concept of planning for the next QB is a crapshoot. The odds that they draft a 3rd-4th round QB that eventually takes over is rather ridiculous.
Quote:
It's not just BBI thread click bait; it's all over the internet. If Reese is using the term "back nine," that's really telling. (And talk about throwing Eli under the bus.) No one in the Steelers organization talks like that about Ben; the Chargers don't talk like that about Rivers.
You act like Reese makes the Back 9 comment all the time. I'm pretty sure if Eli had a better year, Reese wouldn't be asked that question. But really...who cares? It's not a negative comment and everything else he said was complimentary. Eli's played 12 years, of course he's on the back nine. Nothing to see here.
I thought someone was asked after last year, but could be wrong.
I'm fine if the Giants invest zero-premium resources in a QB until Eli retires. Rather go BPA than reach for a QB. But if there's someone who they think can be a top ten QB for a decade, go for it ASAP.
Draft a tackle high. Geez, didn't we just do that. Ninth overall pick. How's that working out?
I agree about drafting a tackle early, but I would also sign a free agent with some mileage on him, but decent in pass protection. If things don't go right with the draft, let the vet fill in for a year or two while Spags and Jerry sort out the final positions of all those high round draft choices.
You know Jerry is going to be very reluctant to give up on a ninth overall pick. If Flowers could be moved to guard than Jerry would save face and Flowers would have a much better chance of succeeding if he's not stuck out on the end with tackles and linebackers and defensive backs all trying to run around him.
Just my thoughts. You just can't assume, no matter how high chosen, that a draft choice is going to make it to the pros.
Not sure if the OL/TE/FB situation is entirely on Reese. The scouting/personnel people are responsible as well.
This team made the playoffs bc of defense and an all-world WR. To me, that's not a formula that's repeatable consistently. I haven't seen evidence that Reese can fix the offense. The Giants have serious weaknesses at OL, TE; no FB, no big WR, and need a FS (not convinced D. Thompson can do it.) They need a dynamic RB also. Perkins is a decent RB who took advantage of a lot of opposing defenses playing nickel regularly against the offense. That's a lot to solve in one off-season.
You either tank in a year with a good QB crop, or string together a bunch of years with projects and journeymen. The concept of planning for the next QB is a crapshoot. The odds that they draft a 3rd-4th round QB that eventually takes over is rather ridiculous.
Don't necessarily agree.
Looking at the playoff teams Green Bay took Rodgers in the twenties. Seattle got Wilson in round 3. Prescott looks useful, also round 3. Oakland got Carr in the second round. Brady was in the sixth. Osweiler was a second rounder.
So looking at those teams you can find success without having a top ten pick. Obviously a lot of the teams in the playoffs do have a high pick like a Manning, Roethlisberger, Stafford, Smith (although he was a FA). But whilst it is not easy it is perfectly possible to get a later round QB to carry your team.
Look at the Skins, they took both a top 3 stud and a later round guy. Who is going to get paid this year?
Peyton most likely would still be playing if the 4 neck surgeries didn't ultimately do him in, albeit it still allowed him to play rather well (save for his last year) for another 3 years..Archie played 15-16 years despite being pounded more times than Peyton and Eli combined..
Count on Eli for at least another 5 years, imv..
Like always, luck is always going to play a heavy hand. Rodgers dropped like a brick in his draft. Wilson came out during a QB heavy draft and dropped.
There's always the chance a good player will drop, and a gem will be available later on, but there are a lot of damn turnips to be dug up in between.
As a Tennessee Volunteer fan I have watched Josh Dobbs for four years. He is very athletic, he looks like he's jogging at times until you realize that he is running away from a defensive back. He has been erratic with his accuracy throughout his time at Tennessee but he has obviously continued to work at it. Check out his bowl game performance against Nebraska. He was very calm in the pocket and was accurate on a wide variety of throws.
I think that this aerospace engineering student athlete has the ability to continue to improve in all facets of the game with professional coaching and mentoring. He put the Vols on his back in crunch time and he refuses to lose. He could be a winner 2-3 years down the road.
Like he said he is not ancient i.e. not to old to compete or be a starter on a contending team but the future is around the corner.
Glennon isn't going somewhere to be a definite backup. He's going to go somewhere where he at least is going to be given an opportunity to win a starting job.
If we look at the entire NFL the list is beneath. I drew a line at pick 15 as most teams should be able to get up to 15 if they really need a QB.
The lists are pretty equal. For every Cam, Luck, Eli, Big Ben there's a Flacco, Carr, Dalton, Wilson. For every struggler like an Osweiler, Kaepernick there's a Bortles or Tannehill.
I'm not even including the fact that the top 3 QBs in the game over the last decade (Brady, Brees, Rodgers) were all acquired by players available after the non-playoff picks.
Available after pick 15
Cousins (4th)
Prescott (3rd)
Rodgers (24)
Brees (2nd)
Kaepernick (2nd)
Wilson (3rd)
Brady (6th)
Taylor (6th)
Fitzpatrick (7th)
Flacco (18)
Dalton (2nd)
Osweiler (2nd)
Siemian (7th)
Carr (2nd)
Before 15
Manning (1)
Wentz (2)
Stafford (1)
Goff (1)
Ryan (3)
Winston (1)
Newton (1)
Tannehill (8)
RG3 (2)
Roethlisberger (6)
Mariota (2)
Luck (1)
Bortles (3)
Rivers (4)
Before 15 but then later available by Free Agency / Trade
Palmer (1)
Bradford (1)
Cutler (11)
Smith (1)
1. how fucking lucky we were to have a true franchise QB for a decade plus
2. how unlucky we really were with fluke/dumb injuries or otherwise to offensive playmakers through Eli's prime (Steve Smith, Nicks, Cruz, Wilson, Plax, etc...)
3. how asinine it was that we couldn't rebuild an OL that for a couple year stretch was one of the best in football and get said franchise QB a legit TE weapon over the course of his prime. there is no excuse for a team with Eli Manning to miss the playoffs 6 times in 7 years in the prime of his career. a travesty.
Well said.
Somebody said Glennon will want $12-$13 million.
Once the line is established, not only will we have more time to win with Eli, but we will be able to win with a developing QB, a solid running game, and a devastating defense.
It will be interesting to see what the FO comes up with for the OL.
Get some studs in front of him and he'll win you a few more Lombardis!!!
Quote:
He's not a bad QB and Sullivan knows him well. I'm not saying he's the guy to replace Eli, but he's certainly worth a look. Glennon is a Free Agent this year and we'll need a back up because I'm sure Nassib will be elsewhere looking to compete for the starting job.
Somebody said Glennon will want $12-$13 million.
can't blame him for trying after seeing what Houston paid Osweiler
Are you sure you're not overstating that it's "all over the internet"? They're not even talking about it locally.
Plus, unless you follow Steeler and charger media, how do you know what they're saying about Ben or Rivers?
Saying he is on the back nine simple recognizes this fact. It doesn't mean they are looking to replace him. It doesn't mean they are disappointed in his play. It doesn't mean they think he regressed. And, it doesn't mean they feel it is imperative to draft a QB this year.
What is does mean, is they need to start thinking about the future of the QB position and how they want to approach it. Part of that process will probably include Eli himself.
He's not particularly polished or diplomatic, it's a fair criticism. But then, Pat Hanlon is the same way and he's the PR man, so what can you expect?
This
Quote:
The GM says his 36 year old quarterback s career is more than 50% over and fans us it as a prelude to attack him.
This
+1000