for display only
Big Blue Interactive The Corner Forum  
Back to the Corner

Archived Thread

Tony Romo Predictions

Chris684 : 1/16/2017 1:23 pm
Now that the Cowboys have been exterminated like the cock-a-roaches they are.

What happens with Tony Romo?

The odds-on favorites are/were the Broncos, but it appears Elway is too smart to trade for him. Talent aside, Romo comes with significant injury risk, plus they invested in Paxton Lynch. It's doubtful they want to give away additional assets for Romo at this point.

Cleveland? The Browns have additional draft picks after the trade with the Eagles last year, but are they committing to RGIII? If not, and they don't like the upcoming QB prospects, maybe they call Dallas?

If the Jets had any other owner I would say forget about it. As an organization overall, the Jets are not in a position to entertain thoughts of acquiring Romo as they likely need much more than a quick fix. But then there is Woody Johnson. The man is high on big name QBs and low on common sense. If he can make a front page headline, he will definitely try.

Any dark horses out there? Arizona? Houston?

Pages: 1 2 | Show All |  Next>>
.  
Mike in Long Beach : 1/16/2017 1:24 pm : link
I don't see as many takers as others  
jcn56 : 1/16/2017 1:25 pm : link
I think Jax and Houston might be the best options, teams that already have the core talent in place so that the addition of a QB ready to win now would help.

The Browns are too far away, I don't think Elway believes that a top flight QB is necessary. The Jets aren't one Romo (or one anything) away from competing for that division any time soon.
I don't think  
Koffman : 1/16/2017 1:25 pm : link
Denver goes for him. They will and should choose between Siemian and Lynch during training camp.
Cousins to Jets  
smshmth8690 : 1/16/2017 1:28 pm : link
Romo to DC.
Placed on IR week 2,
My Dark Horse...  
Giantfan in skinland : 1/16/2017 1:30 pm : link
wait for it...

The Washington Redskins.

Scenario - They don't franchise Cousins and can't reach an agreement with him, so they end up letting him walk. Sign Romo to a short-term deal and try to draft the heir apparent.
The Perfect Place For Romo  
Suburbanites : 1/16/2017 1:31 pm : link
Is not Denver it's Houston. The Texans have a great defense which will get better with Watt returning and Hopkins and Fuller at WR. They're a win now team that's been limited because of Osweiler. Could you imagine Romo finally winning a SB with the other team in Texas LOL.
Lol...  
Giantfan in skinland : 1/16/2017 1:31 pm : link
too slow.
Houston  
BH28 : 1/16/2017 1:31 pm : link
They are a QB away from being dangerous. Brock is not the answer. They have a bunch of cap room so i think they would be able to absorb brock and romo
.  
Danny Kanell : 1/16/2017 1:32 pm : link
Houston would be a really good fit.
Buffalo  
BlueinRoch : 1/16/2017 1:32 pm : link
The Bills may be looking to move on from Tyrod Taylor. He doesn't look like he is going to be the man. EJ Manuel and Cardale Jones are the back-ups. New coach. Who knows?
Cleveland is all about moneyball  
robbieballs2003 : 1/16/2017 1:33 pm : link
No way they give up picks for Romo.
Yeah, Denver or Houston make the most sense to me.  
Heisenberg : 1/16/2017 1:35 pm : link
Both have good/great D's and are a qb away.

I get that you are invested in Lynch, but you also have a defense in it's prime and weapons to spare. He can sit for a bit.
RE: Buffalo  
Steve L : 1/16/2017 1:37 pm : link
In comment 13328449 BlueinRoch said:
Quote:
The Bills may be looking to move on from Tyrod Taylor. He doesn't look like he is going to be the man. EJ Manuel and Cardale Jones are the back-ups. New coach. Who knows?


I was about to post the same thing. The problem is his contract. He just had surgery and if he doesn't pass a physical the Bills owe him $24 million. That's a kick in the ass. Pay him then cut him?
Washington  
AcidTest : 1/16/2017 1:41 pm : link
or Houston for the reasons stated above. Think the Redskins are more likely. Romo buys them a year or two to find a replacement for Cousins.
RE: Washington  
robbieballs2003 : 1/16/2017 1:45 pm : link
In comment 13328461 AcidTest said:
Quote:
or Houston for the reasons stated above. Think the Redskins are more likely. Romo buys them a year or two to find a replacement for Cousins.


Why would Dallas trade Romo to Washington?
RE: RE: Washington  
Bogey : 1/16/2017 1:50 pm : link
In comment 13328468 robbieballs2003 said:
Quote:
In comment 13328461 AcidTest said:


Quote:


or Houston for the reasons stated above. Think the Redskins are more likely. Romo buys them a year or two to find a replacement for Cousins.



Why would Dallas trade Romo to Washington?


Philly traded McNabb to Wash, it could happen.
I think there's a chance that Romo stays in Dallas  
djm : 1/16/2017 1:58 pm : link
Takes a paycut and backs up dak. Any team trading for him is nuts. The guy makes a fortune and can't stay on the field anymore. He's a backup now in my book.
Houston's gotta be the favorite  
giants#1 : 1/16/2017 1:58 pm : link
They are a legit QB away from competing and would likely get some fair weather Cowboy fans to jump on the bandwagon seeing as they also play in Texas.

Denver - Elway's not dumb enough

Cleveland - they're miles from competing and their "moneyball" GM prefers acquiring additional assets not dealing them for an aging, injury prone QB.

Jets - definitely a possibility. Probably think they can bounce back quickly with better QB play and have some offensive talent. Though I don't think they have the cap space.

Bills - possible landing spot if they see their D turning things around quickly now that Rex is gone. Cutting Tyrod would give them plenty of cap room to make it work.

Maybe the Skins if they can't reach an agreement with Cousins.

Rams could be a wildcard as they have a legit defense and Goff looked awful. Plus they probably want to avoid starting off in LA with two awful seasons especially with SD moving there. So Romo could buy Goff another year or 2 to develop.

That's about it though. There are other teams that could use a QB obviously, but I think they're too far away to give up serious assets. I like the Jags, but I think they'd be better off continuing to build their core and either hope Bortles bounces back or draft another QB to develop.

Redskins  
area junc : 1/16/2017 1:59 pm : link
or Broncos
I don't see anyone trading for him  
tomjgiant : 1/16/2017 2:03 pm : link
With his contract for the next three years and his questionable ability to stay healthy.Doesn't make sense for Dallas to keep him around as a backup so might as well bite the bullet now and release him and gain 5.6 mil in cap space.He will still represent 19 mil in dead money but after next year they will be free of him. Once a free agent anyone can sign him to a deal without all the guaranteed money he now has,in that scenario I could see Washington as a landing spot.
It is a good spot  
tomjgiant : 1/16/2017 2:06 pm : link
for old QBs to go and die.
Could they do a june cut  
Chip : 1/16/2017 2:07 pm : link
and split the 19 mil between 2 seasons.
I think they'll release him  
BillT : 1/16/2017 2:08 pm : link
Can't see how after all he's done (and what they did) they won't give him a chance to pick his own situation. And who's going to give picks and take his contract as well. Yikes!
RE: Could they do a june cut  
bigbluescot : 1/16/2017 2:11 pm : link
In comment 13328512 Chip said:
Quote:
and split the 19 mil between 2 seasons.


I think that's the most likely, I just don't see anyone ponying up enough picks to cover the extra $9 million the cap constrained Cowboys could save with the cut. They'll test the market but even if I'm Houston or Denver or the Jets, I'm not giving up a 1st or 2nd for an expensive fragile oft injured 37 year old QB who you'd be lucky to get 2 years out of.
Chiefs would be a good spot  
Old Dirty Beckham : 1/16/2017 2:22 pm : link
Alex Smith blows
RE: .  
Sec 103 : 1/16/2017 2:22 pm : link
In comment 13328433 Mike in Long Beach said:
Quote:

He'd be crazy to go to the JEST !!!!
RE: I don't think  
Tuckrule : 1/16/2017 2:23 pm : link
In comment 13328436 Koffman said:
Quote:
Denver goes for him. They will and should choose between Siemian and Lynch during training camp.


Denver basically said they aren't interested and like Lynch
RE: Houston  
ThatLimerickGuy : 1/16/2017 2:24 pm : link
In comment 13328447 BH28 said:
Quote:
They are a QB away from being dangerous. Brock is not the answer. They have a bunch of cap room so i think they would be able to absorb brock and romo


True. But they are stuck. That contract they gave Osweiler is an albatross and ensures he will be their QB for AT LEAST 2017.
Houston  
giants#1 : 1/16/2017 2:26 pm : link
while it makes sense from a performance standpoint, I'm not sure they would do it from a cap perspective. They're basically stuck with Osweiler next season and trading for Romo would basically prevent them from making any other major moves this offseason.
Dallas!  
old man : 1/16/2017 2:29 pm : link
I can't imagine anybody, even Cleveland , trading for him, so it will have to be a release and eat contract.
He wants Broncos and would fit, and given an injured Peyton Elway gambled on and it turned out OK so he might see himself a genius on hope 2-4-2.
Houston might get him a year or 2, if their OL holds(pun intended).
RE: RE: Washington  
AcidTest : 1/16/2017 2:35 pm : link
In comment 13328468 robbieballs2003 said:
Quote:
In comment 13328461 AcidTest said:


Quote:


or Houston for the reasons stated above. Think the Redskins are more likely. Romo buys them a year or two to find a replacement for Cousins.



Why would Dallas trade Romo to Washington?


I thought maybe he'd be released, and if Cousins goes, he might like a place with a decent offense. They will probably lose Garcon and Jackson, but Doctson, a #1 pick, is an additional asset at WR to compensate for those losses.

There's a big cap hit to release him IIRC, and the Cowboys are already over the cap. But the cap is going up, and I wonder as somebody said if they could split the cap hit over two seasons.
Romo  
Archer : 1/16/2017 2:36 pm : link
Romo is under contract for (3) years. $19,600,000, $8,900,000, and $3,200,000.

I doubt that Tony would renogotiate a reduction in his salary. Therefore, any team that trades for Romo will have a $19,600,000 salary CAP in 2017.

It is possible to convert his salary into a bonus, but,it will cost the team at least $11,000,000 per year.


So what team is a QB away from contending and has at least $19,600,000 in CAP space and will invest in an injury prone 37 year old ?

Houston committed a lot of money to Osweiler....  
Simms11 : 1/16/2017 2:36 pm : link
Don't think they'd bring in another high-priced vet. Nobody's mentioned the Niners. I think they'll be looking for a veteran starter, as well.
Houston or Denver  
SFGFNCGiantsFan : 1/16/2017 2:40 pm : link
...
RE: Romo  
giants#1 : 1/16/2017 2:49 pm : link
In comment 13328562 Archer said:
Quote:
Romo is under contract for (3) years. $19,600,000, $8,900,000, and $3,200,000.

I doubt that Tony would renogotiate a reduction in his salary. Therefore, any team that trades for Romo will have a $19,600,000 salary CAP in 2017.

It is possible to convert his salary into a bonus, but,it will cost the team at least $11,000,000 per year.


So what team is a QB away from contending and has at least $19,600,000 in CAP space and will invest in an injury prone 37 year old ?


Those are his dead money hits. His base salaries over the next 3 seasons are: $14M, $19.5M, and $20.5M which are what the team acquiring him will have to pay. The acquiring team would not be on the hook for any guaranteed money so those #s will also be his cap hits in 2017/18/19 respectively. That said, since none of those base salaries are guaranteed the acquiring team has 2 options:
1. Keep the deal as is and basically have 3 one year deals with Romo. If he gets injured or his play drops off, you simply cut him and move on with no dead cap space.
2. Re-work the deal entirely, which would likely be preferred by Romo and his agent since it would guarantee them some money. So instead of the 3 one year deals, they could maybe agree to a 3 year/$50M deal with $20M guaranteed. Gets Romo some guaranteed money, and saves the acquiring team ~$5M over the 3 years.
Osweiler should change his name to  
mrvax : 1/16/2017 2:53 pm : link
Rottweiler. The guy is a dog and Denver did not call his bluff. Good job but now the Texans are screwed.

Houston, if Dallas eats 70% of the contract.  
No Where Man : 1/16/2017 3:02 pm : link
.
RE: Cousins to Jets  
djstat : 1/16/2017 3:11 pm : link
In comment 13328437 smshmth8690 said:
Quote:
Romo to DC.
Placed on IR week 2,
Jerry will not trade Romo in division
You are right  
Archer : 1/16/2017 3:15 pm : link
I was looking at Romo's CAP hit.

Quote:

"His base salaries over the next 3 seasons are: $14M, $19.5M, and $20.5M"

No matter what happens there will be a significant CAP hit for the new team.They can restructure the contract, but Romo will likely want at least $20M guaranteed and a total contract that averages at least $15M per year. Yes the money is not guaranteed but any team that trades anything of value for Romo would want him for (3) years.


I think that Romo will have a big say in if he is traded and where  
Saos1n : 1/16/2017 3:44 pm : link
Romo and Jerrah have a great relationship and I don't think Jerrah will pawn him off to some dumpster fire, like Cleveland or San Fran.
What about the Bears or Vikings?  
Ben in Tampa : 1/16/2017 3:48 pm : link
He played high school and college ball in the Midwest.
Does anyone know  
therealmf : 1/16/2017 3:49 pm : link
if Romo has a no-trade clause ion his contract. Most of the better players do. If so, my guess would be teams that could give him a shot at the playoffs.

Denver, Houston...
Will any  
Pete in MD : 1/16/2017 3:55 pm : link
team give up significant resources for Romo? He's injury prone and has a huge contract. Teams also know that the Cowboys need to get rid of his contract and probably need to spread the dead money over two years. It limits their leverage.
The Cowboys will not be looking for anything in return  
Vanzetti : 1/16/2017 4:01 pm : link
They just want to trade the salary. He won't cost more than a late round pick unless more than one team wants him.

Ultimately, I think he goes to Denver. They have nobody at QB and you can't just let the prime years of that D be wasted.

RE: What about the Bears or Vikings?  
giants#1 : 1/16/2017 4:02 pm : link
In comment 13328721 Ben in Tampa said:
Quote:
He played high school and college ball in the Midwest.


Vikes have Bradford and Bridgewater under contract.

Bears have lots of holes to fill and I imagine will look for a longer term solution via the draft.
Bears  
ImThatGuy : 1/16/2017 4:13 pm : link
Sorta a homecoming having played at Eastern Illinois. They have some offensive weapons and can help be a competent QB as they figure out the rest of their needs
Houston.  
arcarsenal : 1/16/2017 4:14 pm : link
They're just going to have to admit that Osweiler was a huge mistake and move on.
RE: Houston.  
giantgiantfan : 1/16/2017 4:20 pm : link
In comment 13328754 arcarsenal said:
Quote:
They're just going to have to admit that Osweiler was a huge mistake and move on.


If they have the cap room sure I'd go Romo. You are going to have to give up some picks though. Osweiler is uncuttable this year though with a dead cap hit of 25 million. Luckily it was only a 4 year deal they signed him to. His dead cap hits afterward are 6 million, then 3 million. Dallas can demand a number one and then some given what Bradford went for. I do think you can put in some protections though like Romo must play in X amount of games.
If I'm a GM though...  
Chris684 : 1/16/2017 4:23 pm : link
Romo's health REALLY concerns me.

Not only the back, but the collarbone/clavicle area. History shows that Romo's body just doesnt hold up well against big hits.

The risk/reward on this is very high both ways.
Cohost with Kelly Ripa  
NNJ Tom : 1/16/2017 4:26 pm : link
on the new Live with Kelly and Romo.

Pages: 1 2 | Show All |  Next>>
Back to the Corner