I'm in a bar argument with friend about this. I think he is, but my friend-a Bears fan-literally thinks Eli wearing a gold jacket is a joke.
When he retires, hopefully not soon, he'll be on the top ten for a ton of QB stats. Yes, including INTs. He's got a bit Brett Favre in him.
But I think he's a HOFer. I sadly think most non Giants fans don't think he is.
The only thing in that list that is impressive is the MVPs. Pro Bowls? Seriously?
Having said that, Warner's career is completely disjointed. He arrived out of no where playing great, then disappeared for a time period, before reemerging with the Cardinals.
He's very tough to evaluate...........
So do we have a clue on how others -- experts, his peers, the general NFL fans -- think of Eli? He's been voted Super Bowl MVP twice. He's been voted to the Pro Bowl twice in 13 years. He's never been voted to the All-Pro, 1st or 2nd team. On several years he's been voted so low on the "NFL's top 100 players" list by his peers that led to outrage and ridicule on this forum.
So when it comes to HOF, the ultimate decision on how others think of a player, Eli will likely get in, but it likely will be a long wait, with some favorable circumstances needing to align in that particular year.
Quote:
They are going to give him the Strahan NY Bias treatment and put him in 2nd Ballot almost unanimously.
Roethlisberger and maybe even Rivers will go in 1st Ballot.
Rivers going first ballot would be laughable, absolutely laughable.
Unless Rivers gets a ring, I personally don't think he's going to get in at all. If he gets a ring, I think he makes it.
Even his 2011 campaign where he carried the Giants, he never got the recognition he deserved because of how unspectacular the team was in the regular season.
For their entire careers, they have very similar completion ratio percentage, TD%, INT%. So similar to essentially be equal.
Of course Jay doesn't have the trophies nor the physical toughness....or the leadership. 2010 NFC Championship game is a bit hard to shake along with other shenanigans in the seasons that followed.
But there are enough casual fans out there who believe he is as good as Eli, or maybe more accurately that Eli isn't any better than Jay.
I'd say he's a Hall of Famer.
BUT...
He's very reliant on those two trophies. Unlike a Marino who gets in with 0 or Young/Favre who get in with 1.
Quote:
is not a way of proving Eli belongs in the HOF. Warner was an first team All-Pro 2 times, 4 times overall (Eli 0). Warner was a 2 time NFL MVP (Eli 0). He was voted to the Pro Bowl 4 times (Eli 2, he was an alternate in to others). So, by saying if Kurt Warner made the HOF so should Eli, I don't know if one has much of an argument
The only thing in that list that is impressive is the MVPs. Pro Bowls? Seriously?
Having said that, Warner's career is completely disjointed. He arrived out of no where playing great, then disappeared for a time period, before reemerging with the Cardinals.
He's very tough to evaluate...........
Warner when he was great you could say had higher peaks than Eli Manning.
It's that simple. The Terrell Davis formula.
If he won it all with the Cardinals, then nobody is even bringing this topic up with him. It was close but no cigar. I guess that pick 6 is on him.
But Brady threw one last week and it was ok, haha.
Speaking of the Patriots, how about SB 36? Marshall Faulk is still pissed at what he perceived was cheating.
Normally you'd say he has to go based on that.
But the thing to remember is how voting took place back in the day versus now. You have Joe Namath in the HoF for crying out loud.
I think being the starting QB of a winning SB team was enough back then. Now not as much....even when the QB position is more important than it used to be.
2. Eli is 7th all time in completions currently. Everyone in front of him is a hall of famer
3.Eli is 8th in passing yards. Everyone in front of him is a hall of famer
4. Eli is 7th in touchdowns. everyone in front of him is a hall of famer.
If he just had the rings or just had the numbers i can see making him wait but the guy has both. He also got both of his championships while beating arguable the best team of his era and winning MVP honors both times. I just dont see how you cant put him in
I'm not sure how that helps Eli make the HOF, but I like the nonlinear thinking!
and it doesn't help that he coincided with another HOF question mark - Tom Coughlin. you have a HOF QB with a HOF HC, there should be more playoff seasons/playoff wins in more seasons.
Is all that his fault? of course not. but it has to be taken into account.
Methinks he's a borderline HOF QB. IMO, he needs a rebound year where he and his offense look good in order to make this a done deal. He doesn't need another ring. but he does need to show that he's leading the team to victories.
24 18
23 20
21 10
27 14
31 25
29 16 good season
26 15 good season
18 27
30 14 good season-odell beckham arrives misses playoffs
35 14 elite misses playoffs
26 16 good season
So 26-15 and 26-16 are good seasons, but 27-14 isn't? And the 29-16 wasn't a good season, it was a great one. His best. Nearly 5,000 yards, with the lowest rated rushing attack in the league, and the 30th ranked defense, Eli put that team on his back and willed it into the playoffs.
That was also the beginning of the end of the "big five" on the offensive line.
Everything had to be perfect for Eli to be elite? Name one HOF player on either Super Bowl teams aside from Michael Strahan on defense and I'll concede the point. Prior to Beckham, he had played with only four skilled position pro bowlers, two of which were non contributors to the 2007 team team (Tike and Shockey). The only other pro bowlers who were receivers, I believe made it as alternates (Steve Smith and Victor Cruz). Beckham is the first true weapon he has played with, and guys like Plax, Nicks, Cruz, Smith, Toomer were good contributors but not multi-year, elite superstars.
However,looking at his lifetime QB rating of 83.7 which is
above HOFers,Aikman,Moon,Tarkenton & even Johnny Unitas,I conclude that he has an excellent chance of getting in,but not
on the first ballot.