for display only
Big Blue Interactive The Corner Forum  
Back to the Corner

Archived Thread

Raanan: Giants/JPP NOT close on new deal

jlukes : 3/9/2017 1:29 pm
Per twitter

Quote:
Don't expect a long-term deal between Giants and JPP before free agency. Two sides not close. Giants will have to make do with available funds. Will be somewhat restrictive.
Pages: 1 2 | Show All |  Next>>
Welp,  
GiantFilthy : 3/9/2017 1:31 pm : link
gdi.
Sure seems like the Giants have all  
pjcas18 : 3/9/2017 1:32 pm : link
the leverage here (like many of you said).

This essentially means no other (or not many) significant free agent additions without another move to free up space. If Marshall costs 5M this year and JPP ~17M, that doesn't leave much, $10M or so?

Nice  
Rjanyg : 3/9/2017 1:32 pm : link
Just what we didn't want. JPP and his agent holding out for so much money that we can protect Eli long enough to find our new WR.

Sucks balls!
That sure puts a damper on things  
Giantology : 3/9/2017 1:32 pm : link
Would be nice to have more cash...
damnit!  
BleedBlue : 3/9/2017 1:34 pm : link
fuck it, trade him to cleveland for joe thomas and sign back hankins.
who knows  
UConn4523 : 3/9/2017 1:34 pm : link
his info can also be wrong, guess we'll see soon enough.
Not sure it matters  
jvm52106 : 3/9/2017 1:34 pm : link
I get the impression we would be bargain hunting anyway.. But, JPP deal needs to get done or we need to move on. Can't pay him that much for one season.
i'd trade him  
Jints in Carolina : 3/9/2017 1:35 pm : link
.
......  
Ray_Ray (NYG) : 3/9/2017 1:35 pm : link
it's feeling more and more that this will not gone done at all. Can see a 1 yr rental at best.
Didn't Ranaan also say signing Marshall was unlikely?  
speedywheels : 3/9/2017 1:36 pm : link
.
They can restructure  
Chip : 3/9/2017 1:37 pm : link
Jenkins, Harrison, VErnon, Eli to create cap space. The Cowboys do it all the time to get under the cap.

JPP wants Chandler Jones money and the Giants must be saying no.
RE: i'd trade him  
Brown Recluse : 3/9/2017 1:39 pm : link
In comment 13385449 Jints in Carolina said:
Quote:
.


Who do you think this team is, the Patriots?
Reese had to figure this was an option when the tag was placed on JPP  
speedywheels : 3/9/2017 1:40 pm : link
I'm sure he has a plan to restructure/cut others if he needs cash...
RE: damnit!  
chopperhatch : 3/9/2017 1:40 pm : link
In comment 13385441 BleedBlue said:
Quote:
fuck it, trade him to cleveland for joe thomas and sign back hankins.


Did it it ever occur to that the Browns might not take that trade? Jesus Christ you make it seem like Cleveland offered Thomas for JPP.

Unbelievable the stupidity this time of year.
I could see either side putting this info out...  
Seventh Spiel : 3/9/2017 1:41 pm : link
in an attempt to break an impasse and soften the other's position.
After seeing Chandler Jones contract i'm sure his number went up.  
guitarguybs12 : 3/9/2017 1:42 pm : link
.
RE: i'd trade him  
Klaatu : 3/9/2017 1:42 pm : link
In comment 13385449 Jints in Carolina said:
Quote:
.


You'd have to sign him first, wouldn't you?
We really need a Tackle  
Giants86 : 3/9/2017 1:42 pm : link
Im just not comfortable with either Flowers or Hart. Even a guard would be good. Need to upgrade Jerry and Newhouse. Our line at this moment will not get us that SB.

RE: RE: i'd trade him  
adamg : 3/9/2017 1:43 pm : link
In comment 13385476 Klaatu said:
Quote:
In comment 13385449 Jints in Carolina said:


Quote:


.



You'd have to sign him first, wouldn't you?


Do you? He's tagged. Does he have to approve the tag before he can be dealt?
I understand  
PaulN : 3/9/2017 1:43 pm : link
That JPP wants a long term deal, but it was him that screwed up his situation, now he wants to act as if there is no problem with signing him to an enormous contract when he a good season, but not a dominant season. I am with the Giants on this and would try to get a DE in this draft. If you can add one in this draft then add another in next years draft, then if JPP does not live up to the expectations he has created, you let him walk.

I love JPP but he did not play his hand well when he did get injured, let's not forget, and he is at it again. It does hurt short term, but if the Giants can upgrade the guard position in free agency this season, then add the tackle in the draft, maybe we can get by again. They can also add a tight end to help out. Not ideal, but since when has JPP shown the least concern with the team when his money is concerned. I know he is not alone, but this does not make me feel warm and fuzzy about JPP. Maybe I'm wrong but that is how I feel. If the Giants changed their minds and cut ties with him I would actually understand now, and that is something I never thought I would say.
Dont they  
ajr2456 : 3/9/2017 1:44 pm : link
only need to be under the cap by a certain date?

They can technically spend what they want now.
Vernon  
SBS82 : 3/9/2017 1:45 pm : link
Sounds alot like the situation in Miami last year when they just pulled the tag.
RE: RE: i'd trade him  
pjcas18 : 3/9/2017 1:46 pm : link
In comment 13385476 Klaatu said:
Quote:
In comment 13385449 Jints in Carolina said:


Quote:


.



You'd have to sign him first, wouldn't you?


No, Patriots traded Cassel while on the FT. You can trade players on the FT from what I know.
RE: I understand  
adamg : 3/9/2017 1:47 pm : link
In comment 13385484 PaulN said:
Quote:
That JPP wants a long term deal, but it was him that screwed up his situation, now he wants to act as if there is no problem with signing him to an enormous contract when he a good season, but not a dominant season. I am with the Giants on this and would try to get a DE in this draft. If you can add one in this draft then add another in next years draft, then if JPP does not live up to the expectations he has created, you let him walk.

I love JPP but he did not play his hand well when he did get injured, let's not forget, and he is at it again. It does hurt short term, but if the Giants can upgrade the guard position in free agency this season, then add the tackle in the draft, maybe we can get by again. They can also add a tight end to help out. Not ideal, but since when has JPP shown the least concern with the team when his money is concerned. I know he is not alone, but this does not make me feel warm and fuzzy about JPP. Maybe I'm wrong but that is how I feel. If the Giants changed their minds and cut ties with him I would actually understand now, and that is something I never thought I would say.


I feel the same way. I didn't expect this at all. I guess I should have known better. Thought he bled blue on some level.
RE: Dont they  
YAJ2112 : 3/9/2017 1:48 pm : link
In comment 13385485 ajr2456 said:
Quote:
only need to be under the cap by a certain date?

They can technically spend what they want now.


Top 51 has to be under the cap right now.
RE: Dont they  
guitarguybs12 : 3/9/2017 1:48 pm : link
In comment 13385485 ajr2456 said:
Quote:
only need to be under the cap by a certain date?

They can technically spend what they want now.


Only before the start of the league year. Once 4PM today hits, all teams have to be under the cap and stay under or face penalties.
RE: Didn't Ranaan also say signing Marshall was unlikely?  
Devon : 3/9/2017 1:48 pm : link
In comment 13385456 speedywheels said:
Quote:
.


Yes, but he's probably not wrong about this, given the sentiment around everyone who covers the team.
RE: RE: Dont they  
ajr2456 : 3/9/2017 1:49 pm : link
In comment 13385503 guitarguybs12 said:
Quote:
In comment 13385485 ajr2456 said:


Quote:


only need to be under the cap by a certain date?

They can technically spend what they want now.



Only before the start of the league year. Once 4PM today hits, all teams have to be under the cap and stay under or face penalties.


Gotcha
RE: Dont they  
pjcas18 : 3/9/2017 1:49 pm : link
In comment 13385485 ajr2456 said:
Quote:
only need to be under the cap by a certain date?

They can technically spend what they want now.


Yes they can until the new league year starts today at 4pm.
RE: RE: RE: i'd trade him  
Klaatu : 3/9/2017 1:50 pm : link
In comment 13385496 pjcas18 said:
Quote:
In comment 13385476 Klaatu said:


Quote:


In comment 13385449 Jints in Carolina said:


Quote:


.



You'd have to sign him first, wouldn't you?



No, Patriots traded Cassel while on the FT. You can trade players on the FT from what I know.


Yeah, but Cassel signed his tender and was then traded. I don't think you can trade a guy without him signing his tender first.
Leverage is still with the Giants, all they have to do is restructure  
jcn56 : 3/9/2017 1:51 pm : link
a couple of guys and boom, they're right back where they started in terms of available cap space.

This isn't a good thing, mind you - it'd be better if they were close on contract terms so we'd know JPP is here to stay and they'd have a more manageable cap situation, but it's not dire either.
How many on BBI  
Doomster : 3/9/2017 1:51 pm : link
thought he was going to give the Giants a hometown discount? Come on, 'fess up!
I can't believe we're going to be paying this guy $17 million in 2017  
Go Terps : 3/9/2017 1:52 pm : link
Brutal.
Okay, the tweet says  
Dan in the Springs : 3/9/2017 1:55 pm : link
don't expect a new deal before free agency. Implies they aren't close.

Doesn't free agency start today? Is it really news that the deal isn't going to be done today?

All I get from this tweet is that we shouldn't be expecting a signing in the next few hours. Doesn't mean that we can't see something happen in the next couple of weeks.
Big surprise there... lol  
Patrick77 : 3/9/2017 1:56 pm : link
I get that a lot here figured he might do a hometown discounts or a 12 million per year deal.

The Chandler Jones (who is 4 months younger than JPP) deal pretty much sets the tone. JPP IMO is "worth" somewhere less than Vernon and Jones but will absolutely demand what they got and expect more than what Calais Campbell was paid the last two year (14 and 15 million).

The market is pretty much set and it is fucking outrageously high.
RE: Leverage is still with the Giants, all they have to do is restructure  
pjcas18 : 3/9/2017 1:56 pm : link
In comment 13385519 jcn56 said:
Quote:
a couple of guys and boom, they're right back where they started in terms of available cap space.

This isn't a good thing, mind you - it'd be better if they were close on contract terms so we'd know JPP is here to stay and they'd have a more manageable cap situation, but it's not dire either.


Being able to restructure is really not leverage, it's closer to desperation. Restructuring is not something an NFL teams wants to ever do, it's something they're forced to do to create cap space. Players don't care, just winds up benefiting them.

I looked at Eli's contract, I don't see him being a candidate, best options are the three big ticket FA's signed last year or extending Pugh IMO. But who wants to have to restructure those deals already.

As many predicted, JPP on the FT hamstrings what the Giants can do in FA.
RE: Okay, the tweet says  
jcn56 : 3/9/2017 1:56 pm : link
In comment 13385530 Dan in the Springs said:
Quote:
don't expect a new deal before free agency. Implies they aren't close.

Doesn't free agency start today? Is it really news that the deal isn't going to be done today?

All I get from this tweet is that we shouldn't be expecting a signing in the next few hours. Doesn't mean that we can't see something happen in the next couple of weeks.


The significance would be impact to the 2017 tier 1 FA crop, who will likely be gone by the time they could work something out. It won't prevent the Giants from signing from the second tier (then again, they would have been able to do so through the restructures as well).
CC  
Carl in CT : 3/9/2017 1:58 pm : link
Has two hands.
No surprise  
ZogZerg : 3/9/2017 1:59 pm : link
..
RE: RE: Leverage is still with the Giants, all they have to do is restructure  
jcn56 : 3/9/2017 1:59 pm : link
In comment 13385535 pjcas18 said:
Quote:
In comment 13385519 jcn56 said:


Quote:


a couple of guys and boom, they're right back where they started in terms of available cap space.

This isn't a good thing, mind you - it'd be better if they were close on contract terms so we'd know JPP is here to stay and they'd have a more manageable cap situation, but it's not dire either.



Being able to restructure is really not leverage, it's closer to desperation. Restructuring is not something an NFL teams wants to ever do, it's something they're forced to do to create cap space. Players don't care, just winds up benefiting them.

I looked at Eli's contract, I don't see him being a candidate, best options are the three big ticket FA's signed last year or extending Pugh IMO. But who wants to have to restructure those deals already.

As many predicted, JPP on the FT hamstrings what the Giants can do in FA.


I think you're just repeating fanspeak - restructuring is something just about all teams do (save for those so far under the cap they're looking at the floor). It's the frequent restructures of players who won't be viable towards the end of where you're kicking money that are a problem.

That's not an issue with the Giants, who won't be expecting to part with guys like Snacks or Vernon any time soon, or Eli.

The only thing this prevents is longer term cap management, since the Giants might not know for awhile how they're going to address the DE spot in '18.
Just fucking pull the tag  
Go Terps : 3/9/2017 2:00 pm : link
Move on and use the money to sign two or even three players that could help us.

.  
Danny Kanell : 3/9/2017 2:00 pm : link
I would 100% try to trade him at this point. This team is too close to be this hamstrung financially by a guy not named Eli Manning.

This is why franchising him wasn't a no brainer.
RE: RE: RE: i'd trade him  
Diver_Down : 3/9/2017 2:00 pm : link
In comment 13385480 adamg said:
Quote:
In comment 13385476 Klaatu said:


Quote:


In comment 13385449 Jints in Carolina said:


Quote:


.



You'd have to sign him first, wouldn't you?



Do you? He's tagged. Does he have to approve the tag before he can be dealt?


He's not under contract so we don't own his rights. The tag would need to be signed before he could be traded. He can sit out until the eve of the regular season. He would only incur fines for training camp ($30k/day). After July 14, we can no longer sign him to a multi-year contract. We could always rescind the tag at which point he becomes a free agent with no compensation for the Giants.
RE: Just fucking pull the tag  
Danny Kanell : 3/9/2017 2:01 pm : link
In comment 13385550 Go Terps said:
Quote:
Move on and use the money to sign two or even three players that could help us.


Can we?
RE: Just fucking pull the tag  
KWhite2250 : 3/9/2017 2:02 pm : link
In comment 13385550 Go Terps said:
Quote:
Move on and use the money to sign two or even three players that could help us.


Agree and draft a DE. JPP is good but not that good imo
RE: .  
Patrick77 : 3/9/2017 2:03 pm : link
In comment 13385554 Danny Kanell said:
Quote:
I would 100% try to trade him at this point. This team is too close to be this hamstrung financially by a guy not named Eli Manning.

This is why franchising him wasn't a no brainer.


Who are the Giants missing out on signing? They just got arguably 1 of the top WRs available. I don't think they were ever in the market to pay 9-13 million for FA OL but I guess who knows.
RE: Just fucking pull the tag  
eric2425ny : 3/9/2017 2:05 pm : link
In comment 13385550 Go Terps said:
Quote:
Move on and use the money to sign two or even three players that could help us.


Totally agree. We played pretty well defensively without him last year anyway. With 17 million extra dollars we could probably resign Hank, pick up Warford, and some second/third tier guys. Use the draft for a T, TE, another DE to rotate with Wynn and Okwara and depth based on bpa the rest of the way
It's not fan speak it's math  
pjcas18 : 3/9/2017 2:06 pm : link
restructuring does not mean pay cut, it means guaranteeing portions of or more of a contract than you as the team initially agreed to (aka you are now required to pay the player more or sooner than you thought they were worth.).

Eli isn't an option, because this is the year his cap hit dips. To create cap room with Eli need to increase the cap hit in future years and it's already 22.2 and 23.2 the final two years, that would hurt when they get there.

The others, maybe are candidates but again it's not in you as the teams best interest.

FYI...  
pjcas18 : 3/9/2017 2:11 pm : link
you can trade a player while on the FT, Matt Cassel, Jared Allen, two examples.
It's Simple  
geelabee : 3/9/2017 2:31 pm : link
Pay the man!!!

Fact: JPP is the superior player...he is better the Chandler Jones or Oliver Vernon...people know damn well that JPP will outplay both these 2 next year...just don't get why people expect him to play for less makes no sense...and just don't understand the malice and disrespect for the player...

The Giants should protect themselves with an out after 2-3 years if he can't stay healthy..,
Pages: 1 2 | Show All |  Next>>
Back to the Corner