Big Blue Interactive The Corner Forum  
Back to the Corner
 

Archived Thread

Ryan Ramcyzk

ajr2456 : 3/20/2017 1:46 pm
Interesting read here, with a good breakdown.

Tend to agree.


Ramczyk isn't a 1st round tackle - ( New Window )
What do you agree with?  
Archer : 3/20/2017 2:04 pm : link
The article has conflicting opinions about Ramcyzk. Three analysts believe that he would be an excellent pick for the Giants and one is questioning Ramcyzk.
RE: What do you agree with?  
ajr2456 : 3/20/2017 2:08 pm : link
In comment 13400093 Archer said:
Quote:
The article has conflicting opinions about Ramcyzk. Three analysts believe that he would be an excellent pick for the Giants and one is questioning Ramcyzk.


Apologies, put the wrong link. I agree with White that he isn't a 1st round LT.
correct article - ( New Window )
Hankins is on their wish list,  
grizz299 : 3/20/2017 2:11 pm : link
that tells (or should tell) us something.
The Giants have simply failed to prioritize the offensive line.
I can reasonably only draw one conclusion: They have done an evaluation and they're reasonably happy with what they've got.
Surprisingly, this even seems to emcompass the Tunsil disregard for Apple.
And while it's easy to say there were no top-flight FA's available I think it's safer to say there were FA's available - they were simply not inclined to make the investment.
I don't get it, but I played at Smallvile High some fifty years ago.
They were absolutely scared off from Tunsil  
Ten Ton Hammer : 3/20/2017 2:18 pm : link
because of the weed video leak.
RE: Hankins is on their wish list,  
Klaatu : 3/20/2017 2:40 pm : link
In comment 13400114 grizz299 said:
Quote:
that tells (or should tell) us something.
The Giants have simply failed to prioritize the offensive line.
I can reasonably only draw one conclusion: They have done an evaluation and they're reasonably happy with what they've got.
Surprisingly, this even seems to emcompass the Tunsil disregard for Apple.
And while it's easy to say there were no top-flight FA's available I think it's safer to say there were FA's available - they were simply not inclined to make the investment.
I don't get it, but I played at Smallvile High some fifty years ago.


You can't invest free agent money you don't have.

How does using two 1st round picks and one 2nd round pick on offensive linemen in three of the last four drafts equal failure to prioritize the offensive line?
RE: Hankins is on their wish list,  
Brown Recluse : 3/20/2017 2:43 pm : link
In comment 13400114 grizz299 said:
Quote:
that tells (or should tell) us something.
The Giants have simply failed to prioritize the offensive line.


No, they attempted to and failed. Big difference.
RE: RE: Hankins is on their wish list,  
OC2.0 : 3/20/2017 4:59 pm : link
In comment 13400215 Brown Recluse said:
Quote:
In comment 13400114 grizz299 said:


Quote:


that tells (or should tell) us something.
The Giants have simply failed to prioritize the offensive line.




No, they attempted to and failed. Big difference.


Please send your crystal ball to JR. Fed Ex if you would
I think we have seen that just throwing  
Chris L. : 3/20/2017 8:56 pm : link
high draft picks year after year at the O-Line doesn't guaranty success. They actually have to be good players. When you look at Howard, Njoku, Cook, Foster, Cunningham and Riddick I am pretty sure at least one of those players will be available at #23. Each of those players projects to a higher level at their positions than do any of the first tier O-Linemen. In the first round you pick the player that has the best chance to be great, to be a difference maker not just somebody who will be good but you really need at a specific position. The first round should be about the next 8 to 10 years not just what is perceived to be an immediate need. Fill OL in rounds 2 to 4 where the talent will match up with the draft position.
It's weird...  
ryanmkeane : 3/21/2017 2:16 pm : link
I'm excited to add to the OL in the draft...but I can't get excited about Ramcyzk for some reason
Back to the Corner