The article has conflicting opinions about Ramcyzk. Three analysts believe that he would be an excellent pick for the Giants and one is questioning Ramcyzk.
The article has conflicting opinions about Ramcyzk. Three analysts believe that he would be an excellent pick for the Giants and one is questioning Ramcyzk.
that tells (or should tell) us something.
The Giants have simply failed to prioritize the offensive line.
I can reasonably only draw one conclusion: They have done an evaluation and they're reasonably happy with what they've got.
Surprisingly, this even seems to emcompass the Tunsil disregard for Apple.
And while it's easy to say there were no top-flight FA's available I think it's safer to say there were FA's available - they were simply not inclined to make the investment.
I don't get it, but I played at Smallvile High some fifty years ago.
that tells (or should tell) us something.
The Giants have simply failed to prioritize the offensive line.
I can reasonably only draw one conclusion: They have done an evaluation and they're reasonably happy with what they've got.
Surprisingly, this even seems to emcompass the Tunsil disregard for Apple.
And while it's easy to say there were no top-flight FA's available I think it's safer to say there were FA's available - they were simply not inclined to make the investment.
I don't get it, but I played at Smallvile High some fifty years ago.
You can't invest free agent money you don't have.
How does using two 1st round picks and one 2nd round pick on offensive linemen in three of the last four drafts equal failure to prioritize the offensive line?
high draft picks year after year at the O-Line doesn't guaranty success. They actually have to be good players. When you look at Howard, Njoku, Cook, Foster, Cunningham and Riddick I am pretty sure at least one of those players will be available at #23. Each of those players projects to a higher level at their positions than do any of the first tier O-Linemen. In the first round you pick the player that has the best chance to be great, to be a difference maker not just somebody who will be good but you really need at a specific position. The first round should be about the next 8 to 10 years not just what is perceived to be an immediate need. Fill OL in rounds 2 to 4 where the talent will match up with the draft position.
Apologies, put the wrong link. I agree with White that he isn't a 1st round LT.
correct article - ( New Window )
The Giants have simply failed to prioritize the offensive line.
I can reasonably only draw one conclusion: They have done an evaluation and they're reasonably happy with what they've got.
Surprisingly, this even seems to emcompass the Tunsil disregard for Apple.
And while it's easy to say there were no top-flight FA's available I think it's safer to say there were FA's available - they were simply not inclined to make the investment.
I don't get it, but I played at Smallvile High some fifty years ago.
The Giants have simply failed to prioritize the offensive line.
I can reasonably only draw one conclusion: They have done an evaluation and they're reasonably happy with what they've got.
Surprisingly, this even seems to emcompass the Tunsil disregard for Apple.
And while it's easy to say there were no top-flight FA's available I think it's safer to say there were FA's available - they were simply not inclined to make the investment.
I don't get it, but I played at Smallvile High some fifty years ago.
You can't invest free agent money you don't have.
How does using two 1st round picks and one 2nd round pick on offensive linemen in three of the last four drafts equal failure to prioritize the offensive line?
The Giants have simply failed to prioritize the offensive line.
No, they attempted to and failed. Big difference.
Quote:
that tells (or should tell) us something.
The Giants have simply failed to prioritize the offensive line.
No, they attempted to and failed. Big difference.
Please send your crystal ball to JR. Fed Ex if you would