It was 2 years ago, but I would think someone like that should be banned permanently no? Sends a bad message that you can diss Trump and get banned but try to lure kids into a van is perfectly A OK?
I'm still sort of torn though, BBI rules prevent "outing" posters with their offline identities, and I'm not sure we want every infraction committed by a BBI poster to be fair game to post. On the other hand, it'd be good to know who did something like this if people were bringing kids to a BBI meetup.
RE: RE: I don't typically read the meltdown threads.
I'm still sort of torn though, BBI rules prevent "outing" posters with their offline identities, and I'm not sure we want every infraction committed by a BBI poster to be fair game to post. On the other hand, it'd be good to know who did something like this if people were bringing kids to a BBI meetup.
I think that's a great point. Imagine if this was kept in the dark and this guy showed up with kids around and something happened. This definitely is the exception to the rule, imo.
I'm still sort of torn though, BBI rules prevent "outing" posters with their offline identities, and I'm not sure we want every infraction committed by a BBI poster to be fair game to post. On the other hand, it'd be good to know who did something like this if people were bringing kids to a BBI meetup.
Fair point, although in his case he'll just resurface with a new handle like nothing happened.
I'm still sort of torn though, BBI rules prevent "outing" posters with their offline identities, and I'm not sure we want every infraction committed by a BBI poster to be fair game to post. On the other hand, it'd be good to know who did something like this if people were bringing kids to a BBI meetup.
I think that's a great point. Imagine if this was kept in the dark and this guy showed up with kids around and something happened. This definitely is the exception to the rule, imo.
If BBI was fully anonymous then I'd see Metnut's devil's advocate argument. But B hit the nail on the head. Not only are there BBI together, but apparently Rocky and his family has attended them in the past. People bring their kids to these. It's fair game, and necessary to share this, IMO.
Link - ( New Window )
What?
I agree, it would be helpful!
is this BBI's rocky?
He has young kids.
Can't be real.
is this BBI's rocky?
He has young kids.
Can't be real.
Seriously? Did you miss the whole Penn State debacle?
Color me ... having other things to do?
If it's him, that's fucked up and a shame. I met him wife at camp, and they have 2 great little kids. Scary shit.
Quote:
is this BBI's rocky?
He has young kids.
Can't be real.
Seriously? Did you miss the whole Penn State debacle?
I didn't miss it. But I never met the wife and children of Jerry Sanduski, so ... maybe a shade different in perspective.
Yeah, I was gonna say, I'm gonna guess there were some editorial liberties taken there. At least I hope so.
Color me ... having other things to do?
If it's him, that's fucked up and a shame. I met him wife at camp, and they have 2 great little kids. Scary shit.
Beezer, is that his picture?
Ha
I'm still sort of torn though, BBI rules prevent "outing" posters with their offline identities, and I'm not sure we want every infraction committed by a BBI poster to be fair game to post. On the other hand, it'd be good to know who did something like this if people were bringing kids to a BBI meetup.
Quote:
Color me ... having other things to do?
If it's him, that's fucked up and a shame. I met him wife at camp, and they have 2 great little kids. Scary shit.
Beezer, is that his picture?
gidie says his name was Jimmy Gallagher. But that the photo does not look like the guy he hung out with at camp.
I'm betting it's not the same guy. I'm hoping, too.
I'm still sort of torn though, BBI rules prevent "outing" posters with their offline identities, and I'm not sure we want every infraction committed by a BBI poster to be fair game to post. On the other hand, it'd be good to know who did something like this if people were bringing kids to a BBI meetup.
I think that's a great point. Imagine if this was kept in the dark and this guy showed up with kids around and something happened. This definitely is the exception to the rule, imo.
gidie says it's not.
Both have apparently met him (Joey) and hung out with him (gidie).
::push?::
LMFAO
I'm still sort of torn though, BBI rules prevent "outing" posters with their offline identities, and I'm not sure we want every infraction committed by a BBI poster to be fair game to post. On the other hand, it'd be good to know who did something like this if people were bringing kids to a BBI meetup.
Fair point, although in his case he'll just resurface with a new handle like nothing happened.
Quote:
pretty fucked up.
I'm still sort of torn though, BBI rules prevent "outing" posters with their offline identities, and I'm not sure we want every infraction committed by a BBI poster to be fair game to post. On the other hand, it'd be good to know who did something like this if people were bringing kids to a BBI meetup.
I think that's a great point. Imagine if this was kept in the dark and this guy showed up with kids around and something happened. This definitely is the exception to the rule, imo.
If BBI was fully anonymous then I'd see Metnut's devil's advocate argument. But B hit the nail on the head. Not only are there BBI together, but apparently Rocky and his family has attended them in the past. People bring their kids to these. It's fair game, and necessary to share this, IMO.