for display only
Big Blue Interactive The Corner Forum  
Back to the Corner

Archived Thread

Top 100 list from the site with the best track record for it

Milton : 3/23/2017 5:48 am
The Huddle Report keeps track of each drafnik's top 100 and how it compared with the actual draft. Over the past five years, the site with the best record is The Draft Board Guru. There will be changes between now and the daft, but as of today this is their top 35 (with the full 100 linked below)....

Quote:
1 Myles Garrett Edge Texas A& M jr 1
2 Solomon Thomas Edge Stanford rSo 2
3 Jamal Adams S LSU jr 1
4 Jonathan Allen DL Alabama SR 1
5 Leonard Fournette RB LSU jr 1
6 O.J. Howard TE Alabama SR 1
7 Malik Hooker S Ohio State rSo 2
8 Corey Davis WR Western Michigan SR 1
9 Reuben Foster (X) LB Alabama SR 1
10 Quincy Wilson CB Florida jr 1
11 Marshon Lattimore CB Ohio State rSo 2
12 Dalvin Cook RB Florida State jr 2
13 David Njoku TE Miami rSo 2
14 Mike Williams WR Clemson rJr 2
15 Budda Baker S Washington jr 3
16 Derek Barnett Edge Tennessee jr 3
17 John Ross WR Washington rJr 3
18 Forrest Lamp OG/OT Western Kentucky rSR 1
19 Deshaun Watson QB Clemson jr 1
20 Taco Charlton Edge Michigan SR 4
21 Christian McCaffrey RB Stanford jr 3
22 Haason Reddick LB Temple rSR 2
23 Garett Bolles OT Utah jr 1
24 Mitchell Trubisky QB North Carolina rJr 2
25 Marlon Humphrey CB Alabama rSo 3
26 Fabian Moreau CB UCLA rSR 4
27 Ryan Ramczyk (+) OT Wisconsin rJr 2
28 Charles Harris Edge Missouri rJr 5
29 Tre'Davious White CB LSU SR 5
30 Carl Lawson Edge Auburn rJr 6
31 Gareon Conley CB Ohio State rJr 6
32 Chidobe Awuzie S/CB Colorado SR 4
33 Cam Robinson OT/G Alabama jr 3
34 Kevin King CB Washington SR 7
35 Malik McDowell DL Michigan State jr 2

Draft Board Guru Top 100 - ( New Window )
Hmm  
jeff57 : 3/23/2017 5:55 am : link
Garret Boles ar 23.
Isn't a Top 100 board different from Mock draft?  
GiantGolfer : 3/23/2017 7:35 am : link
Not sure how anyone's Top 100 board could be graded. Mock drafts, yes.
Good find, Milton.  
Giantgator : 3/23/2017 8:13 am : link
He has Zach Cunningham available at our 2nd round pick.

GG-the ranking is based on # of drafted players he got right on his top 100, not necessarily where they were drafted. Even his score, which was best, averaged in the low 80s.
Looks like Barnett  
JCin332 : 3/23/2017 9:02 am : link
also close to 23....
RE: Isn't a Top 100 board different from Mock draft?  
WillVAB : 3/23/2017 9:03 am : link
In comment 13403570 GiantGolfer said:
Quote:
Not sure how anyone's Top 100 board could be graded. Mock drafts, yes.


Easy -- compare top 100 board to players actually drafted in the top 100.
Can you please start a thread that details your relationship  
jlukes : 3/23/2017 9:06 am : link
with Drew - I mean it is borderline obsessive at this point.
Based on that  
Cenotaph : 3/23/2017 9:12 am : link
the ranking within the 100 isn't necessarily useful, as it is a subjective ranking of skill without considering position or team needs. So unlikely to really reflect how these guys will come off the board. So just because a guy is in the 20's in this rank, no reason to believe the picks will come off in this order (and I'd expect they won't be close for many of those players).

Still useful as a general guide of players who should go in the top 3 rounds. Those are the picks they really count, need to hit at least 2 good contributors to help push this team to playoffs or further.
I think if Trubisky's on  
area junc : 3/23/2017 9:13 am : link
the board, we're taking him.
RE: I think if Trubisky's on  
Justlurking : 3/23/2017 10:09 am : link
In comment 13403621 area junc said:
Quote:
the board, we're taking him.


and i dont know how anyone could complain about that.
Good job MIlton  
Chip : 3/23/2017 10:09 am : link
These lists are way more helpful than any mock draft.
Cunningham at 56 or Webb at 52  
Tom in NY : 3/23/2017 10:20 am : link
Either adding a good LB, or Eli's replacement....after adding the OT would be a good move.
RE: Can you please start a thread that details your relationship  
Klaatu : 3/23/2017 10:26 am : link
In comment 13403615 jlukes said:
Quote:
with Drew - I mean it is borderline obsessive at this point.


Well, they started out as Thunder Buddies...

Thanks Milton!  
Jay in Toronto : 3/23/2017 11:18 am : link
So if the draft is strictly by this rating (it won't, Kizer, Trubitsky, Peppers and Watt will go higher than rated):

The only #1 at his position at 23 is Bolles.

In the deepest positions available at 23 are ER (harris 5) and CB (Humphrey 3)

The highest TE availble is Engram rated #40 and 3rd best.
I think some are having a hard  
jvm52106 : 3/23/2017 12:32 pm : link
time separating the TOP 100 from the actual order of selections. Of course needs come in to play but compare top 100 players vs 1st 100 players selected. Regardless of specific needs if you have a good ranking list put together the bulk of the top 100 should go in the top 100 picks. Yeah, 22 might go at 11 or vise versa but the top 100 should still be the top 100.

Needs will dictate where the players may be selected but it shouldn't mean your 35th best player gets selected at pick 125... That means you either are way ahead of anyone else in seeing this kids talents and potential or you were way off on how this kid is actually viewed.
I'm beginning to think its either going to be OL or QB at #23  
PatersonPlank : 3/23/2017 12:37 pm : link
The value and need seem to intersect for us based on the draft ratings. Of course the QB would be the heir apparent for Eli, either Watson or Trubisky. I think if the Giants "really really" think one of these QB's is the next Eli they will take him, if not its Bolles/Lamp/Robinson/Ram.

Just my Opinion.
Baker at 15?  
KWALL2 : 3/23/2017 1:36 pm : link
Highest I've seen that name. Really like him. I thought he could be a round 2 option for NYG. Smart player and offers a lot of versatility. Great prospect to match with Collins.
It's a good thing there are lists like this  
PEEJ : 3/23/2017 1:48 pm : link
otherwise we couldn't scream "reach" or "steal" from our sofas
RE: Isn't a Top 100 board different from Mock draft?  
GeofromNJ : 3/23/2017 1:59 pm : link
In comment 13403570 GiantGolfer said:
Quote:
Not sure how anyone's Top 100 board could be graded. Mock drafts, yes.

When evaluating players, all teams fold "need" into the analysis. Consequently, their value board will differ from a board that is based solely on talent, even if the team judges talent exactly as the talent board.
RE: Can you please start a thread that details your relationship  
Milton : 3/23/2017 4:08 pm : link
In comment 13403615 jlukes said:
Quote:
with Drew - I mean it is borderline obsessive at this point.
I must say the person with the obsession appears to be you. This thread has nothing to do with Boylhart. This top 100 list is put together by some guy named Doug Martz. And The Huddle Report which tracks the top 100 lists is Robby Esch's website. Drew is just a writer for it who does their profiles.
I consider this more interesting  
CT Charlie : 3/23/2017 4:52 pm : link
than a mock draft. It reveals that to these analysts, this year's QB's are not nearly as high-quality as players at other positions. QB's will be drafted higher than this in the draft because QB's are valued more than, say, linebackers, but a Top 100 ranking simply says, "Here are the best football players, in order, in our opinion."
Back to the Corner