for display only
Big Blue Interactive The Corner Forum  
Back to the Corner

Archived Thread

PfT: Giants have some interest in Nick Mangold

EddieNYG : 3/27/2017 1:59 pm
Quote:
According to Pat Leonard of the New York Daily News, the Giants have expressed interest in bringing former Jets center Nick Mangold to the blue side of the stadium.

Link - ( New Window )
Pages: 1 2 <<Prev | Show All |
RE: The question is  
Klaatu : 3/27/2017 5:06 pm : link
In comment 13408344 area junc said:
Quote:
Is he done? Or was he just hurt last year and has reasonably recovered?

If it's the latter, maybe it's Flowers - Mangold - Richburg - Jerry - Pugh

I don't think they're afraid to utilize Pugh's versatility. Like Diehl - he plays where the team needs him to play. I don't see a player of Mangold's character signing to be a backup. He can either play, or he retires.


So, you're going to have a guy who's never played any other position than Center in either college or the pros step in at Left Guard at 33 years-old.

Got it.
Makes no sense for an 11-5 team  
Bob in Newburgh : 3/27/2017 5:40 pm : link
and a guy who has made 5+ million each year for a number of years now.

Also, considering his experience at the position, he might make Jerry look like the greatest RG the world has ever seen in comparison.
RE: The question is  
mrvax : 3/27/2017 5:48 pm : link
In comment 13408344 area junc said:
Quote:
Is he done? Or was he just hurt last year and has reasonably recovered?

If it's the latter, maybe it's Flowers - Mangold - Richburg - Jerry - Pugh

I don't think they're afraid to utilize Pugh's versatility. Like Diehl - he plays where the team needs him to play. I don't see a player of Mangold's character signing to be a backup. He can either play, or he retires.


I would imagine that the Giants would be best suited to have Fluker play RT if he can do it.

I doubt Mangold suddenly plays guard. I could see Richburg at guard but he didn't do well there his rookie year, Camp will sort it out.
RE: Makes no sense for an 11-5 team  
mrvax : 3/27/2017 5:51 pm : link
In comment 13408418 Bob in Newburgh said:
Quote:
and a guy who has made 5+ million each year for a number of years now.

Also, considering his experience at the position, he might make Jerry look like the greatest RG the world has ever seen in comparison.


Mangold made $8.6M last year and was due a total of $9M in 2017. He's going to cost a lot to sign, methinks.
I'm always  
joeinpa : 3/27/2017 6:15 pm : link
a sucker for these kind of moves.
...  
gidiefor : Mod : 3/27/2017 7:05 pm : link
Quote:
Geoff Schwartz‏ @geoffschwartz

This is just an agent trying to stir up some interest. Mangold isn't going to the Giants to start at C.
Sorta has the same vibe as when The Giants signed Schwartz  
lono801 : 3/27/2017 7:06 pm : link
Looked good on paper...

I'm all for bringing in ' The Best Player Available' via F.A.

You never know....Right?
It makes less sense for Mangold than it does for the Giants tbh.  
Ten Ton Hammer : 3/27/2017 7:08 pm : link
.
Mangold is probably a better center than Richburg  
Vanzetti : 3/27/2017 7:19 pm : link
Even though he has some age, one of the best to play the position

Richburg show d signs his second year but took a big step back last year. Probably not the Solution longterm

If they sign him  
RetroJint : 3/27/2017 7:43 pm : link
& I doubt they will, they would do it with the intention of having him start. At Center. I doubt Mangold wants to be a utility man. His entire football life, when his offense has taken the field, he gas been the pivot , when he's been healthy .

This whole line is basically a rental. Jerry's deal is really one-year disguised as a multi-year contract. What's adding another with Nick? Richburg got pushed around a little. It might serve him to watch a real talent play the position. But I don't think so.
Mangold on his worst day is better  
Stan in LA : 3/27/2017 7:44 pm : link
Than Richburg on his best day. If he signs and is healthy he's the starter.
It really just doesn't make a whole lot of sense.  
arcarsenal : 3/27/2017 7:47 pm : link
.
RE: It really just doesn't make a whole lot of sense.  
mrvax : 3/27/2017 8:29 pm : link
In comment 13408530 arcarsenal said:
Quote:
.


Arc, I agree. Doesn't make sense as Schwartz tweeted. And... we do have a backup center who did OK when Richburg got kicked out of a game (dumbass).

RE: Mangold on his worst day is better  
djm : 3/27/2017 11:54 pm : link
In comment 13408528 Stan in LA said:
Quote:
Than Richburg on his best day. If he signs and is healthy he's the starter.


This is nonsense.

The latest crap here is richburg took a huge step back last year. One or two posters say it and now nearly everyone is saying it. Huge step backwards? Try again. Richburg was fine last year even if he wasn't great and he got better as the season progressed.

The Giants arent bringing mangold in to start over richburg get a fricking grip.

Oh and the guy who took a huge step backward last year was mangold. That's why he's still on the street looking for a job. He wasn't only hurt he wasn't as good as year's past. Watch the games.
RE: RE: Rather his sister  
David in LA : 3/28/2017 2:48 am : link
In comment 13408134 Diver_Down said:
Quote:
In comment 13408104 Renton said:


Quote:


at this point.



She actually can play and I bet SheLovesNYCSports.


LMFAO!
Eli Manning has a finite window.  
Beezer : 3/28/2017 8:17 am : link
If Mangold would sign for a reasonable salary, I see absolutely no downside. It's a veteran, he may still have something to offer (those saying they KNOW he does or doesn't ... humorous).

3rd or 4th string? lol Comparing Mangold, even on one leg, to a mid-round draft pick right now, is seriously braindead.
Whaaaaaaaaat???  
Beezer : 3/28/2017 8:21 am : link

Quote:
This whole line is basically a rental.
if Reese really meant it when he said  
Jersey55 : 3/28/2017 10:54 am : link
"anytime you have a chance to improve your team you do it" then he hast find a way to sign Mangold...
RE: RE: The question is  
BigBlue1968 : 3/28/2017 12:18 pm : link
In comment 13408426 mrvax said:
Quote:
In comment 13408344 area junc said:


Quote:


Is he done? Or was he just hurt last year and has reasonably recovered?

If it's the latter, maybe it's Flowers - Mangold - Richburg - Jerry - Pugh

I don't think they're afraid to utilize Pugh's versatility. Like Diehl - he plays where the team needs him to play. I don't see a player of Mangold's character signing to be a backup. He can either play, or he retires.



I would imagine that the Giants would be best suited to have Fluker play RT if he can do it.

I doubt Mangold suddenly plays guard. I could see Richburg at guard but he didn't do well there his rookie year, Camp will sort it out.


Why would you doubt Mangold suddenly plays guard for the Giants? First and foremost, Richburg is NOT moving anywhere from his center spot. He was a Pro Bowl snub last year and arguably one of the NFL's best young centers. His Pro Bowl accolades will soon follow his elite play, starting in 2017. So, the Giants aren't going to move Richburg to another spot, then replace him with Mangold.

Secondly, all NFL offensive lineman have one trait in common, regardless if you are primary career backup or Pro Bowl caliber starter and that common trait is called versatility. To stay in the league, you better be able to play multiple spots on the o-line.

Lastly, while Mangold is an aging 33-year old 7-time Pro Bowler, he can still play, period. Had he not hurt his ankle last year, it's likely he would have made another Pro Bowl. No, centers are not as elite athletically as guards and tackles, they are very similar to guards in physical attributes and do very much the same job.

If Mangold is healthy, he could easily step into the RG spot and start there for the Giants the next 1-2 years while we groom an eventual replacement and create some nice camp competition to improve our line. I still think the Giants are going to draft a young o-lineman in the upcoming draft, but a healthy Mangold would be an upgrade over Jerry, Hart, Fluker, or anyone else at RG. And, yes he's good enough and versatile enough to play guard.



RE: RE: i'm not convinced Mangold has anything left  
BigBlue1968 : 3/28/2017 12:20 pm : link
In comment 13408341 Johnny5 said:
Quote:
In comment 13408302 djm said:


Quote:


but on the cheap? And I have to choose between air or Mangold? I'd take a shot. But I still think he will be on the shelf by December. IF we signed him here I just hope he doesn't come in and kick ass at guard for a few weeks only to go down and sort of ruin the cohesion. But why not take a shot...

He will come cheap or not at all.


I think he still has some gas left. He was indestructible and playing well until he hurt that ankle last year. I really think this was a cap move for the Jets. The question is, how is that ankle?


He was a Pro Bowler from 2013-2015 and hurt his ankle last year. How does he not have anything left in the tank?
because he fell apart last year  
djm : 3/28/2017 1:11 pm : link
and wasn't as good when he was on the field.

Are we really debating that there's a chance Mangold is done? I'm not saying he is but he sure as hell might be. He's 32 not 22.

Like I said, take a shot? Why the hell not. But i'd temper expectations. And he hasn't even signed here yet. Are the Giants truly interested or is this horse shit?
and wasn't Chris Snee and Diehl  
djm : 3/28/2017 1:12 pm : link
pro bowlers on the way down? I think they were.
He's not coming to the Giants  
mrvax : 3/28/2017 1:19 pm : link
and he will not be playing guard anywhere either. I'm certain of that and we will see who's right in a few months.
RE: listening to that too. I disagree with Mike and these hyper callers.  
nicky43 : 3/28/2017 1:25 pm : link
In comment 13408191 Victor in CT said:
Quote:
1) Mangold is pretty beat up. And can he even move enough to play guard.
2) If Mangold IS healthy enough to play C, you would want him to play there. Richburg to me is a big ? at C, but that makes Richburg a backup, because he was a horrid guard.
3) Richburg is as big a ? as Flowers. Loads of people here shit on Flowers, and he has struggled, but too many act as if Richburg is the answer at C. I don't think he is. Too weak physically


I Agree with you on Richburg. He is very overrated by BBI. I think he is a decent Center but not pro bowler. I don't mind him being the start but we do need to upgrade this line. Tired of seeing Eli on his back or rushing his throws without time to scan the field.
RE: and wasn't Chris Snee and Diehl  
Semipro Lineman : 3/28/2017 1:26 pm : link
In comment 13409299 djm said:
Quote:
pro bowlers on the way down? I think they were.


I was just about to mention this. There's a bit of irony watching people currently dismissed recent injuries on popular free agents lineman as incidental after watching so many on here scream about the Giants not jettisoning their own injured lineman soon enough
hopefully  
MotownGIANTS : 3/28/2017 1:29 pm : link
a vet C is released to give us more comp ...

T is/was an issue but it would be a little better if Eli could step up to avoid the rush from time to time (he sure aint gonna out run it)...
Vet depth at best  
LakeGeorgeGiant : 3/28/2017 1:39 pm : link
That's clearly what the Giants must be thinking. They need more bodies, it wouldn't hurt to bring him to camp and see if he is viable injury insurance.

I'm not sure why every potential signing has to be a big fucking drama around here. Not everyone is a potential starter.
Pages: 1 2 <<Prev | Show All |
Back to the Corner