Big Blue Interactive The Corner Forum  
Back to the Corner
 

Archived Thread

If Hankins signs with Indy...

Slade : 4/12/2017 11:20 am
Expect a move within 24 hours...
Slade's good  
WideRight : 4/12/2017 11:22 am : link
this will be interesting....
Oh Jesus,  
chopperhatch : 4/12/2017 11:22 am : link
Would you just STFU on this subject. I make multiple movements in a 24 hour period and none of them stink as bad as your info on this subject.
I appreciate asshat info  
robbieballs2003 : 4/12/2017 11:26 am : link
But Slade got exactly one thing right this offseason and that was after hitdog posted his info so basically nothing.
No doubt Slade's info  
mrvax : 4/12/2017 11:27 am : link
on Hankins has been wrong...several times. And I'm pretty sure that the Giants have a fall back plan already in place. Doesn't take an asshat to predict that.
Just sign Odrick  
NYGBlue42 : 4/12/2017 11:32 am : link
an move on.
So..  
FatMan in Charlotte : 4/12/2017 11:38 am : link
a guy visiting a team will sign within 24 hours IF he signs?

And water, if it isn't frozen, is wet.
RE: So..  
robbieballs2003 : 4/12/2017 11:39 am : link
In comment 13425036 FatMan in Charlotte said:
Quote:
a guy visiting a team will sign within 24 hours IF he signs?

And water, if it isn't frozen, is wet.


Unless it is a gas. Hmmm.
Appreciate the info..  
arcarsenal : 4/12/2017 11:40 am : link
But you've been wrong about Hankins like 50 times already this offseason so I think it's safe to say that wherever you're getting this info from isn't exactly ironclad.
Look I appreciate  
ryanmkeane : 4/12/2017 12:03 pm : link
any and all info but you're now giving us info while at the same time hedging yourself in case you're wrong. C'mon man..
This means the Giants are re signing Hankins  
est1986 : 4/12/2017 12:10 pm : link
.
I predict Hank will sign ....  
Beer Man : 4/12/2017 12:17 pm : link
somewhere before next season. I know this is a bold prediction and I will probably take a lot of heat from BBI for it; but I stand by it. From now on just call me "Slade-Dog"!
Ah another look at me thread.  
bigblue1124 : 4/12/2017 12:18 pm : link
At one point you seemed to have pretty good insight and cred’s here. But now you simply look like an attention whore for some reason.

I guess because some here continue to thank you and brush your ego never the less I hope you find the attention you apparently desperately need.
I'm unsure what he is saying  
Kevin in Annapolis : 4/12/2017 12:21 pm : link
is it

A) if Hankins signs with Indy it will be within 24 hours?

or

B) if Hankins signs with Indy, the Giants will make a move to sign another DT within 24 hours.
Kevin  
Big Rick in FL : 4/12/2017 12:23 pm : link
It looks like B to me. I think he's saying if Hankins signs with Indy we sign another DT within 24 hours.
That is what  
Kevin in Annapolis : 4/12/2017 12:35 pm : link
I thought as well, thanks Rick
Again  
Matt in SGS : 4/12/2017 12:41 pm : link
I appreciate any asshat info, knowing things can change.

From what I'm reading here, the Giants have a Plan B in the works that has been kept on the backburner in case Hankins doesn't work out. That's entirely plausible and we've seen that from Reese in the past. When the Al Wilson trade fell through, they had Kawika Mitchell signed a couple of days later.
RE: So..  
UConn4523 : 4/12/2017 12:43 pm : link
In comment 13425036 FatMan in Charlotte said:
Quote:
a guy visiting a team will sign within 24 hours IF he signs?

And water, if it isn't frozen, is wet.


I think he means we will sign someone else within 24 hours of Hankins signing with Indy. I think...
The question I find interesting  
Chris684 : 4/12/2017 12:49 pm : link
Is if the follow-up move if we lose Hankins is automatically a DT.

Perhaps there is another move, like a trade at another position involving additional salary that has now been freed up by not signing Hankins?

Or it could just be that Odrick is brought in.
RE: The question I find interesting  
Big Blue '56 : 4/12/2017 12:54 pm : link
In comment 13425172 Chris684 said:
Quote:
Is if the follow-up move if we lose Hankins is automatically a DT.

Perhaps there is another move, like a trade at another position involving additional salary that has now been freed up by not signing Hankins?

Or it could just be that Odrick is brought in.


I've been hoping for Odrick for awhile now if Hankins signs elsewhere
RE: The question I find interesting  
Kevin in Annapolis : 4/12/2017 12:55 pm : link
In comment 13425172 Chris684 said:
Quote:
Is if the follow-up move if we lose Hankins is automatically a DT.

Perhaps there is another move, like a trade at another position involving additional salary that has now been freed up by not signing Hankins?

Or it could just be that Odrick is brought in.


Odrick, if healthy, makes sense.
What about Sen'Derrick Marks  
robbieballs2003 : 4/12/2017 1:00 pm : link
?
RE: What about Sen'Derrick Marks  
Klaatu : 4/12/2017 1:14 pm : link
In comment 13425194 robbieballs2003 said:
Quote:
?


Marks has his own injury history, as does Odrick, and he reportedly wasn't happy with his role reduced to back-up (and let it be known). Still he was popular with the fans and the community, and you can't say the same about Odrick, who's something of an odd duck.
I think anybody we sign outside of Hankins is gonna  
robbieballs2003 : 4/12/2017 1:22 pm : link
Be a 1 year deal type meaning we will most likely draft a player in this draft. Marks seems like a perfect match for us on a one year deal.
Again, why the fuck do people get so bent out of shape  
BLUATHRT : 4/12/2017 3:13 pm : link
when asshat info doesn't come to pass. It's probably the best part of the offseason (meaning the rumors). Don't discourage it like a fucking lynch mob.
Thanks for the info Slade  
David in LA : 4/12/2017 3:22 pm : link
fuck these guys giving you crap. Keep the asshattery coming!
RE: Thanks for the info Slade  
robbieballs2003 : 4/12/2017 3:29 pm : link
In comment 13425427 David in LA said:
Quote:
fuck these guys giving you crap. Keep the asshattery coming!


Maybe we can steal Jerrigan  
prdave73 : 4/12/2017 4:21 pm : link
From the Eagles like they stole him from the Ravens..
When's next appearance  
micky : 4/12/2017 4:36 pm : link
By slade ...Monday?

Oye vey and people are hooked liner and sinker on every word.
I am hoping  
SJGiant : 4/12/2017 5:02 pm : link
That Hankins signs elsewhere, and we trade our number one for Joe Thomas.
RE: When's next appearance  
David in LA : 4/12/2017 5:06 pm : link
In comment 13425552 micky said:
Quote:
By slade ...Monday?

Oye vey and people are hooked liner and sinker on every word.


Interesting, beause it seems to me this board hasn't got a clue on how fluid these situations are.
Hankins Update  
Arkbach : 4/12/2017 5:10 pm : link
Says he left without a contract.
Hankins - ( New Window )
RE: RE: When's next appearance  
robbieballs2003 : 4/12/2017 5:17 pm : link
In comment 13425624 David in LA said:
Quote:
In comment 13425552 micky said:


Quote:


By slade ...Monday?

Oye vey and people are hooked liner and sinker on every word.



Interesting, beause it seems to me this board hasn't got a clue on how fluid these situations are.


Haha. Fluid has nothing to do with things that he is posting. He has batted .000. His posts are cryptic, vague, and flat out wrong all the time. Other posters on here have been way more specific and have nailed a bunch of offseason moves whether it was the offer to Marshall, the paycuts of Vereen, and Harris, etc. Hitdog posted the info on Marshall and then after that Slade repeated what he wrote. That is the only thing he ever posted that was correct.

If he was truly an insider or had inside information then what side is he on? The Giants? An agents? A players? If he was on the Giants side then how would ge know if Hankins was going to sign because he posted that awhile back? If Hankins was going to sign then why wasn't it done?

We all appreciate any info even if it turns out not to work out. We don't appreciate info when the poster is habitually wrong.

So, yeah, we can all go fuck ourselves with his cryptic, vague, and wrong information.
It's okay to be critical of the contents of a post  
gidiefor : Mod : 4/12/2017 6:27 pm : link
it is not okay to make crude comments about the poster - your account may be suspended if you do so
I love slade  
UConn4523 : 4/12/2017 6:30 pm : link
can't imagine getting worked up over what he posts
Well, slade seemed to have accurate info on Hank  
yatqb : 4/12/2017 6:58 pm : link
yesterday. There WAS news, with his visit to Indy. Perhaps Hank was optimistic that he'd sign there, but it feel through. I still have hope that we sign him.
Funny how he posted this...  
2ndroundKO : 4/12/2017 7:01 pm : link
15m after Ian Rappaport Tweeted NY interest in Odrick if Hankins signs with Indy.
My guess is he fires his agent  
jlukes : 4/12/2017 7:01 pm : link
and then re-signs with the Giants
RE: It's okay to be critical of the contents of a post  
robbieballs2003 : 4/12/2017 7:02 pm : link
In comment 13425728 gidiefor said:
Quote:
it is not okay to make crude comments about the poster - your account may be suspended if you do so


Was that in response to me?
With Jared Odrick  
mrvax : 4/12/2017 7:04 pm : link
likely to sign a contract not too much over the veteran minimum, I'd cut Hankins loose and sign Odrick now.
RE: RE: When's next appearance  
arcarsenal : 4/12/2017 7:07 pm : link
In comment 13425624 David in LA said:
Quote:
In comment 13425552 micky said:


Quote:


By slade ...Monday?

Oye vey and people are hooked liner and sinker on every word.



Interesting, beause it seems to me this board hasn't got a clue on how fluid these situations are.


He's been wrong about the Hankins situation about 100 times now. I think it's pretty clear that whatever info he's getting on this matter is bogus or made up.
Well I for like asshat information.  
shelovesnycsports : 4/12/2017 7:09 pm : link
Well, it does look bad for Slade, but he has been right before  
jcn56 : 4/12/2017 7:10 pm : link
and there's always that chance that even Hank and his people have no idea what the fuck they're doing today or any day after.
RE: RE: It's okay to be critical of the contents of a post  
gidiefor : Mod : 4/12/2017 7:39 pm : link
In comment 13425775 robbieballs2003 said:
Quote:
In comment 13425728 gidiefor said:


Quote:


it is not okay to make crude comments about the poster - your account may be suspended if you do so



Was that in response to me?


robbie - your posts seem more aimed at factual expressions of your opinion - the really offensive post was deleted. Right or wrong comments and history is fair game - calling a poster names and getting abusive towards them is what is the issue.
RE: RE: RE: It's okay to be critical of the contents of a post  
mrvax : 4/12/2017 7:48 pm : link
In comment 13425825 gidiefor said:
Quote:
Right or wrong comments and history is fair game - calling a poster names and getting abusive towards them is what is the issue.


Good job 👍.
I apologize for it  
chopperhatch : 4/12/2017 8:58 pm : link
Gidie. Its just it is almost a trolling attempt at this point.

Wont happen again.
So the clock starts  
colin : 4/13/2017 1:45 pm : link
Now...
Back to the Corner