If Engram can block then I'm ok, but if he can't he's just another WR because Ellison needs to be in there.
We need to draft lineman (OT/OG/DT) now.
If you honestly have to ask "who sits" in today's NFL of sub packages and match ups depending on situation, then you you need to just realize that you have no idea what you're talking about and do some homework. I'm actually shocked that this post came from you. Good lord.
I posted this because when I think of a 1st Rd pick its someone who is in on every play. If he can block on the running plays well then I'm thrilled with the pick. However if he is only coming on in a package with some type of passing play, then he's a situational "package" guy. I just don't like taking a situational guy in Rd 1. Rd 3 or 4 sure. So I read that Sy says the guy can block well, if this is true then sit Ellison down and we will have a huge weapon. Lord knows our OL and running game needs the help.
Eli is very connected there: he is going to get the straight dope from the people in the program. And nobody knows a player better than the guys who see him every day in practice and hear about everything he does.
If Engram can block then I'm ok, but if he can't he's just another WR because Ellison needs to be in there.
We need to draft lineman (OT/OG/DT) now.
If you honestly have to ask "who sits" in today's NFL of sub packages and match ups depending on situation, then you you need to just realize that you have no idea what you're talking about and do some homework. I'm actually shocked that this post came from you. Good lord.
I posted this because when I think of a 1st Rd pick its someone who is in on every play.
The Apple pick last season kind of debunks this. So does the Kiwanuka pick years ago. There's a precedent for them doing this.
for rd 2. Gmen should consider a move up for an OL or DL in the top 2-5 in this round; maybe TC will take our 55 and our 4th and 5th for the 35(maybe).
He is 10 lbs heavier now, but gained that weight before the combine. He played at Miami at 230-235 all season. He has yet to play any snaps at his current weight
i would rather have the guy who gave problems to the likes of AL, LSU, FL vs the ACC defenses
Seems like clockwork - every year, the draftniks expect
If Engram can block then I'm ok, but if he can't he's just another WR because Ellison needs to be in there.
We need to draft lineman (OT/OG/DT) now.
If you honestly have to ask "who sits" in today's NFL of sub packages and match ups depending on situation, then you you need to just realize that you have no idea what you're talking about and do some homework. I'm actually shocked that this post came from you. Good lord.
The problem with this line is that the Giants roster isn't stacked enough to afford taking a role player 23 overall. The OL is talent deficient. The LBs are questionable. We lost a starting DT and we don't have a bonafide 3rd pass rusher.
If Engram ends up being what the Giants say and hope he is then it's a good pick because he'll be an every down player. If he struggles blocking and has to come off or Shep comes off it devalues the pick.
RE: RE: RE: RE: So who sits, Engram, OBJ, Shep, or Marshall?
If Engram can block then I'm ok, but if he can't he's just another WR because Ellison needs to be in there.
We need to draft lineman (OT/OG/DT) now.
If you honestly have to ask "who sits" in today's NFL of sub packages and match ups depending on situation, then you you need to just realize that you have no idea what you're talking about and do some homework. I'm actually shocked that this post came from you. Good lord.
I posted this because when I think of a 1st Rd pick its someone who is in on every play.
The Apple pick last season kind of debunks this. So does the Kiwanuka pick years ago. There's a precedent for them doing this.
Kiwanuka I'll give you, but that was a few years ago now. However Apple was a necessity with the new era of the NFL. All teams need three starting corners because they are in the nickel most of the time. Apple was on the field constantly, and in fact DRC ended up playing the slot.
Trade up for Ramcyck/Lamp/Cam? I wasn't on board with taking them in the first, but they'd be value in the second.
Would love the Wormley pick, but I'd expect you'd have to move up to get him also.
Quote:
If Engram can block then I'm ok, but if he can't he's just another WR because Ellison needs to be in there.
We need to draft lineman (OT/OG/DT) now.
If you honestly have to ask "who sits" in today's NFL of sub packages and match ups depending on situation, then you you need to just realize that you have no idea what you're talking about and do some homework. I'm actually shocked that this post came from you. Good lord.
I posted this because when I think of a 1st Rd pick its someone who is in on every play. If he can block on the running plays well then I'm thrilled with the pick. However if he is only coming on in a package with some type of passing play, then he's a situational "package" guy. I just don't like taking a situational guy in Rd 1. Rd 3 or 4 sure. So I read that Sy says the guy can block well, if this is true then sit Ellison down and we will have a huge weapon. Lord knows our OL and running game needs the help.
Didn't want Watt. Too many injuries.
Quote:
In comment 13447287 PatersonPlank said:
Quote:
If Engram can block then I'm ok, but if he can't he's just another WR because Ellison needs to be in there.
We need to draft lineman (OT/OG/DT) now.
If you honestly have to ask "who sits" in today's NFL of sub packages and match ups depending on situation, then you you need to just realize that you have no idea what you're talking about and do some homework. I'm actually shocked that this post came from you. Good lord.
I posted this because when I think of a 1st Rd pick its someone who is in on every play.
The Apple pick last season kind of debunks this. So does the Kiwanuka pick years ago. There's a precedent for them doing this.
First round positional breakdown:
QB: 3
RB: 2
WR: 3
TE: 3
OL: 2
DL: 6
OLB: 2
ILB: 3
CB: 5
S: 3
"
i would rather have the guy who gave problems to the likes of AL, LSU, FL vs the ACC defenses
Just too much of a QB driven (and lacking) league.
Quote:
If Engram can block then I'm ok, but if he can't he's just another WR because Ellison needs to be in there.
We need to draft lineman (OT/OG/DT) now.
If you honestly have to ask "who sits" in today's NFL of sub packages and match ups depending on situation, then you you need to just realize that you have no idea what you're talking about and do some homework. I'm actually shocked that this post came from you. Good lord.
The problem with this line is that the Giants roster isn't stacked enough to afford taking a role player 23 overall. The OL is talent deficient. The LBs are questionable. We lost a starting DT and we don't have a bonafide 3rd pass rusher.
If Engram ends up being what the Giants say and hope he is then it's a good pick because he'll be an every down player. If he struggles blocking and has to come off or Shep comes off it devalues the pick.
Quote:
In comment 13447406 BigBlueShock said:
Quote:
In comment 13447287 PatersonPlank said:
Quote:
If Engram can block then I'm ok, but if he can't he's just another WR because Ellison needs to be in there.
We need to draft lineman (OT/OG/DT) now.
If you honestly have to ask "who sits" in today's NFL of sub packages and match ups depending on situation, then you you need to just realize that you have no idea what you're talking about and do some homework. I'm actually shocked that this post came from you. Good lord.
I posted this because when I think of a 1st Rd pick its someone who is in on every play.
The Apple pick last season kind of debunks this. So does the Kiwanuka pick years ago. There's a precedent for them doing this.
Kiwanuka I'll give you, but that was a few years ago now. However Apple was a necessity with the new era of the NFL. All teams need three starting corners because they are in the nickel most of the time. Apple was on the field constantly, and in fact DRC ended up playing the slot.