for display only
Big Blue Interactive The Corner Forum  
Back to the Corner

Archived Thread

Giants turned down three-pick offer from 49ers

bumpsinthenight : 5/11/2017 5:27 pm
From MMQB:

Quote:
Lynch is fairly stilted when he talks trade, compared to the smooth and experienced veteran Marathe. With the Giants about to pick at 23, he calls New York GM Jerry Reese.

“Jerry,” Lynch says, “would you be amenable …”
Amenable. Now there’s a Stanford word for you.
“… to trade your pick here, 23, for 34, 111 and 143?”

Reese must have said no.

“All right,” Lynch says. “What would move the needle?”
Tight end Evan Engram goes to the Giants.

Giants turned down three-pick offer from 49ers during NFL Draft - ( New Window )
Pages: 1 2 3 | Show All |  Next>>
Glad Reese said no  
Rflairr : 5/11/2017 5:33 pm : link
If you wanted to move up that far. You needed to be talking about that first round pick next season
I agree with Reese  
crackerjack465 : 5/11/2017 5:35 pm : link
an early 4th and a late 4th isn't enough to jump that far IMO.
I'm glad he said no  
Jay on the Island : 5/11/2017 5:38 pm : link
If it was a 2nd and a 4th this year and a 2nd next year I would have said yes.
is "amenable" really such an educated word?  
Moondawg : 5/11/2017 5:38 pm : link
Peter King is corny.
I did that math already  
adamg : 5/11/2017 5:41 pm : link
It was a major low ball offer. For someone who doesn't like giving up picks, Reese must have been insulted by the offer, and Lynch must have been half-hearted, stupid, or insanely optimistic if he really expected to move up that far.

23 = 760 points

34 = 560
111 = 72
143 = 34.5
___________
666.5 points

And there was a thread pre-draft that showed, generally teams have to overpay in order to move up in the first.

Reese would be a dope to take this.
“All right,” Lynch says. “What would move the needle?”  
JohnB : 5/11/2017 5:49 pm : link
Lynch low balled him thus making Reese start the process, if there was to be one.

I would have come back with "your 1st and 2nd this year and next year for #23" just to be just as stupid right back at him.
RE: Glad Reese said no  
Jay on the Island : 5/11/2017 5:50 pm : link
In comment 13469311 Rflairr said:
Quote:
If you wanted to move up that far. You needed to be talking about that first round pick next season

We all wish Reese would have been offered that. The 49ers pick next year will likely be top 5 possibly even 1st overall. Imagine having a shot at Allen or Darnold plus your own first rounder.
Lynch had #66 and #104 to trade....  
njm : 5/11/2017 5:57 pm : link
and he offers 2 4th rounders? To quote John McEnroe "You can't be serious"
To be clear...  
njm : 5/11/2017 5:58 pm : link
I'd have made the deal for #34, #66 & #104.
And yet people will still say "trade down trade down trade down!"  
Ten Ton Hammer : 5/11/2017 5:59 pm : link
like it's easy.
RE: “All right,” Lynch says. “What would move the needle?”  
robbieballs2003 : 5/11/2017 6:03 pm : link
In comment 13469329 JohnB said:
Quote:
Lynch low balled him thus making Reese start the process, if there was to be one.

I would have come back with "your 1st and 2nd this year and next year for #23" just to be just as stupid right back at him.


Well, that would be stupid since he didn't have a first this year to trade at the time of our pick. : )
That can't be serious  
section125 : 5/11/2017 6:09 pm : link
a 2nd and 2 4ths for a 1st...?
RE: I did that math already  
ThatLimerickGuy : 5/11/2017 6:13 pm : link
In comment 13469321 adamg said:
Quote:
It was a major low ball offer. For someone who doesn't like giving up picks, Reese must have been insulted by the offer, and Lynch must have been half-hearted, stupid, or insanely optimistic if he really expected to move up that far.

23 = 760 points

34 = 560
111 = 72
143 = 34.5
___________
666.5 points

And there was a thread pre-draft that showed, generally teams have to overpay in order to move up in the first.

Reese would be a dope to take this.


The Jimmy Johnson 1994 trade value chart that you and others reference is an outdated model that isn't used.

Now that draft picks are slotted in terms of salary and the 5th year option added, the entire dynamic of draft pick value has changed.

Don't be the fool who cites this every year.
Lowball offer BUT...  
bigblue12 : 5/11/2017 6:27 pm : link
They could have essentially traded Evan Engram for Forrest Lamp, Samaje Perine and Jake Butt with those picks. Hindsight but interesting
.  
arcarsenal : 5/11/2017 6:28 pm : link
Jerry Reach asleep at the fucking wheel once again....
RE: That can't be serious  
Matt in SGS : 5/11/2017 7:18 pm : link
In comment 13469353 section125 said:
Quote:
a 2nd and 2 4ths for a 1st...?


This. Lynch must have felt full of himself after he fleeced that moron in Chicago.
RE: RE: That can't be serious  
David in LA : 5/11/2017 7:26 pm : link
In comment 13469383 Matt in SGS said:
Quote:
In comment 13469353 section125 said:


Quote:


a 2nd and 2 4ths for a 1st...?



This. Lynch must have felt full of himself after he fleeced that moron in Chicago.


If I were Reese, I'd have told him "listen ROOKIE, I know John Lynch the safety, I don't know much about John Lynch the GM, but I'm the GM that helped bring my organization 2 Lombardi Trophies, you really think you can fleece me like that, kid?"
RE: RE: I did that math already  
Chris in Philly : 5/11/2017 7:29 pm : link
In comment 13469357 ThatLimerickGuy said:
Quote:
In comment 13469321 adamg said:


Quote:


It was a major low ball offer. For someone who doesn't like giving up picks, Reese must have been insulted by the offer, and Lynch must have been half-hearted, stupid, or insanely optimistic if he really expected to move up that far.

23 = 760 points

34 = 560
111 = 72
143 = 34.5
___________
666.5 points

And there was a thread pre-draft that showed, generally teams have to overpay in order to move up in the first.

Reese would be a dope to take this.



The Jimmy Johnson 1994 trade value chart that you and others reference is an outdated model that isn't used.

Now that draft picks are slotted in terms of salary and the 5th year option added, the entire dynamic of draft pick value has changed.

Don't be the fool who cites this every year.


You call him a fool for that? Jesus you're insufferable.
He must have misdialed  
SHO'NUFF : 5/11/2017 7:39 pm : link
probably thought he had Chicago on the line again.
RE: RE: RE: That can't be serious  
aquidneck : 5/11/2017 7:46 pm : link
In comment 13469387 David in LA said:
Quote:
In comment 13469383 Matt in SGS said:


Quote:


In comment 13469353 section125 said:


Quote:


a 2nd and 2 4ths for a 1st...?



This. Lynch must have felt full of himself after he fleeced that moron in Chicago.



If I were Reese, I'd have told him "listen ROOKIE, I know John Lynch the safety, I don't know much about John Lynch the GM, but I'm the GM that helped bring my organization 2 Lombardi Trophies, you really think you can fleece me like that, kid?"


Better to play possum. Always listen. Always be polite. Always be in control. Otherwise you'll put people off and miss opportunity.
RE: .  
SFGFNCGiantsFan : 5/11/2017 7:54 pm : link
In comment 13469363 arcarsenal said:
Quote:
Jerry Reach asleep at the fucking wheel once again....


Reese is inept. What has he done? Fire this clown.
Reese's Reply (Draft Day Style)  
Trainmaster : 5/11/2017 8:03 pm : link
Quote:
"I want your 2018 first rounder, and I want Solomon god damn Thomas, just because I feel like it."


then

Quote:
"Come on John. Say it with me, you pancake-eating ... "
RE: RE: I did that math already  
montanagiant : 5/11/2017 9:01 pm : link
In comment 13469357 ThatLimerickGuy said:
Quote:
In comment 13469321 adamg said:


Quote:


It was a major low ball offer. For someone who doesn't like giving up picks, Reese must have been insulted by the offer, and Lynch must have been half-hearted, stupid, or insanely optimistic if he really expected to move up that far.

23 = 760 points

34 = 560
111 = 72
143 = 34.5
___________
666.5 points

And there was a thread pre-draft that showed, generally teams have to overpay in order to move up in the first.

Reese would be a dope to take this.



The Jimmy Johnson 1994 trade value chart that you and others reference is an outdated model that isn't used.

Now that draft picks are slotted in terms of salary and the 5th year option added, the entire dynamic of draft pick value has changed.

Don't be the fool who cites this every year.

Do you have anything showing that they don't use the Chart anymore?
I'm surprised  
pjcas18 : 5/11/2017 9:07 pm : link
Reese turned down a low-ball trade down offer given Reese's history of never in his 9+ year history as GM trading down.
Good job by Reese  
uconngiant : 5/11/2017 11:41 pm : link
Now if it was a second, third and the earlier fourth that would have been a good trade
RE: RE: RE: I did that math already  
adamg : 5/11/2017 11:46 pm : link
In comment 13469388 Chris in Philly said:
Quote:
In comment 13469357 ThatLimerickGuy said:


Quote:


In comment 13469321 adamg said:


Quote:


It was a major low ball offer. For someone who doesn't like giving up picks, Reese must have been insulted by the offer, and Lynch must have been half-hearted, stupid, or insanely optimistic if he really expected to move up that far.

23 = 760 points

34 = 560
111 = 72
143 = 34.5
___________
666.5 points

And there was a thread pre-draft that showed, generally teams have to overpay in order to move up in the first.

Reese would be a dope to take this.



The Jimmy Johnson 1994 trade value chart that you and others reference is an outdated model that isn't used.

Now that draft picks are slotted in terms of salary and the 5th year option added, the entire dynamic of draft pick value has changed.

Don't be the fool who cites this every year.



You call him a fool for that? Jesus you're insufferable.


Apparently there seem to be multiple camps on BBI. One camp is that your should disparage and be totally disagreeable as frequently and as often as possible. "It's a debate forum."

I suppose conversation and edification is beyond the scope of this school of BBI users.
they offered the same for Washington's 17 I believe.  
madgiantscow009 : 5/12/2017 12:09 am : link
they probably offered it to a few more.
RE: I'm glad he said no  
Sasuke : 5/12/2017 3:27 am : link
In comment 13469318 Jay on the Island said:
Quote:
If it was a 2nd and a 4th this year and a 2nd next year I would have said yes.

Glad your not a GM. That's a horrible move
RE: I did that math already  
Sasuke : 5/12/2017 3:35 am : link
In comment 13469321 adamg said:
Quote:
It was a major low ball offer. For someone who doesn't like giving up picks, Reese must have been insulted by the offer, and Lynch must have been half-hearted, stupid, or insanely optimistic if he really expected to move up that far.

23 = 760 points

34 = 560
111 = 72
143 = 34.5
___________
666.5 points

And there was a thread pre-draft that showed, generally teams have to overpay in order to move up in the first.

Reese would be a dope to take this.


I wish you guys would stop using that point chart its not realistic and almost never truly adds up when you look at the actual trades that happen
Reese responded  
jeff57 : 5/12/2017 5:51 am : link
"What's a trade down"?
RE: Reese responded  
Giantology : 5/12/2017 6:50 am : link
In comment 13469641 jeff57 said:
Quote:
"What's a trade down"?


Brilliant take on this, Jeff. On a thread discussing a rumored trade down that clearly wasn't worth it, no less.
A early second  
mdthedream : 5/12/2017 6:52 am : link
Third and 5th would have to be the offer and I am not sure its worth doing.
Engram was a favorite target  
JonC : 5/12/2017 7:19 am : link
They must have been of the belief he'd be gone if they didn't pick him at #23. I don't an issue picking the prospect you feel strongly about, rather than get too cute and potentially overthink it.
Should have done the deal  
Jimmy Googs : 5/12/2017 7:39 am : link
Engram or Njoku would have been there at 34, and we could have added quality bodies into Secondary with the extra picks.
RE: Engram was a favorite target  
section125 : 5/12/2017 7:47 am : link
In comment 13469652 JonC said:
Quote:
They must have been of the belief he'd be gone if they didn't pick him at #23. I don't an issue picking the prospect you feel strongly about, rather than get too cute and potentially overthink it.


I don't have a clue as to what SF wanted at 23, but we do know ATL wanted Engram. He would not have been there at #34.
JonC maybe you have an inkling as to who Jerry really wanted (Bolles or Howard?), but it appears the Engram was their man. Maybe, just maybe #34, 66 and 104 would have done it. But I think McAdoo wanted someone to stretch the middle of the field more than a tackle, CB and RB...
RE: RE: That can't be serious  
Victor in CT : 5/12/2017 7:49 am : link
In comment 13469383 Matt in SGS said:
Quote:
In comment 13469353 section125 said:


Quote:


a 2nd and 2 4ths for a 1st...?



This. Lynch must have felt full of himself after he fleeced that moron in Chicago.


exactly
RE: Should have done the deal  
jcn56 : 5/12/2017 7:50 am : link
In comment 13469656 Jimmy Googs said:
Quote:
Engram or Njoku would have been there at 34, and we could have added quality bodies into Secondary with the extra picks.


One of those guys would have been there at 34? How do, given both were gone by that time?
RE: Should have done the deal  
Mike in NY : 5/12/2017 7:51 am : link
In comment 13469656 Jimmy Googs said:
Quote:
Engram or Njoku would have been there at 34, and we could have added quality bodies into Secondary with the extra picks.


No they wouldn't have been. Engram would have been taken by Atlanta, Pittsburgh, or New Orleans. Cleveland probably takes Njoku if he is there at 33 (considering they traded up above Pittsburgh for him after Engram was selected).
Atlanta always wanted a pass rusher  
Jimmy Googs : 5/12/2017 7:54 am : link
not a TE.
RE: Atlanta always wanted a pass rusher  
Mike in NY : 5/12/2017 7:58 am : link
In comment 13469668 Jimmy Googs said:
Quote:
not a TE.


Assuming, arguendo, that that was true, there were other teams with TE needs that really liked a player like Engram and we know Cleveland liked Njoku so much that they traded up into Round 1 to assure that they got him
Thats why I said one of the two TEs would have been there.  
Jimmy Googs : 5/12/2017 8:02 am : link
Cleveland clearly was looking TE and so were we.
RE: RE: Reese responded  
jeff57 : 5/12/2017 8:05 am : link
In comment 13469644 Giantology said:
Quote:
In comment 13469641 jeff57 said:


Quote:


"What's a trade down"?



Brilliant take on this, Jeff. On a thread discussing a rumored trade down that clearly wasn't worth it, no less.


Lighten up.
If the Niners were willing to give up their 3  
jeff57 : 5/12/2017 8:09 am : link
Pick 66. I would have done it.
RE: Thats why I said one of the two TEs would have been there.  
jcn56 : 5/12/2017 8:11 am : link
In comment 13469671 Jimmy Googs said:
Quote:
Cleveland clearly was looking TE and so were we.


This is my favorite part of the post-draft, where people speak directly out of their ass authoritatively to make it sound like they know what they're talking about.

So in spite of the fact that rumors had Atlanta highly interested in Engram, and that both were gone by the end of the first round, you continue to insist that one of the two would be available at 34.

That's brilliant.
Atlanta always wanted a pass rusher. They made a deal  
Jimmy Googs : 5/12/2017 8:16 am : link
to trade up to get McKinley when they saw his name falling.

Don't get so excited...
RE: Should have done the deal  
section125 : 5/12/2017 8:27 am : link
In comment 13469656 Jimmy Googs said:
Quote:
Engram or Njoku would have been there at 34, and we could have added quality bodies into Secondary with the extra picks.


JonC already said that they weren't interested in Njuko. If they wanted CBs they would have drafted one with the picks they had.
Believe it was already reported ATL wanted Engram. McKinley may have been a similarly rated player - wanted either/or type situation.
But it is all speculation.
RE: Atlanta always wanted a pass rusher. They made a deal  
jcn56 : 5/12/2017 8:29 am : link
In comment 13469679 Jimmy Googs said:
Quote:
to trade up to get McKinley when they saw his name falling.

Don't get so excited...


So you're the Atlanta GM? How do you know this for a fact?
Yes speculation. Including those in your post.  
Jimmy Googs : 5/12/2017 8:32 am : link
Some common sense though...Atlanta was absolutely dying for a dynamic passrusher but was worried they weren't going to fall to 31. They moved UP to get McKinley and went thru the roof in their draft room when they got him.

Also, I said I would have grabbed some secondary players with the extra picks...not saying Reese wanted to.
See, that's the difference  
jcn56 : 5/12/2017 8:37 am : link
You just assume you're correct. I'm pointing out that Atlanta's interest in Engram was rumored, not fact.

The only facts in those two posts just make your original post look silly. Assuming one would be there at 34, when neither made it that far, makes no sense.
A reason both Tight End's didn't make it to 34  
Jimmy Googs : 5/12/2017 8:42 am : link
is because we picked one at 23.

Atlanta was all-in on getting an edge-rusher...
Pages: 1 2 3 | Show All |  Next>>
Back to the Corner