for display only
Big Blue Interactive The Corner Forum  
Back to the Corner

Archived Thread

DL: after OL, maybe the most key unit to team's future?

SGMen : 5/21/2017 3:42 am
We all know the OL, particularly OT's Flowers & Hart, must step up a LOT this year if Eli & the offense are to enjoy consistent success. This unit is quite possibly our "weakest link" going into the season, and quite frankly I don't think that statement is really debatable.

But the unit that has the potential to mask many an issue and win us many close games is our DL, and not just the starters.
I still think we should have paid DT Hankins the same kind of money he got from the Colts. He is a big over-rated but still solid and only 26 this year. He knew the defensive scheme and I think his best years were ahead of him.

Having said that, I do believe DT D. Tomlinson, though a rookie, will fill in well enough and stuff the run for us. DT Jay Bromley can play some though I don't see him as a true starter based on the last couple of years. Where I think we have potential is DE/DT OWA finally stepping up as a situational interior pass rusher. He has a very quick first step and is now healthy. I think it is critical for him to become a 3rd down pass rush force for us on the inside as neither Tomlinson nor Bromley are pocket pushers.

We should have good pass rush from our starting DE's, JPP and Vernon. They also stop the run very, very well. But I like what I saw from Okwara last year and think he could get some snaps spelling either one of these guys and keeping our DL fresh. I'm not sure if Okwara can possibly try being a 3rd and long INTERIOR pass rusher?

I like that we kept DE Wynn as he is solid against the run, plays specials and knows the defense.

Overall, I think we have the potential of a nice rotation. However, I would NOT be shocked if some veteran DT shook loose after June 1 that we would not try and sign them to shore things up.

If our offense becomes a "move the chains, control the ball more" type offense that can keep the defense fresh, this DL will feast and help our secondary create turnovers. A positive turnover ration is key to our having a winning season and pieces are in place to do that.
Thoughts?
Isn't this true  
SHO'NUFF : 5/21/2017 4:17 am : link
for every team?
Isn't this true  
SHO'NUFF : 5/21/2017 4:17 am : link
for every team?
RE: Isn't this true  
SGMen : 5/21/2017 5:03 am : link
In comment 13477476 SHO'NUFF said:
Quote:
for every team?
Sure, but how many teams have 3 "probowl caliber" DL's starting; and depth of merit / potential like we do?

My point here is that if the Giants staff utilizes the offense with a "time of possession, get long drives" type of philosophy (see New England) to help keep the defense rested, this DL should dominate most games.
The keys are how much OWA & Okwara step up (if at all...ya never know) cause you know rotation, depth and positional attackers to gain ground and dominate.

Again, we may miss DT Hankins this year (if D. Tomlinson can't handle it...as a rookie) or we may not (rotation of Tomlinson, Bromley and OWA works well). That is my one big question mark, an unknown.
Hankins missed several games last year  
George from PA : 5/21/2017 5:19 am : link
And our defense actually improved.....Thomas is more a hankins replacement then Bromley.

4-3 teams rely heavily on the DL...and if defenses do not stop the run, nor pressure the QB.....their teams tend to lose.

The Giants can not pay everyone to big buck....signing Hankins could have lead to losing Collins or OBJ.

If we stay relatively healthy, we will be serious contenders
RE: Hankins missed several games last year  
SGMen : 5/21/2017 5:23 am : link
In comment 13477488 George from PA said:
Quote:
And our defense actually improved.....Thomas is more a hankins replacement then Bromley.

4-3 teams rely heavily on the DL...and if defenses do not stop the run, nor pressure the QB.....their teams tend to lose.

The Giants can not pay everyone to big buck....signing Hankins could have lead to losing Collins or OBJ.

If we stay relatively healthy, we will be serious contenders
Good point about the future and being able to afford everyone. There were a lot of whispers that Hankins was over-rated. I sort of forgot about DT Thomas really, given he was a camp pickup and sort of hasn't had much of a career starting.

Vernon, Tomlinson, Snacks, JPP - start
Wynn, Okwara, OWA - DE backups
Thomas, Bromley - DT backups

Do we carry 10 DL's or 9?
I wonder if folks remember  
aquidneck : 5/21/2017 5:49 am : link
A year ago this time our defense was considered a laughing stock - a bottom 5 unit.

Now we're talking about 3 pro bowlers in the secondary and another 3 on the DL.

That's more than half our starters playing at a pro bowl level.

We've already proven it's not out of the question. Let's hope for a similar result relative to improvement on the OL in 2017.
RE: RE: Hankins missed several games last year  
robbieballs2003 : 5/21/2017 7:04 am : link
In comment 13477489 SGMen said:
Quote:
In comment 13477488 George from PA said:


Quote:


And our defense actually improved.....Thomas is more a hankins replacement then Bromley.

4-3 teams rely heavily on the DL...and if defenses do not stop the run, nor pressure the QB.....their teams tend to lose.

The Giants can not pay everyone to big buck....signing Hankins could have lead to losing Collins or OBJ.

If we stay relatively healthy, we will be serious contenders

Good point about the future and being able to afford everyone. There were a lot of whispers that Hankins was over-rated. I sort of forgot about DT Thomas really, given he was a camp pickup and sort of hasn't had much of a career starting.

Vernon, Tomlinson, Snacks, JPP - start
Wynn, Okwara, OWA - DE backups
Thomas, Bromley - DT backups

Do we carry 10 DL's or 9?


Where is Moss?
Avery Moss looks like a beast  
George from PA : 5/21/2017 7:15 am : link
But rookies DL for DII....to step right in....is asking alot.

They only need one more DE to step up...so OV and JPP do not plaa lot. Of the snaps...create some kind of rotation. We need to stay fresh deep into the playoff😎
RE: Avery Moss looks like a beast  
SGMen : 5/21/2017 7:24 am : link
In comment 13477504 George from PA said:
Quote:
But rookies DL for DII....to step right in....is asking alot.

They only need one more DE to step up...so OV and JPP do not plaa lot. Of the snaps...create some kind of rotation. We need to stay fresh deep into the playoff😎
I forgot about rookie Moss. If we only carry 9 DL's and OWA doesn't show improvement, I think he is the odd man out. I think the Giants like Wynn as he can also play specials.

Avery Moss is a rookie so again, you just don't know how he'll be year 1. There is often much to learn. But look at UDFA Okwara from last year - who'd have thought he would be able to start? He held his own mostly.
RE: Avery Moss looks like a beast  
robbieballs2003 : 5/21/2017 7:25 am : link
In comment 13477504 George from PA said:
Quote:
But rookies DL for DII....to step right in....is asking alot.

They only need one more DE to step up...so OV and JPP do not plaa lot. Of the snaps...create some kind of rotation. We need to stay fresh deep into the playoff😎


My point wasn't about asking Moss to step right in. The above post gave a list of players that the Giants would keep on the 53 man roster. Whe. I said where is Moss I meant is he cut, on the PS or would he be the 10th DL. I doubt they keep 6 DEs unless they feel one of them could play the 3 tech.
I was not a fan of Hankins  
Milton : 5/21/2017 8:27 am : link
My only issue with his loss is that it led to the Giants expending a 2nd round pick on Tomlinson when there were several other "more exciting" prospects to choose from (Obi Melifonwu, Zach Cunningham, Tanoh Kpassagnon, Josh Jones, Dion Dawkins, etc). I like Tomlinson, but he's kind of a "high floor, low ceiling" type of prospect.
Avery Moss looks like a beast...  
Jimmy Googs : 5/21/2017 8:30 am : link
where and when?
I too wish we'd re-signed Hankins, because not only could he play  
yatqb : 5/21/2017 8:30 am : link
next to Snacks, but if Snacks went down he could fill in for him. I wouldn't mind bringing in Woolfork as depth if the price were right.
RE: I was not a fan of Hankins  
SGMen : 5/21/2017 8:41 am : link
In comment 13477534 Milton said:
Quote:
My only issue with his loss is that it led to the Giants expending a 2nd round pick on Tomlinson when there were several other "more exciting" prospects to choose from (Obi Melifonwu, Zach Cunningham, Tanoh Kpassagnon, Josh Jones, Dion Dawkins, etc). I like Tomlinson, but he's kind of a "high floor, low ceiling" type of prospect.
Tomlinson's game is strength & anchoring against the run. He may get a little push as a rusher but not much. He is also, IMHO, NFL ready due to his vast pro-style defense experience with ALABAMA. He likely starts game 1, even if just on 1st and 2nd downs.

If we had kept Hankins, I think we are better off for 2017 but not sure if beyond would be true given cap and our need to sign many this year and next.
RE: Hankins missed several games last year  
HomerJones45 : 5/21/2017 10:37 am : link
In comment 13477488 George from PA said:
Quote:
And our defense actually improved.....Thomas is more a hankins replacement then Bromley.

4-3 teams rely heavily on the DL...and if defenses do not stop the run, nor pressure the QB.....their teams tend to lose.

The Giants can not pay everyone to big buck....signing Hankins could have lead to losing Collins or OBJ.

If we stay relatively healthy, we will be serious contenders
Put little stock in that. You can get away with anything for 3 or 4 games. After that, the opponents have enough film to see the sub's weaknesses and what the team is doing or not doing to cover up for them. Then it's Katie bar the door.
RE: RE: Hankins missed several games last year  
SGMen : 5/21/2017 10:43 am : link
In comment 13477607 HomerJones45 said:
Quote:
In comment 13477488 George from PA said:


Quote:


And our defense actually improved.....Thomas is more a hankins replacement then Bromley.

4-3 teams rely heavily on the DL...and if defenses do not stop the run, nor pressure the QB.....their teams tend to lose.

The Giants can not pay everyone to big buck....signing Hankins could have lead to losing Collins or OBJ.

If we stay relatively healthy, we will be serious contenders

Put little stock in that. You can get away with anything for 3 or 4 games. After that, the opponents have enough film to see the sub's weaknesses and what the team is doing or not doing to cover up for them. Then it's Katie bar the door.
There is a write-up by Duggan in today's Sunday reading thread that speaks to NOT keeping Hankins for more than a bargain basement price as he is over-rated by fans. Maybe letting him go at the price INDY paid was in fact a good long-term idea.

I am really looking forward to hearing about Tomlinson and his progress in the OTA's. It is almost impossible to judge the true talent without real pads and hitting, but we'll at least get a feel for where he is mentally with the game and such.
When Harrison was acquired, I thought Hankins would be more productive  
Ivan15 : 5/21/2017 11:35 am : link
I thought he would get more sacks and pressure. He never stepped up. The Giants decided he wasn't worth paying as an average 3-tackle and a backup 1-tackle.

Maybe Tomlinson can do better in the same role as Hankins played, with Bromley and Thomas for relief, like last year. Tomlinson may even do more as the 3rd down tackle.
RE: When Harrison was acquired, I thought Hankins would be more productive  
SGMen : 5/21/2017 11:54 am : link
In comment 13477659 Ivan15 said:
Quote:
I thought he would get more sacks and pressure. He never stepped up. The Giants decided he wasn't worth paying as an average 3-tackle and a backup 1-tackle.

Maybe Tomlinson can do better in the same role as Hankins played, with Bromley and Thomas for relief, like last year. Tomlinson may even do more as the 3rd down tackle.
I think Hankins 7 sacks from a few years back tainted our opinions of him. I know that last year I too thought he'd be better with Snacks next to him and Vernon too. You know your own players best so the fact we didn't really pursue hard is very telling.

But we really do need DT D. Tomlinson to be the ANSWER cause Bromely and Thomas are stop gap guys, at best.
Back to the Corner