I can't sleep, so here we are.
1. Draft Frank Ntilikina, Tony Bradley, Dwayne Bacon
2. 3 way trade:
LAC Gets Carmelo Anthony
Minnesota Gets Kyle OQuinn, Jamal Crawford, 2020 1st from LAC
NYK Gets Ricky Rubio, Austin Rivers, 2022 1st from LAC
3. Knicks Sign PJ Tucker: 3 years, 40M
Roster Next Season:
C. Willy/Noah/Bradley
PF. KP/Lance
SF: Tucker/Kuz/Bacon
SG: Lee/Rivers
PG: Rubio/Frank/Baker
With Rubio and Tucker, it's a completely different defensive team with a new mentality. Tucker's contract expires with Lee, Rivers and Noah in 3 years, and the Knicks will have a strong young core at that point with plenty of money to spend. In the meantime, we have a fiercely competitive squad that's fun to root for and will play hard every night. KP becomes the focal point, go to scorer, and face of the franchise.
The trade is well thought out.
The 13mm committment for Tucker is tough to stomach.
I'd prefer Dante Cunningham, Jonas Jerekbo, Alan Williams, Jamichael Green, Christian Wood on cheaper deals.
The Knicks have been linked with him a bunch. I think he actually makes a lot of sense as a two way player and culture changing guy.
Im fine with Tucker. Im less fine with signing guys who we are already talking about when they expire. As if we know it is a bad contract. Reminds me of the Rose trade defense last year that it was a short term deal. Im also worried about Noah, Lee, and Tucker expiring at the team time. The Knicks need more continuity. It will help when we have our own picks (although Phil bailed on THJR, and then Grant). NBA teams take a while to gel. Ideally you want guys playing together year after year after year.
That also completely caps out the Knicks. Being a bad team with no cap space is one of the worst things you can do. That also makes the Knicks just good enough to be picking outside the top 5. For me next year should be all about developing KP/Willy/2017 pick and getting a top pick in the 2018 draft. If you want to sign a guy like Ian Clark or someone else young, I'm fine with that. But no reason for this team to sign guys over 30.
I'd be trying to get some extra picks in this draft via trades or Melo/Lee/ KOQ. Put as much young talent around KP as possible. I'd also fire Phil Jackson and write a blank check to a proven GM. But that's another issue.
Without thinking.
Yeah, but that's a different point. And it doesn't seem that any player is allowed to play "their style" under Phil's obsession with the triangle.
Just seems like a lopsided trade heavily in favor of Minn. I could be wrong though.
diallo is thinking of going back to kentucky
Quote:
Rubio (if allowed to play his style) allows KP, WH etc. to grow/thrive in a way that Melo cannot and frankly, does the opposite
Yeah, but that's a different point. And it doesn't seem that any player is allowed to play "their style" under Phil's obsession with the triangle.
Just seems like a lopsided trade heavily in favor of Minn. I could be wrong though.
I also wouldn't do that if I were the clips. You trade all your depth, presumably lose Redick re-signing CP3 and Blake, give up 2 firsts for Melo? Who do they even start at SG? Diamond Stone? Mo Speights?
If the clips lose CP3, however smalla chance that may actually be, then I think Melo would be off the table.
And yes, that team is not a title contender, but they don't mortgage the future or give up any real flexibility. 3/40 is not a big deal these days.
I'll admit it's a stretch, but I think the goal would be to aim adding another "piece" before we get capped out on KP/Willy's next deal. However unlikely that may be. I'd rather leave the chance of adding one than shutting the possibility down with more bad contracts.
If we're adding "culture" vets I'd prefer keeping them to 1-2 year deals (e.g. Sergio Rodriguez, tony Allen) to allow for future cap flexibility.
Also, what's the point of adding guys that may add wins next year but not 3 years down the line? It's going to take more than 1 year to turn the culture around, let's at least guarantee getting a top pick next year before KP and willy start entering their primes. We need another "piece" in this draft and/or next draft.
Semi Ojeleye is this years guy. He's 6'7" and a rocked up 240 lb. High level athlete. Can shoot, handle etc. High character kid.
If we could acquire a mid to late 1st, he would be my guy.
Agree on Rubio. One of my main issues with Phil is failure to get deals done and to make trades happen. His inability to complete the Rubio deal at the deadline was a big failure. Same thing with Melo. It takes a lot of work and deal making to make a trade happen. Phil doesn't seem to possess those traits. In 3 years on the job he's yet to make one positive trade for the Knicks.
If KP is a unique forward that at 7'3" can drain 3s at will, and if the rebounding game has changed due to so many 3's (which tend to bounce farther out?) as opposed to layups and near the basket stuff, as well as due to all the fast breaks, that maybe you add another unique forward, a super athletic rebounder, an aggressive mover in space type, and a ball-disher, as opposed to a thumper / heavy forward ...to better reflect todays game and better feed KP.
so the language for forwards may change.
He's nearly 36% last year, up nearly 3% from his rookie season on 4.8 attempts per game, which is more attempts per game that Steph curry his 2nd year. KP is a pure shooter if I've ever seen one.
By comparison Ryan Anderson attempted 7.5 3s per game this past season. I think KP can easily average that many at his peak. In fact, considering how quickly he can get his shot off and how it's pretty much impossible to contest his shot, I think he can and should push for 10 attempts per game if/when paired with a PG who looks to get shooters open.
If that's another unique type of forward - so be it.
Imagine then KP as a reggie miller only at 7'3"
Also, his hair trigger release spaces the floor. He has no wind up. So his man, a 4 or 5, needs to stay on him to disrupt him at all.
-but- you are wasting KP if you ask him to stay under or near the basket all the time.
the changes in the game may require even more athletic skills to gain that many O rebounds, due to the high numbers on 3s shots and the fast break threat, so a skinny super athletic forward that can fly may be in the works, or even a center of that type, to get the O rebounds and give KP and Co. more chances at 3s and mid range jumpers
so - you may have a unique team with 2 great but unusual forwards
I dont get the Simmons love at all. He's not young. He's a wing who cant shoot -- under 30% from 3, 31.6% from 16-3p. I struggle to see what he does that makes him worth 2-3 Lance Thomas's. If he was a $18 million player, he would have played more minutes. Stinks of Jerome James to me.
got to think tony bradley has one to
good with this, draft frank, doncic next year, all euro super team ☺
go look at any deal that involves a long term deal for an expiring, the team getting a long term contract asks for a pick...
also reports were that minnesota wanted a 1st
DMM - do you think Lance Thomas would be enough to get Rubio?
DMM - do you think Lance Thomas would be enough to get Rubio?
I'm not the right person to ask... I despise Thomas. He looks like he doesn't even feel comfortable running up and down the court. Of course it takes 2 to tango and you never know what other teams think (Wolves apprently will pursue Rose) so they obviously don't value Rubio that highly but I personally think Thomas is hot garbage.
Where did you see this? I know Bill Simmons said this much later, but I read at the time that Phil asked for Rubio-Rose straight up at the deadline and the Wolves turned it down.
I said at the time that I didnt have a problem with the Thomas deal. It's the next step up from veteran min wage. I am troubled by the fact that he hasnt been healthy now in 1.5 seasons. But if he regains the health of the Fisher-era Thomas, he's a helpful piece on a not huge contract. I think one thing to keep in mind with Thomas is that he is a coach's pet. Plays D and appears to be willing to buy into whatever systems coaches want. We have a lot of guys who resist coaching.
we agree on this i hate thomas...
if minnesota offered rubio for thomas and 1 of the 2nd rounders i would do it in a second
X - will be similar to a shooting guard on O and similar to a shot blocking big on D (Porzingas)
Y - will be a dedicated, amazing rebounder and ball distributor on O, (like an upside down point guard once he gets the ball, as opposed to a 'muscle up and put back a layup' player)
and the Y on D - he defends the 3s, top of arc by zone, using his height to an advantage at the arc, so, obviously the Y needs to be athletic and savvy with good hands at both ends, but need -not- be a great scorer, in case you wonder where to find such a kid.
That criticism is right. It's an easy flaw for us fans to seize on, so I think we over-rate its importance. Whereas we dont see/recognize all the fuckups of a guy like KOQ in not doing what the scheme/coaching calls for. But the coaches see that and it probably bugs them a lot more.
I should add that I think I've heard that Thomas is also an A+ teammate and guy to have in the lockerroom. This stuff matters. Acting right and being supportive, conforming to the scheme etc. -- this is stuff that happens on the good teams. Playing Lance Thomas reinforces the rewards for taking to the scheme.
Allows for 14mm to be allocated elsewhere.