I'm certainly no Tebow maniac, but I have nothing against him either.
Just interesting that everyone was so quick to bash him and the Mets for his "undeserving" promotion to Advanced Class A St. Lucie in June, yet 20 games later he's batting .308 with 3 HRs, 3 2Bs and a 3B.
You keep talking about player's peak age this entire thread, even grandstanding about posting a link, yet it only applies to when players are declining, not ascending to their peak?
You do realize that a peak by definition has an upslope and a downslope next to it, right? Or are we going to spew some more happy horseshit about hitting a baseball being difficult as if it has age limiters built in?
Or is being past a peak somehow more indicative of not hitting a ball than still climbing to the peak?
You really seem to be shitty at grasping pretty simple concepts.
Your whole position here is that we are in the midst of watching an ancient 30 year old compete at baseball's lowest level and that it is the most compelling story ever.
Lol
I don't think you realize that most of the responses here are due to the original hyperbole you foisted out there.
I feel strangely like we are getting trolled by the old BBI "z" rule here.