for display only
Big Blue Interactive The Corner Forum  
Back to the Corner

Archived Thread

NFT: Question for the mods: How does a poster become unbanned?

Keith : 7/21/2017 1:12 pm
I know in the past this has been a sore subject where you don't want to pass a message from the grave. Just curious, suppose there was a previously banned poster who feels terrible about his(or her) actions and they really would like to be reinstated. What does that process look like? Suppose this person sent an apology to the necessary parties and that email has been overlooked. Is there something else this person can do? From my understanding, there is a banned poster that is willing to do ANYTHING that it takes. Please notice that I capitalized anything.
Pages: 1 2 3 <<Prev | Show All |
RE: Well that guy himself is Jewish, so that technically gives  
Deej : 7/21/2017 4:30 pm : link
In comment 13535195 Keith said:
Quote:
him the right to say that, so.....


Let's not take the guy effectively calling Jews locusts at face value.
Deej  
Eric from BBI : Admin : 7/21/2017 4:31 pm : link
You want me to ban a Jewish poster for being anti-Semitic?
RE: Deej  
Deej : 7/21/2017 4:32 pm : link
In comment 13535206 Eric from BBI said:
Quote:
You want me to ban a Jewish poster for being anti-Semitic?


I dont call for bannings. I also have no idea whether that guy is Jewish. He didnt post a picture of his shmeckle.
RE: RE: I don't understand why some people on this thread  
NoGainDayne : 7/21/2017 4:34 pm : link
In comment 13535123 arcarsenal said:
Quote:
In comment 13535099 NoGainDayne said:


Quote:


are advocating for someone and saying the "good guy" stuff. Eric has laid out a formula. If he is such a "good guy" he'll let some time pass, come back contrite and convince the mods that that is the case. I've followed the banning threads for a while because they are extremely entertaining we all get heated sometimes, I've gotten into some pissing matches myself over the years. But c'mon, to first stand out among people on the internet for being extreme enough to get banned, and then secondarily take it too far in the cream of the crop of those posters it doesn't matter how "good of a guy you are" you have emotional control problems.

The best thing you can do to help your friend is to tell him to get a handle on that and come back genuinely sorry and changed. All this lobbying through people makes him look even more emotionally immature. That's what children do.



Why?

Because we've had posters here guilty of child abduction or whatever that scumbag did who were allowed to post for years.

We have people who are on their 10th dupe handle who constantly troll, add nothing of value, or simply exist to piss people off.

In comparison, a guy who loses his temper arguing about Eli seems pretty tame as far as I'm concerned.

I've honestly never had one bad interaction with dep in the years he's been here. We've disagreed on some things, but nothing ever got personal.

I'm sure he rubs people the wrong way sometimes, I just don't think it's fair that he's basically banished when it took far worse for others to get banned and less for them to come back.

Whatever. Again - not my site, not my rules- and that's fine.

I think he needed a timeout. He's served it, expressed regret for his actions, and has apologized.


So you tell me what's more likely.

1) Eric and the mods have an axe to grind with Dep or any poster in particular.

OR

2) Dep has behaved in a way towards them and others that stands out as particularly unacceptable and they are simply reacting to that.

At the end of the day a website is a business and this one in particular is a community. Whoever it is you are complaining about that is worse than Dep i'm sure if there was a critical mass of people that also did they would be banned or if their actions stood out as particularly abusive they'd get ban hammer as well.

Don't you think it's a lot more likely that your positive feelings about this poster is affecting your judgement towards his point of view?

Deej  
Eric from BBI : Admin : 7/21/2017 4:45 pm : link
OK, but I'm not sure what your point is then. You seemed to be saying that this is an issue that needs to be dealt with.

Does anyone feel that way?
RE: RE: RE: I don't understand why some people on this thread  
arcarsenal : 7/21/2017 4:46 pm : link
In comment 13535221 NoGainDayne said:
Quote:
In comment 13535123 arcarsenal said:


Quote:


In comment 13535099 NoGainDayne said:


Quote:


are advocating for someone and saying the "good guy" stuff. Eric has laid out a formula. If he is such a "good guy" he'll let some time pass, come back contrite and convince the mods that that is the case. I've followed the banning threads for a while because they are extremely entertaining we all get heated sometimes, I've gotten into some pissing matches myself over the years. But c'mon, to first stand out among people on the internet for being extreme enough to get banned, and then secondarily take it too far in the cream of the crop of those posters it doesn't matter how "good of a guy you are" you have emotional control problems.

The best thing you can do to help your friend is to tell him to get a handle on that and come back genuinely sorry and changed. All this lobbying through people makes him look even more emotionally immature. That's what children do.



Why?

Because we've had posters here guilty of child abduction or whatever that scumbag did who were allowed to post for years.

We have people who are on their 10th dupe handle who constantly troll, add nothing of value, or simply exist to piss people off.

In comparison, a guy who loses his temper arguing about Eli seems pretty tame as far as I'm concerned.

I've honestly never had one bad interaction with dep in the years he's been here. We've disagreed on some things, but nothing ever got personal.

I'm sure he rubs people the wrong way sometimes, I just don't think it's fair that he's basically banished when it took far worse for others to get banned and less for them to come back.

Whatever. Again - not my site, not my rules- and that's fine.

I think he needed a timeout. He's served it, expressed regret for his actions, and has apologized.



So you tell me what's more likely.

1) Eric and the mods have an axe to grind with Dep or any poster in particular.

OR

2) Dep has behaved in a way towards them and others that stands out as particularly unacceptable and they are simply reacting to that.

At the end of the day a website is a business and this one in particular is a community. Whoever it is you are complaining about that is worse than Dep i'm sure if there was a critical mass of people that also did they would be banned or if their actions stood out as particularly abusive they'd get ban hammer as well.

Don't you think it's a lot more likely that your positive feelings about this poster is affecting your judgement towards his point of view?


I think there's little consistency in who gets banned for what or the amount of time that people stay banned.

it has little to do with my feelings towards dep.

If you think the bannings around here have been uniform or logical, we'll just have to disagree.

I think dep deserved a time out. Not banishment.
NoGainDayne  
Eric from BBI : Admin : 7/21/2017 4:48 pm : link
You touched on it, but we have no problem with Dep. It became a maintenance issue.

You can't have it both ways. There are those on BBI who say we have no consistency with moderation. But then we get complaints like this that say there should be special consideration for a regular.

Moderation is not a science and I don't think it is wise or practical to be 100 percent "consistent"... you have to feel you way through each situation and do what you think is best. Mistakes are made. It's subjective.

But in the case of dep, this was NOT a one, two, three, four-time thing. It was a pattern.
I've never been banned.  
Mike from SI : 7/21/2017 4:50 pm : link
Does that mean my takes are not hot enough? Do I have to crank up the volume?

On a serious note, it never ceases to amaze me how so many adults and supposedly good people "irl" can't behave on a f***ing website.

On a third note, whoever came back as KCabMI--that was good.
Would you really clasify my post  
Keith : 7/21/2017 4:52 pm : link
as a complaint? I see it more as an inquiry. At no point did I question your decision or complain about how you handled it.
What did dep do?  
Britt in VA : 7/21/2017 4:52 pm : link
?
RE: Would you really clasify my post  
Eric from BBI : Admin : 7/21/2017 5:07 pm : link
In comment 13535269 Keith said:
Quote:
as a complaint? I see it more as an inquiry. At no point did I question your decision or complain about how you handled it.


Not a complaint at all. As I said above, it's a good question.
RE: What did dep do?  
Eric from BBI : Admin : 7/21/2017 5:08 pm : link
In comment 13535270 Britt in VA said:
Quote:
?


Just checked the notes from the moderation team... repeated personal attacks, warnings issues, new attacks (with specific dates provided).
I like dep  
Kyle in NY : 7/21/2017 5:37 pm : link
and think he's a pretty good poster, certainly a passionate one.

But it's not that hard as an adult to avoid getting in repeated fights around here. Dep couldn't do it the first time around. If he's truly learned and is remorseful, then I'd love to see him return. But his history makes me skeptical.
RE: I am friendly with a guy who got banned  
Modus Operandi : 7/21/2017 6:56 pm : link
In comment 13534874 Moondawg said:
Quote:
and he thought the "ask for forgiveness and promise to be nice" part beneath his dignity. So he won't be back. He was not a multiple offender.


Multiple offender is still be a possibility, though not a goal.
Fwiw,  
Modus Operandi : 7/21/2017 6:59 pm : link
There's no love lost between us and we've mixed it up in the past, but I've never considered anything dep did to be banworthy. Certainly not anything I'd go complaining to a mod about.

He's a turd. But he's our turd.
RE: RE: I am friendly with a guy who got banned  
Moondawg : 7/21/2017 7:01 pm : link
In comment 13535419 Modus Operandi said:
Quote:
In comment 13534874 Moondawg said:


Quote:


and he thought the "ask for forgiveness and promise to be nice" part beneath his dignity. So he won't be back. He was not a multiple offender.



Multiple offender is still be a possibility, though not a goal.


Hey you bastard! You're back.
Just got out...  
Modus Operandi : 7/21/2017 7:05 pm : link
BBI Jail is awesome. I saw Filthy there.
RE: Just got out...  
Moondawg : 7/21/2017 7:07 pm : link
In comment 13535424 Modus Operandi said:
Quote:
BBI Jail is awesome. I saw Filthy there.


Let's hope you didn't besmirch my "beneath his dignity" claim!
RE: Deej  
Deej : 7/21/2017 7:10 pm : link
In comment 13535255 Eric from BBI said:
Quote:
OK, but I'm not sure what your point is then. You seemed to be saying that this is an issue that needs to be dealt with.

Does anyone feel that way?


if we're going to need to make a point to post on BBI, you'll need more mods.

I'm posting here 20+ years. I've never asked you or a mod to get involved.
RE: RE: Just got out...  
Modus Operandi : 7/21/2017 7:11 pm : link
In comment 13535428 Moondawg said:
Quote:
In comment 13535424 Modus Operandi said:


Quote:


BBI Jail is awesome. I saw Filthy there.



Let's hope you didn't besmirch my "beneath his dignity" claim!


Hey man, you do what you gotta do.



Wait, you meant the beg for forgiveness part...
RE: I know. He flies off the handle too much.  
gidiefor : Mod : 7/21/2017 7:12 pm : link
In comment 13534942 Keith said:
Quote:
That being said, I know for a fact that he regrets his behavior and how he has treated the mods(yourself included). He's a good guy, he really is, he just needs to reel it in sometimes when he gets worked up. All I am asking is to open the lines of communication with him and let him aplogize. Everyone on bbi will be much better for it! Thanks for listening.


Keith - I have numerous remorseful emails from dep -- but way more vitreous ones with hateful attacks in them -- His cycle: He instigates - then he loses it and accuses someone else of committing a transgression -- he becomes belligerent - he lashes out - he refuses to accept responsibility for his own actions and blames everyone within striking distance of heinous and immoral transgressions that excuse his behavior -- I've been through several cycles with him

He asked me never to email him again - yet he emails me with hateful emails and after a time then begs me to reconsider his reinstatement --

he was told during his last cycle after he asked for his donation back - that before reconsidered his application a year would have to go by - and yet the familiar remorseful emails have been coming

it's really gotten to the point that we don't know what to do about him - we know he's going to erupt again if we let him back -- it's only a question of time
RE: RE: RE: Just got out...  
Moondawg : 7/21/2017 7:13 pm : link
In comment 13535434 Modus Operandi said:
Quote:
In comment 13535428 Moondawg said:


Quote:


In comment 13535424 Modus Operandi said:


Quote:


BBI Jail is awesome. I saw Filthy there.



Let's hope you didn't besmirch my "beneath his dignity" claim!



Hey man, you do what you gotta do.



Wait, you meant the beg for forgiveness part...


Well, glad you're back!
gidie,  
Keith : 7/21/2017 7:30 pm : link
I appreciate the explanation. I know dep well, as well as you can know someone that you've never met. I've been posting on the same board for as long as I can remember finding the BBWC message boards. He's a fiery one. He mixes it up with guys(I'm sure it'll be a lot less once Eli retires), but he's also a good guy that adds to conversations and adds to bbi.

I'm not trying to tell you what to do. All I know is that he feels bad for how he acted and he wants to apologize. Let him.
RE: gidie,  
gidiefor : Mod : 7/21/2017 8:05 pm : link
In comment 13535449 Keith said:
Quote:
I appreciate the explanation. I know dep well, as well as you can know someone that you've never met. I've been posting on the same board for as long as I can remember finding the BBWC message boards. He's a fiery one. He mixes it up with guys(I'm sure it'll be a lot less once Eli retires), but he's also a good guy that adds to conversations and adds to bbi.

I'm not trying to tell you what to do. All I know is that he feels bad for how he acted and he wants to apologize. Let him.


and we feel bad about taking action against him in October, November, December and March. I received long appologies from him after each of these four "time outs" -- not to mention a dozen or more emails complaining about other posters without references that would make it easy for us to investigate, or the hate emails he sends me -- and frankly -- I don't care about any of that -- what I care about is when he goes into an unmanageable rage and takes over a thread with it, and it becomes a behind the scenes soap opera that takes an enormous amount of time and energy to respond to. This is just ongoing unreasonable behavior - and a guy that's been given more last chances to manage this any other poster on the board - when is enough, enough? How many apologies can a guy make and expect to be believed?

You may feel sympathy for him -- and I have been there myself several times - but at this point it's just hard to believe him.

Fair enough.  
Keith : 7/21/2017 8:25 pm : link
I appreciate your explanation.
RE: Scott in Morgantown  
Rover : 7/21/2017 8:44 pm : link
In comment 13535083 B in ALB said:
Quote:
Was a turd.

I liked Scotty even though he called Pittsburgh abandoned still mill. Every time I saw him post I'd immediately get the song in my head "Scotty doesn't know...Scotty doesn't know!"
RE: RE: Scott in Morgantown  
bigbluehoya : 7/21/2017 8:45 pm : link
In comment 13535513 Rover said:
Quote:
In comment 13535083 B in ALB said:


Quote:


Was a turd.


I liked Scotty even though he called Pittsburgh abandoned still mill. Every time I saw him post I'd immediately get the song in my head "Scotty doesn't know...Scotty doesn't know!"


Steel. It's steel.
Honest question  
UConn4523 : 7/21/2017 8:47 pm : link
If you let him back and he does something bannable, can't you just ban him again? I only ask because of the dupes that are always back, so why not Dep?
RE: RE: I don't understand why some people on this thread  
Rover : 7/21/2017 8:47 pm : link
In comment 13535123 arcarsenal said:
Quote:
In comment 13535099 NoGainDayne said:


Quote:


are advocating for someone and saying the "good guy" stuff. Eric has laid out a formula. If he is such a "good guy" he'll let some time pass, come back contrite and convince the mods that that is the case. I've followed the banning threads for a while because they are extremely entertaining we all get heated sometimes, I've gotten into some pissing matches myself over the years. But c'mon, to first stand out among people on the internet for being extreme enough to get banned, and then secondarily take it too far in the cream of the crop of those posters it doesn't matter how "good of a guy you are" you have emotional control problems.

The best thing you can do to help your friend is to tell him to get a handle on that and come back genuinely sorry and changed. All this lobbying through people makes him look even more emotionally immature. That's what children do.



Why?

Because we've had posters here guilty of child abduction or whatever that scumbag did who were allowed to post for years.

We have people who are on their 10th dupe handle who constantly troll, add nothing of value, or simply exist to piss people off.

In comparison, a guy who loses his temper arguing about Eli seems pretty tame as far as I'm concerned.

I've honestly never had one bad interaction with dep in the years he's been here. We've disagreed on some things, but nothing ever got personal.

I'm sure he rubs people the wrong way sometimes, I just don't think it's fair that he's basically banished when it took far worse for others to get banned and less for them to come back.

Whatever. Again - not my site, not my rules- and that's fine.

I think he needed a timeout. He's served it, expressed regret for his actions, and has apologized.

Screw Dep, he was such a jerk he got banned from weathermans bbi fantasy league for....you guessed it...flaming.
I was wondering why it's been more pleasant of late. Couldn't happened to a more deserving dick. Kudus.
RE: RE: I know. He flies off the handle too much.  
Rover : 7/21/2017 8:50 pm : link
In comment 13535435 gidiefor said:
Quote:
In comment 13534942 Keith said:


Quote:


That being said, I know for a fact that he regrets his behavior and how he has treated the mods(yourself included). He's a good guy, he really is, he just needs to reel it in sometimes when he gets worked up. All I am asking is to open the lines of communication with him and let him aplogize. Everyone on bbi will be much better for it! Thanks for listening.



Keith - I have numerous remorseful emails from dep -- but way more vitreous ones with hateful attacks in them -- His cycle: He instigates - then he loses it and accuses someone else of committing a transgression -- he becomes belligerent - he lashes out - he refuses to accept responsibility for his own actions and blames everyone within striking distance of heinous and immoral transgressions that excuse his behavior -- I've been through several cycles with him

He asked me never to email him again - yet he emails me with hateful emails and after a time then begs me to reconsider his reinstatement --

he was told during his last cycle after he asked for his donation back - that before reconsidered his application a year would have to go by - and yet the familiar remorseful emails have been coming

it's really gotten to the point that we don't know what to do about him - we know he's going to erupt again if we let him back -- it's only a question of time

My god, that is EXACTLY what he did in Weathermans BBI Fantasy Baseball league that got him banned.
Spot on.
There's a bunch of dicks on BBI  
UConn4523 : 7/21/2017 8:54 pm : link
and I've been cursed at by some of them yet none of them are banned. It's just a weird selection process I guess.

The only people I vote to get banned are the dupes and trolls who post absolute garbage and never offer a single constructive post about anything. And even then I wouldn't email anyone to get them banned.
RE: There's a bunch of dicks on BBI  
EricJ : 7/21/2017 9:55 pm : link
In comment 13535522 UConn4523 said:
Quote:
and I've been cursed at by some of them yet none of them are banned. It's just a weird selection process I guess.



... and I never understood why adults would even do that. 99% of them would never do it to your face either.

I suppose the mods have their side that some of us never see...but I did not have a problem with Dep. We battled over Eli's play often but it never got ugly.
Without a doubt the biggest whiny pussy  
Overseer : 7/21/2017 10:37 pm : link
on this board. Basically the definition of "butthurt." I truly thought he was a 13 or 14 y/o for a while.

I say let him back. Juxtaposed with his whiny pussiness, he instantly makes the rest of us look a degree tougher. Like that scene in The Social Network:

Link - ( New Window )
It's been quite a few years, but  
Bramton1 : 7/21/2017 11:10 pm : link
who was the guy who got banned sometime after he bitched on YouTube about us losing to the Eagles in the 2008 playoffs?
Eric is the best there is  
spike : 7/22/2017 7:27 am : link
We are lucky to have him and BBI. He hasnt sold out for more money which he couldve done
RE: Eric is the best there is  
gidiefor : Mod : 7/22/2017 10:16 am : link
In comment 13535741 spike said:
Quote:
We are lucky to have him and BBI. He hasnt sold out for more money which he couldve done


This ^^^^

But this is only one of the reasons why I support Eric and what he does and has done here -- and why I am willing to go down swinging with him. He has built the best Giants fan site anywhere and he makes decisions about it based on his gut intelligence - which when it comes to the Giants, and this board, has amazingly uncanny integrity (as does his wife by the way) and he has never been greedy.
Sanctimony should be a banning offense  
trueblueinpw : 7/22/2017 10:40 am : link
What I hate more than the hot heads, Internet tough guys or even the dups are the few PC types that try to start a fire without any tinder. I think it would be nice if some of these sanctimonious baiters got a time-out every now and again. But, I suppose that would be impossible to qualify and I further suppose that's exactly why our weaker comrades engage in that sort of intellectual cowardice.

Altogether, I'd say the mods and Eric do a terrific job making BBI one of the best places I go on the Internet. I don't support mandatory sentencing but I'd have a hard time understanding how anyone would ever warrant more than two strikes.
RE: Sanctimony should be a banning offense  
Rover : 7/22/2017 12:50 pm : link
In comment 13535880 trueblueinpw said:
Quote:
What I hate more than the hot heads, Internet tough guys or even the dups are the few PC types that try to start a fire without any tinder. I think it would be nice if some of these sanctimonious baiters got a time-out every now and again. But, I suppose that would be impossible to qualify and I further suppose that's exactly why our weaker comrades engage in that sort of intellectual cowardice.

Altogether, I'd say the mods and Eric do a terrific job making BBI one of the best places I go on the Internet. I don't support mandatory sentencing but I'd have a hard time understanding how anyone would ever warrant more than two strikes.

If that were the case, fatman in charlotte woulda been long gone. The self anointed thread police.
FatMan should be your reality check...  
lono801 : 7/22/2017 4:38 pm : link
If you don't get FatMan...you don't get it
RE: RE: I know. He flies off the handle too much.  
montanagiant : 7/22/2017 5:42 pm : link
In comment 13535435 gidiefor said:
Quote:
In comment 13534942 Keith said:


Quote:


That being said, I know for a fact that he regrets his behavior and how he has treated the mods(yourself included). He's a good guy, he really is, he just needs to reel it in sometimes when he gets worked up. All I am asking is to open the lines of communication with him and let him aplogize. Everyone on bbi will be much better for it! Thanks for listening.



Keith - I have numerous remorseful emails from dep -- but way more vitreous ones with hateful attacks in them -- His cycle: He instigates - then he loses it and accuses someone else of committing a transgression -- he becomes belligerent - he lashes out - he refuses to accept responsibility for his own actions and blames everyone within striking distance of heinous and immoral transgressions that excuse his behavior -- I've been through several cycles with him

He asked me never to email him again - yet he emails me with hateful emails and after a time then begs me to reconsider his reinstatement --

he was told during his last cycle after he asked for his donation back - that before reconsidered his application a year would have to go by - and yet the familiar remorseful emails have been coming

it's really gotten to the point that we don't know what to do about him - we know he's going to erupt again if we let him back -- it's only a question of time

Sounds like Dep needs other things right now in his life other than BBI to assist in his issues.

No one deserves to have that done to them because they banned someone acting like a child
This place got soft  
Deej : 7/22/2017 5:56 pm : link
when it was Pete's Corner, you had to kill an active poster in hand-to-hand combat to become unbanned.
RE: This place got soft  
gidiefor : Mod : 7/22/2017 6:50 pm : link
In comment 13536144 Deej said:
Quote:
when it was Pete's Corner, you had to kill an active poster in hand-to-hand combat to become unbanned.


Aha -- this is why I had to kill Lippy today --- in self-defense
I feel bad for anyone who gets banned from this site  
LCtheINTMachine : 7/22/2017 9:09 pm : link
It's obviously the sign of deep psychological issues to be a multiple offender on a football site. I support BBI and encourage anyone banned to seek a mental health professional. That's the best way to solve the problem.
RE: I feel bad for anyone who gets banned from this site  
RC02XX : 7/22/2017 10:56 pm : link
In comment 13536263 LCtheINTMachine said:
Quote:
It's obviously the sign of deep psychological issues to be a multiple offender on a football site. I support BBI and encourage anyone banned to seek a mental health professional. That's the best way to solve the problem.


Oh fuck off with you and your sanctimonious bullshit.
Interesting discussion...  
manh george : 7/23/2017 12:11 am : link
and just one observation: Those, such as Arc, who are basing their judgement as too fairness regarding banning and reinstatement simply upon what they see on the threads are flat-out being unfair. Eric and Gidie have made it very clear that the issues and behaviors that prevented Dep (as an example) from being reinstated yet again TOOK PLACE OFF LINE.

If you don't see the off-line exchanges, then how the hell do you know what is fair and what is unfair?
....  
madgiantscow009 : 7/23/2017 4:19 am : link
RE: RE: RE: I know. He flies off the handle too much.  
mfsd : 7/23/2017 6:59 am : link
In comment 13536139 montanagiant said:
Quote:
In comment 13535435 gidiefor said:


Quote:


In comment 13534942 Keith said:


Quote:


That being said, I know for a fact that he regrets his behavior and how he has treated the mods(yourself included). He's a good guy, he really is, he just needs to reel it in sometimes when he gets worked up. All I am asking is to open the lines of communication with him and let him aplogize. Everyone on bbi will be much better for it! Thanks for listening.



Keith - I have numerous remorseful emails from dep -- but way more vitreous ones with hateful attacks in them -- His cycle: He instigates - then he loses it and accuses someone else of committing a transgression -- he becomes belligerent - he lashes out - he refuses to accept responsibility for his own actions and blames everyone within striking distance of heinous and immoral transgressions that excuse his behavior -- I've been through several cycles with him

He asked me never to email him again - yet he emails me with hateful emails and after a time then begs me to reconsider his reinstatement --

he was told during his last cycle after he asked for his donation back - that before reconsidered his application a year would have to go by - and yet the familiar remorseful emails have been coming

it's really gotten to the point that we don't know what to do about him - we know he's going to erupt again if we let him back -- it's only a question of time


Sounds like Dep needs other things right now in his life other than BBI to assist in his issues.

No one deserves to have that done to them because they banned someone acting like a child


+1

If he (or anyone) has really sent hateful emails to site owners or mods (and I see no reason not to believe what's being shared he), he's got bigger issues than whether or not he posts here.

And he apparently demanded his donation back? That's pathetic.

Anyone who really wants to be his friend, tell him to stop worrying about BBI and grow up
Not to pile on  
hassan : 7/23/2017 4:22 pm : link
But how someone that sought conflict and basically questioned rational people's fandom of the Giants (usually the objective non homer fans here that may have even been slightly critical of Eli) and ruined a number of decent discussions is being spun as a some ok guy is beyond me.

Maybe the disclosure that he threatened moderators with hate mail should reveal what he's about. Personally did not need to see that to know he was certifiable.
RE: This place got soft  
steve in ky : 7/25/2017 11:06 am : link
In comment 13536144 Deej said:
Quote:
when it was Pete's Corner, you had to kill an active poster in hand-to-hand combat to become unbanned.


When it was Pete's people didn't really get banned. For a large portion of time we didn't even have to log in.
RE: RE: This place got soft  
Deej : 7/25/2017 11:16 am : link
In comment 13538231 steve in ky said:
Quote:
In comment 13536144 Deej said:


Quote:


when it was Pete's Corner, you had to kill an active poster in hand-to-hand combat to become unbanned.



When it was Pete's people didn't really get banned. For a large portion of time we didn't even have to log in.


I stand corrected.
Pages: 1 2 3 <<Prev | Show All |
Back to the Corner